babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Canada continues to embarrass itself at the UN

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Canada continues to embarrass itself at the UN
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 17 September 2007 09:19 AM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From the UN news service

quote:
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has been approved after 143 Member States voted in favour, 11 abstained and four – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States – voted against the text.

Hmmm... what is the common link between those four countries?

I would urge everyone to write to their MPs and tell them how ashamed we are as Canadians to have our government actively oppose human rights legislation. We have lost any international credibility we ever thought that we had.

[ 17 September 2007: Message edited by: Le Téléspectateur ]


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Buddy Kat
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13234

posted 17 September 2007 11:40 AM      Profile for Buddy Kat   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually this speaks volumes on what governments in those countries are really concerned about. While Joe public probably doesn't care as they are talking first nation rights...the message is clear "when it comes to resource money there is no such thing as human rights for anyone".

All people everywhere should be pissed off ...whats next children rights? Women rights?

These agreements aren't binding anyways but do send a strong message to all people on how low governments will go and the next time you hear the bullshit in a speech or whatever about human rights etc. you will know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are "lying bags of feces".

Please flush the Neo-con already Canada!


It's also strange that New Zealand a green party country took it's stance also....but yep they too are just concerned about resource money at the expense of human rights.

[ 17 September 2007: Message edited by: Buddy Kat ]


From: Saskatchewan | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged
Le Téléspectateur
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7126

posted 18 September 2007 08:42 AM      Profile for Le Téléspectateur     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I agree. I don't think that this is a party problem (Greens over Cons, etc). Most of the countries that supported the Declaration did so with the caveat that they in no way supported collective rights as international law. That I think speaks to the state as an oppressive force.

Here's an interesting article on Indigenous peoples and states by Jeff Corntassel.


From: More here than there | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831

posted 18 September 2007 06:24 PM      Profile for Boarsbreath   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What they have in common is politicial issues involving indigenous peoples, combined with some sensitivity toward gestures like this.

What the countries voting FOR this have in common is either no such political issues or such oppressive policies toward their indigenous peoples (i.e. minorities) that UN talk is completely irrelevant.


From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 18 September 2007 06:26 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Uhm, yeah. Okay.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
ceti
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7851

posted 19 September 2007 05:10 AM      Profile for ceti     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
These four -- The colonial anglosphere, with right-wing media monopolies driving the political agenda.

It's not just a matter of indigenous rights, but the entire multilateral UN system these countries are giving their collective finger to. The US has been doing this even before Bush. Australia as well. Harper's Canada is the next member of this possy (whether we are Goyle or Crabbe is another thing).

Heck neo-con views and propaganda are even trickling here on Rabble without much challenge. The whole country is under the death-eater spell.


From: various musings before the revolution | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 19 September 2007 06:13 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
From the article noted by Le Téléspectateur:

quote:
... the word Canada is derived from a Mohawk term, Kanatiens, which means “they sit in our village.” A contemporary translation of this term would be “squatter.”

That's quite different from the "village" definition in the Canadian government produced "historical moment" commercial.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca