babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » US Repub Debate Aftermath

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: US Repub Debate Aftermath
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 29 November 2007 09:22 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tempers still raw after fractious Republican debate

I have to laugh. And laugh. And laugh.

The chickens have finally come home to roost. The Repubs have been so used to trashing anybody who isn't a Republican that they can no longer quit using the tactic on each other. It's too much to hope that this kind of public airing of the Republican use of below-the-belt debate techniques will make people wake up and wonder what "their party" has become.

[ 29 November 2007: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
West Coast Greeny
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6874

posted 29 November 2007 11:05 AM      Profile for West Coast Greeny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Never think the Republicans are out of it, but they are in disarray at the moment. You will have noticed that the Republican crowd was way more partisan than the Democratic one. That bodes very poorly for the Republicans in the next general election.

As for the individual candidates I think Guiliani lost some momentum by setting the negative tone that was carried through the entire night, and McCain might have gained some by staying out of the fracas. The big picture is no less complicated than it was a week ago, but I still peg Mitt Romney as the favorite to take the nomination.

[ 29 November 2007: Message edited by: West Coast Greeny ]


From: Ewe of eh. | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 29 November 2007 09:26 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, never let it be said that searching for the lowest common denominator was hard to do.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Peppered Pothead
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14772

posted 30 November 2007 01:01 AM      Profile for Peppered Pothead        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by West Coast Greeny:
Never think the Republicans are out of it, but they are in disarray at the moment. You will have noticed that the Republican crowd was way more partisan than the Democratic one. That bodes very poorly for the Republicans in the next general election.


They are not out of it, because...

a) Their Neo-Liberal 'opponents' will ultimately implement most of their policies, with merely a slight delay or dilution.

b) They have their dirty bags of tricks, which include :

-Emotive attack ads
-Corporate media manipulations & bias
-Staged or engineered events (domestic & international)
-Lack of proportional representation
-The Iowa Caucus
-The electoral college
-8 hour waits in the voting line
-Blacklisting blacks off of the voting regestration list and other intentional obstructions of minorities
-No paper trail for the e-voting machines
-Pro-Bush Diebold, and other corporations, who have exclusive access to the e-voting machine codes, and have set up barriers to transparency

(among other things)

Still, it's really just a fraudulent, corrupt, deceptive & manipulative 2-party state via the Neo-Liberal/Neo-Conservative monopoly.


From: Victoria, B.C. | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged
Abdul_Maria
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11105

posted 30 November 2007 05:06 AM      Profile for Abdul_Maria     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Peppered Pothead:
They are not out of it, because...

a) Their Neo-Liberal 'opponents' will ultimately implement most of their policies, with merely a slight delay or dilution.


no kidding. continuing the policies of Bush is what Hillary is saying she'll do. she's already beating the war-drums about Iran.

bread & circus' in America. but not democracy, not at the federal level.


From: San Fran | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 30 November 2007 09:51 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here's a look at the real Rudy Guiliani, Authoritarian Poor-Basher Extraordinaire.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 01 December 2007 06:35 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Those comments after are a bit depressing.
From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 01 December 2007 06:47 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Both parties do this to each other during the primaries. The candidates tear each other apart and attack each other. It's happening with the Democrats too. People will forget about it once someone wins, and then it'll be business as usual in the presidential election.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 01 December 2007 07:33 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I dunno; the Repubs are particularly prone, IMO, to engaging in lowest-common-denominator slugfests because they're used to trashing the Dems that way.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
West Coast Greeny
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6874

posted 01 December 2007 11:45 AM      Profile for West Coast Greeny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Both parties do this to each other during the primaries. The candidates tear each other apart and attack each other. It's happening with the Democrats too. People will forget about it once someone wins, and then it'll be business as usual in the presidential election.

I've been watching both debates, and while there was some sniping between Obama and Clinton, and one attack by John Edwards, none of the Democrats fell anywhere near the level Guiliani or Thompson did.

The Democrats are far more likely to rally around thier candidate (even if its Hillary) than the Republicans at this point. There are so many ways the party could fracture.

- Socons have already threatened to run a 3rd candiate if Guiliani wins.
- Supply-siders will never unite with Huckabee.
- Romney has to get past all the bigots.
- And while all this is happening, conservative Libertarians are leaving in droves, with Ron Paul siphoning more and more of them. Do you really think he'll endorse any of the other Repubs for prez?

[ 01 December 2007: Message edited by: West Coast Greeny ]


From: Ewe of eh. | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca