babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » "men are jerks" [tongue in my cheek!] ....

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: "men are jerks" [tongue in my cheek!] ....
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062

posted 15 February 2005 07:52 AM      Profile for thwap        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But besides that, have any of you ever read or do you know of a work of scholarship that traces the roots of misogyny in human societies?

Perhaps a work of anthropology or feminist theory?

[ 15 February 2005: Message edited by: thwap ]


From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mush
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3934

posted 15 February 2005 09:41 AM      Profile for Mush     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There's always Engels.
From: Mrs. Fabro's Tiny Town | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 10:09 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
thwap, many of the major works of the late sixties / early seventies stage of the women's movement made claims that verged on the anthropological -- I'm thinking of de Beauvoir, Greer, Kate Millett, etc -- although I don't think anyone would value them for that today.

Through the seventies, I think that women were still struggling with biological determinism -- rejecting it for themselves some of the time, and yet constructing socio-historical (and sometimes anthropological) arguments about gender difference and the patriarchy.

Just by googling, I found this site that makes that point, and then describes the more complex narratives that began to develop in the 1980s:

quote:
third wave feminism. This period extends roughly from 1980 to the present. Anthropologists had been "haunted" by biological determinism which suggested that gender was a straight forward cause and effect phenomenon from physiological differences. However, these questions cannot be simplified to a cause and effect relationship and the trends since the 1980s propose a reversal of the earlier separation of biology and culture by indicating that sex is also a social category like gender, because people do have social expectations which are based on the physical body. Additionally, more detailed work in endocrinology and physiology made it increasingly difficult to distinguish between biology and cultural factors. The dichotomies stressed by second wave feminist were problematic at times because it was so hard to separate women from men and other factors such as class. This coupled with Said’s Orientalism, as well as postmodern discourse, encouraged an evaluation of representation and as a result a number of non white, non middle class voices were added. Furthermore, being categorized as woman no longer supersedes other distinctions and roles. Class, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, religion, etc. are also recognized as important characteristics that diversify the category of women; in other words it is acknowledged that all women do not have the same universal needs and experiences. Feminism pioneered work in representation, recognizing that theories are influenced by historical, political, social, and cultural contexts which brings about questions regarding anthropologists relationships with their informants. Feminism in the 1980s and 1990s has centered on production and work, reproduction and sexuality, and gender and the state (Lamphere 1997; Morgen 1989). It has also been during this time that men in the "Anthropology of Men" began to look at "man" in a similar manner as feminist had been evaluating "woman." In the 1990s women’s studies would be changed to gender studies, reflecting a more comprehensive perspective.

A bit lumpy, but a useful overview of the way the work itself has changed. Interesting that that site also reminds us to look back to Margaret Mead, eg, already working in the 1920s.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062

posted 15 February 2005 10:31 AM      Profile for thwap        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks skdadl,

I'd already been referred to Mead. I'll have to check her out.
I thought I'd ask here before googling because I have no way of separating wheat from chaff when it comes to this sort of thing.
I know there are some feminist scholars who hang out here.

Thanks again


From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 10:35 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
thwap, also have a scan through lonecat's thread below in this forum, called Women's Studies 100. Good reading suggestions there, and lonecat is giving us an outline of the course he's doing.

[ 15 February 2005: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 15 February 2005 10:50 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Am I allowed to criticize a thread title like this in the feminism forum?
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 15 February 2005 10:54 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Magoo, if you hadn't made this post by about noon, we would have started to worry about you.
From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 15 February 2005 10:56 AM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Glad I could set your mind at ease. Next time, why not try being consistent and make it for me?

This wouldn't fly on any other forum, so why should it here?


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 11:05 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
thwap has special dispensation.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 15 February 2005 11:06 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, I also find the thread title offensive. It needs quotes around it, to better indicate what the thread is about, which is not a blanket condemnation of men, but something rather different.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 15 February 2005 11:09 AM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
thwap has special dispensation.

Because....?


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 11:13 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I said that partly because it becomes immediately clear from thwap's first post that he was writing tongue-in-cheek when he thought up his attention-grabbing title.

But I also said it partly to annoy Mr Magoo.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438

posted 15 February 2005 11:13 AM      Profile for Hailey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If someone made a thread that said "women are jerks, blacks are jerks, asians are jerks etc" it would be dealt with differently than "men are jerks" and the reason eludes me.

How tragic that persons regard their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons as jerks.

Just for the record if you have had nothing but an endless series of negative experiences with 50% of the population that is very troublesome. I believe the reasons for that are larger than "men are jerks". I have a wonderful husband, father, brother, nephews, brothers in laws, and friends. They are not "jerks" and you have no right to assume that without the benefit of knowing them.

Perhaps someone can help me understand how persons can reconcile such bold hate-filled generalizations with being a person that celebrates anything decent or right.

You would demand a man be banned if he did the same thing.


From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 11:17 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Knowing thwap, I suspect that he is going to be very happy to modify his attention-grabber as soon as he gets back here, although I have no idea when that will be.

It is perfectly plain that no one who posted to this thread before Hailey was taking any of the views that Hailey seems to be imputing, not just to the thread title, but to some of us.

I mean, what can you do? Sigh.

[Edited to correct dangling participle. ]

[ 15 February 2005: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 15 February 2005 11:21 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hailey:
How tragic that persons regard their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons as jerks.
Actually, it's more tragic that some of them ARE jerks. But we know, of course, that it's unfair and unethical to paint an entire gender in a negative light. The fact that Thwap's title is tongue-in-cheek becomes apparent after you read his opening post, but I really feel that the title needs quotes around it to indicate that off the bat. Provocative thread titles that only provoke and advance nothing don't really serve the content of the thread very well.

From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 15 February 2005 11:30 AM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Perhaps someone can help me understand how persons can reconcile such bold hate-filled generalizations with being a person that celebrates anything decent or right.


Hailey:

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that most men, be they pro-feminist, anti-feminist, or whatever, don't really get offended if they hear a woman saying "men are all jerks". Whatever you think about men's willingness to tolerate such "abuse", the fact is if men don't care about it they're not gonna complain about it, and if they don't complain about it, then women aren't gonna worry too much about saying it.

Yes, I know the "men's rights" crowd thinks it's offensive and damaging to men to hear such misandry freely spouted, however in my experience they are pretty much a self-proclaimed voice on that particular issue. I don't think I've ever heard a man who wasn't a bona fide member of some "men's group" say that he is bothered by women calling men "jerks" and whatnot.

[ 15 February 2005: Message edited by: voice of the damned ]


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438

posted 15 February 2005 11:34 AM      Profile for Hailey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Alright. Well........satire and tongue in cheek stuff often ZIPS over my head...so it's my fault for taking something seriously that wasn't intended to be.

I considered editing it out but then it wouldn't make sense - the 2-3 posts that followed - so I'll let it sit untouched.

[ 15 February 2005: Message edited by: Hailey ]


From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 15 February 2005 11:57 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Besides, thwap is right. As a rule, men are jerks. All of them except for me
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 15 February 2005 12:03 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not a jerk. I'm an asshole....and I'm proud of it.

quote:
Folks, I's like to sing a song about the American dream. About me. About you. About the way our American hearts beat way down in the bottom of our chests. About the special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts-maybe below the cockles-maybe in the sub-cockle area. Maybe in the liver. Maybe in the kidneys. Maybe even in the colon, we dont know.

(singing)

I'm just a regular Joe with a regular job
I'm your average white suburbanite slob
I like football and porno and books about war
I've got an average house with a nice hardwood floor
My wife and my job
My kids and my car
My feet on my table
And a cuban cigar

But sometimes that just ain't enough
To keep a man like me interested
(oh no) Uh-uh (no way)
No, I've gotta go out and have fun
At someone else's expense
(Oh yeah)
Yeah yeah
(Yeah yeah)
Yeah Yeah Yeah Yeah Yeah

I drive really slow in the ultra fast lane,
While people behind me are going insane

I'm an asshole
(He's an asshole)
I'm an asshole
(He's an asshole, such an asshole)

I use public toilets
and I piss on the seat
I walk around in the summertime
Sayin', "How 'bout this heat?"

I'm an asshole
(He's an asshole)
I'm asshole
(He's the world's biggest asshole)

Sometimes I park in the handicapped spaces,
While handicapped people
Make handicapped faces

I'm an asshole
(He's an asshole)
I'm asshole
(He's a real fucking asshole)

Maybe I shouldn't be singing this song
Rainting and raving and carrying on
Maybe they're right when they tell me I'm
Wrong......

Nah!!

I'm an asshole
(He's an asshole)
I'm asshole
(He's the world's biggest asshole)

You know what I'm going do? I'm gonna get myself a 1967 Cadillac Eldorado convertable - hot pink with whaleskin hubcaps and all-leather interior and big brown baby seal eyes for the headlights, yea! I'm gonna drive around in that baby at 115mph, getting one mile per gallon, sucking down Quarter Pounder cheeseburgers from McDonald's in the old-fashioned nonbiodegradable containers. When I'm done suckin' down those greaseball burgers, I'm gonna toss the Styrofoam container right out the side and there ain't a goddamned thing anybody can do about it. You know why? Because we got the bombs, that's why. Two words nuclear fuckin weapons, okay? Russia, Czechslovakia, Romania - they can have all the democracy they want, have a big democracy cakewalk walk through the middle of Tianamen Square and it won't make a lick of difference because we've got the bombs, okay?!

John Wayne's not dead - he's frozen. And as soon as we find a cure for cancer we're gonna thaw out the Duke and he's gonna be pretty pissed off. You know why? Have you ever taken a cold shower? Well multiply that by 15,000,000 times - thats how pissed off the Duke's gonna be. I'm gonna get the Duke and John Cassavetes and Lee Marvin and Sam Peckinpah and a case of whisky and drive down to Texas...

(Hey)
and have a humongous barbecure-
(Hey)
we're gonna go to LBJ's ranch and start a bonfire
(Hey!)
and throw deer and rabbits and cats and old people, and-
(HEY!)
slow drivers and MIckey Rourke and - (HEY)
(You know something? You really are an asshole)
Shut up and sing the song, pal

(He's an asshole)
You empty little simp. I thought I was the asshole-
(He's a real fucking asshole)
And it was him the whole time
(He's an asshole
(He's the world's biggest asshole)
A-S-S-H-O-L-E
(everybody!)
A-S-S-H-O-L-E
Arf arf arf arf arf arf arf
Chimg fump ching puh fluh cluh bing
Ooh ooh ooh ooh
I'm an asshole and I'm proud of it.



From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 15 February 2005 12:57 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The most unfortunate thing about inappropriately worded thread titles (of all sorts) is that they end up with a derailed discussion, and are ultimately futile.

However, IIRC, even sarcastic racism or sexism is considered inappropriate here.

Hopefully the thread title will change, or more likely thwap will start a new thread that doesn't result in a derailed discussion.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 15 February 2005 12:57 PM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
How tragic that persons regard their fathers, brothers, husbands and sons as jerks.

Tragic? Hardly.

quote:
You would demand a man be banned if he did the same thing.

You have said and implied worse about feminists in this very forum and your still here.

And for a true misogynist, jerk would be too delicate of a description which leads me to conclude that thwap was playing with us and I really can't get worked up over a teasing comment directed at the group that is never marginalized in any society I can think of.


From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 15 February 2005 01:38 PM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe men aren't jerks after all.

But boys are still icky.



From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 15 February 2005 01:42 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by housemouse:
But boys are still icky.



Dare I say that girls have girl fleas?


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
cynic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2857

posted 15 February 2005 01:45 PM      Profile for cynic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, I said that partly because it becomes immediately clear from thwap's first post that he was writing tongue-in-cheek when he thought up his attention-grabbing title.

Not really - it isn't immediately clear that it is tounge-in-cheek, it is clear that it is stupid though.
That thwap, what a jerk.


From: Calgary, unfortunately | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 01:46 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by housemouse:
Maybe men aren't jerks after all.

But boys are still icky.




From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 15 February 2005 01:47 PM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Not really - it isn't immediately clear that it is tounge-in-cheek, it is clear that it is stupid though.
That thwap, what a jerk.

A reply like this doesn't leave you much room to really be namecalling though does it?


From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
cynic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2857

posted 15 February 2005 01:58 PM      Profile for cynic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sure it does. I could do it all night. Jerk.
From: Calgary, unfortunately | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Scout
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1595

posted 15 February 2005 02:03 PM      Profile for Scout     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: Toronto, ON Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 February 2005 02:05 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That sounds lonely. Also not very restful.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
thwap
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5062

posted 15 February 2005 02:06 PM      Profile for thwap        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Knowing thwap, I suspect that he is going to be very happy to modify his attention-grabber as soon as he gets back here, although I have no idea when that will be.

Right this very second. (Haven't even read the whole thread yet, but it appears to have gotten nasty.)


From: Hamilton | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 February 2005 02:10 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In the tongue-in-cheek spirit, a little prayer for men from ""Red Green".

ahem.

I'm a man.
But I can change.
If I have to.
I guess.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 15 February 2005 02:23 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On the initial question, I would agree with Mush and a have a look at Engels. Try, "The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State." Just don't stop with old Freddie. But he will give you a clear picture of likely historical development: hunter-gatherers, later, agriculture and the development of a "social" surplus, hence the "necessity" to dispose of that surplus, and the first class-like division in human society: men and women. Engels also situates the existence of the state as proof of the existence of insoluble contradictions in a society, since a part of society placing itself above the rest of society is a kind of absurdity. Anarchists and Marxists have similar perspectives at this point.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Dr. Mr. Ben
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3265

posted 15 February 2005 02:36 PM      Profile for Dr. Mr. Ben   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In the same vein of intriguing but vaguely dubious mythopoetic histories, Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents might be an interesting companion to some of your other reading.
From: Mechaslovakia | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 16 February 2005 08:43 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought this was a thread about the actor-comedian, Steve Martin.

New Accounts Bank Manager: I will need two pieces of identification.
Navin R. Johnson: ah yes. I have my temporary driver's license - and - my astronaut application form... I didn't pass that though, I failed everything but the date of birth


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca