babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Fred Korematsu v George W. Bush

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Fred Korematsu v George W. Bush
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 20 February 2004 03:16 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A fascinating Nat Hentoff column from the Village Voice:

quote:
In 1942, when he was 22 years old, Fred Korematsu—working as a welder in a California shipyard—had refused to be put into an internment camp. He was arrested and locked up. It was that conviction that the Supreme Court upheld in the 1944 Korematsu v. United States case, deciding that in wartime, the government could indeed put him away without a hearing and without any judicial determination that he had done anything wrong. It is this king-like authority that George W. Bush now claims over those he designates as "enemy combatants."

It wasn't until 1983 that San Francisco Federal District Judge Marilyn Patel overturned that 1944 Korematsu conviction. Among the lawyers filing that successful 1983 appeal were some whose parents had also been imprisoned in those internment camps.

Now, at the age of 84, Fred Korematsu continues to protest against a president, George W. Bush, who also holds both American citizens and noncitizens in legal black holes without the most basic civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution.

Korematsu has authorized an amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States, in his name, on behalf of American citizen Yaser Hamdi, designated an "enemy combatant" by President Bush and held for two years in an American navy brig without guaranteed Sixth Amendment access to a lawyer, and without any prospect of a trial at which he can defend himself. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld maintains that Hamdi can be held in this legal black hole for "the duration of hostilities," and that could take generations.

Fred Korematsu's message to the Supreme Court is also on behalf of non-American citizens imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay—Khaled A.F. Al Odah et al. and Shafiq Rasul et al.



From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 20 February 2004 03:28 PM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ironic you should start this thread today:


"The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the Constitution forbids the Bush administration from holding U.S. citizens indefinitely and without access to lawyers or courts when they are suspected of being “enemy combatants.”

The justices will consider the case of Jose Padilla, an American citizen, former Chicago gang member and convert to Islam who was arrested in his home city after a trip to Pakistan. The government alleges he was part of a plot to detonate a radiological “dirty bomb” in the United States."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4313349/


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 20 February 2004 03:31 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, and it isn't just US citizens either.

quote:
Separately, the court will hear a challenge this spring from foreign-born terror suspects held in open-ended custody at the military's prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. That case asks whether those more than 650 prisoners may challenge their detention and treatment in U.S. courts.

From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca