babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Afghanistan: The NDP keep saying...

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Afghanistan: The NDP keep saying...
BitWhys
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13465

posted 17 November 2006 09:56 AM      Profile for BitWhys     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
... that it is different under the American command than under NATO. We are going to do exactly the same thing. Our military is going to perform the same roles. Our aid people are going to do the same thing. Our diplomats and the RCMP are going to do the same thing. There will not be one iota of change except that we will be under NATO command instead of Enduring Freedom. Nothing will change.

We are following the same tactics. We are following NATO tactics. Go check what the French are doing in the north. Go check what the Germans are doing in the north. They are doing the same thing.


- Gordon O'Conner - HoC - May 17, 2006

I realize its just nitpicking but...

quote:
The French, German and Italian forces patrol relatively quiet sectors in the north, but are also under self-imposed limitations that keep them out of combat operations.

Some forces are not allowed to patrol 70 kilometres beyond their bases - meaning soldiers can't stay outside of the wire overnight.


...I really hate being lied to.

anyone else wish this was an easer topic to deal with?


From: the Peg | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 17 November 2006 10:51 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No offence, but I am having trouble understanding your point.

Are you saying O'Connor said that once under NATO, Canadians would be doing the same work as the French and Germans, and that's a lie? Or are you saying that he said that there would be no change for Canada in the transition from Enduring Freedom to ISAF, and that's a lie? Or are you suggesting you'd like to see some French and Germans risking their lives in the south?

Help me.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
BitWhys
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13465

posted 17 November 2006 10:54 AM      Profile for BitWhys     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Although it too will be rendered a matter of debate by a good old "What I meant was...", the first one. The doing the same thing as the French and Germans thingie.

[ 17 November 2006: Message edited by: BitWhys ]


From: the Peg | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 17 November 2006 11:19 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bitwhys; wtf has your title got to do with what you posted? Not that what you posted makes anymore sense that your title for this thread!!
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
BitWhys
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13465

posted 17 November 2006 12:22 PM      Profile for BitWhys     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Its the first part of what O'Conner said in Parliament.

whatever

kill the thread. I don't care


From: the Peg | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 17 November 2006 05:26 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What exactly is it that "the NDP keep saying"??

...and by the way, what O'Connor was saying is that everyone in Afghanistan would be doing the same thing under NATO command as they did before under direct US command. He did not say that Canada, Germany, and all he other NATO countries would now be doing the same things as each other.

[ 17 November 2006: Message edited by: M. Spector ]


From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
BitWhys
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13465

posted 17 November 2006 06:31 PM      Profile for BitWhys     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
oh come on. Its a direct and complete quote from the May 17th Hansards.

quote:
The NDP keep saying that it is different under the American command than under NATO. We are going to do exactly the same thing. Our military is going to perform the same roles. Our aid people are going to do the same thing. Our diplomats and the RCMP are going to do the same thing. There will not be one iota of change except that we will be under NATO command instead of Enduring Freedom. Nothing will change.

We are following the same tactics. We are following NATO tactics. Go check what the French are doing in the north. Go check what the Germans are doing in the north. They are doing the same thing.


meanwhile the French and the Germans aren't even on the front lines, let alone taking combat duties. make of it what you will. I get it already. Just don't mention the war.

[ 17 November 2006: Message edited by: BitWhys ]


From: the Peg | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Pierre Cyr
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6278

posted 19 November 2006 04:39 AM      Profile for Pierre Cyr     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The mission did change but not necessarily because it went from US to nato command. In fact early on we were pretty much only doing reconstruction now we are doing counter insurgency. Its a failing mission if its not drastically overhauled. To start buy the damn poppies. Even is our forces arent involved with that the farmers wont likely distinguish between western forces that are or arent doing this to them.
From: Grand Falls NB | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
BitWhys
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13465

posted 19 November 2006 12:46 PM      Profile for BitWhys     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Licensing poppy for production for the opium derivative market would be an excellent step in the right direction but it won't happen for at least two reasons. First, the legitimate market is dominated by an oligarchy (American, btw) and if there's one thing oligarchies hate, its change. The second, an assumption, is that after 5 years there still isn't enough real government developed to oversee a project of that complexion.
From: the Peg | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 19 November 2006 02:02 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by BitWhys:
First, the legitimate market is dominated by an oligarchy (American, btw) and if there's one thing oligarchies hate, its change. The second, an assumption, is that after 5 years there still isn't enough real government developed to oversee a project of that complexion.

And don't forget historical evidence for the black market in illicit drugs funding right-wing political parties, covert wars against small Latin American countries, subsidizing weapons sales for Middle Eastern countries at war with former CIA stooges, Air America in S.E. Asia etc etc.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca