Author
|
Topic: CUPE 500 brass knocked for inaction
|
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457
|
posted 06 July 2007 07:50 AM
quote: SOME members of CUPE local 500 are slamming the union's leadership for not acting swiftly to deal with the conduct of a union representative who was the subject of a recent internal investigation.Documents obtained by the Free Press detail five separate complaints -- ranging from allegations of sexual misconduct, racism and harassment -- have been leveled against the member. The complaints date back to December 2005.
CUPE 500 brass knocked for inaction
From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CUPE_Reformer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7457
|
posted 06 July 2007 09:05 AM
Originally posted by munroe quote:
Two weeks in the summer with a Stat holiday in between is far from unreasonable.
munroe: quote: 2) During contract negotiations with the city in 2006, the member made "racist remarks about the ethnic background of the city's negotiator."FINDING: Based on evidence provided by witnesses, and by the remorseful admission of the member in question, the union's investigator found his behaviour to be "completely unacceptable ... a form of discrimination and harassment."
From: Real Solidarity | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13076
|
posted 06 July 2007 11:00 AM
Munroe wrote: quote: There is no room in my mind for rascist and sexist behaviour.
I absolutely agree. This is especially concerning in that it is coming from an elected rep who is directly responsible for the overall well-being of the membership. Having said that, however, despite the article's sensationalism, it can't be clearer that the CUPE local has a very open and transparent democratic process. quote: She's on the Executive and would have been in a position to make that point on Monday. Two weeks in the summer with a Stat holiday in between is far from unreasonable.
Again I fully agree. An investigation in response to the complaints was made in a timely manner, and the executive will obviously be dealing with it in a similar level-headed way. This is democracy in action--something that is almost totally non-existent in fraudulent rackets like CLAC and other fake "unions" that the initiator of this thread likes to promote. quote: Sounds to me like Caulfield simply has a vested interest. If she was the one who went to the press, then she acted inappropriately.
I get this impression as well. To be fair, however, she may actually honestly feel the executive is moving too slowly. On the other hand, she may also have a particular axe to grind with either the person in question or someone else on the executive. Going to the corporate media over what is simply a regular meeting date doesn't sound very legit--much like the initiator of this thread. It seems motivated by the desire to slander other people and advance a destructive agenda.
From: goes far, flies near, to the stars away from here | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|