Author
|
Topic: Saudi women respond to religious police...with pepper spray
|
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44
|
posted 26 September 2007 12:23 PM
quote:
According to Dr. Al-Marshood, the two commission members approached the girls in order to "politely" advise and guide them regarding their inappropriate clothing.Consequently, the two girls started verbally abusing the commission members, which then lead to one of the girls pepper-spraying them in the face as the other girl filmed the incident on her mobile phone, while continuing to hurl insults at them.
http://www.asharqalawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=1&id=10309 Good work, ladies!
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
bliter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14536
|
posted 26 September 2007 12:58 PM
Here's the conclusion: quote: The two females were then escorted to the police station where they apologized for the attack, were cautioned and then released.
While one may deplore what many will see as the suppression of Saudi women, it is one thing to answer a verbal assault in kind, and quite another to turn to physical assault, which pepper spraying is. Many are fast to condemn the unjustified use of this weapon against demonstrators.
From: delta | Registered: Sep 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
bliter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14536
|
posted 27 September 2007 02:35 PM
L T: quote: I don't think that two women pepper spraying cops is even remotely comparable to legions of paramilitary troops gassing protesters with tear gas, pepper spray, tasers and whatever else they can get away with.If you can't see the difference in power than you really need to check your head.
I referred to pepper spraying only. The introduction of straw men was unnecessary - as was the snide.
From: delta | Registered: Sep 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
minkepants
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13708
|
posted 30 September 2007 03:08 PM
nahhhhh. fuck that shit. good fer them.you introduced the issue of demonstrators,trying to draw moral equivalence between police attacking citizens and citizens defending themselves agaist police. In tis context, to be more accurate,to draw a parallel between police attacking citizens and chattel defending themselves against a misogynist dictatorship of slothful inbreds,governing at the pleasure of the western petrochemical industry. If anyone initiated rhetorical sleight-of-hand, it was you. One has to wonder who these ladies were that they got away with a warning. The Shrub twins? One suspects that they weren't peasants. oh yeah, also, in addition to looking up the definition of straw man you should make a note that snide is an adjective, not a noun. [ 30 September 2007: Message edited by: minkepants ]
From: Scarborough | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323
|
posted 30 September 2007 03:22 PM
bliter,A word of advice. When someone seems to be attacking you, viciously, for something you don't even know you did, pay no attention. Eventually they go away. By the way, welcome again to babble, and your contributions have been appreciated. unionist
From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
bliter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14536
|
posted 30 September 2007 04:14 PM
Give it up, minkepants. You are trying to make too much out of what followed from the rather mild observation of the second post.My reference to "snide" was purposely done, not wishing to overdo it - and was in response to this: quote: If you can't see the difference in power than you really need to check your head.
Straw men or red herrings. Take yer pick. On keyboard skills: I won't comment on your own.
From: delta | Registered: Sep 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|