babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » How the U.S. engineered the current disaster in Gaza

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: How the U.S. engineered the current disaster in Gaza
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 08 March 2008 07:21 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here is David Rose's current Vanity Fair exposé of USA's disastrous meddling in the Palestine-Israel conflict, referenced by Uri Avnery.
Journalism like no Canadian seems to have the guts (or the right) to do anymore.
THE MIDDLE EAST
The Gaza Bombshell
BY DAVID ROSE, Vanity Fair, April 2008

After failing to anticipate Hamas’s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, David Rose reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.

The Al Deira Hotel, in Gaza City, is a haven of calm in a land beset by poverty, fear, and violence. In the middle of December 2007, I sit in the hotel’s airy restaurant, its windows open to the Mediterranean, and listen to a slight, bearded man named Mazen Asad abu Dan describe the suffering he endured 11 months before at the hands of his fellow Palestinians. Abu Dan, 28, is a member of Hamas, the Iranian-backed Islamist organization that has been designated a terrorist group by the United States, but I have a good reason for taking him at his word: I’ve seen the video.

It shows abu Dan kneeling, his hands bound behind his back, and screaming as his captors pummel him with a black iron rod. “I lost all the skin on my back from the beatings,” he says. “Instead of medicine, they poured perfume on my wounds. It felt as if they had taken a sword to my injuries.” (...)

(To hear an interview with David Rose and to see documents he uncovered, click here.)


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 09 March 2008 05:08 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The general outline of this was is evident from the available facts in the mainstream media. It was not a secret that the US started funnelling new weapons to Fatah, after Hamas won the election.

The fact the already corrupt Fatah, has become even moreso since after Arafat died (was murdered?) is an "open" secret. Arafat at least had enough prestige to give his strong arm tactics legitimacy, while Abbas never did. The tactics remain, but there is no strategy -- Oslo is dead.

What is also gone is the PLO. Let's remember that Fatah was only one member group within the PLO, and that Arafat headed a coalition of various groups comprising the Palestinian resistance, and at one time the people who today are in groups such as Hamas, would once have once been participants in, and subject too, the discipline of the larger group.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 09 March 2008 05:33 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Muhammad Dahlan has been written about by others in the recent past. It may have been Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, or perhaps it was Jonathan Cook or Robert Fisk, but whoever it was I seem to remember an article predicting a dirty and ugly role for this gauliter of US and Israeli policy in Gaza.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 09 March 2008 05:50 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This sort of meddling is de rigeur for the US. The Soviet Union imploded from the collapse of its own command economy and since,lacking an enemy to focus its fear-mongering of the American people,the US government has fomented unrest globally.

Since said collapse,the US needs to create imaginary enemies (of the minor sort) to maintain the imaginary global pre-eminence it feels it deserves. Other nations- mainly the Ango and Euro nations play along so they are not singled out for repercussions by the Emperor Who Has No Clothes.

I believe President Bush should receive the Nobel Peace Prize because he,as the leader of the neo-con cabal has accomplished what the whole world collectively could not. He has single handedly destroyed the American economy,creating a debtor nation whose economy cannot support its expanding defense budget just as the Soviets could not.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 09 March 2008 06:01 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But this is not the first time that Vilnai has expressed extreme views about Gaza's future.

quote:
Last summer he began quietly preparing a plan on behalf of his boss, the Defense Minister Ehud Barak, to declare Gaza a "hostile entity" and dramatically reduce the essential services supplied by Israel -- as long-time occupier -- to its inhabitants, including electricity and fuel. The cuts were finally implemented late last year after the Israeli courts gave their blessing.

Vilnai and Barak, both former military men like so many other Israeli politicians, have been "selling" this policy -- of choking off basic services to Gaza -- to Western public opinion ever since.


Furthermore,

quote:
Last October, after a meeting of defense officials, Vilnai said of Gaza: "Because this is an entity that is hostile to us, there is no reason for us to supply them with electricity beyond the minimum required to prevent a crisis."

This is part of a long term strategy says Cook, and makes a point that babbler Cueball has been making for some time:

quote:
After the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza in 1967, a consensus in the Israeli military quickly emerged in favor of maintaining control through a colonial policy of divide and rule, by factionalizing the Palestinians and then keeping them feuding.

As long as the Palestinians were too divided to resist the occupation effectively, Israel could carry on with its settlement program and "creeping annexation" of the occupied territories, as the Defence Minister of the time, Moshe Dayan, called it.




Finally

quote:
Fatah's control of the West Bank is being shored up by Israel because its leaders, including President Mahmoud Abbas, have made it clear that they are prepared to cooperate with an interminable peace process that will give Israel the time it needs to annex yet more of the territory.

Hamas, on the other hand, is under no illusions about the peace process, having seen the Jewish settlers leave but Israel's military control and its economic siege only tighten from arm's length.

In charge of an open-air prison, Hamas has refused to surrender to Israeli diktats and has proven invulnerable to Israeli and US machinations to topple it. Instead it has begun advancing the only two feasible forms of resistance available: rocket attacks over the fence surrounding Gaza, and popular mass action.


Cook points out in his article that the residents of Sderot "where the attacks have been going on for years, the mayor, Eli Moyal, recently called for talks with Hamas". 64 percent of Israelis agree with this opinion. However, negotiations would put an end to the creeping annexation of the West Bank so we can't have any of that, can we?

Cook: The meaning of "Shoah"


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Indiana Jones
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14792

posted 09 March 2008 07:05 AM      Profile for Indiana Jones        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:

The fact the already corrupt Fatah, has become even moreso since after Arafat died (was murdered?) is an "open" secret.

Yeah, he was "murdered" by developing cancer. Nice conspiracy theory. And 9/11 was an inside job. And the moon landing was faked.


From: Toronto / Brooklyn / Jerusalem | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 10 March 2008 03:23 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You wanna be an ass that is fine with me, but smart asses bother to check there facts. No cause of death has been established. You check it out. Or did you do the psychic autopsy the whole world is waiting to hear about?

quote:
In late 2004, after effectively being confined within his Ramallah compound for over two years by the Israeli army, Arafat became ill and fell into a coma. While the exact cause of death remains unknown, doctors spoke of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and cirrhosis, but no autopsy was performed. Arafat died on November 11, 2004 at the age of 75.


Arafat

Low platlette count, or Cirrhossis of the liver. No one even speculated "cancer". Where you get that from?

I don't expect you to post an apology, or a retraction. People like you don't. But I suggest you stop reading Judeaoscope, or whatever wingnut Zionist blog your reading as your sources because your "facts" are full of shit.

Here are some real ones:

quote:
The official statement announcing Arafat's death said the Palestinian leader succumbed from a "mystery blood disorder". Earlier, doctors were said to have ruled out cancer, leukemia and poisoning as reasons for his illness, but al Kurdi said today he believes further study is necessary to eliminate the possibility of poisoning.


Arafat's doctor calls for autopsy

"Mystery blood disorder." That is what is called a quote. By the way, they rules out AIDS to, which is probably where you got the cancer idea. That was floating around in the Zionosphere for a while, and gullibility ranks high as requisite for spending time in that club.

Now here is some "speculation:"

quote:
In September 2003, Sharon's vice prime minister, Ehud Olmert, said of Arafat that "killing him is definitely one of the options." He added: "We are trying to eliminate all the heads of terror, and Arafat is one of the heads of terror."


What killed Arafat? Infection a mystery

I think I'll avoid being a dumb ass, and say the case is open since guess what? It is! No cause of death established.

A mystery blood disease with some of the symptoms of Ricin poisoning (doctors did not test for this because it is not common) and no autopsy performed on a controversial international political personality with plenty of enemies... I'll keep the question mark, thank you, because accuracy is important to me, if not you.

Anyway have fun in the Zionosphere where fables are facts, and facts fables. Tell all your friends Arafat died of Cancer or AIDS, and make Goebbels golden rule come true: Tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth.

[ 10 March 2008: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 10 March 2008 05:56 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Who Murdered Arafat?" by Uri Avnery, 2005

[ 10 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca