babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Women and equality: Still a long way to go

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Women and equality: Still a long way to go
Mick
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2753

posted 07 January 2004 06:25 PM      Profile for Mick        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Women and equality: Still a long way to go

Flashback to 1971, when delegates to CUPE’s national convention adopted a ground-breaking report on the status of women in CUPE. The report challenged the union to make changes in a number of areas to advance equal rights for women members both in the union and in the workplace.

Now, more than 30 years later, CUPE’s long history of fighting inequality and injustice for women in the workplace is beginning to pay off. Recent victories include a $414 million proxy pay equity payout in 2003 by the then- Conservative Ontario government to 100,000 women across the province, pay equity advances for health care workers in Saskatchewan and victories won through strikes large and small across the country.

While CUPE campaigns – like ‘Up with Women’s Wages’, focused on increasing the wages of female workers – are succeeding at the bargaining table, women’s political participation in the union has stalled. The retirement of National President Judy Darcy, and that of National Secretary-Treasurer Geraldine McGuire two years earlier, has left a female leadership void, say many women’s rights activists in the union.

“To go from a period where women have played a significant leadership role in CUPE to an executive board that is predominantly male leaves me asking, ‘Where are the women?’ This has to change,” says Denise Hammond, a worker at the Ryerson Students’ Administrative Council in Toronto and a member of CUPE 1281. She points out that there are 300,000 women in CUPE and “our issues must be better represented in our union through the visible presence of female leaders. It’s shocking that this kind of gender gap is happening.”

Read More...



From: Parkdale! | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 07 January 2004 06:40 PM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure what Hammond is on about... is being female a requirement for being pro-equality?
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 07 January 2004 07:01 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No. Having a female presence among the leaders of a union is necessary for pro-equality.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skadie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2072

posted 12 January 2004 04:44 PM      Profile for skadie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am a local Chairperson with the United Transportation Union.

I noticed when I first took the position about two years ago that there was no allowances for having a woman in that position. For example, all information was addressed to "Brother" or "Mr. Chairman." The Union handbooks were filled with little cartoons of men eyeing up the Presidents secretary who wore heels and a short skirt, or imagining pin-up girls while working. My boss complained about having to alter his papers to include me.

Two years later I've discovered that the Union doesn't take into account the challenges of women working for the Employers that they oversee. Women have an entirely different set of working challenges which aren't being addressed in Arbitration or Agreements.

I definitely think that if the Chief Officers of the Union had some female influence then women would have a much easier time securing and keeping jobs in the transportation industry.


From: near the ocean | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Heather
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 576

posted 12 January 2004 06:24 PM      Profile for Heather   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The retirement of National President Judy Darcy, and that of National Secretary-Treasurer Geraldine McGuire two years earlier, has left a female leadership void,
Why didn't these women have trainees during their term?

I've just been learning about women and globalization- I didn't realize globalization had such an impact on women.

For example, should Canada opt for the two tier health care and continue to cut support for home care, it pushes women back into the "volunteer" sector. Particularly for those families that can not afford to pay for these services up-front. YIKES!!


From: Planet Earth | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 January 2004 08:08 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Women already contribute more "volunteer" labour than people realize in the health care field anyhow. Who does it fall to, to take care of elderly and sick relatives? Often female members of the family and often unpaid - in fact, many women have to forgo outside work in order to take care of ailing relatives.

My grandfather has Parkinson's. For my grandmother and my aunt, his care was a full-time job (and now for my aunt, it's a part-time job on top of the other stuff she does in her life). For my mother, who works outside the home full-time, it was a second part-time job at least one day a week, and before he went to the nursing home (which took ages, btw, even though my grandmother was too old and frail to take care of him physically), the women in our family took turns sleeping at their place once a week to relieve my grandmother, who wasn't getting any sleep due to my grandfather wandering in the night.

So yeah, that's for sure - there's a hell of a lot of unpaid work being done by women. Sure, men do unpaid work as well, but I don't think it's anywhere near to the extent that women do, or at least that women are EXPECTED to do.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Heather
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 576

posted 12 January 2004 11:21 PM      Profile for Heather   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"For women around the world... globalization is not an abstract process unfolding on an elevated stage. It is concrete and actual. Female textile workers from... Eastern Germany are losing their jobs to women in Bangladesh; Filipinas clean vegetables and kitchens in Kuwait; Brazilian prostitutes offer their services around Frankfurt's main railway station; and Polish women look after old people at rock-bottom prices in... Germany.


Women & the Economy - An Introduction to Women and Globalization

From: Planet Earth | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca