[ 18 October 2008: Message edited by: writer ]

I can't remember what is supposed to be good for, though.

It was a cheap paint scrapper-- nicely marked up.

One has to wonder why a product is better sold over T.V. than in stores. My answer (captain obvious, here) is that they are products best seen and not touched before purchase.

It pains me to admit that I have watched the infomercials for the "Magic Bullet". Somewhat counterintuitively, it's a food processor and not a sex toy.

I'm not interested in the product being, well, rather jaded after the "Ronco Pocket Apendectomy Kit" debacle and my subsequent suspension from all London Secondary School science classes, but I am interested in the pitch. It's interesting, in the way that Fox's "When Good Pets Go Bad" schlockumentary was interesting.

Incedentally, I don't think that Buffalo was ever a good pet.

So, I am a bit of a connoisseur of sorts, of bad T.V. Bad 70's made for T.V. movies, the worst commercials, the most formulaic sitcoms, the most unscarry horror movies, I know them all, and have them in a handy easy to use guide.

And now, it can be yours for not $99.99, not $59.99, but for the low low price of $29.99.!!!!!!!!! Plus shipping and handling.

But wait! There's More!

If you act now, get my latest diatribe on Bob "Benedict" Rae for no extra Charge!!!!!!!!

That's a 120.00 dollar value!!!!!!!!

Act now while quantities last. Operators are standing by.

[ 18 October 2008: Message edited by: Tommy_Paine ]

quote:

---

Originally posted by writer:
Boom Boom, you are taking me where I've never been before: http://www.infomercialratings.com/

---

I've seen adds from the 1800's that have the same schtick. You'd think that after a person gets burned on those X-ray specs in the back of comic books, they'd, you know, recognize the modus operandi of shady advertising, and be immune to the pitch. And even if you didn't get burned, you'd see it happen to others and avoid products sold with dubious techniques.

But, either the same people fall for it over, and over again, or everyone falls for it once.

More annoying to me is (I might have the name wrong) "Billy Mays" (or is it Mayer?) the guy who does commercials for a number of products. His delivery is a high pitched shrill on the edge of shouting.

Thank you to whoever invented the remote.

As annoying as that is, it's done for a reason. Advertisers know a lot of people leave the T.V. on as background noise or engage themselves in other things while commercials are on. That guy's voice is at a frequency made to cut through the noise in your house-- and your walls.

Related, almost all chanels now broadcast commercials at a higher volume than the program. I would point to the History Chanel as being one of the worst offenders.

Of course, this is actually illegal, and the cable companies claim they don't do it.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tommy_Paine:
I find him annoying-- except for the first time through. His patter was interesting, in that it included all the usual elements of cheezy commercials, but with a more amusing delivery.

More annoying to me is (I might have the name wrong) "Billy Mays" (or is it Mayer?) the guy who does commercials for a number of products. His delivery is a high pitched shrill on the edge of shouting.

Thank you to whoever invented the remote.

As annoying as that is, it's done for a reason. Advertisers know a lot of people leave the T.V. on as background noise or engage themselves in other things while commercials are on. That guy's voice is at a frequency made to cut through the noise in your house-- and your walls.

Related, almost all chanels now broadcast commercials at a higher volume than the program. I would point to the History Chanel as being one of the worst offenders.

Of course, this is actually illegal, and the cable companies claim they don't do it.

But, they are liars.

---