quote:
Pollution trading in the USA has saved industry a lot of time, money and trouble. However, pollution trading has also created ‘toxic hotspots’ in poor areas and in communities of colour, reinforcing existing environmental injustices. When a polluter buys credits in a trading scheme, this enables them to continue, or even increase, their own pollution. On a global scale credits generated in the trade in greenhouse gases will come from dubious projects in countries far away from the source of the original pollution. Not only are credits enabling pollution to continue at home, but the generation of those credits is highly suspect as well. Communities living with factories on their doorstep will continue to suffer the effects of pollution indefinitely.
In the USA, the main traded pollutants in the schemes are sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). These pollutants are the main sources of smog, acid rain and have adverse impacts on human health. Particulate pollution (NOx and SO2 in the air) cuts short the lives of an estimated 30,000 Americans each year. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that its pollution trading schemes are a success and have achieved low cost reductions far beyond its expectations. The model for the national acid rain schemes is often cited as a smaller local program - the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM), which is centred in the Los Angeles area.
Sulphur trading in Los Angeles
The RECLAIM program “includes 370 facilities from various industrial sectors, including oil refineries, power plants, aerospace companies, asphalt batch plants, chemical plants, cement plants, and many more.” The EPA state that “the major benefit of RECLAIM is that air quality goals necessary to protect public health and the environment are met in a more cost-effective manner.” It was introduced in 1993 and trading began one year later. However prior to its introduction, there was a lengthy dismantlement of the previous ‘command and control’ programme. This all added up to a loss of up to 10 years in pollution control legislation in the LA area. LA is one of the most polluted regions in the USA and with each year of inaction during the slow implementation of RECLAIM, thousands of people died.
Trading programmes in effect privatise the problem of air pollution. Government and communities lose control over environmental protection, placing it in the hands of the polluters. When the incentive to reduce emissions is profit and cost-effectiveness, there is an incredible pressure to cheat by overestimating reductions, while underestimating emissions. This can lead to fraudulent claims of reductions, inaccurate reporting of emissions and general gaming of the system as demonstrated by the citations issued in March 2002 to Anne Scholtz. Scholtz, prominent architect of RECLAIM and CEO of the emissions broker ACE, was caught filing false trading reports. If fraud is prevalent in a small local scheme such as RECLAIM, it will almost certainly be rife in the international trade in greenhouse gases where it is impossible to properly monitor and enforce accurate reporting of emissions reductions and honest filing of trades.