babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Abortion Law Around the World

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Abortion Law Around the World
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 25 April 2008 08:48 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought this Reuters piece was interesting, which highlights abortion law around the world.

From this sheet, it indicates that Canada has the most liberal abortion law on Earth, and is one of the few places abortion is legal anytime during pregnancy. What do babblers think?

Here are a few examples:

quote:
EUROPE - The legal abortion period is 10 weeks in France, Greece, Denmark, Norway and Portugal, 12 weeks in Germany, Belgium and Austria and 22 to 24 weeks in Britain, Spain, Switzerland and the Netherlands. Malta, Ireland and Poland still have highly restrictive abortion laws.

MUSLIM COUNTRIES - Islam bans the abortion of a living fetus, but some countries like Syria allow abortion in cases where there is a pressing medical need, such as a danger to the mother's health.

ISRAEL - A woman may terminate a pregnancy if she is not married, or if the pregnancy is the outcome of rape or poses health risks. Abortions are also allowed for women younger than 17 or older than 40.

CANADA - Abortion has been legal, for any reason at any time up to delivery, since the Supreme Court struck down an anti-abortion law in 1988.



From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 25 April 2008 08:52 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
G: From this sheet, it indicates that Canada has the most liberal abortion law on Earth, and is one of the few places abortion is legal anytime during pregnancy. What do babblers think?

I think there is no abortion law in Canada, which is a good thing, but you seem to have managed to miss that small point. In fact, writing about a "liberal" abortion law is sort of misleading, isn't it, Ghislaine?


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 25 April 2008 09:35 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Supplemental: I missed this the first time around ...

quote:
Reuters: MUSLIM COUNTRIES - Islam bans the abortion of a living fetus ...

This is simply false and misleading. It confuses Muslim countries with the religion itself, just as some people confuse Israel with the Jewish religion ...

quote:
As Islamic scholar Azizah al-Hibri says, "The majority of Muslim scholars permit abortion, although they differ on the stage of fetal development beyond which it becomes prohibited." After 120 days, abortion is permissible only to save the mother's life, where the pregnancy is harming an already suckling child, or when it is known that the fetus is malformed. Though the various schools of Islam differ on the time in which an abortion is permitted, al-Hibri says all "permit abortion for exigencies such as saving the mother's life."

USA Today: Where does God stand on abortion?

Yes, the Reuters piece is very "interesting" indeed ...


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 25 April 2008 09:50 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:

I think there is no abortion law in Canada, which is a good thing, but you seem to have managed to miss that small point. In fact, writing about a "liberal" abortion law is sort of misleading, isn't it, Ghislaine?


You are right, sorry about that. I guess I meant that the abcense of any abortion law is "liberal" in a freedom of choice kind of way, not in a Liberal Party passing C-484 kind of way.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 25 April 2008 09:53 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There are plenty of Canadian web sites on the history of abortion in Canada. Some of these give a good summary of the legal history as well. You might want to supplement your reading of Reuters with a peek at some of those other sites. Cheers.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 25 April 2008 10:38 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Too bad many countries around the world do not understand human equality rights, though admittedly the EU is trying, with their recent inclusion of women into the human species category.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 25 April 2008 11:07 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We have a great deal to proud of in this country, and that includes some global legal precedents. The first women in history to claim refugee status by virtue of her gender claimed such status in this country. The same sex marriage laws are another such precedent. So too is the lack of an abortion law in Canada.

Of course we have a long way to go, but such precedents point the way to the future, a future in which the dream of the full equality of women is a reality.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 25 April 2008 11:45 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A less rosy view of ourselves and of the future - C-484's little brother.

Conservative Party members of Parliament must have been the first surprised to see the Liberals help their fellow Ken Epp's C-484 private bill comfortably pass 2nd reading in Parliament six weeks ago. Now, other opponents of choice are happily crawling out of the woodwork.
Another good reason to vote the Conservatives out of office if the Opposition can ever get its act together...

quote:
(OTTAWA, April 16, 2008) - Conservative MP Maurice Vellacott (Saskatoon-Wanuskewin) today re-introduced a Private Member's Bill that would "prohibit coercion in medical procedures that offend a person's religion or belief that human life is inviolable. The bill seeks to ensure that health care providers will never be forced to participate against their will in procedures such as abortions or acts of euthanasia".

Mr. Vellacott's proposal - he chairs the official multi-party Pro-Life Parliamentary Committee - would enter into law the so-called "clause of conscience" that allows PEI women, for instance, and those of most of rural Canada to be denied access to abortion simply because no pro-choice doctor has been hired in their area of the country. Exit universality as a foundation of the Canada Health Act.

A former pastor, MP Vellacott is a long-time foe of women's reproductive rights, GLBT rights, the Court Challenges program and other irritants to
arch-Conservatives, such as the "God-like powers" of Canadian judges (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Vellacott)

[ 25 April 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
wanker
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12497

posted 25 April 2008 11:52 AM      Profile for wanker     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Question? And I honestly don't the exact answer.

When does the fetus actually become a person?
When its feet are all the way out, assuming the head came out first?
When the umbilical cord is cut?
None of the above?


From: ottawa | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 25 April 2008 12:10 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A fetus never is a person.

In Canada, we are supposed to gain legal protections as people with the drawing of our first breath.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 25 April 2008 12:14 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In our culture it's whenever a male authority figure decrees it to.
In the Roman empire, the baby was deemed a person when the paterfamilias raised it in his hands, "acknowledging" it. Those that didn't pass this test were left to die.
Then the Christian world made baptism the rite of passage into humanity. Indeed baptism was often delayed days or weeks to see if the child would live.
Now, the Canadian State has decreed that it is when it "has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother" (see below).
And a lot of people are trying to push back this limit and extend male control/definition of personhood before the birth process.
ETA: And no, women have never accepted these laws passively.

[ 25 April 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 25 April 2008 01:00 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wow, women sure are passive in your world. In mine, things have been changing. In some ways, significantly. And there is much hope for greater change.

Anyway, I believe in Canada it's with the first breath, not emergence. Trying to track down the exact reference. Might take me a couple of days.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 25 April 2008 01:06 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
writer is correct.

personhood happens at first breath, not upon exiting the vaginal canal.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 25 April 2008 01:21 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Criminal Code:

223. (1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether or not

(a) it has breathed;

(b) it has an independent circulation; or

(c) the navel string is severed.


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 25 April 2008 01:28 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have traced the following quote from Bloc québécois Justice Réal Ménard:
quote:
(...)“the state of the law indicates that the first rule in right-to-life issues is that a fetus is not a human being until it is out of the womb, has drawn its first breath, and is deemed living and viable.”(...) (in "Actions an Anti-Choice Government Can Take to Limit Your Access to Reproductive Health Service? A REPORT CARD", ACPD)

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 April 2008 01:41 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
Criminal Code:

223. (1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether or not

(a) it has breathed;

(b) it has an independent circulation; or

(c) the navel string is severed.


Well that's interesting - so according to this, a "child" is NOT a "human being" before it is born.

I guess that explains this part of Bill C-484:

quote:
(5) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the child is not a human being.

[ 25 April 2008: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 25 April 2008 01:49 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yup.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 25 April 2008 02:02 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
yes, it is that section of C484 which signified this was an attempt to grant personhood upon a fetus.

Thanks for that CC section 223 mspector, so then what the living state means is that there is a heart beat present after it has proceeded completely out of the canal and not at first breath


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
werestillhere
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15160

posted 25 April 2008 05:23 PM      Profile for werestillhere     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
CANADA - Abortion has been legal, for any reason at any time up to delivery, since the Supreme Court struck down an anti-abortion law in 1988.

I think this is a gross and misleading overstatement of facts. Before 12 weeks abortion is available in *certain areas* of Canada, or in other words only if the woman has the means to travel to a location where the procedure is available. In the second trimester you have to go to a hospital and may be at the mercy of the health professionals there and their particular biases. In the third trimester abortions are almost never performed, unless there is a grave risk to the mother's health. The quote above makes it sound as if Canadians are going around having abortions all the time, at any point in pregnancy, for any reason.


From: Montreal | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged
Gab
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14992

posted 25 April 2008 05:25 PM      Profile for Gab     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hello! I would just like to comment on the post made by Ghislaine that points out that when it comes to Canada and abortions we have,"the most liberal abortion law on Earth, and is one of the few places abortion is legal anytime during pregnancy."
While it is true that abortion is legal in Canada, in lieu of the recent anniversary of the momentous Morgentaler decision that gave Canadian women the right to an abortion, I would strongly question the above statement. While the media recently reflected back on the 1988 Supreme Court decision, it was brought to light that abortion is in fact becoming increasingly restricted accross the country. Consider that in PEI woman have nowhere to terminate an unwanted pregnancy at all. Fewer than 1 in 5 hospitals perform the service and in Ottawa the wait time for one can extend to six weeks, a danger for such a time-sensitive procedure. The arbitrary rules that have crept into the system have made a complete mockery of the Supreme Court ruling. Ghislaine's above statment just seems to reaffirm how many Canadians are under the illusion that Canada has strong abortion laws, when in fact they are only weakening. thoughts?

From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 25 April 2008 06:47 PM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Many thanks, M. Spector.

Gab, my understanding is that we have no abortion laws.

The issue is with access, and with having doctors who are willing to perform the procedure.

quote:
More than 13 years after the law criminalizing abortion in Canada was struck down and despite its status as a medically necessary service, access to abortion is becoming more and more restricted across the country. "Ironically, it seems to be getting worse rather than better since the Morgentaler decision in 1988," says Marilyn Wilson, executive director of the Canadian Abortion Rights Action League in Ottawa. "There are a number of barriers and the [number is increasing]."

On Jan. 28, 1988, the Supreme Court struck down the Criminal Code section that made it a criminal activity to perform an abortion, a section that had been used repeatedly to charge Dr. Henry Morgentaler. Three years later, a bill passed in the House of Commons to recriminalize abortion but was defeated in the Senate. Since then, there has been no federal abortion law and no legal restrictions against the procedure.

In theory, this means that a woman can legally obtain an abortion anywhere, but the continued lobbying by churches, antiabortion groups and some political parties, as well as the actions of extremists to create a climate of fear for abortion providers, means that obtaining an abortion has become increasingly difficult. The availability of abortions in Canada now depends on a woman's location and the size of her pocketbook.

"There are huge discrepancies in the availability of reproductive services, including abortion, from province to province and, of course, within provinces," says Martha Jackman, a constitutional law professor at the University of Ottawa. "I can't think of another medically necessary service that is so inaccessible."

Abortion services in Canada: a patchwork quilt with many holes


[ 25 April 2008: Message edited by: writer ]


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gab
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14992

posted 26 April 2008 09:22 AM      Profile for Gab     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
writer, what do you mean when you say we have no abortion laws?
yes that's a very interesting article. It's interesting how she talks about abortions being dependent on the size of your pocketbook.

From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 26 April 2008 09:40 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just what she says there are no abortion laws in Canada. It would be against women's human rights basiclally.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 26 April 2008 10:00 AM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Gab, she also explains why there are no laws regarding abortion in Canada. There's lots on the net about this.

Here's one:

quote:
Canada is one of the very few countries in the world that has NO criminal law restricting abortion at all. We first liberalized our law against abortion in 1969; then our Supreme Court threw it out completely in 1988. And we've been doing just fine without it. In the 11 years since we began our great experiment, we've found that doctors and women exercise the right to abortion responsibly, without the need for any legal restrictions.

Abortion in Canada: History, Law, and Access



From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gab
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14992

posted 26 April 2008 02:49 PM      Profile for Gab     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
oh right I see you what you mean. hmmm that's interesting. It brings to mind an interesting debate I've been following around university campuses in Canada where schools are taking away club status and funding for pro-life club groups. the pro-life groups are obviously upset and some of them are getting their status back as a result even after rightfully loosing their funding because of basically harassing women at abortion clinics. there's been a lot on written about it (especially on the Carleton campus)
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca