babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » U.I cutbacks details?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: U.I cutbacks details?
Shipgone
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5368

posted 02 May 2004 03:03 PM      Profile for Shipgone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not that familiar with the details of the UI cuts that were made by P. MArtin back in 95? What were the deplorable features of these cutbacks.

thanks


From: TO | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Polunatic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3278

posted 02 May 2004 03:08 PM      Profile for Polunatic   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You only need to start one thread per topic.
From: middle of nowhere | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sara Mayo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3714

posted 02 May 2004 03:57 PM      Profile for Sara Mayo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This topic seems better suited to the labour forum than the media forum, so I suggest the discussion take place in this thread.

The Canadian Labour Congress has a detailled report on the problems with the current EI system.

Here are some quotes from the summary which answer your question:

quote:
There were four rounds of changes in the 1990's.

The first two rounds, one at the end of 1990 (Bill C-21), and a second in early 1993 ( C-113 ), reduced protection from 74% of the unemployed in 1990 to 57% in 1993.

The third round came with the 1994 Budget. The legislation cut the length of the benefit period by as much as 50% for many claimants, and laid the base for the benefit structure that would be used for the introduction of Employment Insurance in 1996.

The tougher eligibility rules in the 1994 legislation reduced insurance coverage from 57% of the unemployed in 1993 to 42% in 1996.

The fourth round came with the introduction of Employment Insurance, and the conversion of the “weeks system” as the measure of labour force attachment to an “hours system.” More significantly, EI more than tripled the minimum qualifying hours. It also reduced further the length of the benefit period, and quadrupled the weeks to qualify for thousands of part-time workers.

...

With both qualifying requirements, and the length of the benefit period determined by a very complex schedule tied to the monthly unemployment rates in 58 different EI regions across the country, coverage ratios vary widely from region to region, province to province, and city to city.

Thirteen of the 24 cities have coverage below 30%. In several cities, less than a quarter of the city’s unemployed receive UI.

The differences are more than geographic. The difference in coverage between men and women is large and has widened with the introduction of Employment Insurance in 1996. The gender gap widens even more for specific age groups.


There's more, but the website is having problems loading right now...

[ 02 May 2004: Message edited by: Sara Mayo ]


From: "Highways are monuments to inequality" - Enrique Penalosa | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Shipgone
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5368

posted 03 May 2004 02:54 PM      Profile for Shipgone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the info Sara I had no idea how brutal the cuts had been.

Dan


From: TO | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Wilf Day
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3276

posted 05 May 2004 12:45 AM      Profile for Wilf Day     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A great organizing tool is a forum on the travesty our national unemployment insurance program has become over the years, and talking about strategies to fix it. For example:

quote:
Northumberland Labour Council and Coalition Against Poverty
Invite you to attend our workshop
EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE:
THE REAL STORY
Tuesday, May 18th at 7:30 pm
United Way office, Suite 203, Fleming Building
1005 Elgin Street West, Cobourg

Guest Speaker: Jacquie Chic, Executive Director, Income Security Advocacy Centre, Toronto

• learn how weeks became hours and why we all pay premiums but few of us can ever collect benefits

• find out about the huge E.I. surplus and why workers can’t access paid retraining anymore

• join us as we look for ways to make Employment Insurance work to benefit Canadians again



From: Port Hope, Ontario | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca