Author
|
Topic: Is it time to get rid of the traditional wedding dress.
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 16 February 2005 11:43 PM
I believe the white wedding dress was a Victorian invention, no? I'd be more inclined to open things up to other colours and forms - but hasn't that been done a lot recently? Two marriages I've been to in France - in one the bride had a gown in sort of muted pastel medieval colours - she looked like a faerie queen from Brittany - their wedding was outdoors, sort of on the moors, under a moody sky - the other was a Jewish wedding (obviously they had done the obligatory civic wedding first, the only one with legal standing) the bride was Moroccan; the groom a Canadian of Polish origin. Lots of good cheer at that "mixed" (Ashkenazi and Sephardic) wedding! Both weddings had lots of good food, wine and music, of course. I haven't been to a gay wedding yet! I do have friends in France who did the PACS (more or less civil union) thing but I wasn't there - and I have two lesbian friends here who were supposed to tie the knot - but alas they broke up. Edited to add: not all abusers are white bigots, and I suppose not all are male. Alas the marriage of my grandma and grandpa evokes some of the colour and sex complexities Auntie raised in her column this week. [ 16 February 2005: Message edited by: lagatta ]
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402
|
posted 17 February 2005 01:59 AM
I don't know of any young women who wore their drandmother's wedding dress. They all bought new dresses in a traditional style. Why they want to is a mystery to me.Personally, i have no use for these confections - nor for elaborate, expensive weddings. I was married at city hall, wearing a simple ivory dress sewn by my mother, and had an informal party at my new home. My husband, though Caucasian, has never so much as called me a bad name in 24 years. My mother was married at a different city hall, wearing a fawn-coloured suit and a neat little hat. She was abused for many years. Both my grandmothers wore white, though nothing terribly fancy. One was widowed at age 32, before the romance even wore off, and never married again. The other raised 4 step-children and 3 of her own; her husband treated her with affection and respect through all of their life together. My daughter spent two months shopping for her perfect lacy white gown; seven months planning her wedding and reception. She and her groom payed - a lot! - for everything. It was all very pretty. Four years, one house and one baby later, they seem happy. I'm not seeing a pattern.
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 17 February 2005 02:13 AM
I don't think it's an overgeneralization to say that most guys aren't all that concerned with wedding dresses, and I suppose I'm no exception, but a fellow student when I was in school, a mature student, showed me a picture of her daughter's wedding, and her daughter was wearing a black dress. And it was spectacular.What made it fascinating (even to me) was that it was a perfectly classical style — almost iconic — but all in jet black. It didn't look "Gothy", or like it was stolen from the wardrobe room of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. If anything, it looked like a classical dress viewed in negative. I've been to and photographed plenty of weddings, but this is the only dress that's ever stood out in my mind.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943
|
posted 17 February 2005 03:31 AM
quote: What's with this stupid white dress and all the hand me downs from our grandmothers who were abused during there marriages. By accepting these sentimental gifts from our grandmothers are we not saying we accept the fact that they were abused by there white male bigots.
Am I the only one here who can see that this is clearly a troll? And a rather ham-handed one at that? And what's with this "we" business in reference to accepting grandma's wedding dress? The writer's profile lists his gender as male.
From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
ShyViolet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6611
|
posted 17 February 2005 03:48 AM
quote: Originally posted by voice of the damned:
Am I the only one here who can see that this is clearly a troll? And a rather ham-handed one at that? And what's with this "we" business in reference to accepting grandma's wedding dress? The writer's profile lists his gender as male.
that was my first thought and that's why i elected to not respond to him.
From: ~Love is like pi: natural, irrational, and very important~ | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 17 February 2005 07:15 AM
I don't know why anyone is replying to this troll, who is obviously pulling a parody of feminists. Every other post he's made have been trolling posts in other forums.Don't feed the trolls! (Oops, I didn't read past the first three posts when I posted this. Glad others noticed too.) [ 17 February 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
belva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8098
|
posted 17 February 2005 11:47 AM
My thoughts about the subject have varied. When I married--way back in 1968--I wore a "traditional" white dress. I enjoyed the ceremony & reception.After my divorce, eleven years later, I rejected the trappings of "traditional" weddings. When my daugther-in-law married my son, she made her own lovely gown, simple & extremely tasteful. Of my two daughters, one is married & one single. My married daughter bought a lovely "used" gown, altered it slightly, & looked beautiful in it. What made me enthusiastic again about "traditional" gowns was the wedding seven years ago of two lesbian friends. They both wore traditional white gowns AND veils. Both are beautiful persons, physically & spiritually. What spoke to me the most [this of course before Massachusetts, before Canada, before San Francisco]was the use of many traditional symbols by my friends to express the reality of their relationship, their love--a reality which much of the United States selects to ignore. A Unitarian minister performed the ceremony in a beautiful garden setting. When they lifted each others veils & kissed each other, I cried with joy for them. I understood at least something of their use of "traditional" symbols to teach the rest of us about love. I thanked them then & still thank them. It's not so much the symbol per se but what people express with the use of symbols. My friends taught me much.
From: bliss | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402
|
posted 17 February 2005 04:55 PM
quote: Originally posted by lagatta: Oh, I thought so too but it was a fun topic and not something I'd get particularly worked up about in any event so what the heck . I really wish I had the ability to post pictures. Renzo is so well turned out in his white tie and tail.
Same here. After all, spring is coming; all kinds - and i mean, all kinds - of people are planning weddings; the topic might even be sort of relevant. PS. What does Renzo's intended intend to wear?
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402
|
posted 18 February 2005 04:30 AM
quote: Originally posted by shaolin: Shit - does this mean I'm going to have to pick an outfit too?! I can't really see wearing a dress, at least not without trousers underneath. Me thinks it may be a good excuse for a new pair of sneakers though!
Gril, you always have to pick an outfit, even if you're just going to the pub, or the corner store, or bed (well, no... now that i recall those distant years, maybe that one's god-given). Nothing wrong with trousers. I've worn a dress maybe five times in the last 20 years - the same dress, actually; a long, slinky black job with big red flowers. Once i outgrew that, dresses pretty much lost their appeal. At city hall, the couple ahead of us was about 17 each. The bride wore new jeans with an elastic belly; the groom had on his old ones; neither had invested in new sneakers or shirt. The mother of the bride wore her Sunday dress and a permanent scowl. Two other young waifs, no flowers. Then, here we come, with mother, children, brothers, sisters-in-law, friends, all shined up, spiffy, solemn and happy... I've often wondered how long those kids lasted. You dress for how you feel. When you're in love, you generally want your SO to be proud; you generally want the world to notice and applaud. It's not the institution you're celebrating, but the union.
From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|