babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » US tanks crush Iraqi protesters: police

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: US tanks crush Iraqi protesters: police
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 03 April 2004 05:08 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"There were two or three dead among the protestors who threw themselves under American tanks, which could not avoid them on Tahrir square," said Sergeant Abbas Mohamad.
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 03 April 2004 06:17 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Horrible. These situations make you wonder, though, how long the US can maintain the illusion that it is just a few Sunni hold-outs from the Saddam regime who oppose their prescence in Iraq.
From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 03 April 2004 08:45 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Horrible all right. Hopefully it wont be as traumatic for the drivers as it is for train engineers who run over morons on the tracks.

I guess in this case it would be under the tracks though.


From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
patrokles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3068

posted 03 April 2004 08:53 PM      Profile for patrokles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i'm a little skeptical about the 'lunging under the tanks' part... mightn't it be reasonable (and perhaps even consistant) that abc spun this?
From: schmlocation! | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
No Yards
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4169

posted 03 April 2004 09:00 PM      Profile for No Yards   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What WERE thos horrible protestors doing protesting in the a public square for in the first place? Don't they realize that this is where tanks come to drink from the fountains?

America needs to enforce tank sancturay in Iraq, where humans and tanks cannot inter-mix . . . tanks are wild animals, and humans should allow them to exist in their natural environment and keep away from them, else who knows when one of these wild creatures might consider you a threaat and suddenly attack?


From: Defending traditional marriage since June 28, 2005 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 03 April 2004 09:07 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Of course they are territorial. They are like mother elephants defending their offspring from hynas and jackals.
From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 04 April 2004 12:32 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by HeywoodFloyd:
Horrible all right. Hopefully it wont be as traumatic for the drivers as it is for train engineers who run over morons on the tracks.

It probably won't be; tank drivers, unlike train drivers, are trained to kill. It's their job.


From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 04 April 2004 12:49 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heywood, that is disgusting.

I had to read you several times over to be sure you had written something so vile.

So you're in favour of foreign tyrants "liberating" Iraqis by shutting down their press? Not only that, but you can make flaccid jokes about tanks running down protesters brave enough to behave as though it were citizens who belonged on city streets and not tanks?

Gee, Heywood -- Tiananmen Square must have been a real knee-slapper for you. I can hear you braying, all the way from Calgary.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 04 April 2004 04:17 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Tiananmen Square comes to mind.

Kids today, just no respect, throwing themselves in front of armoured vehicles. As I remember it some Chinese tank drivers stopped, others didn't bother, or didn't bother to see.

But the outrage was universal, nonetheless. Why are armoured vehicles being used for crowd control?


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 04 April 2004 06:33 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You know, I was reminded of Tiananmen Square as well, but I felt the similarity was not exact, since the man at Tiananmen simply stood there, facing the tanks, whereas these people are reported as "throwing themselves" under the tanks.

It is unclear to me what the motivations were of those who did so, since I imagine the view from a tank, unlike, say, a bulldozer, would seem to be pretty restricted.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 04 April 2004 08:22 PM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah. The other difference is that the lone protestor in Tiannamen sqaure wasn't actually crushed either.
From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 04 April 2004 08:32 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by WingNut:
Yeah. The other difference is that the lone protestor in Tiannamen sqaure wasn't actually crushed either.

Wasn't he later arrested and shot?


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
WingNut
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1292

posted 04 April 2004 08:37 PM      Profile for WingNut   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't know. Probably. It is China a most favoured trading partner where all our electronics and clothes are produced.

Maybe that's why in Iraq they allegedly dive under tanks. It is preferable to the torture they face when arrested for protesting being foreign al qaeda terrorists and all.


From: Out There | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 04 April 2004 08:57 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My whole point was that if you are going to throw yourself under a 70 ton tracked vehicle, don't be shocked if it in fact doesn't notice.

This situation is like the Rachel Corrie incident. Good for her for standing on principle. Dumb on her for forgetting that we aren't much more than a watermelon.


From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
DownTheRoad
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4523

posted 04 April 2004 09:01 PM      Profile for DownTheRoad     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Tiananmen square analogy is pretty weak considering the Chinese student protests were peaceful.

From: land of cotton | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 04 April 2004 09:38 PM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Where are the flowers and candy. Looks like you guys who supported the war better get you combat fatigues on and get over there. Private security firms are hiring as is the US army.

Good Luck, Chickenhawk.


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 04 April 2004 10:41 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by HeywoodFloyd:
This situation is like the Rachel Corrie incident. Good for her for standing on principle. Dumb on her for forgetting that we aren't much more than a watermelon.

I do hope you are unaware of the fact that in the Rachel Corrie case, the 'dozer driver played chicken with her for at least half an hour before finally running her down. It was certainly not a case of being unaware of her presence. More like a driver who would have preferred to get around her or scare her away, but settled for murder if that was what it took to get his assignment of destroying someone's home accomplished.

Now you know, I'd be very pleased if you retracted that statement. I'm sure you see that in the light of the real situation, it comes off incredibly insensitive, even brutal.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
HeywoodFloyd
token right-wing mascot
Babbler # 4226

posted 04 April 2004 11:21 PM      Profile for HeywoodFloyd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Rufus, it is like the Corrie incident in that in both cases, activists were crushed under armored tracked vehicles.

You have brought up a good point. If the intent of the tank drivers was not to crush the activists and they did so inadvertently, then do the drivers (or the US in general) deserve any anger directed against them? It seems like the drivers were doing everything they could do to avoid crushing these morons.


From: Edmonton: This place sucks | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790

posted 05 April 2004 02:22 AM      Profile for Cueball   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Anyway chickenhawk ....

In related news:

10 U.S. Troops Killed in Iraqi Violence

quote:
NAJAF, Iraq (AP) - Supporters of an anti-American cleric rioted in four Iraqi cities Sunday, battling coalition troops in the worst unrest since the spasm of looting and arson immediately after the fall of Saddam Hussein. At least 22 Iraqis, eight U.S. troops and one Salvadoran soldier died.


Iraq Ambush Hurts 3 Portugal,2 Italy Police

Four dead in North Iraq blast

British troops clash with Iraqi demonstrators

Violent Disturbances in Iraq From Baghdad to Southern Cities

quote:
By day's end, witnesses said Shiite militiamen controlled the city of Kufa, south of Baghdad, with armed men loyal to a radical cleric occupying the town's police stations and checkpoints.

[ 05 April 2004: Message edited by: Cueball ]


From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 05 April 2004 08:15 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by HeywoodFloyd:
Rufus, it is like the Corrie incident in that in both cases, activists were crushed under armored tracked vehicles.

You have brought up a good point. If the intent of the tank drivers was not to crush the activists and they did so inadvertently, then do the drivers (or the US in general) deserve any anger directed against them? It seems like the drivers were doing everything they could do to avoid crushing these morons.


Well, I tend to suspect that the tank drivers did not crush the guys inadvertently, but currently we just don't have the evidence one way or another; it could well have been accidental (unlike the murder of Rachel Corrie). But I assumed you thought so. I couldn't imagine anyone insensitive enough to be mocking people who were deliberately run over, so I had just assumed you believed that in both Corrie's case and this one it was inadvertent, just an accident based on size/momentum/poor sight lines.
If you made your original comment believing they were crushed deliberately (and knowing Corrie was), then your original comment was sick and brutal.


Meanwhile, even if the crushing in this case was accidental, it was the result of a policy of using tanks for crowd control. That is a brutal, Communist-China style policy. Stupid too. Tanks are lousy at crowd control, and it's one of the most vulnerable situations they could be in. The very fact that someone could get run over means that if they'd wanted to, anyone could have shoved an antitank mine or home-made equivalent under the treads, or even slapped something nasty right onto the undercarriage.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca