babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Secret French Documents on 9-11 Released

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Secret French Documents on 9-11 Released
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 17 April 2007 09:18 AM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
And at first, a surprise: The high number of notes devoted exclusively to al-Qaeda's threats against the United States, months before the suicide attacks in New York and Washington. Nine whole reports on that subject between September 2000 and August 2001, including a five-page summary entitled, "Airplane Hijacking Plans by Radical Islamists," and dated ... January 5, 2001! Eight months before September 11, the DGSE reports therein tactical discussions conducted between Osama bin Laden and his Taliban allies from the beginning of 2000 on the subject of hijacking American commercial airliners.

.....

As of January 2001, the al-Qaeda leadership nonetheless showed itself to be transparent to the eyes - and ears - of French spies. The redactors even detailed disagreements among the terrorists over the practical modalities of the planned hijacking. They never questioned their intention. Provisionally, the jihadists favored capturing an airplane between Frankfurt and the United States. They established a list of seven possible companies. Two would finally be chosen by the September 11 pirates: American Airlines and United Airlines. In his introduction, the author of the memo notes, "According to the Uzbek intelligence services, the airplane hijacking plan seems to have been discussed at the beginning of 2000 during a Kabul meeting of representatives from Osama bin Laden's organization.


translation of Le Monde article


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 17 April 2007 02:39 PM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Whether the terrorist attacks in NY happened or not Bush would still have created an excuse to go to war. The Iraq war was planned as soon as Bush and the neo cons came into power.

These stunning charges come from a conservative insider.

quote:
Former Bush Speechwriter Hints at 9/11 Inside Job
Says Neo-Cons would have created a false flag to justify war had it not been for WTC attack, questions official story

"Had it not been for 9/11, the Bush White House, determined to go to war, would no doubt have seized on some synthetic provocation, on the order of the one LBJ used to push through the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1965," Gold writes.

According to the ZTalk blog, in his book Gold also, "Takes pains to point out the holes in the official line (of 9/11) and has some acerbic comments about Israel's peculiar responses."

For Gold, a lifetime Bush family friend and a GOP darling, to go turncoat and detail how the Neo-Cons were feverishly preparing for a false flag event to justify their pre-planned war, while questioning the official 9/11 story, is a resounding slap in the face to those who claim that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job because whistleblowers would foil the conspiracy.

Hundreds of experts and professionals in all sectors of government, the military, science and industry have blown the whistle, but whenever they attempt to garner media attention, they are harangued as anti-American traitors by loudmouth TV shills who are on the payroll of the very criminals that carried out 9/11.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WAT20070413&articleId=5381


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 17 April 2007 02:42 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Are the hawks still claiming that Saddam was in on 9-11 ?.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
quelar
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2739

posted 17 April 2007 02:53 PM      Profile for quelar     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He wasn't?

But...but...Colin lied?


From: In Dig Nation | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Nanuq
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8229

posted 17 April 2007 03:11 PM      Profile for Nanuq   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There doesn't seem to be a smoking gun in the actual memo. Terrorists have been hijacking planes for decades so the idea that Bin Laden was planning to hijack and hold a plane for ranson wasn't particularly threatening. It was the whole suicide bombing planes into buildings that was the new wrinkle and there is no mention of that in the memo. Before the first plane hit, it was just business as usual.
From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 17 April 2007 03:22 PM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Are the hawks still claiming that Saddam was in on 9-11 ?.

Of course. President er.. vice-prez Cheney recently told an AIPAC crowd-- and even more recently Rush Limbaugh, the Al Qaeda-Sadaam link was the reason they had to attack--
in spite of the recently declassified Pentagon report that showed otherwise:

"Hussein's Prewar Ties To Al-Qaeda Discounted
Pentagon Report Says Contacts Were Limited

By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 6, 2007; A01

Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides "all confirmed" that Hussein's regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday.

The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community's prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and about its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February.

The report's release came on the same day that Vice President Cheney, appearing on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, repeated his allegation that al-Qaeda was operating inside Iraq "before we ever launched" the war, under the direction of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist killed last June.

"This is al-Qaeda operating in Iraq," Cheney told Limbaugh's listeners about Zarqawi, who he said had "led the charge for Iraq." Cheney cited the alleged history to illustrate his argument that withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq would "play right into the hands of al-Qaeda...."
Cheney vs. Pentagon


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 20 April 2007 09:46 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Are the hawks still claiming that Saddam was in on 9-11 ?.

And then there's Karl Rove from yesterday:

"On the global war on terror, he said the country faces ``a shadowy enemy that lives within a population that strikes from the dark.''

In a question-and-answer period after his speech, Rove was asked whose idea it was to start a pre-emptive war in Iraq.
"I think it was Osama bin Laden's," Rove replied...."

Goebbles would be proud. The Big Lie


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca