Author
|
Topic: Periods continued from women in Canadian army
|
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072
|
posted 05 June 2006 10:14 AM
I 'm just going to ask the question how many women actually spend a week a month, going about their day thinking about how terrible their period is ? My reaction usualy is-"oh its that time again, okay." Its not my focus in life. I totally have sympathy for those women who have edometriosis (sorry if that's spelt wrong), and its resonable for those women not to see getting your periods as a great thing or a no big deal thing. However I would like to sumbit that the following attitudes are oppressive and anti-feminist : quote: I'm assuming that women in combat roles would be pre-menopausal due to their age. What the heck does a woman do, out in the battlefield, when she has her period? I've wondered about this for years. Like, really, what do you do when you're bleeding like a stuck pig, cramping, tired, etc.? Just go off into the bush and change pads?
quote: I find it hard to believe that any woman welcomes the onset of her monthly menses as a New Agey celebration of life instead of a bloody bore that has to be dealt with.
It just seems to me that these ideas lock into the overall very old, mysoginist ideas that the female body (and thus women as women are only bodies with no brains, after all this is what our culture is always saying to us)is inherently weak, so since woman = body then women are inferior. The female body is weak, always sick, and periods are a sign of that sickness. These ideas have their sources in Ancient Greece. The Ancient Greekas considered women malformed men, subhuman- something had happened in the womb that they had not become men, they were errors, birth defects. Women's sexuality, women 's bodies are feared because we can bleed a whole darn lot without dying once a month - so by saying that we're inferior, dangerous, we must be taken care of, kept under control. In feminist terms, this means oppressed. [ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Pride for Red Dolores ] [ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Pride for Red Dolores ]
From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
hopebird
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6565
|
posted 05 June 2006 12:15 PM
quote: Originally posted by Noise:
I think you may be reading a bit too much into the first quote to come to this conclusion... From a male point of view, it does seem the innocent question (perhaps not worded the best, I don't like the stuck pig term personally). I have (along with the poster I assume) no experience with this and am curious myself what women in the military go through (and moreover have a strong concern that women are being treated as inferiors because of it). So I don't see that inquiry as mysoginic, but instead an attempt to better understand. [ 05 June 2006: Message edited by: Noise ]
I disagree. The inquiry uses VERY loaded language and from first glance its intentions suspicious. I mean, comm. on, who says crap like,"..what do you do when you're bleeding like a stuck pig...." What vile language. The imagery is violent and, as a woman who actually experience menstruation, substantially over-stated as well. The author also assumes that all women experience symptoms that make then a “burden” i.e "cramping, tired, etc.?" Women experience a ariety of symptoms that, with the exception of the most serious medical cases, are dealt with quite effortlessly. This line "Just go off into the bush and change pads?" is especially funny to me. Yes, that is exactly what they do. Why is that so hard to believe that we just manage? And pads are a relatively new addition to history. What does this author think women did pre-"feminine hygiene product?" Just lay down and die. What about women who don’t have the privilege of running to Shopper’s Drug Mart for “supplies.” Imagine the “mystery” they must inspire in this jerk. I think the passage is at best insensitive and misguided (not to mention just plain simplistic and absurd) and at worst (likely) misogynistic and aimed at devaluing the capabilities of women in combat (and elsewhere). ~L
From: Regina, Sask | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732
|
posted 05 June 2006 08:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by nuclearfreezone: Field hygiene. Excellent term. Quite a few years ago there were several cases of toxic shock syndrome related to the use of tampons.And what does one do with the spent material, so to speak, when you're in enemy territory and don't want to leave any traces behind? The military must have a procedure for this, I'm thinking. Does anybody know?
You pack it out in a ziploc bag. The same as your crap, TP, and anything else you brought in with you.
From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Mike878
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11732
|
posted 05 June 2006 08:10 PM
quote: Originally posted by Webgear: You carry all waste (all garbage) out of the field with you.I use to carry a water proof bag for waste products.
Good times in the infantry!
From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470
|
posted 05 June 2006 08:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by Mike878: You pack it out in a ziploc bag. The same as your crap, TP, and anything else you brought in with you.
quote: Originally posted by Webgear: You carry all waste (all garbage) out of the field with you. I use to carry a water proof bag for waste products.
Good lord, why? Why not just bury it? It sounds like you guys are hiking in Canadian National Parks or something. As a side note, I recall reports of little boots carting around a portable potty (although a thousands times more sophisticated than the roadside ones) when he travelled to certain countries. The reason given was to protect Bush's DNA.
From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Surrender_Monkey
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12700
|
posted 05 June 2006 10:42 PM
quote: Originally posted by siren: I wonder how conservatives like the Taliban view female coalition forces. Not much different than they viewed Soviet trained female personnel perhaps.
Unfortunately many Afghans don't know what to make of our women in uniform. I had one female soldier tell me that Afghans just assume they are prostitutes as the Russians brought prostitutes with them and dressed them up in uniforms. On the other hand, women working in Kandahar say that the men down there often treat them as 'honorary men'. I figure that's because they don't really know how to take them otherwise! SM
From: Canada | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|