Author
|
Topic: Norway dumps Wal-Mart shares
|
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44
|
posted 25 July 2006 11:00 AM
quote: Imagine this for a government conundrum: revenues so high it's hard to know how to spend them. No wonder Norway, flush from oil exports, is picky about where it invests its $236 billion government pension fund - the third largest on the planet.In June it divested about $430 million worth of shares from Wal-Mart Stores (Charts) and Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (Charts), after savaging Wal-Mart for "serious and systematic" labor violations in several countries and Freeport for dumping copper tailings in a New Guinea river. Now officials say their cleanup campaign is just getting started. "We are working on how to act as shareholders in different companies," says Kristin Halvorsen, the leader of Norway's Socialist Left Party, who was appointed Finance Minister last October. "That is quite new for us."
http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/24/magazines/fortune/NorwaytoWMT.fortune/index.htm?cnn=yes Now - how to get the CPP investment people to start making similar decisions?
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798
|
posted 17 August 2006 07:05 PM
quote: Originally posted by Martha (but not Stewart): Here's something that an individual can do with an RRSP, bearing in mind that even a bank's "ethical" funds are managed by someone you probably don't know. Instead of buying into mutual funds, invest directly in the stock market by buying stocks. This way, you control what companies you invest in, not some funds manager. And you can invest in a way that reflects your own ethical priorities: you can make a point of investing in companies with lots of women on their boards, or with clearly articulated environmental concerns, or who donate to causes you endorse, etc.: whatever ethical priorities you set. Just a thought.
That is a great idea. A self-directed online trade at a Canadian discount brokerage costs about $30. Most ethical funds are not ethical at all and the Labour Sponsored Investment Funds are a vehicle for the fund managers to pocket the tax credit.LSIFs have a notoriously high Management Expense Ratio- the fees charged to manage the Fund. It is not difficult to manage your own account.From an activist pointof view,as a shareholder,one can influence corporate policy. I can visualise a babble activist crew showing up at the AGM clutching their share certificate,demanding to be heard.
From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|