Author
|
Topic: Ashes of Nazi victims to be buried
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 29 March 2005 02:33 PM
quote: So of course we must take a religious ceremony in which believers turn to God for consolation and strength, and ruin it by including some atheist ...
Balderdash. Including the "non-faithful" is no more difficult (nor inappropriate) than including different faiths, and by no means does it "ruin" it for everyone. Giving an atheist a Christian or Jewish funeral or memorial is no more appropriate than giving a Christian or a Jew a Hindu funeral or memorial. And frankly, if including atheists threatens your faith, your faith isn't worth much.
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 29 March 2005 02:46 PM
Nothing like offending the memory of the many secular Socialists, Communists, Liberal Humanists and others murdered by the Nazis. (Many of those people were of Jewish origin - people who were both Jews and political enemies were singled out for especially cruel mistreatment at the very onset of the Nazi regime - no wonder Walter Benjamin committed suicide when he thought he was going to be turned over to the Gestapo. Nobody wishes to insult the beliefs of observant Jews and Christians! I don't believe in God, and certainly think a rabbi, priest etc should be included in the commemorative ceremony. The secular commemorative ceremonies I've attended commemorated the lives of the people who have died, their contribution to the world, how their memory lives on and continues to enrich the world. I've never heard any petty cracks about "religion is a bunch of hokum" - for one thing, that would be needlessly offensive to persons of faith attending the ceremony. Every year, in Berlin, there is a huge commemoration at the empty grave of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. The Nazis posthumously "disappeared" their bodies in 1935. People of all leftist persuasions: social-democrats, old and reconstructed communists, anarchists, and various shadings of far left and anticapitalists attend, and put thousands of red roses on their graves.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 29 March 2005 03:38 PM
Your answer is self-evident; as is your disingenuousity. Not to recognize and incorporate the beliefs of those atheists who died does indeed denigrate their death, especially when their beliefs are so disparaged as to be considered on a lower level than those of other victims.And I already quoted where you said that a joint Jewish/Christian ceremony would "cover" the athiests; oh, and also the part where you said atheists wouldn't care because quote: maybe some of those who died were atheists, whom atheists presumably believe are now non-existent and would know nothing about it anyway.
Well, news for you: We do care. Especially given that a large number of committed atheist victims of the Holocaust were also commited socialists, and where I come from we remember and honour the sacrifice of those who went before us. In case you haven't figured it out yet, you hateful little person, we're the ones arguing for inclusion. YOU are the one who says our beliefs don't matter enough to be included. When you're in a hole, quit digging Contrarian. [ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Coyote ]
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477
|
posted 29 March 2005 03:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by Draco: You would require the acknowledgement of the atheists who were killed, on terms which would respect their beliefs, to be relegated to a separate ceremony. That would qualify as disparaging them, in my opinion.
No. I would expect a joint Christian-Jewish ceremony to remember all of the victims WITHOUT specifying what percentage held which religious or political beliefs and which percentage of the ashes we will pray for and which percentage we will not pray for because they may not have believed in God. They were all murdered, they were all victims, the specific reasons why each person was murdered is not important; we would ask God to bless all of them. THE POINT IS THAT IT IS A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY! Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists. It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out. I mean, should we demand that a Christian-Jewish ceremony include Orthodox, Conservative and Reform rabbis as well as Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Eastern Orthodox, Calvinist priests and ministers as well as ministers for any other sect that possibly had some adherents among the dead?
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885
|
posted 29 March 2005 04:00 PM
quote: Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists.
As someone has mentioned, there can't be a separate, secular ceremony to bury the ashes. It can only be done once. The point is that the ceremony should be inclusive of all the victims, reflective and respectful of their beliefs. It should be as inclusive as possible. quote: It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out.
It is not a waste of time to honour the dead by respecting their beliefs. It is very human to desire a memorial which reflects one's beliefs; they are at the core of who one is. It should be as inclusive as possible. [ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Draco ]
From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469
|
posted 29 March 2005 04:12 PM
quote: Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists.
So you wouldn't be offended if, the next day, the non-Christian, non-Jewish remembrants dug up the ashes and reburied them? Great! Thanks! quote: It is a waste of time trying to list and "be inclusive" of every single political opinion and belief and sect and ethnic group and sexual identity of the people who died; because you are going to leave someone out.
How about we leave the Christians out this time then? You seem rather unconcerned about someone being excluded, so you wouldn't mind if it's you this time then? Again, great! quote: I mean, should we demand that a Christian-Jewish ceremony include Orthodox, Conservative and Reform rabbis as well as Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Eastern Orthodox, Calvinist priests and ministers as well as ministers for any other sect that possibly had some adherents among the dead?
Uh, if this were solely scheduled to be a Jewish ceremony, and if Christians weren't invited, you'd be furious. You wouldn't be saying "Oh, should we demand that a Jewish ceremony include Christian and ....". Can you at least be that honest? You'd be furious, wouldn't you?
From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 29 March 2005 04:25 PM
So, let us honour these victims of Nazism. I thought of "La Rose and le Réséda" by Louis Aragon because it specifically deals with the topic of believers and non-believers among executed resistance fighters, though Aragon is certainly not my favourite poet - too national-patriotic. But it can be a start: La Rose et le Réséda Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Tous deux adoraient la belle Prisonnière des soldats Lequel montait à l'échelle Et lequel guettait en bas Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Qu'importe comment s'appelle Cette clarté sur leur pas Que l'un fut de la chapelle Et l'autre s'y dérobât Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Tous les deux étaient fidèles Des lèvres du coeur des bras Et tous les deux disaient qu'elle Vive et qui vivra verra Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Quand les blés sont sous la grêle Fou qui fait le délicat Fou qui songe à ses querelles Au coeur du commun combat Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Du haut de la citadelle La sentinelle tira Par deux fois et l'un chancelle L'autre tombe qui mourra Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Ils sont en prison Lequel A le plus triste grabat Lequel plus que l'autre gèle Lequel préfère les rats Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Un rebelle est un rebelle Deux sanglots font un seul glas Et quand vient l'aube cruelle Passent de vie à trépas Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Répétant le nom de celle Qu'aucun des deux ne trompa Et leur sang rouge ruisselle Même couleur même éclat Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas Il coule il coule il se mêle À la terre qu'il aima Pour qu'à la saison nouvelle Mûrisse un raisin muscat Celui qui croyait au ciel Celui qui n'y croyait pas L'un court et l'autre a des ailes De Bretagne ou du Jura Et framboise ou mirabelle Le grillon rechantera Dites flûte ou violoncelle Le double amour qui brûla L'alouette et l'hirondelle La rose et le réséda Louis Aragon
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Draco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4885
|
posted 29 March 2005 04:39 PM
quote: Originally posted by Contrarian: Honestly, you guys are like a bunch of medieval Christians arguing over relics. Why do you care if you have the ashes handy or not?The problem is not that you folks want to memorialize the victims; the problem is that you want to prevent Jews and Christians from holding their own religious ceremony.
The committal of the ashes to the earth is not a trivial thing. It can only be done once. I just think it is important to truly acknowledge, to the best we are able, the beliefs of those who are being honoured through this act. As a spiritual person, I cannot fathom how it would diminish the ceremony to include aspects that reflect the practices and beliefs those of those who were not religious.
From: Wild Rose Country | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795
|
posted 29 March 2005 05:09 PM
I had never even heard of this camp until today, but...Having a row over how to best pay tribute while laying to rest the remains of those killed by the Nazis. Wow. quote: There is some soul of goodness in things evil, Would men observingly distil it out. Wm Shakespeare
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 29 March 2005 05:10 PM
"Die Moorsoldaten" ["The Peat Bog Soldiers"]A poem about internees in an early Nazi concentration camp (in German and English). This particular camp was in the northern moorlands near the Dutch border: Wohin auch das Auge blicket, Moor und Heide nur ringsum Vogelsang uns nicht erquicket, Eichen stehen kahl und krumm. Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor! Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor! Auf und nieder geh'n die Posten, keiner, keiner kann hindurch. Flucht wird nur das Leben kosten! Vierfach ist umzäunt die Burg. Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor. Wir sind die Moorsoldaten und ziehen mit dem Spaten ins Moor. Doch für uns gibt es kein Klagen, ewig kann's nicht Winter sein. Einmal werden froh wir sagen: Heimat, du bist wieder mein! Dann zieh'n die Moorsoldaten nicht mehr mit dem Spaten ins Moor. Dann zieh'n die Moorsoldaten nicht mehr mit dem Spaten ins Moor. Far and wide as the eye can wander, bog and moor are everywhere Not a bird sings out to cheer us, oaks are standing bent and bare. We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog. We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog. Up and down the guards are pacing, no one, no one can break through Flight would mean a sure death facing, guns and barbed wire greet our view. We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog. We are the peat bog soldiers, we're marching with our spades to the bog. But from us there's no complaining, winter will in time be past One day we shall cry, rejoicing: "Homeland dear, you're mine at last!" Then will the peat bog soldiers march no more with their spades to the bog. Then will the peat bog soldiers march no more with their spades to the bog.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477
|
posted 29 March 2005 06:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by Contrarian: ...I would happily attend a Jewish funeral, a Christian funeral and a secular memorial. But I would not demand that they arrange their services to reflect my own beliefs and I would not tell them they are not allowed to pray for certain ashes that might not have belonged to their group...
What part of this did you not understand, Coyote? quote: ...I would expect a joint Christian-Jewish ceremony to remember all of the victims WITHOUT specifying what percentage held which religious or political beliefs and which percentage of the ashes we will pray for and which percentage we will not pray for because they may not have believed in God. They were all murdered, they were all victims, the specific reasons why each person was murdered is not important; we would ask God to bless all of them. THE POINT IS THAT IT IS A RELIGIOUS CEREMONY! Anyone is welcome to hold a secular ceremony and I would expect such a ceremony to also memorialize ALL of the people who died, not just the atheists and communists...
Is this not clear enough for you?I will just add that if I had heard there was going to be a Jewish service I would have no objection, and I would never be so arrogant as to say they must include Christian speakers or part of the Christian liturgy in their service. I would still be willing to attend, as I would for a memorial run by homosexuals, gypsies, communists, Lutherans or any other group. Some posters have argued either that a religious service should be not allowed, or it should be watered down into a non-religious committee meeting and THAT is what I object to. If you want a secular service, go ahead but do not ban religious services. As for who gets to bury the actual ashes, WHO CARES? They are just physical remains, they have no mystical meaning, no soul, nothing there to appreciate what is being done with them 60 years after the life went out of them. I mean, I'm not a big fan of open casket funerals, they never look as if they are just sleeping to me; and I see no big difference between having a funeral with the body present or a memorial service after the body has been buried. [ 29 March 2005: Message edited by: Contrarian ]
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881
|
posted 29 March 2005 06:30 PM
It is very clear to me, Contrarian. Atheists just do not matter to you. What on Earth would predicate that the internment of these bodies be completely religious in nature? The fact that you want it to be? This is the laying down of ashes that can only be done once. What you are telling the families of the atheists who died is that if they want to see their family respected it will have to be on their own time - because you sure as hell aren't going to go even the slightest bit out of your way to accomodate them. What do you think we were asking for, Contrarian? The right to sneer every time a prayer was said, or God was mentioned? To kick the religious out? All either lagatta, Magoo, myself, or others have argued is that an event that can only be done once should actually be inclusive. We mourn as you mourn, Contrarian, and you are denying that, telling us to shuffle off and not bother you with our secularism. Frankly, that sucks. I expected better of you. I will not again.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 30 March 2005 12:56 PM
quote: Originally posted by DavisMavis: Can't they have an interfaith kind of service, maybe with multiple speakers or something?
That's all anyone was asking for right from the start of this thread. No, I don't REALLY think Contrarian is "on crack", it's just an expression, and maybe one I shouldn't have used. Although I think, reading this thread, that she might have forgotten to take her reading comprehension pills yesterday if she can interpret the posts in this thread, including lagatta's beginning post, as a request to banish religious people from the service, or stop them from doing a religious observance. And it's been explained to her again and again and again and again that this is not what was meant, and she stubbornly sticks to her misinterpretation. What else are we supposed to think?
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659
|
posted 30 March 2005 02:39 PM
quote: One hundred and fifty urns, each holding 30 kilograms (66 pounds) of ashes, were buried near the camp's former crematorium in a joint Christian and Jewish ceremony.The names of some victims were read aloud in symbolic tribute to all of those who died. "It is an act of piety," said Adam Koenig, among some 50 survivors of the camp who attended Tuesday's ceremony. "We should not be allowed to forget them," said Koenig, who traveled from Frankfurt, as the ashes were interred.
Words fail. A layer of ashes, intermingled, 1.5-metres thick. Words should fail.
From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477
|
posted 30 March 2005 11:33 PM
I don't have time to discuss this in detail.Skdadl, I appreciate your fairmindedness very much. Lagatta, I started off too harshly and I am sorry for that; I still think that a ceremony either has to be religious, in which case God is mentioned and spoken to and present, or non-religious, in which case God is not mentioned. If the first is thought to leave out the non-religious dead, the second leaves out the religious dead. I don't actuaqlly believe either kind of ceremony would actually leave anyone out, but I think that if a religious ceremony is planned, it should not be expected to become non-religious. Coyote, you made a false accusation which you did not back up, and you refused to pay attention to what I did say. You owe me an apology.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|