Author
|
Topic: 2002 Social Assistance Income
|
|
|
|
|
Kindred
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3285
|
posted 26 May 2003 03:08 PM
quote: News alerts Ontario Campaign 2000 - Toronto, 25 Mar 03 Ontario’s poor children getting poorer, study finds There are more poor children than there were a decade ago and they are deeper in poverty, says a report released today by Campaign 2000. Ontario is home to 390,000 poor children, a 41% increase over the last decade. Forty percent live in families existing on incomes more than $10,000 below the poverty line. “Ontario’s strong economy led to reduced welfare caseloads but welfare numbers only tell half the story,” says Pedro Barata”, author of Child Poverty Persists, Time to Invest in Children and Families. “One in four poor children live in a family with full time, full year earnings. Their situation can be attributed to government policy that scrapped social supports for families with children. The economy just wasn’t strong enough to fill the void.” Low-income husband-wife families saw their income decline by nearly $900 since 1996 putting them $10,500 below Statistics Canada Low Income Cut-off line. Lone mothers would need, on average, $8,600 to reach the poverty line. A main culprit is Ontario’s minimum wage; at $6.85 it ranks fourth in the country. It would need to double to take an average family out of poverty. The report also points to the removal of rent controls, cuts to subsidized child care and welfare and the lack of transitional health supports for families leaving social assistance.
What is interesting is the difference that exists between these figures that our Govt deems acceptable and for those Immigration requires from foreign students wanting to study in Canada quote: According to Citizenship and Immigration To receive your student authorization to study in Canada you must prove to the Canadian authorities that you can meet their estimates for living expenses. Exclusive of tuition, and other student fees, each student should show proof of the following in bank statements, registered funds or other sources: $10 000 for twelve months, an additional $4000 for a spouse and $3000 for each dependent (child). These costs include food, accomodation, transportation, medical insurance, books, clothing and sundries. How they have arrived at these figures and whether the differential of location has been considered is not clear, but be certain these figures are an absolute minimum. The figures supplied by each institution will be more accurate guidelines and will be considered instead of this index when available. And then there's Quebec As Quebec requires separate authorization for students applying to study in that province, it too has different (and lower) numbers associated with living costs. Again, these are the amounts that you will have to show proof of $9 600 for single students. $12 960 for two people (spouse or other dependent), $16 000 for three and $2240 for each additional dependent.
These are guaranteed financial support requirements for students entering Canada, and although they are IMO optomistic at best it is interesting to note they are higher than Social assistance payments. These amounts are calculated to reflect basic shelter and food, over and above the cost of education. Also assumed is that because these are not permanent residents in Canada expenditure for clothing and other items will be minimal over the 12 months residency in Canada. FYI Here is a site that shows the Average household expenditures, provinces and territories Stats Canada http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/famil16c.htm The Acceptable Living Level Report prepared by The Social Planning Council of Winnipeg in March 2001 found that a single mother with two children, one aged 6 and one aged 15 would need an income of $27,374.00 in order to achieve a "standard of living that should be within everyone's reach". Taking into consideration that the above hypothetical family would spend $6096.00 on food in order to meet basic nutritional requirements. a mere $7800.00 on shelter costs, and I think that is rather low compared to the cost of shelter in most cities across Canada. The cost of public transport is $1832.40. http://www.spcw.mb.ca/reference/doc_all2000.pdf I would love to see our fat cat politicians who are asking for a 27% raise in pay live on $10,000.00 a year. That wouldnt even cover their tax free travel allowance, or their bar bills. What really irks me is that Campaign 2000 is focusing so much attention of the Right of Children to have access to recreational programs and activities across Canada. Its bloody lunacy for anyone to believe its smarter or better of kinder to get a hungy kid on a ball field rather than to feed him/her. They are more worried about whether kids living in poverty are in good physical shape than they are about the kids having a safe place to live, food and adequate clothing. health care and access to education.
From: British Columbia | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Southside Red
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4135
|
posted 26 May 2003 07:33 PM
I totally agree with Kindred. In Edmonton, the cost of living is not cheap. I am in the position of having to apply for welfare. I just completed a year-long course last month, but have been unable to find work. My last students finance cheque was in March. My rent and utilities are $1000 per month for me and my 2 grandchildren, aged 12 and 15. I have not yet paid May's rent, and am in danger of eviction from a house with no insulation, windows that don't open and doors that don't lock. The vacancy rate here is about 1% in a good month, so moving is not an option. The waiting list for public housing runs about 2 1/2 years. I receive $228 per month from the Children in Need program, and $407 from the Child Tax Benefit. I will be allowed approximately $1050 on welfare, minus the above.Kindred is right, in that it is more important that kids eat and have a safe place to live than that they play sports. However, in Alberta, the government and the non-profits are so intent on churning out good future corporate citizens that they neglect the day-to-day necessities of food and shelter. How else can you explain charities such as Sport Central, which provides free sports equipment for low-income kids, or the race by corporations to get publicity by providing computers for schools in poor neighbourhoods? While I believe that the emphasis should be on kids, the reality is that no matter how many free hot lunches a child gets at school or at a playground over the summer - if they go home to a parent who hasn't eaten for 2 days, hasn't paid the rent, and is depressed over an inability to find work or the money to look for work - that child is going to have problems that playing hockey can't alleviate.
From: Edmonton, AB | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Kindred
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3285
|
posted 26 May 2003 09:30 PM
I am thinking the reason behind BC dropping the working age to 12 or whatever is so that welfare can use that as the age to say kids are no longer eligible for assistance. Sometimes I get so angry - Went and picked up 2 of the supplements I take to maintain my health. Fibromyalgia can compromise your immune system as well. And it cost me $72.00. And thats just 2 of them. I take about 8 different thingsa day. No one factors those into the income required for disabled people, or poor people, I dont see vitamins etc on the list of neccessities. I spend about $150.00 a month out of my own pocket for supplements. Disabled people have the added expense of having to hire someone to shovel the snow, mow the lawn, do odd jobs around the house that an able bodied person could do. Most cant use public transit and have to rely on either their own vehicle or taxis. Someone said being poor is expensive? Case lot sales come around and if the poor could afford to put out a couple of hundred dollars they would be paying 50 cents for a can of soup instead of $1.19 a can, but they cant do it. So they pay more for food and everything else. The whole system stinks. Hockey my ass, kids who are malnourished cant put their all into sports or hope to be the next super star.
From: British Columbia | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kindred
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3285
|
posted 26 May 2003 10:11 PM
This will make you sick, what CEOs are paid in Canada http://222youth.com/salaries.htm quote: Ontario Power Generation CEO and Director - Ronald W. Osborne He has a $775,000 salary, a $975,000 annual bonus, and $99,008 in car allowances and benefits. BC Hydro CEO Michael Costello - CEO made $466,057 in salary and bonuses in 2001. This is a raise of $86,000 from the previous year. In 1996/97, his first year as head of BC Hydro, Costello earned $127,000. More than 500 employees at BC Hydro earned $100,000 or more last year. Seven other BC Hydro board members earned more than $200,000 in 2000/01 and bonuses ranged from $45,000 to $92,000
http://www.cbc.ca/news/features/hydroone_salaries.html
From: British Columbia | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|