Author
|
Topic: Secret French Documents on 9-11 Released
|
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518
|
posted 17 April 2007 09:18 AM
quote: And at first, a surprise: The high number of notes devoted exclusively to al-Qaeda's threats against the United States, months before the suicide attacks in New York and Washington. Nine whole reports on that subject between September 2000 and August 2001, including a five-page summary entitled, "Airplane Hijacking Plans by Radical Islamists," and dated ... January 5, 2001! Eight months before September 11, the DGSE reports therein tactical discussions conducted between Osama bin Laden and his Taliban allies from the beginning of 2000 on the subject of hijacking American commercial airliners. ..... As of January 2001, the al-Qaeda leadership nonetheless showed itself to be transparent to the eyes - and ears - of French spies. The redactors even detailed disagreements among the terrorists over the practical modalities of the planned hijacking. They never questioned their intention. Provisionally, the jihadists favored capturing an airplane between Frankfurt and the United States. They established a list of seven possible companies. Two would finally be chosen by the September 11 pirates: American Airlines and United Airlines. In his introduction, the author of the memo notes, "According to the Uzbek intelligence services, the airplane hijacking plan seems to have been discussed at the beginning of 2000 during a Kabul meeting of representatives from Osama bin Laden's organization.
translation of Le Monde article
From: toronto | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125
|
posted 17 April 2007 02:39 PM
Whether the terrorist attacks in NY happened or not Bush would still have created an excuse to go to war. The Iraq war was planned as soon as Bush and the neo cons came into power.These stunning charges come from a conservative insider. quote: Former Bush Speechwriter Hints at 9/11 Inside Job Says Neo-Cons would have created a false flag to justify war had it not been for WTC attack, questions official story "Had it not been for 9/11, the Bush White House, determined to go to war, would no doubt have seized on some synthetic provocation, on the order of the one LBJ used to push through the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1965," Gold writes. According to the ZTalk blog, in his book Gold also, "Takes pains to point out the holes in the official line (of 9/11) and has some acerbic comments about Israel's peculiar responses." For Gold, a lifetime Bush family friend and a GOP darling, to go turncoat and detail how the Neo-Cons were feverishly preparing for a false flag event to justify their pre-planned war, while questioning the official 9/11 story, is a resounding slap in the face to those who claim that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job because whistleblowers would foil the conspiracy. Hundreds of experts and professionals in all sectors of government, the military, science and industry have blown the whistle, but whenever they attempt to garner media attention, they are harangued as anti-American traitors by loudmouth TV shills who are on the payroll of the very criminals that carried out 9/11.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=WAT20070413&articleId=5381
From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058
|
posted 17 April 2007 03:22 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: Are the hawks still claiming that Saddam was in on 9-11 ?.
Of course. President er.. vice-prez Cheney recently told an AIPAC crowd-- and even more recently Rush Limbaugh, the Al Qaeda-Sadaam link was the reason they had to attack-- in spite of the recently declassified Pentagon report that showed otherwise: "Hussein's Prewar Ties To Al-Qaeda Discounted Pentagon Report Says Contacts Were Limited By R. Jeffrey Smith Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, April 6, 2007; A01 Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides "all confirmed" that Hussein's regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday. The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community's prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and about its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February. The report's release came on the same day that Vice President Cheney, appearing on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, repeated his allegation that al-Qaeda was operating inside Iraq "before we ever launched" the war, under the direction of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist killed last June. "This is al-Qaeda operating in Iraq," Cheney told Limbaugh's listeners about Zarqawi, who he said had "led the charge for Iraq." Cheney cited the alleged history to illustrate his argument that withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq would "play right into the hands of al-Qaeda...." Cheney vs. Pentagon
From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058
|
posted 20 April 2007 09:46 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: Are the hawks still claiming that Saddam was in on 9-11 ?.
And then there's Karl Rove from yesterday: "On the global war on terror, he said the country faces ``a shadowy enemy that lives within a population that strikes from the dark.'' In a question-and-answer period after his speech, Rove was asked whose idea it was to start a pre-emptive war in Iraq. "I think it was Osama bin Laden's," Rove replied...." Goebbles would be proud. The Big Lie
From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|