babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Air Travel

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Air Travel
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 11 July 2001 04:56 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Cost of trip from Vancouver to San Francisco in 1973 (US dollars): $25.

Cost of that trip, today, if adjusting strictly for inflation: $100.

Today's actual cost: $200 US.

Air travel seems to be increasingly chaotic, poorly organized, Byzantine, complex, and most of all, less and less accessible to poor and middle-class people.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Liam McCarthy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 800

posted 11 July 2001 07:32 AM      Profile for Liam McCarthy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Explain this one to me:
It's cheaper to fly from Toronto to Glasgow than it is to fly from Windsor to Toronto.

From: Windsor, Ont. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trisha
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 387

posted 11 July 2001 11:16 AM      Profile for Trisha     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A trip from Thunder Bay to Sault Ste. Marie costs over $400 return. That's an eight or fewer hour drive. The bus costs almost as much.

It cost me more to fly to Penticton, B.C to see my brother a few years ago that it cost for him and his wife to go to Mexico. Also, I had four plane changes, they had one.


From: Thunder Bay, Ontario | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 11 July 2001 01:34 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually, it just occurred to me what part of the cause of this mess in air travel is: Airline deregulation.

I still think it is incredibly dumb that to get anywhere you almost HAVE to change airplanes at least once, and the flights are almost inevitably delayed badly.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Gayle
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 37

posted 12 July 2001 11:22 AM      Profile for Gayle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's costing me nearly $400 to fly from Halifax to Toronto. If I'd wanted to fly from Sydney to Halifax, it would have been closer to $800. 'Splain that one to me.
From: Cape Breton, Nova Scotia | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
ragegran
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 865

posted 20 July 2001 12:10 PM      Profile for ragegran        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't explain anything -- and share everyone's frustration. But i do have a suggestion ( which maybe doesn't belong in this discussion???) anyway here it is:

To encourage some sense of Candian unity, I'd like to see every Canadian provided with a ONCE IN A LIFETIME return to ticket to anywhere in this country outside of the home province. It's not only ridiculous, it's criminal that most Candians cannot afford to visit their own country because of prohibitively high airfares. Bus *may* sometimes be cheaper, but most people don't have the time to travel by bus. Given the size of Canada air travel really is the only practical way to go.

Comments or improvements on this suggestion are welcome.


From: Ottawa,Ont,Canada | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 20 July 2001 03:57 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Airplanes are fine if you need to get somewhere in a hurry, but if you want people to explore their country I think the highways and biways are the best way to do it. You have more freedom to choose your destinations that way.

Like, if people get a free plane ticket to another province, what are they gonna do once they get there? Hang out at the airport?

Personally, I think the best way to explore is on a motorcycle (danger factor notwithstanding), a la Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Or in one of the micro-sized 4x4s, like a Chevy Tracker.

But I really don't think air-travel is a great way to explore the "real Canada".


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 21 July 2001 09:10 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was a real fan of the CPR back when it used to carry passengers across the country. The excuse the Mulroney gov't used for killing it was low ridership -- but how did that happen? From the sixties on, fares had risen to equal or, eventually, surpass air fares -- so of course ridership fell -- the familiar vicious circle capitalists seem so talented at creating. CN, of course, is still there, but it's still too expensive, and between Winnipeg and Vancouver it hits only the northern cities.

Make me p.m., and my first order of business will be bringing back both transcontinental routes, frequent trains, really low fares. You're welcome.

PS: Anyone know of good regional spur lines we should bring back too? Most of those have been stupidly killed off as well.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 21 July 2001 10:16 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What are spur lines? Excuse me, my ignorance is showing.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Trisha
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 387

posted 21 July 2001 01:19 PM      Profile for Trisha     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The passenger trains don't go through Thunder Bay any more, they go to a tiny little berg called Armstrong.

A few years ago, I took my then 86-year-old aunt to B.C. on the train to visit my brother. She'd always dreamed of going there. In her entire life, she'd never been any further west that Winnipeg and had never travelled east either, even though my uncle worked for the railroad. He'd always planned that they would travel all over Canada by train when he retired but he died before they could.

Anyway, she loved the trip and the staff on the train treated her like royalty. She finally saw the variety of scenery in Canada and was fascinated by the prairies and the mountains. She met some very nice other travellers too, and was serenaded by the dining room staff the night before we arrived in Salmon Arm. This is the next best way to travel across Canada after motorcycle or car. I personally prefer to be able to stop in places that interest me, but even just to see the changes across the country from a train window beats flying. I've flown places twice, and arrived stressed and ill. I really didn't enjoy it at all.


From: Thunder Bay, Ontario | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 21 July 2001 05:03 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hate flying myself. My ears are sensitive to air pressure differences and it always takes a day for my ears to "hear normally" again and it hurts like hell when we land.

I prefer driving for this reason.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 21 July 2001 08:27 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes air travel has really deteriorated. Just the other day the Post ran a story about all the riff-raff let into first class nowadays. What's a rich person to do?

Skdadl, I do believe the Ontario Northlander is on the chopping block too. Does the Algoma railway still run, or is it not a passenger line? Meades? I also took the old Canadian across the country and it was a great trip.

You hate flying, DrC? I used to love it but developed a complex about it when I worked in India. You have to start wondering about the airworthiness of the thing when you're in India and the cabin signage is in Spanish and Portuguese -- a third generation hand-me-down probably. One of the regular flights involved landing at Jammu, which had a shorter than standard landing strip pinned between the Pakistani frontier and the mountains so that the plane had to do a rapid corkscrew descent. The plane would touch down on the very near edge of the runway, atop a cliff overlooking the Jhelum (?) river, and even with full reverse thrust would only come to a stop at the far edge of the runway. Oh and the turbulence over the Panjshir mountains on the way to Kashmir...

One plane my colleagues were on was flying into an Indian summer storm. These are violent storms that blacken the sky, whip up a fearsome wind, and roil with clouds of hail. It's common practice in India to fly with only just enough fuel to reach the destination. So as this plane was approaching the storm cloud, with less than half a tank left, making it impossible to return, the only viable alternate route was through Pakistan. The Pakistani authorities refused permission for a diversion, and the pilot flew right into the storm. For twenty minutes the plane was tossed and violently shaken by shearing winds, pelted by lightning and battered by hail. Everyone thought it was the end of them. When the plane landed the pilot basically dissolved into a puddle of goo and had to be carried away and replaced. Luckily, as I say, I was not actually on this flight. Still, just hearing about it made me scared.

Another time, in the Delhi departure area, I noticed that the man supposedly checking bags with an X-Ray machine was staring at the ceiling for about forty-five minutes while hundreds of passengers went through. I pointed this out to the Lufthansa agent, who replied, "yes sir, it is a sham." Enjoy your flight!

I am not a troublesome passenger, though I become a bit of a lush on intercontinental flights. I do, however, generally ask for a shaving kit "so I can be presentable for customs." So far the attendants have obliged me, ducking into first class and bringing me bags of goodies.

A girl I knew used to march right into first class once the hatch was closed and act like she owned the place. Well, not exactly, she wouldn't disturb them too much by asking for stuff. She never got ejected. Some people have the knack, I guess. I don't think I could do that.

[ July 21, 2001: Message edited by: rasmus_raven ]


From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 23 July 2001 01:13 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Check it, people:

*** Airports across the country tardy

WASHINGTON (AP) - More than one-quarter of flights into 11 of the
nation's busiest airports were at least 15 minutes late during the
first five months of the year, government figures show. It was a
coast-to-coast problem: Seattle and New York topped the list. At the
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, 31.3% of flights were late
from January through May, the Transportation Department said. New
York's LaGuardia Airport was just behind, at 31.1%. Three of every
10 flights to Los Angeles International Airport arrived at least 15
minutes behind schedule during the period leading into the summer
travel season. Boston, New York Kennedy, San Francisco, Chicago
O'Hare, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Diego and Newark, N.J., all had
at least 25% of their flights arriving late. The numbers are the
first look at the airports with the most late flights, as compared
with the on-time records of individual airlines or particular
flights. The government found 20 regularly scheduled flights
arriving late at least half the time last year.

*** Airport delays glance, see http://www.infobeat.com/fullArticle?article=410169895

Full article at: http://www.infobeat.com/fullArticle?article=410169865


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
alldaybreakfast
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1071

posted 24 July 2001 02:15 AM      Profile for alldaybreakfast     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Someone told me last year that the amount of greenhouse gas burnt in a one-way flight (he didn't define the length) was something like a year of regular driving. Does anyone know if this is true, or what the actual numbers might be like? I'd hate to think it *is* true... some years, I've had a dozen or so (unavoidable) one-way trips! I don't drive; I'd like to think it all evens out as far as my personal consumption is concerned.

[ July 24, 2001: Message edited by: alldaybreakfast ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 24 July 2001 09:26 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Aha! allday b.: You are making the carbon-sink argument for yourself, as our beloved gov't does in trying to wangle points off our Kyoto commitments, yes? In your case, the trade-off is I fly; I do not drive.


A puzzle: where do we locate the actual carbon sink here? In a lack (lack of car)? I ask this question seriously, because I make the same trade-off: I smoke; I do not drive (also don't fly much; don't have air conditioning; etc).

[ July 24, 2001: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 24 July 2001 11:34 AM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think your personal share of fuel in a transatlantic flight is on the order of 7000 litres. I base that on the claim that if all people in the world used only their fare share of oil, in quantities that were enironmentally sustainable, then each of us would be allowed one litre of gas per day, including all our hidden fuel usage (transportation of things we buy etc.). If you didn't use any other fuel *at all* for 20 years, you'd have earned yourself one transatlantic flight.

This from David Korten's excellent little book (though it is marred by several serious typos and errors), Globalizing Civil Society.

[ July 24, 2001: Message edited by: rasmus_raven ]


From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
alldaybreakfast
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1071

posted 25 July 2001 12:52 AM      Profile for alldaybreakfast     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yikes. I think I've used about 400 years' worth of oil in the last two. I was only expressing a certain amount of guilt over this... I totally don't buy the carbon sink argument, btw, which is apparently based on really shoddy science.

I have one foot in Canada and one in the UK, so I make several transatlantic flights a year. For personal and educational reasons, I kind of have to. I'd love to take a train, but alas, early 21st century technology isn't up to a 5000km chunnel just yet. So Canada 3000 it is. I feel very guilty about this, but my personal circumstances (my MA programme and fiance are in England) prevent me from doing much about it.

Sorry to get really subjective here; I guess what I really want is for someone to tell me it's OK... or invent a solar-powered jetliner!


From: Toronto | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
wagepeace
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 114

posted 25 July 2001 02:09 PM      Profile for wagepeace     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have a friend of mine who always flies first class or business class. He says that he purposefully farts in first class for reasons I'd rather not get into at the present time. He also dresses in what he calls his "hippie flyin' clothes" whenever he flies.

Suffice to say, it makes for some interesting stares and dirty looks.

Me, I hate flying - terrified of it really! And I am flying to Regina from Halifax on the 16th of August for $391.00 taxes included - one way!

I think it is a good price. It is with Canjet.


From: In a fog and on anti-psychotics | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Markbo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 124

posted 31 July 2001 10:01 AM      Profile for Markbo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
After returning from a cross country trip. Windsor-Halifax-Castlegar-Vancouver-Calgary-Windsor (yes, I still found internet cafe's to babble on) I found the price of the tickets rising 50% while a friend of mine called me to tell me about Air Canada's discount program (I explained that it applied to business class only).

Year after I sold my factory, 38 flights.

Major problem is the airline is strapped with too much debt it cannot dig its way out of. If there is any deregulation between Air Canada and the U.S. there needs to be a massive paydown of this debt or we are doomed.

I'm not being anti labour here but I think labour has too great of a balance of power in these equations. Pilot are not doctors dammit! I respect them but come on.


From: Windsor | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 31 July 2001 05:23 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Markbo, if YOU were flying a 777 full of what, 500 people? At better than a few hundred kilometers per hour, wouldn't YOU want to get paid some darned good money for that?

If you want that kind of money why don't YOU go become a pilot instead of whining about the wages they get paid?

I want to turn this into a bit of a general rant again..

Why the hell is it that right-wingers carefully try to pretend they're not jealous of workers negotiating a good deal for themselves while at the same time the same right-wingers are off crapping about the high wages the workers get?

My rejoinder is: Shit or get off the pot. Either go down and apply for one of those jobs or shut up and form a union at your OWN workplace so YOU can get a better wage.

[ July 31, 2001: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 01 February 2003 07:02 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, in light of September 11th and the topic of this thread, what do the thread archaeologists say is relevant or needs re-examining in this thread?
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
SamL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2199

posted 04 February 2003 11:07 PM      Profile for SamL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The added cost PLUS the extra hassles and (from a security viewpoint) useless and redundant hurdles and hoops that we have to jump over and through, especially for those of us who are darker than this ( ).
From: Cambridge, MA | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 04 February 2003 11:49 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Edited because I just realized my question was answered above my own post. *doi*

[ 13 February 2003: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 05 February 2003 12:51 AM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've had a dry spell with the traveling -- haven't had to go anywhere by plane since before 11Sept01. The blond guy has, and chafes at having to be at the airport that much earlier, even though they hardly give him a second glance.

But given the going-over I got the last time I went down to the US, I'm loathe to consider taking a trip down there now...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Aviator
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3299

posted 05 February 2003 02:06 AM      Profile for Aviator     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As a pilot, the best way to see the this magnificent country is from the air (of course, what would you expect me to say?). When you fly in the "big birds", you are cruising at 30,000 feet plus and much of the clarity you get at lower altitudes disappears. But get in your Cessna Skyhawk and fly at 5500 feet and the beauty of our land comes alive. I learned to fly on Vancouver Island, and talk about breathtaking!
At the same time, no jerks trying to kill you on the road. Once flying gets in your blood and in your soul their every other method of travel pales in comparison.

I learned to hate driving because I grew on the island. The roads were (and in some cases, still are) so bad. At one time, it would routinely take (and I am not exaggerating about this) an hour to drive from Courtenay to Campbell River. Incidentally, these two towns are only 50 km apart. Fifty bloody kilometers taking an hour. You have got to be kidding! The speed limit used to be around 100 km per hr. then it was lowered to 80. But many people consistently drive it at 50 or 60 km an hr. And, on top of that, they drive like a yo yo: one minute they are speeding, the next they are doing 50. So imagine being stuck behind someone doing 50 in an 80 zone on a highway that is actually engineered for 100 km per hr. You can never take your eyes off his rear end to look at the ocean view for fear you will end up buried in his or her trunk.

As a pilot, you see parts of this country you simply cannot see from the road. And all in a very relaxing manner. I can actually fly to Vancouver, do some business, and then fly home for less money than driving, taking the ferry, and having to stay overnight.

I am reminded of the flyer's bit of wisdom. When I see a guy in a fancy car it tells me two things about him: 1. he has a lot of money, and 2. he doesn't know how to fly.


From: British Columbia | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Willowdale Wizard
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3674

posted 13 February 2003 05:12 PM      Profile for Willowdale Wizard   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i moved back to canada from england at xmas, and you wouldn't believe the hassle i got for my carry-on laptop bag when i flew from heathrow to chicago o'hare to pearson. they rip things apart compared too intra-european travel (london to italy, for example).

i likes the train, and i still likes the train.

the other thing that's developed since the previous part of the thread are budget airlines (jetsgo, etc here in canada, and ryanair, easyjet in ireland/britain) outside of the USA,

or as john crosbie would have said, bood-jet airlines. god, it was great having him as finance minister, if only for the pronounciation.

i haven't flown budget airlines here in canada (i miss canada 3000), but the ones in europe feel like the bus, you pile on, no seating assignments, pay for your overpriced sandwiches, the flights continually leave 20 min late, and they fly to these 2nd airports in european cities (like, in berlin, they fly to schoenfeld, way way in the south-west of greater berlin, as opposed to tegel, which is on the subway line).


From: england (hometown of toronto) | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca