Author
|
Topic: Who finds crucified frogs blasphemous?
|
Snuckles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2764
|
posted 28 August 2008 07:09 PM
The Pope does. . . quote: ROME (Reuters) - An Italian museum on Thursday defied Pope Benedict and refused to remove a modern art sculpture portraying a crucified green frog holding a beer mug and an egg that the Vatican had condemned as blasphemous. The board of the Museion museum in the northern city of Bolzano decided by a majority vote that the frog was a work of art and would stay in place for the remainder of an exhibition. The wooden sculpture by the late German artist Martin Kippenberger depicts a frog about 1 metre 30 cm (4 feet) high nailed to brown cross and holding a beer mug in one outstretched hand and an egg in another. Called "Zuerst die Fuesse," (Feet First), it wears a green loin cloth and is nailed through the hands and the feet in the manner of Jesus Christ. Its green tongue hangs out of its mouth.
From: Hell | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921
|
posted 28 August 2008 07:13 PM
Well, I know I'm going to regret this: I do, too. I'm not sure "blasphemous" is the right word, though. At the very least, it's a lack of respect for the suffering of others.ETA: I realize that the artist claimed his sculpture was a depiction of human angst. His angst can't begin to compare to the reality of crucifixion, which was a form of state terrorism and torture inflicted almost exclusively on slaves and the poor and exploited of the empire. Just think of the other forms of terror, torture, and death just waiting to be given this kind of whimsical treatment. Here is a description of the practice. [ 28 August 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]
From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|