babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Periods continued from women in Canadian army

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Periods continued from women in Canadian army
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 05 June 2006 10:14 AM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I 'm just going to ask the question how many women actually spend a week a month, going about their day thinking about how terrible their period is ? My reaction usualy is-"oh its that time again, okay." Its not my focus in life.
I totally have sympathy for those women who have edometriosis (sorry if that's spelt wrong), and its resonable for those women not to see getting your periods as a great thing or a no big deal thing.
However I would like to sumbit that the following attitudes are oppressive and anti-feminist :

quote:
I'm assuming that women in combat roles would be pre-menopausal due to their age. What the heck does a woman do, out in the battlefield, when she has her period? I've wondered about this for years. Like, really, what do you do when you're bleeding like a stuck pig, cramping, tired, etc.? Just go off into the bush and change pads?

quote:
I find it hard to believe that any woman welcomes the onset of her monthly menses as a New Agey celebration of life instead of a bloody bore that has to be dealt with.

It just seems to me that these ideas lock into the overall very old, mysoginist ideas that the female body (and thus women as women are only bodies with no brains, after all this is what our culture is always saying to us)is inherently weak, so since woman = body then women are inferior. The female body is weak, always sick, and periods are a sign of that sickness. These ideas have their sources in Ancient Greece. The Ancient Greekas considered women malformed men, subhuman- something had happened in the womb that they had not become men, they were errors, birth defects. Women's sexuality, women 's bodies are feared because we can bleed a whole darn lot without dying once a month - so by saying that we're inferior, dangerous, we must be taken care of, kept under control. In feminist terms, this means oppressed.

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Pride for Red Dolores ]

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Pride for Red Dolores ]


From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
slimpikins
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9261

posted 05 June 2006 10:42 AM      Profile for slimpikins     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When I was a kid, I was raised by my mother, aunt, and sister. I was the only person in the house who didn't menstruate (being the only male). I remember when my sister hit menarche, there was a big family party for her and I remember feeling somewhat left out of the club. So, I totally don't understand the whole 'weakness' thing that is sometimes assosciated with menstruating, I always considered it somewhat assosciated with the inherent power of womanhood.
From: Alberta | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 05 June 2006 11:43 AM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It just seems to me that these ideas lock into the overall very old, mysoginist ideas that the female body ...is inherently weak, so since woman = body then women are inferior.

I think you may be reading a bit too much into the first quote to come to this conclusion... From a male point of view, it does seem the innocent question (perhaps not worded the best, I don't like the stuck pig term personally). I have (along with the poster I assume) no experience with this and am curious myself what women in the military go through (and moreover have a strong concern that women are being treated as inferiors because of it). So I don't see that inquiry as mysoginic, but instead an attempt to better understand.

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]


From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
hopebird
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6565

posted 05 June 2006 12:15 PM      Profile for hopebird     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Noise:

I think you may be reading a bit too much into the first quote to come to this conclusion... From a male point of view, it does seem the innocent question (perhaps not worded the best, I don't like the stuck pig term personally). I have (along with the poster I assume) no experience with this and am curious myself what women in the military go through (and moreover have a strong concern that women are being treated as inferiors because of it). So I don't see that inquiry as mysoginic, but instead an attempt to better understand.

[ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]


I disagree.

The inquiry uses VERY loaded language and from first glance its intentions suspicious. I mean, comm. on, who says crap like,"..what do you do when you're bleeding like a stuck pig...." What vile language. The imagery is violent and, as a woman who actually experience menstruation, substantially over-stated as well. The author also assumes that all women experience symptoms that make then a “burden” i.e "cramping, tired, etc.?" Women experience a ariety of symptoms that, with the exception of the most serious medical cases, are dealt with quite effortlessly.

This line "Just go off into the bush and change pads?" is especially funny to me. Yes, that is exactly what they do. Why is that so hard to believe that we just manage?

And pads are a relatively new addition to history. What does this author think women did pre-"feminine hygiene product?" Just lay down and die. What about women who don’t have the privilege of running to Shopper’s Drug Mart for “supplies.” Imagine the “mystery” they must inspire in this jerk.

I think the passage is at best insensitive and misguided (not to mention just plain simplistic and absurd) and at worst (likely) misogynistic and aimed at devaluing the capabilities of women in combat (and elsewhere).

~L


From: Regina, Sask | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noise
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12603

posted 05 June 2006 01:09 PM      Profile for Noise     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You are correct hopebird, the question is horribly worded and implies much of what you have stated here (sorry if I've implied otherwise). The intent of my post was to point out that the question itself does have validity (especially if women soldiers are being discriminated against because of this), despite the wording being poor.
From: Protest is Patriotism | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged
nuclearfreezone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9059

posted 05 June 2006 01:47 PM      Profile for nuclearfreezone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I'm the original poster and if you had read my profile you would have seen that I'm a female born in 1951. I've had my fair share of periods, now post-menopausal, and know of what I speak.
From: B.C. | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
nuclearfreezone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9059

posted 05 June 2006 01:51 PM      Profile for nuclearfreezone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Short posts 'cause my computer keeps crashing.

I apologize if the terminology was offensive but that's the way I felt especially after baby #2 and when I started moving into menopause. I certainly felt more tired on those days. That doesn't imply that women are weak, far from it; it only states a fact, I was extraordinarily tired on those days. Other women must be too. But I still ran a business and looked after my kids, a single parent so no, not weakness, just tired.


From: B.C. | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 05 June 2006 02:05 PM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As far as I know, before the disposables most women use today in the west, sponges and rags were used.
And I understand that the question of what women do in the army during their periods is just one of curiosity- I object to infered attitudes and ideas towards mensturation being expressed.

From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 June 2006 04:37 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I guess it wouldn't be possible for women to use a reusable cup like the Diva Cup when they're on a mission, huh? It would probably be hard to get it clean - I tend to sterilize mine before using it.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 05 June 2006 04:54 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It just seems to me that these ideas lock into the overall very old, mysoginist ideas that the female body (and thus women as women are only bodies with no brains, after all this is what our culture is always saying to us)is inherently weak, so since woman = body then women are inferior.

I thought what women did monthly helped keep their risk of heart attack down. To my mind, that's one in the "superior" column.

Of course, there was the time that I was paired with a female NCO a full foot shorter than me for unarmed combat drills. I don't know how many times she proceeded to make me eat the mat.


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 05:01 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
I guess it wouldn't be possible for women to use a reusable cup like the Diva Cup when they're on a mission, huh? It would probably be hard to get it clean - I tend to sterilize mine before using it.

Nothing is ever truely clean... the sand there is powder-fine and gets into everything...


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 June 2006 05:17 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, that's what I figured. Which is why it's probably not a great idea to use a silicone, reusable cup that you insert into the vagina. Probably a good way to get a nasty infection. Although it's too bad, because once it's in, it's probably the most convenient thing a woman can use, since it doesn't need to be emptied as often as a tampon or pad needs to be changed, it stays in place, and you can pretty much forget about it for hours after you put it in.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 05:51 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Considering what is in the dust and sand, yep, raging infection for sure. My eyes got infected just from the constant dust...

Doesn't the birth control shot stop mensturation? IIRC that is what some female soldiers do for a tour, one less thing to worry about. I would imagine even using disposable products would be risky in an environment where you don't wash for days or weeks at a time while "outside the wire".


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 05 June 2006 06:06 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Depends on how you do it. I've heard that with the three month shot, you don't have a period for the whole time you're on it, but I don't know if that's true. You can also do a little trick with the pill where you don't take a break for the fourth week of the cycle, you just start the next round of pills right away, and it stops you from having your period. I've got to wonder just how safe that is though. I mean, I figure we probably get rid of that stuff from our systems for a reason.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 06:22 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Probably safer to do that for six months than risk the alternative though...

I bet there is someone, somewhere looking at this subject in detail. Field hygiene and preventative medicine is a huge concern for the military. Historicaly more people are loss to sickness and infections than to enemy action.


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
nuclearfreezone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9059

posted 05 June 2006 07:55 PM      Profile for nuclearfreezone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Field hygiene. Excellent term. Quite a few years ago there were several cases of toxic shock syndrome related to the use of tampons.

And what does one do with the spent material, so to speak, when you're in enemy territory and don't want to leave any traces behind? The military must have a procedure for this, I'm thinking. Does anybody know?


From: B.C. | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 08:05 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by nuclearfreezone:
Field hygiene. Excellent term. Quite a few years ago there were several cases of toxic shock syndrome related to the use of tampons.

And what does one do with the spent material, so to speak, when you're in enemy territory and don't want to leave any traces behind? The military must have a procedure for this, I'm thinking. Does anybody know?


You pack it out in a ziploc bag. The same as your crap, TP, and anything else you brought in with you.


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Webgear
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9443

posted 05 June 2006 08:07 PM      Profile for Webgear     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You carry all waste (all garbage) out of the field with you.

I use to carry a water proof bag for waste products.


From: Montgomery's Tavern | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 08:10 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:
You carry all waste (all garbage) out of the field with you.

I use to carry a water proof bag for waste products.


Good times in the infantry!


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 05 June 2006 08:32 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mike878:
You pack it out in a ziploc bag. The same as your crap, TP, and anything else you brought in with you.

quote:
Originally posted by Webgear:
You carry all waste (all garbage) out of the field with you.
I use to carry a water proof bag for waste products.

Good lord, why? Why not just bury it? It sounds like you guys are hiking in Canadian National Parks or something.

As a side note, I recall reports of little boots carting around a portable potty (although a thousands times more sophisticated than the roadside ones) when he travelled to certain countries. The reason given was to protect Bush's DNA.


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732

posted 05 June 2006 08:42 PM      Profile for Mike878        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's only done when you're in enemy territory sneaking and peaking... anything you leave gives them clues as to your groups's disposition, size, etc etc...

Otherwise it's usualy buried in latrines, or burned with diesel, or collected and treated (or dumped) by sewage trucks...


From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 05 June 2006 09:58 PM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, that makes sense.

I no longer need to think of our military returning from forays into the more rural parts of Kandahar with their Bison's laden with ... um... zip lock bags.

I wonder how conservatives like the Taliban view female coalition forces. Not much different than they viewed Soviet trained female personnel perhaps.


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Surrender_Monkey
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12700

posted 05 June 2006 10:42 PM      Profile for Surrender_Monkey        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by siren:
I wonder how conservatives like the Taliban view female coalition forces. Not much different than they viewed Soviet trained female personnel perhaps.

Unfortunately many Afghans don't know what to make of our women in uniform. I had one female soldier tell me that Afghans just assume they are prostitutes as the Russians brought prostitutes with them and dressed them up in uniforms. On the other hand, women working in Kandahar say that the men down there often treat them as 'honorary men'. I figure that's because they don't really know how to take them otherwise!

SM


From: Canada | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
Loretta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 222

posted 06 June 2006 06:20 AM      Profile for Loretta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When I was in the CF, Canadian military men, including many of my own age, viewed their female counterparts in much the same way -- either as those who slept around or those who were closeted "dykes". Periods were considered a valid reason to keep women out of many fields of employment within the CF, including aircrew (I was in the airbranch), field related jobs (army) and ship duties.

There were those few who were considered "honorary men" -- those who took on being "one of the guys" but they were rare. In any case, our status was always viewed through the male lens. Our rank was even designated with an "(F)" following it and all documents carried that designation. I don't know if that's still the case.

Most women in the CF would be pre-menopausal, but obviously there are simple ways to deal with that. It's bizarre to think that it takes so long to turn these attitudes around.


From: The West Kootenays of BC | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 06 June 2006 10:31 AM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
When I was a kid, I was raised by my mother, aunt, and sister. I was the only person in the house who didn't menstruate (being the only male). I remember when my sister hit menarche, there was a big family party for her and I remember feeling somewhat left out of the club. So, I totally don't understand the whole 'weakness' thing that is sometimes assosciated with menstruating, I always considered it somewhat assosciated with the inherent power of womanhood.

I realize that this is the wrong forum for this, but I'm curious. I know that some families have "moon parties" and/or things like that for girls who reach menarche: what do they do for boys? Anything?


From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca