babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » New Iraq Law on Petroleum Exports: Dick Cheney's Law?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: New Iraq Law on Petroleum Exports: Dick Cheney's Law?
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 20 February 2007 11:08 AM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It legalizes very unfair types of contracts that will put Iraq in very long-term contracts that can go up to thirty-five years and cause the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars from Iraqis for no cause.

And the second point is concerning Iraq's sovereignty. Iraq will not be capable of controlling the levels -- the limits of production, which means that Iraq cannot be a part of OPEC anymore. And Iraq will have this very complicated institution called the Federal Oil and Gas Council, that will have representatives from the foreign oil companies on the board of it, so representatives from, let’s say, ExxonMobil and Shell and British Petroleum will be on the federal board of Iraq approving their own contracts.

And the third point is the point about keeping Iraq’s unity. The law is seen by many Iraqi analysts as a separation for Iraq fund. The law will authorize all of the regional and small provinces’ authorities. It will give them the final say to deal with the oil, instead of giving this final say to central federal government, so it will open the doors for splitting Iraq into three regions or even maybe three states in the very near future.


http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/20/1523250


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 20 February 2007 01:37 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
These "PSA"s are totally corrupt and favour energy companies who have no intentions to share anything with the Iraqi people for years. Iraq's oil couldn't be easier to access and retrieve, but these companies will take the Iraqi people for all they're worth, crooked bastard-liars that they are. PSA's are not used by most of the largest oil producing nations because they are disadvantageous to governments seeking revenues from energy exports.


Yanqui imperialists had Russia at a disadvantage in the 1990's and proceeded to sign similar production sharing agreements with Russian bureaucrats representing a nation reeling from crooked privatization schemes involving western officials, capitalist bankers, and Harvard economists. U.S. companies Mobil, Texaco and Exxon won a tender for licenses on three remaining blocks of the Sakhalin oil field in 1993 through "PeeSA's", but the Russian government annulled the results of the tender in 2004, citing changes in PSA tax laws, and perfectly legal use of a free market mechanism available to all democratically-elected governments.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 20 February 2007 02:18 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That is really amazing! Here we find out that the elected representatives of the people of Iraq come up with the SAME structure for giving away their oil that the elected repressentatives of the people of Russia did.

It's like someone was helping them.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 20 February 2007 07:31 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They were helped for sure. It's been noted that the economies of resource-poor countries grew an average of three times the rate of mineral-rich nations in the last half of the 20th century. I think the Saudi's dumping oil on world markets in 1985-86 caused some problems for Russian oil revenues. That was the real killer for the Soviet economy then, and people were angry with the shortage of staples, like citrus, chocolate, bread etc, considered normal commodities of trade by open economies then but stifled by an extra-territorial multinational company in scope cold war embargo. The Cubans and Koreans know all about it today still. This article is from January about the low hanging fruit about to be plucked in Iraq. I often wondered if they weren't diverting some of the oil and revenues since the invasion.

quote:
According to to International Energy Agency figures, PSAs are used in connection to only 12 percent of world oil reserves, in countries were exploration prospects are uncertain and production costs are high. None of this applies to Iraq, where the cost-per-barrel of extracting oil is among the lowest in the world because . . .

From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca