babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » CUPE 500 brass knocked for inaction

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: CUPE 500 brass knocked for inaction
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457

posted 06 July 2007 07:50 AM      Profile for CUPE_Reformer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
SOME members of CUPE local 500 are slamming the union's leadership for not acting swiftly to deal with the conduct of a union representative who was the subject of a recent internal investigation.

Documents obtained by the Free Press detail five separate complaints -- ranging from allegations of sexual misconduct, racism and harassment -- have been leveled against the member.

The complaints date back to December 2005.


CUPE 500 brass knocked for inaction


From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
munroe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14227

posted 06 July 2007 08:07 AM      Profile for munroe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm unclear of the point here. Perhaps, the post is intended to focus on the sensationalism of the Winnipeg Free Press or perhaps it is intended to focus on how premature airing of dirty laundry does a disservice to a democratic organization.

In the article, several facts stand out. Complaints were made and investigated. Conclusions were drawn and reported. The report was published two weeks ago and it will be considered at a meeting next Monday. Provided the process was fair (and there is no reason not to assume it was), all of this suggests the issues were dealt with thoroughly. Now, the conclusions will be dealt with expeditiously. A bit better then two weeks is not a long time given the implications.

It is sad to see that someone jumped the gun and ran to the press before the consideration of the report itself occured. It isn't surprising that this medium jumped on the opportunity to turn the matter against a trade union. If there's a "fly in the soup" here, it's the person who turned an internal personnel matter as yet incomplete into a mediafest.


From: Port Moody, B.C. | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457

posted 06 July 2007 08:26 AM      Profile for CUPE_Reformer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Originally posted by munroe
quote:

The report was published two weeks ago and it will be considered at a meeting next Monday.



munroe:

quote:
Sallie Caufield, the union's secretary -- and a member of the local's executive -- said she's upset the executive isn't meeting sooner to deal with the matter.

From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
munroe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14227

posted 06 July 2007 08:42 AM      Profile for munroe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
She's on the Executive and would have been in a position to make that point on Monday. Two weeks in the summer with a Stat holiday in between is far from unreasonable. Sounds to me like Caulfield simply has a vested interest. If she was the one who went to the press, then she acted inappropriately.
From: Port Moody, B.C. | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457

posted 06 July 2007 09:05 AM      Profile for CUPE_Reformer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Originally posted by munroe
quote:

Two weeks in the summer with a Stat holiday in between is far from unreasonable.



munroe:

quote:
2) During contract negotiations with the city in 2006, the member made "racist remarks about the ethnic background of the city's negotiator."

FINDING: Based on evidence provided by witnesses, and by the remorseful admission of the member in question, the union's investigator found his behaviour to be "completely unacceptable ... a form of discrimination and harassment."



From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
munroe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14227

posted 06 July 2007 09:37 AM      Profile for munroe     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think you're missing the point. There is no room in my mind for rascist and sexist behaviour. The problem is that jumping out front publicly in this manner does nothing to address the problem and may simply divert attention from the issue.
From: Port Moody, B.C. | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076

posted 06 July 2007 11:00 AM      Profile for Steppenwolf Allende     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Munroe wrote:

quote:
There is no room in my mind for rascist and sexist behaviour.

I absolutely agree. This is especially concerning in that it is coming from an elected rep who is directly responsible for the overall well-being of the membership.

Having said that, however, despite the article's sensationalism, it can't be clearer that the CUPE local has a very open and transparent democratic process.

quote:
She's on the Executive and would have been in a position to make that point on Monday. Two weeks in the summer with a Stat holiday in between is far from unreasonable.

Again I fully agree. An investigation in response to the complaints was made in a timely manner, and the executive will obviously be dealing with it in a similar level-headed way.

This is democracy in action--something that is almost totally non-existent in fraudulent rackets like CLAC and other fake "unions" that the initiator of this thread likes to promote.

quote:
Sounds to me like Caulfield simply has a vested interest. If she was the one who went to the press, then she acted inappropriately.

I get this impression as well. To be fair, however, she may actually honestly feel the executive is moving too slowly. On the other hand, she may also have a particular axe to grind with either the person in question or someone else on the executive.

Going to the corporate media over what is simply a regular meeting date doesn't sound very legit--much like the initiator of this thread. It seems motivated by the desire to slander other people and advance a destructive agenda.


From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 06 July 2007 11:32 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by munroe:
I think you're missing the point.

No one is missing your point. CUPE_Reformer makes it her/his business to post examples of union "wrongdoing" - real or imagined - generally without comment. Then, posters start speculating on situations based on incomplete information, and big debates start in which CUPE_Reformer refrains from comment. Get the picture?

[ 06 July 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca