babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Iraq and Afghanistan -- are they different?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Iraq and Afghanistan -- are they different?
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 01 March 2006 10:08 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 


Three years after the U.S. invaded to overthrow a repressive regime, to pursue the war on terror, and to liberate the people, the suffering of the Iraqi people intensifies:

(BBC) Many dead in new Baghdad attacks

Four years after the U.S. invaded to overthrow a repressive regime, to pursue the war on terror, and to liberate the people, the suffering of the Afghanistani people intensifies:

quote:
The [Canadian] force's mission includes supporting reconstruction efforts, but Eikenberry offered a dire warning for his successor: "There will be an increase in violence in the spring, and we can forecast an increase in violence in the summer."

History will challenge us to explain the difference between these two adventures. It will accuse of self-serving moral blindness. It will ask, "Did anyone really not grasp that both invasions had everything to do with U.S. strategic and economic interests? Did anyone really find a soft spot in the American heart for suffering foreigners?"

Rather than wait for history, I would like to pose those questions now. Iraq and Afghanistan: Details aside -- what is the difference?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca