babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » British teacher pardoned in Sudan

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: British teacher pardoned in Sudan
ohara
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7961

posted 03 December 2007 03:31 AM      Profile for ohara        Edit/Delete Post
Good news

CNN


From: Ottawa | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 04:22 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
An appropriate response to a barbaric and primitive law. Prosecuting individuals for blasphemy regardless of the state doing it is repulsive.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 03 December 2007 04:44 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Are you being deliberately provocative in using the words "barbaric" and "primitive," or are you just unclear as to the connotations of them?

I knew hoping that this racist tabloid story would die with the last closed thread was too much to ask...


From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 04:50 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I chose my adjectives with care,YMMV.

ETA: I think Canada's drug laws are "primitive and "Barbaric". I think the application of the death penalty in the US is "primitive" and "barbaric."

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Caissa ]


From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 03 December 2007 04:58 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Then I'm curious to know why you "carefully" decided the term "primitive" in relation to an African nation, and why, rather than the natural, compassionate response of rejoicing at the fortunate homecoming of this woman after a terrifying ordeal, you chose to respond (to provoke, actually, as you concede) with epithets loaded with racist and colonialist baggage.

I am concerned that you are more reactive to the sensationalist nature of piece obviously intent on tapping into Islamophobia in the Western world than to the human plight of the woman involved.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Catchfire ]


From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 05:15 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It's a good thing she's not Australian. They'd make her serve the rest of her sentence back home.

Indeed, she's lucky she's not Canadian and facing a death sentence. She wouldn't even rate a consular visit these days.

Of course, that might only apply to prisoners held in democratic prisons like Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, as opposed to the primitive and barbaric non-U.S. facilities.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 05:42 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Thanks for your concern, Catchfire. I am indeed happy that she was released. I'll be happier when Sudan eliminates that law from its books, Canada legalizes marijuana and the US abolishes the death penalty. Primitive and barbaric laws should be opposed wherever they are found.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 06:04 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Caissa:
Primitive and barbaric laws should be opposed wherever they are found.

Especially when they're far from home.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 03 December 2007 06:12 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post
I too am pleased she has been pardoned. To western sensibilities the law is absurd. However Islam in certain places and amongsrt certain groups of the faithful has a very different take on faith and Sharia law permeates much of society in many countries in Africa. We may not like it, find it bizarre and extraordinary that someone could be locked away and even whipped for such innoucuous action however anyone travelling to such places let this be a cautionary tale.

Most Muslims I know here in Canada find Sharia law as it is applied in its extreme objectionable and we ought not hold Muslims here in a negative light for what occurs in countries such as Sudan. That said in my view I hope that Sharia law goes through an eventual reformation in due time.


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 06:17 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Unionist, I am surprised that you would not want to oppose barbaric and primitive llaws close to home.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 07:24 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Petsy, it's very kind of you not to blame Muslims in Canada for what happens in Sudan.
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 03 December 2007 07:35 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Hey!! Where are all the Chicken Littles clucking and squawking about excessive Presidential powers in the Venezuela threads? I mean, this is barefaced interference with the decisions of the judiciary! Dictatorship! Dictatorship! Pieces of Eight!
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 09:22 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think most executive branches worldwide have the power to grant clemency.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 03 December 2007 09:32 AM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Yeah ..its funny how when its a white-person or western, who gets to benifit form dictatorial powers, then its a good thing.

but when its Africans or in the case of Latin america African and Indidenouse people, then its all bad and evil.

Ask yourself why someone would go to work in a foreign country, and not bother to be intimately familiar with the laws of the land.

You have a duty, to get to know your rights, in any country that you choose to reside in. According to Canadian law, ignorance of the law is not good enough.

I do think here punishment was excessive, but in reality westerners need to learn that they are not above the law.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Free_Radical
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12633

posted 03 December 2007 09:37 AM      Profile for Free_Radical     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Indeed, she's lucky she's not Canadian and facing a death sentence. She wouldn't even rate a consular visit these days.

Depends on if Stockwell Day considers Sudan "a democratic country that supports the rule of law" (CBC).

Sudan obviously isn't, but he's cool with the U.S. - and no doubt this particular brand of religious fundamentalism must carry some appeal for Day. So who knows.

He'll probably need a sit-down with the ambassador from Khartoum to suss out his views on when the dinosaurs roamed the earth before reaching a conclusion.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Free_Radical ]


From: In between . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 03 December 2007 09:41 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Looks like right-wing rag The Daily Express agrees with Caissa about the "barbarity" of Sudanese justice. From the blog Islamophobia Watch:
quote:
The right-wing press is having a field day with the report that teacher Gillian Gibbons has been arrested in Khartoum after letting her class of seven-year-olds name a teddy Mohammed.

The Daily Express leader is headed "Barbaric clash of values" and opines that the actions of the Sudanese state "show how nasty is the Muslim code of sharia law" and indicate "a fundamental incompatibility between Islamic and Western values".

The Sun mentions that Ms Gibbons' children have refused to issue a statement and quotes a relative as saying that "they do not want to aggravate the situation". But the Sun itself has no hesitation in doing just that. Its front page article is headlined "Muslims insulted by Teddy" and an editorial comment inside declares:

"The West is routinely condemned for demonising Muslims. But it's hard to sympathise with a faith that demands 40 lashes for calling a teddy bear Mohammed. Every perceived slight seems punishable by violence or even death. Until Muslim leaders speak out publicly against such barbarity, East and West will never come to understand one another."

Needless to say, the Sun hasn't actually asked any leading British Muslims for their views on the case. The Sun Online website has, however, invited its readers to submit their opinions.


While I remain convinced that Cassia "carefully chose" words like "primitive" and "barbaric" to provoke rather than to engage critically, his threatening, macho posturing reproduces the age-old Orientalist vocabulary of defining Middle Eastern people as backwards and animalistic. The sensationalist way this story is framed in the Western media (40 lashes? Really? She was sentenced to two weeks; still unacceptable, surely, but it's a far cry from the "barbarity" of a public whipping) and gleefully scooped up by certain babblers is extraordinarily disquieting. It's consonant with the way Muslim leaders in the U.K. are expected to go through great measures to denounce the story, to criticize a nation they have virtually no contact with, or else face accusations of appeasement from white leaders and media. If only we could expect the same from our white politicians on the Western acts of "barbarity" that touch a helluva lot more people than one English school teacher...

It shouldn't be surprising, of course, since Caissa usually only shows up here to defend the rights of white masculinity and point out where minorities or women are playing their respective "cards" out of turn.

ETA: At the pain of repeating myself on the earlier thread, I wonder where all this Western outrage and concern at Sudanese injustice has been since 2003, when the Darfur genocide began. I guess it doesn't have the feelgood punch an English school teacher provides.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Catchfire ]


From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 03 December 2007 09:48 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Catchfire, I hope you chose your words carefully. While your second to last paragraph may be in the bounds of opinion your last paragraph is a lie. A moderator has been informed.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Free_Radical
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12633

posted 03 December 2007 10:03 AM      Profile for Free_Radical     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Catchfire:
ETA: At the pain of repeating myself on the earlier thread, I wonder where all this Western outrage and concern at Sudanese injustice has been since 2003, when the Darfur genocide began. I guess it doesn't have the feelgood punch an English school teacher provides.

If you are genuinely concerned about the the genocide, I applaud you as one of the good ones.

Too many , so-called progressives take the view that trying to do anything about this disaster - or to even talk about it - is paramount to being a stooge of American and neo-con imperialism. Best to let the peole of Darfur suffer, because the U.S. might somehow tangentially gain by the world stepping in, you know?

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Free_Radical ]


From: In between . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 03 December 2007 10:40 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Petsy, it's very kind of you not to blame Muslims in Canada for what happens in Sudan.

Unionist that was a completely gratuitous comment.


From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 10:55 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
OK OK we get it - it's only right to condemn western countries for ridiculous crimes and punishments otherwise you're a racist. Btw - the reason this story matters - is the fanaticsm! Really believing that this woman deserved to die! It's not about Islam or Africa or the US. The idea that people are always rational - ie. every action is a rational response to some injustice - this should prove that this is clearly false - irrational thoughts and actions when backed up by superstition can be very dangerous. That's the main point I believe. Bring on the sidetracking.

also - I'm not a right wing troll - I picked this thread to comment cause I read this board and I like to go against the grain and make people defend ridiculous things sometimes.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 03 December 2007 10:58 AM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Sharia law permeates much of society in many countries in Africa.

Really? Would you mind listing the many African countries where Sharia law has permeated much of society?


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 03 December 2007 10:59 AM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
also - I'm not a right wing troll - I picked this thread to comment cause I read this board and I like to go against the grain and make people defend ridiculous things sometimes.

Very noble of you good sir.


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 03 December 2007 11:05 AM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
things that makes me go Hmmm .. World wide outrage bacause one woman might spend two weeks in jail or get lashed.

HMMMMMMM .. but no worldwide outrage at countless African women getting rapped, tortured, terrorized and killed?

Excuse me for pointing out the obvious racial preferential treatment.

Its funny how they can find the means, to interfere with the Sudanese govt in the case of one white woman.

maybe some white women need to threaten their western govts, that they will move in and live with the women b4 it will be worth the while for the rest of the western powers to do something.

Since its blatantly obvious, that our (African) lives are worthless to the global community.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 03 December 2007 11:16 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I suppose it is as good a time as any to point out that the U.S., under President Clinton, bombed a Sudanese generic drug plant in August of 1998, killing many immediately and many more later due to lack of cheap drugs in that country, for which reparations have never been paid. The spurious claims of the Americans about the presence of chemical weapons is only matched by their disgraceful unwillingness to apologize, much less pay for, their atrocity to this day.

Outrage over "Western" atrocities isn't merely the result of the feverish imaginations of religious zealots but a cold, hard fact in Sudan.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 11:28 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
very true Beltov - clinton made a rush decision made on bad intell - and should have admitted the error, apologized and made amends but it's also true that Sudan welcomed Bin Laden against the wishes of Saudia Arabia after they ripped up his passport and Bin Laden planned the Cole bombing while living in Sudan - so it doesn't excuse it, it explains it a bit more.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 03 December 2007 11:40 AM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
lets not forget that the US govt, was dealing with the Taliban and provided weapons and other military support to the very same fundamentalist that they claim to be going after now.

Or how they say nothing about the fact that funds are openly raised for terrorist groups, on Saudi TV.

SO long as the oil flows from Saudi, they have no human rights violations. As soon as that changes, the us will suddenly find some excuse to depose them.

Same as how now that China is involved in Sudan, there is fake outrage at the govt of Sudan. Some would argue the outrage is related to Sudan no longer buying weapons of mass destruction from the US and Canada, and selling Oil to China etc.


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Petsy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12553

posted 03 December 2007 11:44 AM      Profile for Petsy        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Le Téléspectateur:

Really? Would you mind listing the many African countries where Sharia law has permeated much of society?



Sudan, almost half the provinces of Nigeria, to some extent in Libya and Senegal,Somalia...do you know any more?

From: Toronto | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 03 December 2007 11:47 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Catchfire:
It shouldn't be surprising, of course, since Caissa usually only shows up here to defend the rights of white masculinity and point out where minorities or women are playing their respective "cards" out of turn.

Your post was fine up until this point. You know what's wrong with this picture. Please refrain next time.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 03 December 2007 11:53 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ibelongtonoone:
quote:
Btw - the reason this story matters - is the fanaticsm! Really believing that this woman deserved to die!

Read the article? There was no death involved here:

quote:
Gibbons, 54, was sentenced to 15 days in jail last Thursday. Without a pardon, she would have remained in jail another six days.

Weeks of jailtime, deserved to die... Whats the difference? As long as we can point out that it is their fanaticism (extra points if we can squeeze in the word barbaric) and how much better our culture is, we are good no?

The rush to judge other cultures by the values of our culture is unfortunate.


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 03 December 2007 11:56 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Too many , so-called progressives take the view that trying to do anything about this disaster - or to even talk about it - is paramount to being a stooge of American and neo-con imperialism. Best to let the peole of Darfur suffer, because the U.S. might somehow tangentially gain by the world stepping in, you know?

Talk about stooges. How come Free_Radical you don't give a shit about the genocide in Iraq? Why is it those lives and that suffering doesn't weigh on your conscience at all?

Is it because a genocide carried out by the US is just alright with you? It is those other, lesser genocides that have value as propaganda tools that you care about?


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 11:57 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
OK - So the US government acts hypocritically - wow what a shock - who knew! It was actually the Mujahideen who the US was funding but I get yr point (the Taliban came about during the civil war witht the installed communist government in Kabul following the soviet pull-out and they were trained and funded by Saudi Arabia and based their own religous police) Do you think the Soviet invasion was good? So the US helping fight - wrong side or right side? Basically what you're saying is as long as the US acts hypocritically - it's impossible to critize human rights abuses any where in the world except the US?
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 12:07 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Basically what you're saying is as long as the US acts hypocritically - it's impossible to critize human rights abuses any where in the world except the US?

How about you explain to us why it's a "human rights abuse" to ban insults to Mohammed in a school?

What would you call it: "Freedom of speech"?

Like, what if a Grade 3 teacher in a Catholic School in Ontario named one of the kids' stuffed pigs "Pope Benedict", had it marry another stuffed pig called "Mr. Piggy", and had all the kids throw rice, going "Oink oink Your Holiness, have a great honeymoon, and don't forget your birth control pills!". He might (or might not) be subject to civil or criminal charges, but he would have a hard time keeping his job - no?

But I do understand how comforting it is to tell a story about how the bad people of a different colour, creed, and continent did this crappy thing to this well-meaning white lady - and how important it is to rave, rant and spew about this on a progressive board, at a time when the only country of the world that accuses Sudan of committing genocide is looking for ways to squeeze their way in to that country.

So let's just wait for the next horror story about the bad bad people.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 12:14 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
noise - Cooler heads prevailed as I suspected they would all along - I was referring to the people in the streets calling for her death and of course fanaticsm is not limited to any race, religion or people living on a certain continent. I simply said that it happens - and it's not the result of rational thinking.

I often think there is a something interesting hiding in statements that accuse others of racism or thinking of those in foriegn countries as barbaric when their no visible evidence to back these claims up. Who's the one who's really thinking these things? How lucky those poor Sudanese have you looking out for them hey!


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 12:16 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Petsy:
Unionist that was a completely gratuitous comment.

Which one - mine, or the one by you that I was repeating?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 12:18 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
good try Unionist - since it was the kids idea to name the bear that name. Maybe the kids should have been arrested too. I 'm sure you feel exactly the same way about the offence some christians took to the crufix in piss piece of art. The artist should have been arrested right?
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 12:27 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
good try Unionist - since it was the kids idea to name the bear that name.

Says who? And the kids run the classroom, right? I think she did it on purpose and thought she could get away with it. No one is above the law.

quote:
Maybe the kids should have been arrested too.

Nah, underage. That would have been an offence against human rights.

quote:
I 'm sure you feel exactly the same way about the offence some christians took to the crufix in piss piece of art. The artist should have been arrested right?

Not if he took his birth control pills.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 12:36 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
you have sick mind my friend
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 03 December 2007 12:50 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Basically what you're saying is as long as the US acts hypocritically - it's impossible to critize human rights abuses any where in the world except the US?

Did I say that? I don't think I said that at all. I think I was responding to another jerk accusing babblers of supporting atrocities in Darfur? Do you support atrocities in Iraq? Would it be fair if I said you did?

You should consider reading comments in context. It might be more helpful for you.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 12:55 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
sorry FM that comment was directed toward the comment Afro-healer made - I'm new at this and several post were added before I got my response in I should have made that clear.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 03 December 2007 12:57 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No problem.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 03 December 2007 12:59 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I often think there is a something interesting hiding in statements that accuse others of racism or thinking of those in foriegn countries as barbaric when their no visible evidence to back these claims up. Who's the one who's really thinking these things?

I was pointing out we are judging another society based on our societies values and not theirs... Why have we assumed our values are superior and take precedence over another societies values?... To the point where we must interject and enforce our values no less.

quote:
How lucky those poor Sudanese have you looking out for them hey!

How lucky those poor Sudanese have you to tell them whats right and wrong, what violates their law and what doesn't, and what laws of theirs are unjust in your eyes. At times, they need protected from us. Wanna tell them what they can and cannot march in the streets in protest for next? (oh wait, you already are).

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885

posted 03 December 2007 01:00 PM      Profile for Draco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
Btw - the reason this story matters - is the fanaticsm! Really believing that this woman deserved to die! It's not about Islam or Africa or the US. The idea that people are always rational - ie. every action is a rational response to some injustice - this should prove that this is clearly false - irrational thoughts and actions when backed up by superstition can be very dangerous. That's the main point I believe. Bring on the sidetracking.

If the point of the story is to demonstrate that people are prone to dangerous fanaticism, then it makes it even harder to understand why discussing it in a context of our own culture's dangerous fanaticism would be considered sidetracking.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Draco ]


From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Free_Radical
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12633

posted 03 December 2007 01:03 PM      Profile for Free_Radical     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
How come Free_Radical you don't give a shit about the genocide in Iraq?

Provide evidence that I "don't give a shit about the genocide in Iraq", first.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Free_Radical ]


From: In between . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 03 December 2007 01:04 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ah, so it is only genocide for you if Bush declares it so. That explains a lot. So, for you, there was no Armenian genocide.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Free_Radical
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12633

posted 03 December 2007 01:11 PM      Profile for Free_Radical     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
So, for you, there was no Armenian genocide.

Again, without evidence that I, in your words, "don't give a shit about the genocide in Iraq", or that I believe "there was no Armenian genocide", you're just making yourself look very silly.

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Free_Radical ]


From: In between . . . | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 01:24 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
Draco - I understand your point - I think the problem is that - on the one hand if one believes that laws against blasphemy are good and fair and should be enforced(but only in Sudan not Canada or America) that seems hypocritical. Secondly (see the obove post by Noise) many babblers believe comparing the Sudanese to ourselves is unfair because we have different cultures. So??
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 03 December 2007 01:56 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
gain, without evidence that I, in your words, "don't give a shit about the genocide in Iraq", or that I believe "there was no Armenian genocide", you're just making yourself look very silly.



Now you apply double-standards. How not a surprise is that?

Here are your words:

quote:
Too many , so-called progressives take the view that trying to do anything about this disaster - or to even talk about it - is paramount to being a stooge of American and neo-con imperialism. Best to let the peole of Darfur suffer, because the U.S. might somehow tangentially gain by the world stepping in, you know?

And you linked to other discussions on this board. So you don't mind accusing others or applying blanket smears but you take exception when the same methods are applied to you. What a hypocrite. But I suppose that is self-evident.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 03 December 2007 02:10 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:
you have sick mind my friend

Nah, I just like making people say ridiculous things, then ridiculing them for it.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 03 December 2007 02:19 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Secondly (see the obove post by Noise) many babblers believe comparing the Sudanese to ourselves is unfair because we have different cultures.

Not compare... Judge and enforce. Are you missing this intentionally?

Here's our story:


quote:
Gibbons, 54, was sentenced to 15 days in jail last Thursday. Without a pardon, she would have remained in jail another six days.

...

"This was an unfortunate, unintentional, innocent misunderstanding," Ahmed said.

...

Gibbons was cleared of charges of inciting hatred and showing contempt for religious beliefs, her lawyer, Ali Ajeb, said.


Misunderstanding of laws, cleared of charges. She apologized and her Gov't stepped in, getting her a presidential pardon after she served 9 of the 15 day prison term.


So far the response here:

quote:
An appropriate response to a barbaric and primitive law.

Another cultures laws are barbaric and primitive when judged by our values... Good to know.

quote:
To western sensibilities the law is absurd. However Islam in certain places and amongsrt certain groups of the faithful has a very different take on faith and Sharia law permeates much of society in many countries in Africa. We may not like it, find it bizarre and extraordinary that someone could be locked away and even whipped for such innoucuous action however anyone travelling to such places let this be a cautionary tale.

Watch out for these bizarre cultures

And my personal favorite:

quote:
Btw - the reason this story matters - is the fanaticsm!

The strange part is you're right... It's to fuel fanaticism. Go read the comments on the CNN article if you want a good idea of who's fanaticism it's fueling. As you put it... A 15 day jail term that was stopped at day 9 with a full apology matters not a bit... It's all about the fanaticism.

ETA... If it were anything else, this statement would be the headline:

quote:
Cooler heads prevailed as I suspected they would all along

[ 03 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 03 December 2007 02:22 PM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
This thread turned out to be just as fruitful as I thought it would.
From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 03 December 2007 02:26 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You would have expected otherwise, Catchfire?
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 03 December 2007 04:00 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
You deliberately misread me. Go back and look at all my posts yesterday and today and you will see that I'm not trying to stir up more anger and hatred at all. When I was talking about fanaticsm I meant the protesting crowds(everything needs a caveat on this site it seems - not that they represent all Islamic people or all Sudanese) calling for her death not the government officials.

When Crtistians in America get upset because they feel like their religion is been attacked by a joke on a half hour comedy show or a provocative artwork somewhere, they get their networks to send out e-mails and they all talk about evil-hollywood and starting boycotts and if it gets big enough getting the offence things off the air or out of the museum. That's not a good thing but rarely do you see them calling for the writer of the offensive joke to be killed or the network president to be beheaded.

Again I don't believe that these things represent the majority of muslims, but they are real - the camera person didn't give these people signs or tell them what to say. These images of people calling for violence creates part of the fear by which Bush can so easily manipulate the populace of the US with Fox News help of course.

IT's cultural!! Absolutely but that doesn't change the images that your regular average person sees on the news. (and if you've read Sontag or McLuhan you understand the power of images, especially in today's world!!)

As far a blashphemy, I think that people should be free to think what they want and freely worship. Anyone mocking, insulting or attacking any religion or it's symbols is being mean but it shouldn't be illegal because honestly it can also be funny - for example South Park's satire of christian symbols - Jesus and The Devil, as well as the episodes on Mormonism and Scientology.

Anyways I can see that my interest in this topic has been misunderstood. See ya around.


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
Dead_Letter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12708

posted 04 December 2007 01:24 AM      Profile for Dead_Letter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by AfroHealer:
things that makes me go Hmmm .. World wide outrage bacause one woman might spend two weeks in jail or get lashed.

HMMMMMMM .. but no worldwide outrage at countless African women getting rapped, tortured, terrorized and killed?

Excuse me for pointing out the obvious racial preferential treatment.

Its funny how they can find the means, to interfere with the Sudanese govt in the case of one white woman.

maybe some white women need to threaten their western govts, that they will move in and live with the women b4 it will be worth the while for the rest of the western powers to do something.

Since its blatantly obvious, that our (African) lives are worthless to the global community.


The plight of Africans, men and women, could hardly be more publicized in the Western world.

The notoriety of this case owes solely to the bizarre and ridiculous circumstances of it, not because the woman is white.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Dead_Letter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12708

posted 04 December 2007 01:34 AM      Profile for Dead_Letter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Noise:

The rush to judge other cultures by the values of our culture is unfortunate.[/QB]


Specious.

"Culture" is a meaningless word nowadays in politics. Slap it onto anything, justify anything.

Let's judge other COUNTRIES on more objective standards - are they harsh with their poor, their minorities or their 'criminals'? Do their people live well? Does rationality prevail or does superstition and mysticism? Does the rule of law prevail or does arbitrary government?

Sudan is a singular failure on all of those counts. The case of Gillian Gibbons is but one sensational example.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Dead_Letter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12708

posted 04 December 2007 01:59 AM      Profile for Dead_Letter     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ibelongtonoone:

As far a blashphemy, I think that people should be free to think what they want and freely worship. Anyone mocking, insulting or attacking any religion or it's symbols is being mean but it shouldn't be illegal because honestly it can also be funny -

People are free to think whatever they want mainly because there is no real way to stop them from doing so.

I believe they should be free to worship as well. Although, I also believe it is the least of anyone's rights, trumped by any other more important one it might violate.

Where I don't agree is that part about being "mean". It's not "mean" to mock, insult or attack someone's religion. Religious people really, really, really have that coming. And you do realize that the society we have evolved into is a direct result of people having the courage to "mock, insult and attack" the predominant religion? If nobody ever did that, the Enlightenment would never have happened. We'd still be having Thirty Years' Wars.

People can ahead and think what they want because no one can stop them, as I said. But that doesn't mean anyone else needs to take them seriously when they want to impose it on others. Hey look, a lot has happened between now and 600 AD when the Koran was written. Or between now and two millenia ago when the Bible was composed. Humankind has learned a thing or two since then. A couple contradictions have opened up between now and then. We must no longer gear our societies around those outdated tomes. We know better now. Religious people trying to compel adherence to their illogical views from their fellow citizens by force is sooooo four hundred years ago. When it happens in our day, we are best served by speaking the truth, not placating stupidity.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 04 December 2007 03:43 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
While the rhetorical power of your rolly-eyed smiley is quite compelling, I question your assertion that the only reason this story is in the news is its "bizarre" and "ridiculous" nature. Usually, "ridiculous" stories get relegated to the odd-bin section of the news, and not two straight weeks of front-page treatment. Why this story? And why did this particular individual rate direct, personal state visits to plead for her freedom, and yet the millions of Africans who live under daily threat can't get their pictures in the Obituaries?

I concede that they aren't English citizens, but even without mentioning that the life of a citizen of the British Empire is no longer worth more than that of a savage, why did four British citizens have to wait two years to be released from Guantanamo Bay? (At least four British residents, incidentally, are still imprisoned, without charge--unlike the school teacher in question.) Why can't this question be considered without trotting out the lame-duck response of anti-Americanism? It's contextualizing the story, not deflecting it.

It should be taken for granted that the sentence levied was unjust, so the next level of intelligent analysis should not be to gleefully (or in some cases, maliciously) point fingers at a culture so that we can pat our Western backs at not being as backwards as Sudan (motes, beams, eyes, etc.) but rather to question why this story? Why now?

As AfroHealer aptly points out, this story is a microcosm of Western assumptions of cultural primacy and the problems that arise when a member of one culture enters into another without properly understanding the attendant values and system of justice. Citizens of Western society simply do not have the right to travel wherever they like and expect the world to change with them, to simulate America wherever they go. And no, I am not saying the school teacher deserved what she got, but I am willing to guess that a Sikh travelling to America or Britain is far less likely to earn state-intervention should they produce a similar cultural misstep. When immigrants come to the West, they are expected to adapt (why else would they leave their "primitive" home?) Why aren't Western emigrants to Oriental countries expected to do the same? In fact, the response in this thread has been indignant that we should alter our world-view to one more consonant with African nations.

It would be nice if the left characteristically engaged in a bit more critical scepticism when it came to stories like this, especially stories that relate to the cultural and politically mediated impulses of imperialism and Islamophobia that are powering movements of global conflict the Left is attempting to combat.


From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 December 2007 04:05 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Catchfire:
It would be nice if the left characteristically engaged in a bit more critical scepticism when it came to stories like this, especially stories that relate to the cultural and politically mediated impulses of imperialism and Islamophobia that are powering movements of global conflict the Left is attempting to combat.

I generally agree with all your comments, but what makes you initimate that the "left" is not critical of trivial stories like this one?

There are no doubt individuals (cf. this discussion board) who train their telescopes on every real or imagined sin committed in a small list of countries which (coincidentally) happen to be on George W. Bush and Stephen Harper's "This Week's Axis of Evil" list. They have no eyeglasses, let alone microscopes, to aid them in examining the real crimes committed by their own governments and societies.

IMHO, it is their instincts and their partisanship which are askew. Generally speaking, it is difficult to understand what such attitudes have to do with anything denoted by the term "left". In the case of media efforts to stir up hysteria (like the Gillian Gibbons case), I don't mind speaking calmly to friends, workmates, and family members about what the media are doing. But for those who style themselves "leftist" while buying into Anglo-U.S. imperial haughtiness, I still think ridicule and teasing are the most apt response.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 04 December 2007 04:09 AM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
That's not a good thing but rarely do you see them calling for the writer of the offensive joke to be killed or the network president to be beheaded.

Are you kidding me?? Pat Robertson, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, more Fox News wingnuts have openly called for the deaths of not just anti-religious people, but heads of state and entire populations. I don't see anyone but the left calling these freaks on this, do you?


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 04 December 2007 04:17 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ahh, I suppose when I said "left" I was using a nice catch-all term for people on this board who used this story as an opportunity to beat-up on the barbarians. I didn't mean to criticize the ridicule of those reactionary folk, ridicule which I mostly enjoy. Clearly, the left does have people who can thoughtfully critique this issue. I just wanted to make sure I spelled out precisely what was at stake here.
From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 05:14 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
The notoriety of this case owes solely to the bizarre and ridiculous circumstances of it, not because the woman is white.

In the West, where more often than not, bigotry rules, including among late night posters to web sites, we want to view the rest of the world through a lens of our own making.

In Sudan, blasphemy is punished with death. And, yet, in the West, we have taken little notice of those convicted of blasphemy, or even worse, criticizing Sharia law, which also carries a sentence of death, until a white, British school teacher was convicted.

Already facing a reduced sentence, the West rose as one and demanded even less and so she was released.

Meanwhile, Sudanese took to the streets. And, again, we interpreted for ourselves that these blood thirsty savages were calling for the head of our sweet teacher. It isn't possible, for example, that they were protesting the double-standard where a Sudanese faces a lopped off head for the crime of blasphemy while a white school teacher faces 15 days reduced to nine and probably in segregation.

No, because, in the West, we have never rioted over unfair penalties. No justice; no peace.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 04 December 2007 05:55 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ibelongtonoone :
quote:
You deliberately misread me. Go back and look at all my posts yesterday and today and you will see that I'm not trying to stir up more anger and hatred at all. When I was talking about fanaticsm I meant the protesting crowds(everything needs a caveat on this site it seems - not that they represent all Islamic people or all Sudanese) calling for her death not the government officials.

I know the fanatacism you're talking about, I'm not blind to that... But it's all we (and our media) are paying attention to. If you're not stirring up hatred, then perhaps I've missed ya on this one... But many (almost exclusively) are. The woman involved here... She was cleared of all charges (for a 15 day prison term... Not a death sentence), taken care of by gov't officials (No abuse while she was in the care of authorities... apparently). You could almost say the moderates won here. Any praise for them? No, because thats not whats important... Stressing the differences in our cultures/laws and showing off the fanatics is.


quote:
Let's judge other COUNTRIES on more objective standards - are they harsh with their poor, their minorities or their 'criminals'? Do their people live well? Does rationality prevail or does superstition and mysticism? Does the rule of law prevail or does arbitrary government?

Sudan is a singular failure on all of those counts.


Agreed, our superiority as obviously demonstrated by yourself makes it perfectly to ignore any of their laws that we want. Thankyou for clarifying

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 05:58 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No crime should be punishable by the death penalty regardless of the country.

Legal penalties for blasphemy regardless of the country prescribing them are something all leftists and progressives should oppose.


From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 04 December 2007 06:03 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
No crime should be punishable by the death penalty regardless of the country

Good contribution Caissa... Want to comment on the 15 day prison term and pardon, or are you just here to freak out at Islam and 'progressives that like the death penalty'?

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 December 2007 06:06 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Caissa:
No crime should be punishable by the death penalty regardless of the country.

Legal penalties for blasphemy regardless of the country prescribing them are something all leftists and progressives should oppose.


What was the crime of the Al-Shifa factory workers who were sentenced to the death penalty by Bill Clinton - and the thousands who died afterwards because of the consequent shortage of malaria and TB drugs?

What was the crime of the Afghan citizen, imprisoned by the puppet regime installed by the U.S. and Canada and facing the death penalty for converting from Islam to Christianity?

And the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in countries illegally invaded and occupied by those same forces?

No one has yet paid for those acts of blasphemy, in which our country and its "allies" (sorry) were complicit.

Until they do, then whining and griping about the Sudanese legal system discloses a dangerous double standard. It is particularly odious and offensive to shed tears over the existence of the death penalty in Sudan when our own frigging government has brought our society closer to restoration of capital punishment just in the past month.

Such hand-wringing seems to me to be grist to the mill of the very same murderers who commit their crimes on a world scale and sentence countless thousands to death every year, without the pretext of law or any judicial proceedings.

ETA: One thing you can say about the Sudanese. They only apply the death penalty in their own country.

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 06:08 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I am happy about the Presidential pardon. The fifteen day prison term was excessive. Your last clause was uncalled for and indeed Noise; a moderator will be notified.

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Caissa ]


From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 06:10 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Ask yourself why someone would go to work in a foreign country, and not bother to be intimately familiar with the laws of the land.

Oh gee, like if I go to work in a foreign country, I better read their entire criminal code to see whether there is a death penalty for naming a teddy bear "Mohammed" (the most popular name for men in the entire Muslim world).

I guess before my next trip to Italy i better call the Italian embassy to make sure that I won't get shot by a firing squad if I name my goldfish "Benedict".


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 06:13 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
How about being sentenced to a living death?

quote:
What came next was deeply personal. (It is why I use "Joseph," a pseudonym for this good husband.) A Muslim, he does not like to speak to me of such personal things. But he had no choice. Camp Six is complete isolation. The men call it the dungeon above the ground. He is held alone in a metal cell, denied any contact with companions, books, news, the world - with his wife or child.

North Korea used this isolation technique against our airmen in 1952. We know a good idea when we see it, so the taxpayers paid $30 million to Dick Cheney's former company to duplicate North Korea.

The bunks had to be filled. Joseph got one. And so a message through me was the only way he could do his duty by her.

"I want you to tell her that it is time for her . . .. to move on."

"You mean . . .?"

"Yes. I will never leave Guantanamo."



There is no outrage, no protests, no chest thumping or denounciations of Christo-fascism when the victims are both ours and brown skinned.

ETA, and in case no one clicks on the link:

quote:
No one alleges that Joseph was ever a terrorist, or a soldier, or a criminal. The military told him in 2002 he was innocent.

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 06:13 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Call it ethnocentrism is you like - I consider any use of the death penalty to be barbaric and evil and i also consider any laws of blasphemy or "lese-majeste" to be idiotic and I will oppose them anywhere and everywhere.

I also oppose female circumcision and the practice of women who have been raped being stoned to death in parts of Afghanistan and i oppose people being executed for being gay or lesbian in Iran and other countries. I don't give a damn if this is considered "normal" in some cultures. I think it's wrong period and i make no apologies.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 04 December 2007 06:14 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Christ, Caissa, do you ever have anything useful to contribute? While your aphoristic provocations might give you a cheap thrill, your incessant goading and subsequent crying to a moderator is getting tiresome. Any time you want to actually read this thread, you just let us know.
From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 06:15 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Right on, Stockholm.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 06:17 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Call it ethnocentrism is you like - I consider any use of the death penalty to be barbaric and evil and i also consider any laws of blasphemy or "lese-majeste" to be idiotic and I will oppose them anywhere and everywhere.

And I don't believe you. Where is your outrage on the article I linked above. I bet is far less exuberant as when it is an Islamic nation.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 06:17 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No need to refer to the Greek derivation for Messiah, Catchfire; although it is indeed interesting in a thread about blasphemy.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 04 December 2007 06:17 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
Call it ethnocentrism is you like - I consider any use of the death penalty to be barbaric and evil and i also consider any laws of blasphemy or "lese-majeste" to be idiotic and I will oppose them anywhere and everywhere.

That's wonderful, and I applaud your cheval de bataille. Just out of curiosity, when will you (and Caissa, for good measure) be "opposing" such laws in a non-Arab nation?


From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 December 2007 06:17 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:
Oh gee, like if I go to work in a foreign country, I better read their entire criminal code to see whether there is a death penalty for naming a teddy bear "Mohammed" (the most popular name for men in the entire Muslim world).

Don't include your babble posts in your c.v. if you really are looking for foreign job offers.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Catchfire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4019

posted 04 December 2007 06:19 AM      Profile for Catchfire   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
No need to refer to the Greek derivation for Messiah, Catchfire; although it is indeed interesting in a thread about blasphemy.

Isn't there a "moderator [to] be notified" that you should concern yourself with?

From: On the heather | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 06:26 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No, Catchfire; I don't believe their should be penalties for blasphemy.
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 04 December 2007 06:36 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Your last clause was uncalled for and indeed Noise; a moderator will be notified.

So the first clause of 'good contribution' Caissa is ok, the second explaining how 'good contribution' is intended to mean how inane your post was is worthy of mod intervention?

quote:
I also oppose female circumcision and the practice of women who have been raped being stoned to death in parts of Afghanistan and i oppose people being executed for being gay or lesbian in Iran and other countries.

Stockholm, I agree with this... But it's nonsequitor at best. Was the Brit teacher stoned, raped, executed, or otherwise? As far as I can see, she was treated very fairly and pardoned, including extra attempts to ensure her security. Not one word of support or agreeance for the moderates that pardoned her, nothing at all in regards to the story, just repetative judgements of the fanatics. Perfectly good scenario of when 'cool heads' prevailed, yet all we can do is fuel the extremes.

If there is a Western media 'mission success'! to be proclaimed, they hit their target and then some

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]

ETA:

quote:
No, Catchfire; I don't believe their should be penalties for blasphemy.

Unless it's blasphemy directed at Caissa, then it's an 'email to the mod'-worthy event

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
The Wizard of Socialism
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2912

posted 04 December 2007 06:45 AM      Profile for The Wizard of Socialism   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post
Man, there is all manner of craziness aboot this morning! It almost makes me wish I had a position on any of this so I could get in on it. Carry on with your verbal soccer riot. Is that the beer guy? "Yo, beer here!!"
From: A Proud Canadian! | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 07:27 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Just out of curiosity, when will you (and Caissa, for good measure) be "opposing" such laws in a non-Arab nation?

First of all Iran is a non-Arab nation and I condemn their use of the death penalty and all other human rights abuses. I also condemn female circumcision in various sub-Saharan African countries which are also not "Arab". and I also condemn the use of the death penalty in the US and China (two more non-Arab countries) and I consider it barbaric when Tamil Tigers blow people up (guess what they aren't Arabs or Muslims either) and i consider the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust to have been barbaric (not Muslim or Arab either).

The scary things about this whole incident in Sudan are as follows:

1. If this woman had been a native Sudanese and committed the same crime - she may well have been executed and we never would have even known about it. I'm sure the Sudanese government doesn't put out regular press releases about who they execute for absurd "crimes" such as blasphemy.

2. The very fact that thousands of people were marching in Khartoum demanding that she be executed is a sign of a pretty sick society. Sure you can compare this to Rev. Phelps and his "God hates fags" demos at funerals for people who died of AIDS in the US - but he has about 20 followers and he gets condemned by everyone. The demand for execution for ridiculously petty so-called crimes seems to be a lot more widespread in Sudan and that's sad.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 07:29 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You don't read anything anyone else writes, do you?

The suggestion that the protests were for white school teacher blood is inherently racist.

quote:
Meanwhile, Sudanese took to the streets. And, again, we interpreted for ourselves that these blood thirsty savages were calling for the head of our sweet teacher. It isn't possible, for example, that they were protesting the double-standard where a Sudanese faces a lopped off head for the crime of blasphemy while a white school teacher faces 15 days reduced to nine and probably in segregation.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 07:37 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
It isn't possible, for example, that they were protesting the double-standard where a Sudanese faces a lopped off head for the crime of blasphemy while a white school teacher faces 15 days reduced to nine and probably in segregation.

Show me evidence that the Sudanese protesters were demanding that Sudanese people jailed for similar "crimes" be given clemency? I see none. They just wanted the British woman to be murdered by their government.

If they were protesting the double standard then they would have been demanding that double standard be eliminated by having the government immediately commute the sentences of all people on death's row in Sudan for having named a stuffed animal Mohammed.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 08:17 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
How do you know what the hell they wanted? Where you there? Do you understand their language? Did you talk to them? Did the people protesting the acquittals related to the Rodney King assault demand everyone convicted on assualt be freed? Or did they want the perpetrators punished? Do you view the black rioters following the Ridney King acquittal in the same way you view the Sudanese of do you hold a special bigotry for Muslims?
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 08:28 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I happen to think that there is a big difference between protesting the aquittal of people captured on videotape almost beating someone to death - and people demanding the savage execution of a woman who let some 7 year old children name a stuffed animal "Mohammed" - the most popular name for boys in the Muslim world.
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 08:31 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I think you have no idea what they were protesting. Nevertheless you have no difficulty ascribing to them whatever perverted ideas pops into your mind based on how those people are presented to you by your television. And that says far more about you then it says anything about them.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 08:48 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Do you know what they were protesting, FM?
From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
EmmaG
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12605

posted 04 December 2007 09:26 AM      Profile for EmmaG        Edit/Delete Post
The BBC seems to agree with the view that the protestors were calling for a tougher sentence for the teacher:

quote:
The marchers took to the streets after Friday prayers to denounce the sentence as too lenient.

The protesters gathered in Martyrs Square, outside the presidential palace in the capital, many of them carrying knives and sticks.

Some news agencies reported thousands of people took part in the protest, but a BBC reporter at the scene said up to a thousand marchers turned out.

According to some agencies, some of the protesters chanted: "Shame, shame on the UK", "No tolerance - execution" and "Kill her, kill her by firing squad".

One demonstrator told reporters that it was unacceptable to take a toy and call it Muhammad.

"We can't accept it from anybody. Even if they can do that in Europe, they cannot do it here in Sudan. We ask our rulers and judges to review what they have said. Fifteen days is not enough."



From: nova scotia | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Black Dog
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2776

posted 04 December 2007 09:33 AM      Profile for Black Dog   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I was pointing out we are judging another society based on our societies values and not theirs... Why have we assumed our values are superior and take precedence over another societies values?... To the point where we must interject and enforce our values no less.

Sometimes our values are superior.


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 04 December 2007 09:39 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black Dog:

Sometimes our values are superior.


You mean, the loonie?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 09:55 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Do you know what they were protesting, FM?

No. But rather than demonizing all of them because it fits nicely within my preconceptions, I prefer to think of them as people angry that a foreigner who happens to be white is treated by the law more leniently than any native Sudanese could hope to be treated under similar circumstances.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Black Dog
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2776

posted 04 December 2007 09:58 AM      Profile for Black Dog   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No I mean the not having bullshit blasphemy laws thing.

See, this is what's confusing to me, probably because I've been out of circulation here, but why do people who have absolutely no problem calling shenanigans on bullshit laws and repressive practices carried out by white, western Judeo-Christian states suddenly load up on the caveats and non sequiturs when it comes to bullshit laws and repressive practices of anybody else?


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 10:00 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
FM wrote: I prefer to think of them as people angry that a foreigner who happens to be white is treated by the law more leniently than any native Sudanese could hope to be treated under similar circumstances.


Well that would be your preconceptions. I'm not aware of a single news story in any medium which supports it.


From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
EmmaG
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12605

posted 04 December 2007 10:02 AM      Profile for EmmaG        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

No. But rather than demonizing all of them because it fits nicely within my preconceptions, I prefer to think of them as people angry that a foreigner who happens to be white is treated by the law more leniently than any native Sudanese could hope to be treated under similar circumstances.


Did you read the link I posted above from the BBC? I agree that part of it is likely that they were angry that a white woman was being treated more leniently, however most seemed to agree with the law overall and want it enforced.


From: nova scotia | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Caissa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12752

posted 04 December 2007 10:36 AM      Profile for Caissa     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Here is Al-Jazeera's coverage of the subject.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ABE23B63-C647-4920-8522-1288785EC453.htm


From: Saint John | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
EmmaG
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12605

posted 04 December 2007 10:48 AM      Profile for EmmaG        Edit/Delete Post
From Caissa's link above:

quote:
Hundreds of people took to the streets of the Sudanese capital on Friday, many waving swords and Islamic flags and calling for her execution.

I would understand doubting CNN, CBC, BBC etc., but even Al Jazeera is reporting the protest in this manner.


From: nova scotia | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 04 December 2007 11:07 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Like, what if a Grade 3 teacher in a Catholic School in Ontario named one of the kids' stuffed pigs "Pope Benedict", had it marry another stuffed pig called "Mr. Piggy", and had all the kids throw rice, going "Oink oink Your Holiness, have a great honeymoon, and don't forget your birth control pills!". He might (or might not) be subject to civil or criminal charges, but he would have a hard time keeping his job - no?

Sure. And if all that happened to the woman was being fired from her job, then that would've been fine.

I think you might have had a problem with it, on the other hand, if people paraded in the streets chanting for the execution of your hypothetical teacher, and they were sentenced to caning and imprisonment because of it.

I'm sorry, but while I understand why using racially-loaded terms like "barbaric" is a problem when talking about Africans, I have no problem with saying in no uncertain terms that such laws are wrong, and the people parading in the streets calling for her execution are way in the wrong. Just as they are wrong when they support such heinous punishments for the powerless and the dissenters among their own citizens. These people are religious persecutors, not misunderstood underdogs.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 04 December 2007 11:21 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Did you read the link I posted above from the BBC? I agree that part of it is likely that they were angry that a white woman was being treated more leniently, however most seemed to agree with the law overall and want it enforced.

Oh, the BBC spoke to most of them? Some how I missed that in the report.

The Al Jazeera report does not support the BBC report as not only did it not interview most of them, it apparently didn't interview any of them.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
AfroHealer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11362

posted 04 December 2007 11:51 AM      Profile for AfroHealer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Can't help but notice how some in the west have characterized Aljahzera as propaganda. but Then refer to it whenever a story there apears to support their argument. Even though it really does not. (I just checked, they said some were calling for her death,) sounds like what I hear at anti-abortion or homophobia protest.

All kinds of Christian leaders have called for killings of all kinds of people in Canad and the US, some even do it on their national TV shows.

But somehow you are surprised that some African religious leaders might have similar views?

How come the fanatics here, who are supporting the killing of many in other parts of the world, are just ignored or laughed at. But its only the Islamic leaders that need to be address.

I would suggest that you have a better chance of actually doing something about the wave of hatred coming from christian religious leaders within western countries. But oh, that would mean actualy having to talk to people from your culture who are insensitive and bigoted. Its so much easier to just ignore that, and fan the flames of Islamophobia.

I listen to an interview with the British School teacher today, she said she went to Sudan for some adventure. Who the heck is so clueless as to go into the middle of a war zone, and be that naive and insensitive to local customs.

How anyone in the western would could have missed the stories about the so-called "Mohamed Cartoons" recently, is beyond me.

I feel sorry for the kids she was teaching.

How about ask the Canadian Govt. what they are doing about the child-abuse and other crimes against humanity happening in bountiful BC. OH i see, they claim to be chrisitan, so its ok.

Like anyone can tell me with a straight face, that the same sort of thing would be tolerated in Canada, if it was any non-mainstream religion.

BC polygamist claims Persecution


From: Atlantic Canada | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
pookie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11357

posted 04 December 2007 12:01 PM      Profile for pookie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by AfroHealer:

I listen to an interview with the British School teacher today, she said she went to Sudan for some adventure. Who the heck is so clueless as to go into the middle of a war zone, and be that naive and insensitive to local customs.

How anyone in the western would could have missed the stories about the so-called "Mohamed Cartoons" recently, is beyond me.

I feel sorry for the kids she was teaching.


Nice.


From: there's no "there" there | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 04 December 2007 12:05 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
All kinds of Christian leaders have called for killings of all kinds of people in Canad and the US, some even do it on their national TV shows.

...and when they do, I condemn them and they tend to be made into objects of derision and ridicule in our mass media as well.

quote:
But somehow you are surprised that some African religious leaders might have similar views?

Actually, it DOES surprise me that even the most fanatical religious freaks on earth would advocate the death penalty over the naming of a stuffed animal.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Black Dog
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2776

posted 04 December 2007 12:59 PM      Profile for Black Dog   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
All kinds of Christian leaders have called for killings of all kinds of people in Canad and the US, some even do it on their national TV shows.

But somehow you are surprised that some African religious leaders might have similar views?


What's troubling is the part where the views of these wackos is actually the law of the land.

quote:
How come the fanatics here, who are supporting the killing of many in other parts of the world, are just ignored or laughed at. But its only the Islamic leaders that need to be address.

Because, as you say, our wackos are ignored or laughed at. They are not running the show and getting people imprisoned or executed.

quote:
How about ask the Canadian Govt. what they are doing about the child-abuse and other crimes against humanity happening in bountiful BC. OH i see, they claim to be chrisitan, so its ok.

I'm not sure how a story about a police investigation into these nutters and their claims of persecution indicates anyone thinks it's ok.

quote:
Like anyone can tell me with a straight face, that the same sort of thing would be tolerated in Canada, if it was any non-mainstream religion.

The Bountiful bunch are not a mainstream religion. They aren't even mainstream Mormons.

[ 04 December 2007: Message edited by: Black Dog ]


From: Vancouver | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 04 December 2007 01:36 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
talk about twisting yourself in pretzels to defend a ridiculous law and this case. or better yet attack the woman for having the nerve to travel to another foreign country - "She should stay away or go back where she came from" - paraphrasing Afrohealer here - doesn't sound very progressive to me! Excuse my sarcasm.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 04 December 2007 02:00 PM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I can't articulate how incredibly sorry I am that this thread has reached over 100 posts. I really can't.
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca