babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Ashes of Nazi victims to be buried

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ashes of Nazi victims to be buried
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 29 March 2005 12:34 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
5 foot deep layer of victims ashes discovered in concentration camp to be buried in joint christian and jewish ceremony
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 March 2005 12:50 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Map of Oranienburg / Sachsenhausen, just north of Berlin

Haunted, and haunting.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 01:10 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hope the ceremony also included a secular facet for the countless victims of Nazi violence who did not believe in any religion, whether their origins were Jewish, some form of Christian, both, or other. If not, it is yet another act of confiscation of memory.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 March 2005 01:15 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's so strange: I learned these place-names when I was a kid, long before I'd seen maps of Germany or learned any of the language. They come back to me in such a loaded way.

I've never been to Germany -- I would love to go, and I'm sure that it isn't all foggy and dark all the time, but that is the way my ten-year-old mind elaborated it from the stories I was learning.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 01:22 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
I hope the ceremony also included a secular facet for the countless victims of Nazi violence who did not believe in any religion, whether their origins were Jewish, some form of Christian, both, or other. If not, it is yet another act of confiscation of memory.

If they did not believe in any religion, why would they want to be part of a religious ceremony? If it is a joint Jewish and Christian ceremony, it's likely to try to remember everyone.

From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 01:26 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Contrarian: Don't you think that a ceremony to commemorate all the victims, which tries to take into account their beliefs (hence the mixed ceremony) should also take into account that a great many were not believers?

My grandfather, socialist and atheist, died a few years ago. His memorial service was one of the most engaging, poignant things I have ever experienced - and no mention of God or religion. Had he died in a similar act of barbarity, I know I for one would react strongly against a service to commerate his death (amongst those of others) that did not take into account his beliefs.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 01:35 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There should be a ceremony for everyone, and as it is mixed ashes one can't isolate the DNA of who was a devout Jew, devout Christian, or atheist of either or both of those backgrounds, or the odd Muslim (believer or not) from some of the Soviet republics and the Balkans.

What brought that to mind was specifically some funeral memorials for "Jewish atheists" I knew and valued: Lea Roback, the writer Dan Daniels, and some others who are not publicly known. The memorials definitely included Jewish cultural references but nothing religious in nature, as the people we were honouring were staunch atheists. So were a great many "politicals" (including Jews) exterminated by the Nazis.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 02:28 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So of course we must take a religious ceremony in which believers turn to God for consolation and strength, and ruin it by including some atheist who wants to stand upp and shout "There is no God! I don't believe in this! Some of those ashes were atheist ashes!"

Let atheists hold a secular ceremony of their own if they want to, on the off chance that maybe some of those who died were atheists, whom atheists presumably believe are now non-existent and would know nothing about it anyway.


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 29 March 2005 02:33 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
So of course we must take a religious ceremony in which believers turn to God for consolation and strength, and ruin it by including some atheist ...

Balderdash. Including the "non-faithful" is no more difficult (nor inappropriate) than including different faiths, and by no means does it "ruin" it for everyone.

Giving an atheist a Christian or Jewish funeral or memorial is no more appropriate than giving a Christian or a Jew a Hindu funeral or memorial.

And frankly, if including atheists threatens your faith, your faith isn't worth much.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 02:35 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Contrarian, I think you're being needlessly insulting. No one is speaking of disparaging the beliefs of those Jews, Christians, and other believers who perished. Why on Earth could a ceremony dedicated to the lives and deaths of these people not include the acknowledgement of secularists? Would it really diminish the religious rites to have some acknowledgement of those secular atheists who died, many in large part because of their beliefs? Remember, they came for the communists and the trade unionists first.

That last bit is just insulting, and you owe a lot of people an apology. Because we are atheists we do not mourn loss? We do not remember? We do not "feel" as you feel?


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 02:41 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
If it is a joint Jewish and Christian ceremony, it's likely to try to remember everyone.
And what the Hell is this? Just divide the atheists into "Jewish" and "Christian" atheists. They're covered. Because, you know, the atheists didn't really mean it.

From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 02:44 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Posters on this forum have been extremely disparaging of religious people and religious beliefs time and time again; I do not see why I should be more sensitive to their beliefs than they have been to mine.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 02:46 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So let me get this straight: In a fit of pique over comments on a discussion forum, you are willing to disparage the memory of Holocaust dead?

Wow.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 02:46 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nothing like offending the memory of the many secular Socialists, Communists, Liberal Humanists and others murdered by the Nazis. (Many of those people were of Jewish origin - people who were both Jews and political enemies were singled out for especially cruel mistreatment at the very onset of the Nazi regime - no wonder Walter Benjamin committed suicide when he thought he was going to be turned over to the Gestapo.

Nobody wishes to insult the beliefs of observant Jews and Christians! I don't believe in God, and certainly think a rabbi, priest etc should be included in the commemorative ceremony.

The secular commemorative ceremonies I've attended commemorated the lives of the people who have died, their contribution to the world, how their memory lives on and continues to enrich the world. I've never heard any petty cracks about "religion is a bunch of hokum" - for one thing, that would be needlessly offensive to persons of faith attending the ceremony.

Every year, in Berlin, there is a huge commemoration at the empty grave of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. The Nazis posthumously "disappeared" their bodies in 1935. People of all leftist persuasions: social-democrats, old and reconstructed communists, anarchists, and various shadings of far left and anticapitalists attend, and put thousands of red roses on their graves.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 29 March 2005 02:47 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Posters on this forum have been extremely disparaging of religious people and religious beliefs time and time again; I do not see why I should be more sensitive to their beliefs than they have been to mine.

You constitute the majority in North America. We constitute a minority.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 02:47 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And for the record, this is one atheist who has never disparaged religious belief or faith. You can witness numerous battles with Stockholm and others. Or not. You just dropped considerably in my estimation.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 29 March 2005 02:49 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Posters on this forum have been extremely disparaging of religious people and religious beliefs time and time again; I do not see why I should be more sensitive to their beliefs than they have been to mine.

Were some of these disparagers among the Holocaust dead? Or if not, what's your vested interest in excluding them? How much Christian charity would it really cost you to include them (besides the obvious answer of "too much, apparently").


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 02:58 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Boy, are you guys twisting this argument! Tell you what; using quotations and the context, demonstrate exactly how I could be said to have disparaged any victims of the Holocaust. Edited to add; Coyote, you are the one who falsely accused me of this and I have no respect for someone who indulges in such dishonesty. Shame on you!

What I am objecting to are the people here and now who are refusing to allow Christians and Jews to perform a religious ceremony to commit the ashes of these people to God and to pray for everyone who died there, whatever their beliefs. And why couldn't other people hold a separate secular memorial? No one is saying they can't do it, just that they have no business trying to hi-jack a RELIGIOUS ceremony.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Contrarian ]


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 03:03 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And what we're questioning is why a memorial service for Holocaust victims should be intrinsically religious, especially given the respect given to Jewish and Christian victims by acknowledging both these beliefs. Why stop there? Why not be truly inclusive? You're right, a separate and purely secular ceremony could be held; so could a separate Christian or separate Jewish ceremony. However, if the idea is to commemorate ALL the victims, why not include ALL the victims?

YOU are the one being needlessly divisive, and you should damn well be ashamed of yourself.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 03:05 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How can a ceremony be separate, when the ashes of the dead are forever intermingled? And nobody here has objected to a rabbi or a priest or pastor of any Christian denomination saying a prayer for the faithful or for anyone. All I said was that the memory of those who did not believe in a faith should be honoured as well. Why do you find that objectionable?

There are many such ceremonies - I attended the memorial for the victims of the Vel d'Hiv roundup of Jews in Paris - there was a rabbi present, an old resistant who gave a secular speech, and representatives of the state apologising for French complicity in these crimes.

Were you not moved when Willy Brandt, who was a social-democrat and anti-Nazi exile and not a religious man as far as I know, kneeled at the monument to the dead of the Warsaw Ghetto to express contrition for the Nazi genocide?


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 03:09 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
How can a ceremony be separate, when the ashes of the dead are forever intermingled?
That's beautiful lagatta, but apparently we've all missed the point. This ceremony, if we listen to Contrarian, is about her and her experience on a discussion forum.

From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 03:16 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Boy, are you guys twisting this argument! Tell you what; using quotations and the context, demonstrate exactly how I could be said to have disparaged any victims of the Holocaust.
No answer for this, Coyote, and all who swallowed his false accusation?

From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885

posted 29 March 2005 03:30 PM      Profile for Draco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
No answer for this, Coyote, and all who swallowed his false accusation?

You would require the acknowledgement of the atheists who were killed, on terms which would respect their beliefs, to be relegated to a separate ceremony. That would qualify as disparaging them, in my opinion.


From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 03:38 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your answer is self-evident; as is your disingenuousity. Not to recognize and incorporate the beliefs of those atheists who died does indeed denigrate their death, especially when their beliefs are so disparaged as to be considered on a lower level than those of other victims.

And I already quoted where you said that a joint Jewish/Christian ceremony would "cover" the athiests; oh, and also the part where you said atheists wouldn't care because

quote:
maybe some of those who died were atheists, whom atheists presumably believe are now non-existent and would know nothing about it anyway.
Well, news for you: We do care. Especially given that a large number of committed atheist victims of the Holocaust were also commited socialists, and where I come from we remember and honour the sacrifice of those who went before us.

In case you haven't figured it out yet, you hateful little person, we're the ones arguing for inclusion. YOU are the one who says our beliefs don't matter enough to be included.

When you're in a hole, quit digging Contrarian.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 March 2005 03:41 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dearest Coyote, Contrarian is not a hateful little person.

I'm just posting to say that I wish that all the good people on this thread could take a deep breath, see that it might be worth cutting one another a bit of slack for time needed to understand and interpret, and then try again.

Ok?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 03:43 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
She has made it perfectly clear that atheist deaths do not matter in the same way that Jewish or Christian deaths do, skdadl; how is that anything other than hateful? I'm certainly glad the care of my grandfather's memory, or that of anyone I love or have loved, is not in her hands.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 03:50 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I had/have several friends who are/were former resistance fighters or survivors of Nazism. (Most have passed on of old age, of course...). In general these people are/were nonbelievers, as people from various left traditions. In other times and places there are or were a lot of religious leftists (Latin American being one) but in general in Europe of the day, this was not the case. I find it most hateful that anyone should insult the memory of these people who suffered so much and fought so bravely, and of their comrades who did not survive.

I find what Contrarian said to be most hateful. Yes, I've read hateful postings about religious beliefs and practices by secular babblers, but they have always been warned not to do it again.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 03:51 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Draco:
You would require the acknowledgement of the atheists who were killed, on terms which would respect their beliefs, to be relegated to a separate ceremony. That would qualify as disparaging them, in my opinion.
No.
I would expect a joint Christian-Jewish ceremony to remember all of the victims WITHOUT specifying what percentage held which religious or political beliefs and which percentage of the ashes we will pray for and which percentage we will not pray for because they may not have believed in God. They were all murdered, they were all victims, the specific reasons why each person was murdered is not important; we would ask God to bless all of them. THE POINT IS THAT IT IS A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY! Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists.

It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out. I mean, should we demand that a Christian-Jewish ceremony include Orthodox, Conservative and Reform rabbis as well as Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Eastern Orthodox, Calvinist priests and ministers as well as ministers for any other sect that possibly had some adherents among the dead?


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Amy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2210

posted 29 March 2005 03:58 PM      Profile for Amy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure if I'm expressing confusion over the same thing as many of you above-the article didn't give many details- but why does it have to be a religious ceremony to begin with, when the identities of those that they are burying is unknown?
From: the whole town erupts and/ bursts into flame | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885

posted 29 March 2005 04:00 PM      Profile for Draco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists.

As someone has mentioned, there can't be a separate, secular ceremony to bury the ashes. It can only be done once. The point is that the ceremony should be inclusive of all the victims, reflective and respectful of their beliefs. It should be as inclusive as possible.

quote:
It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out.

It is not a waste of time to honour the dead by respecting their beliefs. It is very human to desire a memorial which reflects one's beliefs; they are at the core of who one is. It should be as inclusive as possible.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Draco ]


From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 04:11 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What you are saying, Draco, is that Jews and Christians must not be allowed to practice their religion.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 29 March 2005 04:12 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists.

So you wouldn't be offended if, the next day, the non-Christian, non-Jewish remembrants dug up the ashes and reburied them? Great! Thanks!

quote:
It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out.

How about we leave the Christians out this time then? You seem rather unconcerned about someone being excluded, so you wouldn't mind if it's you this time then? Again, great!

quote:
I mean, should we demand that a Christian-Jewish ceremony include Orthodox, Conservative and Reform rabbis as well as Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Eastern Orthodox, Calvinist priests and ministers as well as ministers for any other sect that possibly had some adherents among the dead?

Uh, if this were solely scheduled to be a Jewish ceremony, and if Christians weren't invited, you'd be furious. You wouldn't be saying "Oh, should we demand that a Jewish ceremony include Christian and ....".

Can you at least be that honest? You'd be furious, wouldn't you?


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Amy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2210

posted 29 March 2005 04:21 PM      Profile for Amy   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
What you are saying, Draco, is that Jews and Christians must not be allowed to practice their religion.

What!?!

No, that is ifact the opposite of what he, and anybody else on this thread who is objecting to the specific religious nature of this ceremony, is saying.


From: the whole town erupts and/ bursts into flame | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 04:24 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No, Magoo. I would happily attend a Jewish funeral, a Christian funeral and a secular memorial. But I would not demand that they arrange their services to reflect my own beliefs and I would not tell them they are not allowed to pray for certain ashes that might not have belonged to their group. Honestly, you guys are like a bunch of medieval Christians arguing over relics. Why do you care if you have the ashes handy or not?

The problem is not that you folks want to memorialize the victims; the problem is that you want to prevent Jews and Christians from holding their own religious ceremony.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Contrarian ]


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 04:25 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So, let us honour these victims of Nazism. I thought of "La Rose and le Réséda" by Louis Aragon because it specifically deals with the topic of believers and non-believers among executed resistance fighters, though Aragon is certainly not my favourite poet - too national-patriotic. But it can be a start:

La Rose et le Réséda

Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas
Tous deux adoraient la belle
Prisonnière des soldats
Lequel montait à l'échelle
Et lequel guettait en bas
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Qu'importe comment s'appelle
Cette clarté sur leur pas
Que l'un fut de la chapelle
Et l'autre s'y dérobât
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas
Tous les deux étaient fidèles
Des lèvres du coeur des bras
Et tous les deux disaient qu'elle
Vive et qui vivra verra
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Quand les blés sont sous la grêle
Fou qui fait le délicat
Fou qui songe à ses querelles
Au coeur du commun combat
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Du haut de la citadelle
La sentinelle tira
Par deux fois et l'un chancelle
L'autre tombe qui mourra
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Ils sont en prison Lequel
A le plus triste grabat
Lequel plus que l'autre gèle
Lequel préfère les rats
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Un rebelle est un rebelle
Deux sanglots font un seul glas
Et quand vient l'aube cruelle
Passent de vie à trépas
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Répétant le nom de celle
Qu'aucun des deux ne trompa
Et leur sang rouge ruisselle
Même couleur même éclat
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

Il coule il coule il se mêle
À la terre qu'il aima
Pour qu'à la saison nouvelle
Mûrisse un raisin muscat
Celui qui croyait au ciel
Celui qui n'y croyait pas

L'un court et l'autre a des ailes
De Bretagne ou du Jura
Et framboise ou mirabelle
Le grillon rechantera
Dites flûte ou violoncelle
Le double amour qui brûla
L'alouette et l'hirondelle
La rose et le réséda

Louis Aragon


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 March 2005 04:31 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Amy, although the identities of the victims whose ashes have just been found obviously can't be known, in a more general sense it is known who was sent to Sachsenhausen and when and why, so it is possible to have a sense of proportion about the groups of people who died there.

I believe that Sachsenhausen was one of the earlier camps the Nazis set up, before the beginning of the war, and because it was so close to Berlin it was a convenient place to send many political prisoners, although pogroms against German Jews had begun before the war started too. So I think that the population was always diverse (in terms of the reasons people were condemned), more so than in many other camps, especially those set up later in the east.

There are lots of fine websites about how the camp system developed and who was imprisoned when; I just found this one by googling.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885

posted 29 March 2005 04:39 PM      Profile for Draco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Honestly, you guys are like a bunch of medieval Christians arguing over relics. Why do you care if you have the ashes handy or not?

The problem is not that you folks want to memorialize the victims; the problem is that you want to prevent Jews and Christians from holding their own religious ceremony.


The committal of the ashes to the earth is not a trivial thing. It can only be done once. I just think it is important to truly acknowledge, to the best we are able, the beliefs of those who are being honoured through this act.

As a spiritual person, I cannot fathom how it would diminish the ceremony to include aspects that reflect the practices and beliefs those of those who were not religious.


From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 29 March 2005 05:09 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I had never even heard of this camp until today, but...

Having a row over how to best pay tribute while laying to rest the remains of those killed by the Nazis.

Wow.

quote:
There is some soul of goodness in things evil,
Would men observingly distil it out.
Wm Shakespeare

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 05:10 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"Die Moorsoldaten" ["The Peat Bog Soldiers"]

A poem about internees in an early Nazi concentration camp (in German and English). This particular camp was in the northern moorlands near the Dutch border:

Wohin auch das Auge blicket, Moor und Heide nur ringsum
Vogelsang uns nicht erquicket, Eichen stehen kahl und krumm.
Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor!
Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor!

Auf und nieder geh'n die Posten, keiner, keiner kann hindurch.
Flucht wird nur das Leben kosten! Vierfach ist umzäunt die Burg.
Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor.
Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor.

Doch für uns gibt es kein Klagen, ewig kann's nicht Winter sein.
Einmal werden froh wir sagen: Heimat, du bist wieder mein!
Dann zieh'n die Moorsoldaten nicht mehr mit dem Spaten ins Moor.
Dann zieh'n die Moorsoldaten nicht mehr mit dem Spaten ins Moor.

Far and wide as the eye can wander, bog and moor are everywhere
Not a bird sings out to cheer us, oaks are standing bent and bare.
We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog.
We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog.

Up and down the guards are pacing, no one, no one can break through
Flight would mean a sure death facing, guns and barbed wire greet our view.
We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog.
We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog.

But from us there's no complaining, winter will in time be past
One day we shall cry, rejoicing: "Homeland dear, you're mine at last!"
Then will the peat bog soldiers march no more with their spades to the bog.
Then will the peat bog soldiers march no more with their spades to the bog.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 29 March 2005 05:30 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes heph, Im somewhat sorry I posted this link
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 March 2005 05:33 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Bacchus, I think that Will-yum is encouraging us to go on in that quotation, not to quit.

We can restore general good feeling and respect here, as we should.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 05:48 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Blessed are the peacemakers.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 29 March 2005 05:56 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought it referred to any manufacturer of dairy products?

I couldnt resist that


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 06:14 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:

We can restore general good feeling and respect here, as we should.

I'm not sure how. Contrarian seems intent on ignoring that inclusivity actually means including people, even those that don't agree. Anyone else notice that no one here has denied that there should be a Jewish and a Christian prescence at this internment? But someone seems to feel that atheists just die, then become Jewish or Christian post de facto.

She has also decided it is alright to demean the beliefs and struggles of many of those who died for their beliefs, simply because they do not conform to hers.

As much as I understand your point, and Heph's, but tell me: Who was demanding (with me) that homosexuals be included in Yad Vashem? Because we matter. All of us. This smacks very much to me of Contrarian trying to lay whole claim to the Holocaust, and very specifically so in order to spite atheists on this board. That is shameful, and I do not make peace with that.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 06:23 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
...I would happily attend a Jewish funeral, a Christian funeral and a secular memorial. But I would not demand that they arrange their services to reflect my own beliefs and I would not tell them they are not allowed to pray for certain ashes that might not have belonged to their group...

What part of this did you not understand, Coyote?
quote:
...I would expect a joint Christian-Jewish ceremony to remember all of the victims WITHOUT specifying what percentage held which religious or political beliefs and which percentage of the ashes we will pray for and which percentage we will not pray for because they may not have believed in God. They were all murdered, they were all victims, the specific reasons why each person was murdered is not important; we would ask God to bless all of them. THE POINT IS THAT IT IS A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY! Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists...
Is this not clear enough for you?

I will just add that if I had heard there was going to be a Jewish service I would have no objection, and I would never be so arrogant as to say they must include Christian speakers or part of the Christian liturgy in their service. I would still be willing to attend, as I would for a memorial run by homosexuals, gypsies, communists, Lutherans or any other group.

Some posters have argued either that a religious service should be not allowed, or it should be watered down into a non-religious committee meeting and THAT is what I object to. If you want a secular service, go ahead but do not ban religious services.

As for who gets to bury the actual ashes, WHO CARES? They are just physical remains, they have no mystical meaning, no soul, nothing there to appreciate what is being done with them 60 years after the life went out of them. I mean, I'm not a big fan of open casket funerals, they never look as if they are just sleeping to me; and I see no big difference between having a funeral with the body present or a memorial service after the body has been buried.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Contrarian ]


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 06:30 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is very clear to me, Contrarian. Atheists just do not matter to you. What on Earth would predicate that the internment of these bodies be completely religious in nature? The fact that you want it to be? This is the laying down of ashes that can only be done once. What you are telling the families of the atheists who died is that if they want to see their family respected it will have to be on their own time - because you sure as hell aren't going to go even the slightest bit out of your way to accomodate them.

What do you think we were asking for, Contrarian? The right to sneer every time a prayer was said, or God was mentioned? To kick the religious out? All either lagatta, Magoo, myself, or others have argued is that an event that can only be done once should actually be inclusive. We mourn as you mourn, Contrarian, and you are denying that, telling us to shuffle off and not bother you with our secularism. Frankly, that sucks. I expected better of you. I will not again.


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 29 March 2005 06:47 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What I said above, edited. And Coyote? Fuck you.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 06:48 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
not worth it.

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 06:55 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
now, how did that happen?

[ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]


From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 29 March 2005 07:00 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is just a whole lot of hot air anyways. Since the article says that they were found during an excavation, they were already laid to earth and this whole ceremony is really about honoring the dead.

Now, in that light, may I please use my STFU bat?


From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 07:12 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here are some pictures of the camp as it is today - rather too prettified, perhaps.

http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Sachsenhausen/ConcentrationCamp/Tour01.html

Walter Benjamin on remembering the nameless: "Schwerer ist es das Gedächtnis der Namenlosen zu ehren als das der Berühmten. Dem Gedächtnis der Namenlosen ist die historische Konstruktion geweiht."
(Walter Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften, I, S. 1241)


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 29 March 2005 07:16 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanx for the link, lagatta.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 29 March 2005 07:33 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There will be plenty more, Coyote . Here is one - despite the home page all in German, there is content in English - I checked. http://www.gedenkstaette-sachsenhausen.de/ Since I'm studying German, I'll keep an eye open for this story - haven't seen anything on the German public broadcaster www.dw-world.de so far. I have attended similar commemorations, and they always had a "civic" component as well as prayers and homelies by clerics.

I thank Bacchus again for this link. It is a pity that someone is small-minded. And no, I don't like it any more when it is us atheists who insult people of faith. I think it is essential that there be a rabbi and a Christian cleric. It isn't a matter of silly political correctness. The Nazis added insult to injury by making sure that their victims would disappear in "night and fog". (Nacht und Nebel). A generation later, their pupils of Operation Condor did the same - Ningun Nombre, the desaparecid@s.

Retrieving the dead and discovering their stories is a key task of the living, and not only for people of faith. It is an essential way of declaring "Never Again!"


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 30 March 2005 08:10 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
No, Magoo. I would happily attend a Jewish funeral, a Christian funeral and a secular memorial. But I would not demand that they arrange their services to reflect my own beliefs and I would not tell them they are not allowed to pray for certain ashes that might not have belonged to their group.

Are you on crack?

No one has said that there can't be Jewish and Christian prayers at the ceremony. What they're saying is that they want a secular component INCLUDED in the burial service! They want both religious and secular components included in the ONE burial ceremony. They can't have more than one burial ceremony because you can only bury the ashes ONCE. So they want that ONE time to be inclusive of EVERYONE'S beliefs!


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DavisMavis
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7508

posted 30 March 2005 09:32 AM      Profile for DavisMavis     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, I'm with Michelle on this one. Can't they have an interfaith kind of service, maybe with multiple speakers or something? I don't agree with the idea of having separate ceremonies for mixed ashes, so the only real solution is having a mixed ceremony for mixed ashes. I'm not an expert on the dynamics of a memorial service, but maybe they could have a service that memorialized Christians, Jews, Atheists, and Agnostics? I don't think anyone on this forum is really trying to be disingenuous, but the discussion has to be about inclusion, not exclusion.
From: the occupied territory of nova scotia | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 30 March 2005 09:47 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, I'm not with anyone who thinks that Contrarian is on crack. I also am not with anyone who thinks that Coyote should fuck himself. I'm also not with anyone who thinks that anyone else here is a "hateful little person."

DavisMavis is quite right to offer people a chance to breathe deeply, realize that many have been writing right past each other in this thread, not offering anyone else a chance to rethink a bit and concede a bit.

I mean, what really matters in these discussions? One's own self-righteous sense of having been right from square one, or a developing sense of different values and fairness?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 30 March 2005 09:58 AM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here is a fascinating account of Peter Marcuse, the son of German Jewish Marxist exile from Nazism Herbert Marcuse burying his father's ashes in Berlin.

Skdadl, I disagree. Contrarian was extremely insulting and there is no reason to find common ground with her on this matter. Nobody on this thread insulted people of faith or said prayers or clerics should not play a part in the ceremony.

Ha'aretz has a better report - I'll retrieve it. There is definitely a civic component to the ceremony honouring the memory of the people murdered at the camp.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 30 March 2005 11:53 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks lagatta. I was vaguely familiar with who Marcuse was. I have to know more now I've read your post. merci grazia
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 30 March 2005 12:18 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is, I think, the culture of memory that is most important about Nazi atrocities (or indeed, any atrocity) and given that as a basic premise, inclusion is far better than exclusion, even if its just a added line line "in memory of all the victims of this slaughter, jew and gentile, political and non-political, religious and non-religious"
From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 30 March 2005 12:56 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by DavisMavis:
Can't they have an interfaith kind of service, maybe with multiple speakers or something?

That's all anyone was asking for right from the start of this thread.

No, I don't REALLY think Contrarian is "on crack", it's just an expression, and maybe one I shouldn't have used. Although I think, reading this thread, that she might have forgotten to take her reading comprehension pills yesterday if she can interpret the posts in this thread, including lagatta's beginning post, as a request to banish religious people from the service, or stop them from doing a religious observance.

And it's been explained to her again and again and again and again that this is not what was meant, and she stubbornly sticks to her misinterpretation.

What else are we supposed to think?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 30 March 2005 02:06 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That she's on crack.

There. It had to be said. Skdadl, do you have a better explanation for why she's sticking to the belief that the seculars are out to prevent anyone of any faith from praying? Give me one good one and I'll edit this.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 30 March 2005 02:18 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Probably because she became upset early on and had no space to rethink her position before she found herself accused of "disparaging Holocaust victims," a charge that tends to make further generous and thoughtful discussion impossible, at least within the first 24 hours, in my experience.

Y'know, most people are willing to do a little self-criticism in a fair environment. I think that Contrarian has shown herself to be a babbler of that capacity, but for a few hours yesterday, things here were happening too hot and fast for anyone to be fair.

I thought that when I first read the whole stretch (I'd missed a couple of hours), and I think it now.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659

posted 30 March 2005 02:39 PM      Profile for swallow     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
One hundred and fifty urns, each holding 30 kilograms (66 pounds) of ashes, were buried near the camp's former crematorium in a joint Christian and Jewish ceremony.

The names of some victims were read aloud in symbolic tribute to all of those who died.

"It is an act of piety," said Adam Koenig, among some 50 survivors of the camp who attended Tuesday's ceremony.

"We should not be allowed to forget them," said Koenig, who traveled from Frankfurt, as the ashes were interred.


Words fail. A layer of ashes, intermingled, 1.5-metres thick. Words should fail.


From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 30 March 2005 11:33 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't have time to discuss this in detail.

Skdadl, I appreciate your fairmindedness very much.

Lagatta, I started off too harshly and I am sorry for that; I still think that a ceremony either has to be religious, in which case God is mentioned and spoken to and present, or non-religious, in which case God is not mentioned. If the first is thought to leave out the non-religious dead, the second leaves out the religious dead. I don't actuaqlly believe either kind of ceremony would actually leave anyone out, but I think that if a religious ceremony is planned, it should not be expected to become non-religious.

Coyote, you made a false accusation which you did not back up, and you refused to pay attention to what I did say. You owe me an apology.


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 30 March 2005 11:44 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:
Lagatta, I started off too harshly and I am sorry for that; I still think that a ceremony either has to be religious, in which case God is mentioned and spoken to and present, or non-religious, in which case God is not mentioned. If the first is thought to leave out the non-religious dead, the second leaves out the religious dead. I don't actuaqlly believe either kind of ceremony would actually leave anyone out, but I think that if a religious ceremony is planned, it should not be expected to become non-religious.

There is no room in your worldview for a hybridized ceremony?


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 30 March 2005 11:46 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Contrarian:

Coyote, you made a false accusation which you did not back up, and you refused to pay attention to what I did say. You owe me an apology.



Like hell.

From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca