babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » StopWar is opposed to Israel: View from Left! Part II

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: StopWar is opposed to Israel: View from Left! Part II
sidra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11490

posted 16 August 2006 10:14 PM      Profile for sidra   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
American system stands as an opposition to dictatorships that are so common in many other parts of the world; hence it was and is a beacon of hope and freedom for many. venus_man

The thread had been closed for its length. I however cannot let such crap go unchalledged.

Egypt, Morroco, Tunisia, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Yemen (to name a few) are all dictatorships. Guess who is supporting these regimes, training their police forces, supplying them with the latest gadgets and teaching them the latest torture techniques in order to maintain them in power, in order to prevent "regime change" from dictatorships to democracies? The USA.

"American system stands as an opposition to dictatorships that are so common in many other parts of the world." Get the f*** off the potty and turn off that Fox channel that is filling your head with the shit you are downloading !!

[ 16 August 2006: Message edited by: sidra ]


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Odin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12824

posted 16 August 2006 11:40 PM      Profile for Odin     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought Jordan was a constitutional monarchy like Canada. The only difference is the monarchical veto can be overidden in Jordan.
From: Greater Vancouver | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged
venus_man
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6131

posted 17 August 2006 06:31 AM      Profile for venus_man        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wow, such anger requires an anger management, first of all, and then perhaps an intellegent conversation can emerge. Are you a Hiz-h agent, for they usually speak with such an meaningless angry “passion”? It seems that the anger is blinding you to a degree when you see only that which corresponds to your state of anger, if you know what I mean. I am saying that because you missed the point of what I was trying to convey. USA is a democracy as oppose to Iran for instance; it is a country where tens of millions of immigrants from all over the world come for freedom in a broadest sense of the word and hardly anybody leaves that country to immigrate somewhere else. The fact that you can express your political and social anger in such a way without being executed is democratic and speaks of freedom. I’m not sure who sponsors what for it is all too complicated and speculative and as I said, I do not agree with some of the US polices. So just relax and enjoy freedoms this country offers.
From: outer space | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 17 August 2006 07:51 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Are you a Hiz-h agent, for they usually speak with such an meaningless angry “passion”?

Apparently Hizbollah has cornered the market on "passion"?

quote:

it is a country where tens of millions of immigrants from all over the world come for freedom in a broadest sense of the word and hardly anybody leaves that country to immigrate somewhere else.

Once again Venus, you continually display that you have no clue Who would guess that the nations that consume 80% of the worlds resources amoungst it's 20% of the worlds population would have nearly nobody leaving? Of course none of the consumers want to leave to move to one of the nations they exploit.

You live in a happy, but very false reality Venus


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
venus_man
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6131

posted 17 August 2006 08:31 AM      Profile for venus_man        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is not really for you to judge what is false or true. You also consume, if not then please why don’t you go and live in your beloved Iran or become a Hiz-h agent for it seems you have enough anger towards western lifestyle and freedoms to be one of them. You clearly show disrespect for people of America and Canada by calling all of us a mere mindless consumers who exploit others. And who the heck are you to speak like that, if I may ask? Why are you here, in this country then (that is if you are here)? Interesting question isn’t it? Because if you are so “righteous” and “knowledgeable” and a non-consumer then go ahead, leave, the gates are open.
From: outer space | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 17 August 2006 08:50 AM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why is this fool still here? He's obviously a troll. C'mon guys, stop picking up those punk cards.

Now if you'll excuse my, I have a Hizbollah meet-and-greet pot luck to attend. I've made a tuna cassarole. MMMmmmm. Tuna. We're gonna be discussing what's the best way to remove fairy ring from your lawn. Oh, and how to remove Israel from the ME. I've heard you use vinnegar. Sounds like an old wives' tale to me. Cheerio.


From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
nister
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7709

posted 17 August 2006 08:54 AM      Profile for nister     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Comparing N. America to others has nothing to do with opposition to Israel, and her enablers.

In February of 1991, the IRA launched a mortar attack in the heart of London, targetted at 10 Downing St. One hit and shattered a tree just outside No. 10; two others landed at the neighbouring address, also a govt. building. If the British responded to this mortal peril the way Olmert responded to the capture of IDF soldiers, Dublin would have been flattened.

Who in their wildest dreams would have contemplated such a response?


From: Barrie, On | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 17 August 2006 09:27 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It is not really for you to judge what is false or true.

WHen you put up posts on this board that have no grounding in reality, then I feel I should point that out ^^

quote:
You clearly show disrespect for people of America and Canada by calling all of us a mere mindless consumers who exploit others.

Not all... Most are mere mindless consumers, but there are those that try to make a change (the more that wake up and realize what their ignorance is causing, the better). Go find your ecofootprint and see what this world would require for everyone to live like we do. Whether you accept it or not, we (we representing Europe and North America mainly) make up ~ 20% of the worlds population and we consume 80% of the current resources produced. If pointing out statistics is disrespectful, so be it... But I get the feeling it's pointing out how invalid your statements are that you find disrespectful.

[ 17 August 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
sidra
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11490

posted 17 August 2006 08:46 PM      Profile for sidra   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
USA is a democracy as oppose to Iran -venus_man

Iran was a democracy and guess who engineered the overthrow of its democratically- elected, secular (Mosadek) government in 1953 ?

Com'on, venus_man, make an effort !! Just one guess !

Other than that, in the same vein as what fellow Babblers have already submitted, it is a matter of survival that people would rather be on the side of consumption than misery. Nothing to do with "democracy" and "freedom". For the latter, guess which country has the highest rate of incarceration in the world with a disproportionate rate of minority incarceration ?


From: Ontario | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
venus_man
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6131

posted 18 August 2006 06:36 AM      Profile for venus_man        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well as someone pointed out above- this discussion has nothing to do with the title of the thread. I do realize that USA and Canada have policies problems and that politics is a dirty game in general. But please don’t say-ah poor Iran it was used by the USA. Bull. They have their own brains and as I’ve mentioned it is all too complicated and speculative for us to know exactly what and how things were happening, though some would pretend they know.

You speak of minorities. Those same minorities are rushing to N. America in search of freedoms and better life. Minorities have much better treatment in the US then in their countries of origins and even the EU. Plus I believe that N. American system gives you all opportunities to work on yourself and become whoever you want without much interference and interruption. You may grow up in the ghetto and become a senator or a movie star etc. Hence it al comes down to the individual, as long as military or dictatorial fears are not in your way.

To the title of the discussion. I’d say that Israel has all rights to damage and in fact get rid of hiz-h whose ideology is-Israel shouldn’t exist and, as their fatherland Iran’s dictators saying-holocaust was a mere joke with a full desire of repeating such. They do admire nazis and their salutation is the one nazis would use. They are degrading woman, brainwashing the population for one purpose-power and influence over same population. They can dress them all in black thus shutting down their emotional life, place green belts over their heads, so they would think unanimously, and fill their hearts with hatred towards anyone- Arab, Jew, westerner…anyone. What a stark difference from Israel that is a democratic state where Arabs, Sufis, Christians, Jews, Russians, Ethiopians live in a democracy with equal opportunities to growth and prosperity. You can be a political activist, criticize the government, be in an opposition, dress like hippy and do whatever…


From: outer space | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 18 August 2006 08:10 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Israel that is a democratic state where Arabs, Sufis, Christians, Jews, Russians, Ethiopians live in a democracy with equal opportunities to growth and prosperity

Hehe, what a wonderful reality you live in Venus. In some ways I wish your reality was true ^^. Now please go tell the Israeli-Arabs who are referred to as '2-legged cockroaches' and explain to them that they have equal opportunities ^^


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
venus_man
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6131

posted 18 August 2006 08:26 AM      Profile for venus_man        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From Wikipedia:

“Israeli Arabs are full citizens of the State of Israel, with equal protection under the law, and full rights of due process. Unlike Jewish citizens, they cannot be drafted into the Israeli army, but they may serve voluntarily. There are currently twelve Israeli Arabs sitting as members of the 17th Knesset out of a total of 120 seats, and there is one Arab judge, Justice Salim Jubran, sitting in the Supreme Court of Israel. Ariel Sharon's 2001 cabinet included one Israeli Arab minister, Salah Tarif, and in March 2005, Oscar Abu Razaq was appointed Director General of the Ministry of Interior. Arabic is one of Israel's official languages.”
"...In July 2006, the Israeli Government decided to brand all Arab communities in the country as 'class A' development areas, thus making them eligible for tax benefits. This decision aims to encourage investments in the Arab sector"

[ 18 August 2006: Message edited by: venus_man ]


From: outer space | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
pogge
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2440

posted 18 August 2006 09:56 AM      Profile for pogge   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by venus_man:
But please don’t say-ah poor Iran it was used by the USA. Bull. They have their own brains and as I’ve mentioned it is all too complicated and speculative for us to know exactly what and how things were happening...

Since you like Wikipedia:

quote:
On 4 April 1953 CIA director Dulles approved $1 million to be used "in any way that would bring about the fall of Mossadegh". Soon the CIA's Tehran station started to launch a propaganda campaign against Mossadegh. Finally, according to The New York Times, in early June, American and British intelligence officials met again, this time in Beirut, and put the finishing touches on the strategy. Soon afterward, according to his later published accounts, the chief of the CIA's Near East and Africa division, Kermit Roosevelt, Jr. a grandson of Theodore Roosevelt, arrived in Tehran to direct it.

The plot, known as Operation Ajax, centered around convincing Iran's monarch to use his constitutional authority to dismiss Mossadegh from office, as he had attempted some months earlier. But the Shah was uncooperative, and it would take much persuasion and many meetings to successfully execute the plan. Meanwhile, the CIA stepped up its operations. According to Dr. Donald N. Wilber, who was involved in the plot to remove Mossadegh from power, in early August, Iranian CIA operatives pretending to be socialists and nationalists threatened Muslim leaders with "savage punishment if they opposed Mossadegh," thereby giving the impression that Mossadegh was cracking down on dissent, and stirring anti-Mossadegh sentiments within the religious community.

Mossadegh became aware of the plots against him and grew increasingly wary of conspirators acting within his government. He set up a national referendum to dissolve parliament. Some purport that the vote was rigged, with Mossadegh claiming a 99.9 percent victory for the "yes" side. Allegations that Mossadegh was resorting to dictatorial tactics to stay in power were in turn cited by US- and British-supported opposition press as a reason to remove Mossadegh from power. Parliament was suspended indefinitely, and Mossadegh's emergency powers were extended.

Inside Iran, Mossadegh's popularity was eroding as promised reforms failed to materialize [6] and the economy continued to suffer due to heavy British sanctions. The Tudeh Party abandoned its alliance with Mossadegh, as did the conservative clerical factions.

In August 1953 Mossadegh attempted to convince the Shah to leave the country. The Shah refused, and formally dismissed the Prime Minister, in accordance with the foreign intelligence plan.


Doesn't seem all that complicated.


From: Why is this a required field? | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca