babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Saudis crack down on flirting and Valentine's Day

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Saudis crack down on flirting and Valentine's Day
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 05:51 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Prosecutors in Saudi Arabia have begun investigating 57 young men who were arrested on Thursday for flirting with girls at shopping centres in Mecca.

The men are accused of wearing indecent clothes, playing loud music and dancing in order to attract the attention of girls, the Saudi Gazette reported.

They were arrested following a request of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice.

The mutaween enforce Saudi Arabia's conservative brand of Islam, Wahhabism.

Earlier in the month, the authorities enforced a ban on the sale of red roses and other symbols used in many countries to mark Valentine's Day.


BBC World News


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 23 February 2008 05:55 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Is it wrong that I'm thrilled that the men got arrested rather than the women they were flirting with??? which is my perception of what usually happens.....
From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 06:03 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:
Is it wrong that I'm thrilled that the men got arrested rather than the women they were flirting with??? which is my perception of what usually happens.....

Yeah, well I hope you're kidding in some kind of macabre way, because there is no such thing as a society where one gender is free while the other is enslaved.

Amnesty International report on how this wonderful Islamic state treats women gently and kindly, compared to men

quote:
‘I use a sword to kill male criminals... and firearms, specifically pistols, to kill female criminals. I think firearms are used to spare the woman, as to be executed by sword would mean uncovering her head and exposing her neck and some of her back.’ - Sa’id bin Abdullah bin Mabrouk al-Bishi, a Saudi Arabian executioner

From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 23 February 2008 06:09 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It doesn't matter anyhow. They're our allies, so there's no need to bring democracy and freedom to the Saudis!
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 23 February 2008 06:10 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
yes I'm being dark and ironic

I would hope we would evolve to a society where no one gender is persecuted


From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 06:16 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:
yes I'm being dark and ironic

I would hope we would evolve to a society where no one gender is persecuted


Ok, I agree.

The reason I opened this thread is a little crusade [sic] I'm on.

I'm convinced that the main monotheistic religions in vogue in our society (Yahweh-worship, God&Jesus-worship, Allah-worship) are forces for darkness and backwardness - both in matters of science and morality.

This doesn't apply to the believers of those religions.

What it means is that every single Jew, Christian, or Muslim who wants to promote scientific enlightenment or social progress - even plain simply humanitarian values - must do so in spite of the accepted doctrine of their religion.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
rural - Francesca
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14858

posted 23 February 2008 06:22 AM      Profile for rural - Francesca   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
but for some of those faiths, what is being done is against doctrine
From: the backyard | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 06:23 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:
but for some of those faiths, what is being done is against doctrine

With all due respect, Francesca, that's what every apologist says. Part of the evil of religion is that everyone claims theirs is the "true" doctrine.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 07:21 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Saudis crack down on flirting and Valentine's Day

Germans killed more than 6 million Jews, Gypsies, disabled people and homosexuals.

Atheists killed and imprisoned millions of human beings.

And the list goes on.

What is your point, unionist ?


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 07:32 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
What it means is that every single Jew, Christian, or Muslim who wants to promote scientific enlightenment or social progress - even plain simply humanitarian values - must do so in spite of the accepted doctrine of their religion. -unionist

Here is an example that shows that what you are saying is bullshit.

Prophet Mohammed put a halt to killing new-born females (that "instantly brought shame" to their fathers, mal relatives and tribesmen). He did that in spite of the Islamic doctrine, says unionist.

[ 23 February 2008: Message edited by: adam stratton ]


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 23 February 2008 07:34 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
His point is that he feels free to assert his understanding of montheastic relgions, entirely based on his own cultural derived experience, while not even doing a peripheral examination of other doctrines, for example Islam, which is generally not antagonisitc to scientific exploration rather, absorbs such into its doctrine.

Then having concluded that he can impose such an assertion by applying his own cultural conceptions upon others, without investigating the actuallities, he then suggests that anyone pointing out variances between the doctrines is defending socially backward practices.

[ 23 February 2008: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
marzo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12096

posted 23 February 2008 07:41 AM      Profile for marzo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:

Germans killed more than 6 million Jews, Gypsies, disabled people and homosexuals.

Atheists killed and imprisoned millions of human beings.

And the list goes on.


Germany has moved far away from its Nazi past while the article describes the brutal life-hating ideology of present-day S.Arabia.
What atheists are you talking about?
Do you believe it is necessary for you to defend the Saudi justice system?

[ 23 February 2008: Message edited by: marzo ]


From: toronto | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 23 February 2008 07:46 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Amazing. Our own propoganda distortions are so effective, people are actually able to say that Saudi Arabia is a akin to National Socialist Germany, with a straight face.

I guess what Goebbels said about lies was right.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 07:54 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
Well, more than six million people gased and otherwise killed. Probably more than 6 million roses prevented from being delivered. Same number, must be the same thing.
From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 08:07 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by rural - Francesca:

but for some of those faiths, what is being done is against doctrine



quote:

Originally posted by unionist:

With all due respect, Francesca, that's what every apologist says


Either one agrees with you, unionist, or he/she is an apologist. And you have the nerve to talk about the Saudi religious police.

Your intellectually bankrupcy is clear for all to see.


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 08:17 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:

Germans killed more than 6 million Jews, Gypsies, disabled people and homosexuals.

Atheists killed and imprisoned millions of human beings.

And the list goes on.

What is your point, unionist ?


Interesting theses:

1. Atheism is a religion?

2. The Nazis murdered millions because their atheist God told them to?

Your comments aren't offensive, really. They're just dumb.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 08:19 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:
Prophet Mohammed put a halt to killing new-born females (that "instantly brought shame" to their fathers, mal relatives and tribesmen). He did that in spite of the Islamic doctrine, says unionist.

What a kind man he was. Putting a halt to killing new-born females! And he needed some Deity to whisper that to him?

What a load.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 23 February 2008 08:19 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Secular regiemes are no cure against mass human rights violations. You guys are barking up the wrong tree.

That is the point.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 08:20 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:
Amazing. Our own propoganda distortions are so effective, people are actually able to say that Saudi Arabia is a akin to National Socialist Germany, with a straight face.

Saudi Arabia isn't "akin" to Nazi Germany - it's far worse.

You know why?

Because it still murders and tortures people today.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 08:21 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:
Secular regiemes are no cure against mass human rights violations.

Great argument!!!

Er...

Whom are you arguing against there?


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 23 February 2008 08:25 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I am arguing against the general thesis being put forward, which is that secular regiemes do not prevent mass human rights violations simply because they are secular. Muslim's practically invented secularism in state organizations and it has not prevented the state authority from being abusive to minority peoples.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 08:31 AM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cueball:
I am arguing against the general thesis being put forward, which is that secular regiemes do not prevent mass human rights violations simply because they are secular.

Nobody put forward that thesis. Try refuting theses that people actually put forward. It's more difficult, but ultimately more rewarding.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 23 February 2008 10:25 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Am I ever glad I don't live in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or any of those other undemocratic shitholes propped up by the vicious empire. I'd have been beheaded or thrown in the slammer for insulting the royal family in public by now.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 23 February 2008 10:29 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
And aren't you glad you aren't an Arab living in Canada and fingered by xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and kept without a trial for an indeterminate amount of time in a secret holding facility without any right to know the above infomation?
From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 23 February 2008 10:53 AM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
you could just as well be an arab living in Canada, with a nice house, good job, many good friends, a variety of cultural activities and with a pretty decent amount of freedom compared to all countries around the world.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 11:50 AM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Saudi Arabia isn't "akin" to Nazi Germany - it's far worse.

You know why?

Because it still murders and tortures people today. -unionist


So does Israel. Would you say that Israel is "far worse" than Nazi Germany? Why not?


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Ibelongtonoone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14539

posted 23 February 2008 12:05 PM      Profile for Ibelongtonoone        Edit/Delete Post
All comparisons to Nazi Germany lead any discussion awry, so continuing in this vein will lead nowhere usefull as I'm sure yr aware, however I think his point was that any comparison of past injustices by any government are less serious than current injustices simply because the past is academic and the Nazi Regime is in the dustbin of history while the regime in Saudi Arabia exists right now.
From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 12:51 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:
So does Israel. Would you say that Israel is "far worse" than Nazi Germany? Why not?

Childish sophistry. Grow up.


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 23 February 2008 01:46 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by unionist:
Childish sophistry. Grow up.


Just an aside semantical quibble, perhaps a better way to word that would have bee:

Immature sophistry. Grab some life experience and wisdom and get back to me, when you have it.

As really, we alkl "grow up" but that process when concluded does not always contain maturity or wisdom.

Moreover, children are much more rational and less prone to succumb to mythology, if it is not imposed upon them.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Slumberjack
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10108

posted 23 February 2008 02:18 PM      Profile for Slumberjack     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:
Germans killed more than 6 million Jews, Gypsies, disabled people and homosexuals.
Atheists killed and imprisoned millions of human beings. And the list goes on.
What is your point, unionist ?

What is your point Adam. The discussion here pertains to the evils of religion. Bringing in other examples of barbarity doesn't invalidate the focus on religion being put forth.


From: An Intensive De-Indoctrination, But I'm Fine Now | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 23 February 2008 02:27 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
you could just as well be an arab living in Canada, with a nice house, good job, many good friends, a variety of cultural activities and with a pretty decent amount of freedom compared to all countries around the world.
Yup. But not that to know when or why all that can be taken away on the word of xxxxxxxxxxxxx.

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
unionist
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11323

posted 23 February 2008 02:34 PM      Profile for unionist     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by remind:


Just an aside semantical quibble, perhaps a better way to word that would have bee:


I agree with your quibble. I actually hesitated before writing that, but didn't get around to editing. Thanks for the correction!


From: Vote QS! | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 02:36 PM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
What is your point Adam. The discussion here pertains to the evils of religion. Bringing in other examples of barbarity doesn't invalidate the focus on religion being put forth. Slumberjack

The "evil of religion" in yet another thread about how Islam is evil, when we were already discussing it in another thread.

But sprry, Slumberjack, I have not seen unionist's explanation before I asked the question. I was just thinking Why he opened yet another thread when were discussing the very same subject somewhere else and the thread was still open. But is his explanation, that I missed:

quote:
The reason I opened this thread is a little crusade [sic] I'm on.

Please tell me, Slumberjack or for "crusades" ?


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Trevormkidd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12720

posted 23 February 2008 02:43 PM      Profile for Trevormkidd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Actually the other thread is about Islam and Science which is not the very same thing.
From: SL | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged
adam stratton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14803

posted 23 February 2008 02:46 PM      Profile for adam stratton        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by adam stratton:
So does Israel. Would you say that Israel is "far worse" than Nazi Germany? Why not?

quote:
Originally posted by unionist

Childish sophistry. Grow up.


Easier to draw the Nazi comparison with S.A. than with Israel.

I prefer being a candid child to a grown up with no backbone, who peddles double-standards.

You still have not answered my question, unionist.
Show an even handedness !

[ 23 February 2008: Message edited by: adam stratton ]


From: Eastern Ontario | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 23 February 2008 02:58 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Sorry folks, but this is off-topic and descending into insults, and I don't see it getting any better, so I'm closing it.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca