babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » The Wal-Mart Way II: The Empire Strikes Back

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The Wal-Mart Way II: The Empire Strikes Back
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 01 July 2005 11:22 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Since my other Wal-Mart thread has been locked, thought I'd start a new one continuing the chronicling of the tales of our favourite corporate citizen:
quote:

A former Wal-Mart executive responsible for inspecting apparel factories in Central America has sued the company, accusing it of firing him for being too aggressive about finding workplace violations, like locked exits and mandatory 24-hour shifts.

The executive, James W. Lynn, said he upset Wal-Mart officials by complaining vigorously about apparel contractors that fired pregnant workers and about one company official who, according to several inspectors, was corrupt and treated substandard factories leniently.

In a lawsuit filed two weeks ago in state court in Arkansas, where Wal-Mart Stores is based and Mr. Lynn lives, he asserted that he was terminated in 2002 "for truthfully reporting the abysmal working conditions in Central American factories utilized by Wal-Mart and for refusing to comply with Wal-Mart's demand that he certify factories in order to get Wal-Mart's goods to market."

. . . .

Several of his monitoring reports noted that factories in Honduras padlocked exits, lacked drinking water, did not have toilet paper and did not pay overtime to some employees. He said some factories were so hot that people passed out and that several gave pregnancy tests to newly hired women, dismissing those found to be pregnant. Such tests and firings would violate Wal-Mart's rules.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/01/business/01walmart.html?pagewanted=print


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 01 July 2005 12:09 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sounds good. (The thread topic, I mean. Not Walmart's ongoing, atrocious conduct.)

Here's the original thread for reference.

[ 01 July 2005: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 02 October 2006 06:59 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest private employer, is pushing to create a cheaper, more flexible work force by capping wages, using more part-time workers and scheduling more workers on nights and weekends.

Wal-Mart executives say they have embraced new policies for a large number of their 1.3 million workers to better serve their customers, especially at busy shopping times — and point out that competitors like Sears and Target have made some of these moves, too.

But some Wal-Mart workers say the changes are further reducing their already modest incomes and putting a serious strain on their child-rearing and personal lives. Current and former Wal-Mart workers say some managers have insisted that they make themselves available around the clock, and assert that the company is making changes with an eye to forcing out longtime higher-wage workers to make way for lower-wage part-time employees.

Investment analysts and store managers say Wal-Mart executives have told them the company wants to transform its work force to 40 percent part-time from 20 percent. Wal-Mart denies it has a goal of 40 percent part-time workers, although company officials say that part-timers now make up 25 percent to 30 percent of workers, up from 20 percent last October.


http://tinyurl.com/o8x4b


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 02 October 2006 07:06 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Best solution to WalMart is simply not to shop there, and encourage others to do likewise.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 02 October 2006 10:13 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When people buy cheap stuff from Walmart, they're contributing to social and economic destruction of local economies. Every buck spent at Walmart is another UI-EI-O dollar the feds will steal, withold from and sometimes payout to unemployed workers.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 04 December 2006 06:19 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
20 years gets you a polo shirt.

quote:


The program includes several new perks “as a way of saying thank you” to workers, like a special polo shirt after 20 years of service and a “premium holiday,” when Wal-Mart pays a portion of health insurance premiums for covered employees. Sarah Clark, a spokeswoman for Wal-Mart, said the program was a “a more formalized, contemporary approach” to communicating with and collecting feedback from its fast-growing work force.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/04/business/04walmart.html


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 04 December 2006 06:31 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And wow. How generous of the to pay PART of the premiums for their employees' health care! What a crock.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
oldgoat
Moderator
Babbler # 1130

posted 04 December 2006 07:03 AM      Profile for oldgoat     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
20 years gets you a polo shirt.

..and they're working extra hard to meet the anticipated demand...


From: The 10th circle | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 04 December 2006 05:17 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by josh:
20 years gets you a polo shirt.

20 years at Wal-Mart should get you a coupon for a free euthanization down at the local vet. I know I'd use it.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 03 August 2007 05:23 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Wal-Mart is Mexico’s largest private-sector employer in the nation today, with nearly 150,000 local residents on its payroll. An additional 19,000 youngsters between the ages of 14 and 16 work after school in hundreds of Wal-Mart stores, mostly as grocery baggers, throughout Mexico—and none of them receives a red cent in wages or fringe benefits. The company doesn’t try to conceal this practice: its 62 Superama supermarkets display blue signs with white letters that tell shoppers: OUR VOLUNTEER PACKERS COLLECT NO SALARY, ONLY THE GRATUITY THAT YOU GIVE THEM. SUPERAMA THANKS YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20056614/site/newsweek/from/RS.5


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 13 August 2007 12:18 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wal-Mart isn't even impressing investors these days:

quote:
The company's growth rate has slowed to a crawl, overtaken by rivals once thought to be no match for the "beast of Bentonville." Average annual profit growth lags that of Target Corp., Costco Wholesale Corp. and other competitors. Wal-Mart's repeated efforts to push upscale merchandise have ended in tears. Expansion at home is still thwarted by hundreds of U.S. communities; and several forays abroad are struggling or have been scrapped. The stock price is down 32 per cent since the turn of the century, when CEO Lee Scott took the reins, while the Morgan Stanley retail index has soared 180 per cent....As it is, many on Wall Street are convinced Scott will be out of a job come next year if he can't show some progress over the next six months in breathing new life into the world's largest retailer. He isn't given much hope of doing so.

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/245470


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 13 August 2007 03:30 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
OUR VOLUNTEER PACKERS COLLECT NO SALARY, ONLY THE GRATUITY THAT YOU GIVE THEM. SUPERAMA THANKS YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING

This practice isn't limited to WalMart and it's not limited to Mexico. All the grocery stores here work that way and the baggers make a lot more than they would if they were being paid some sort of minimum wage.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Lard Tunderin' Jeezus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1275

posted 13 August 2007 05:57 AM      Profile for Lard Tunderin' Jeezus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Where are you located these days?
From: ... | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
bruce_the_vii
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13710

posted 13 August 2007 09:26 PM      Profile for bruce_the_vii     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
One way to look at taxes is that wage earners carry the load, have the responsibility ultimately to pay for government services. In Canada the average wage earner pays maybe $15,000 in taxes a year, all told, by this logic. Minimum wage earners are very heavily subsidized by average workers. Thus Wal Mart is actually not only making it on the backs of poorly paid workers but on the back of everyone that pays taxes. Some how succesful corporations should be paying their fair share of taxes, shouldering the load.
From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 21 November 2007 02:38 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

A collision with a semi-trailer truck seven years ago left 52-year-old Deborah Shank permanently brain-damaged and in a wheelchair. Her husband, Jim, and three sons found a small source of solace: a $700,000 accident settlement from the trucking company involved. After legal fees and other expenses, the remaining $417,000 was put in a special trust. It was to be used for Mrs. Shank's care.

Instead, all of it is now slated to go to Mrs. Shank's former employer, Wal-Mart Stores Inc.


Two years ago, the retail giant's health plan sued the Shanks for the $470,000 it had spent on her medical care. A federal judge ruled last year in Wal-Mart's favor, backed by an appeals-court decision in August. Now, her family has to rely on Medicaid and Mrs. Shank's social-security payments to keep up her round-the-clock care.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119551952474798582.html


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 21 November 2007 06:23 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
"Two years ago, Wal-Mart chief executive H. Lee Scott Jr. outlined ambitious goals to turn the world's largest retailer into a more environmentally friendly company," reports the Washington Post. "Wal-Mart yesterday released its first report on its progress in meeting those goals, and showed mixed results." Among Wal-Mart's supposedly "significant gains" was "selling 22 seafood products that have been certified as sustainable by the Marine Stewardship Council" (MSC). But, as the Center for Media and Democracy's Bob Burton has written, the MSC's environmental record is questionable. One independent review, "commissioned by three U.S. foundations, concluded that MSC's claim to certify 'sustainable' fisheries 'in most cases is not justified,' and fisheries 'that are not in compliance with the law can be, and have been, certified,'" states an excerpt from Burton's new book, "Inside Spin."

prwatch.org

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 27 November 2007 05:32 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The company, which earned $2.9 billion last quarter, sued a former employee who suffered permanent brain damage in a car accident to get back $470,000 it spent on her medical bills.

Here’s the story. The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) reported yesterday that Deborah Shank, 52, who stocked shelves in Wal-Mart’s store in Cape Girardieu, Mo., was broadsided by a tractor-trailer seven years ago, causing permanent brain damage. Unable to walk without help or communicate meaningfully with her family, she now lives in a nursing home.

Wal-Mart’s health insurance plan paid about $470,000 in medical expenses. But after the Shanks sued and settled with the trucking company, Wal-Mart sued the couple and demanded its money back, plus interest and legal fees—more than the $417,477 the settlement had placed in a special-needs Medicaid trust fund for Shank’s future health care expenses.



Wal-Mart sues brain-damaged worker

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 08 January 2008 03:26 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
CBC Newsworld is showing the doc WalMart Nation tonight at 10. In the advert, there are picketeers walking around a WalMart store with signs that say "WalMart pays women less".
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca