babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Surgeon sued for giving anesthetized patient temporary tattoo

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Surgeon sued for giving anesthetized patient temporary tattoo
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 24 July 2008 06:57 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
A female patient, in surgery for a herniated disc, found a temporary tattoo on her lower abdomen the next morning after surgery.

Phillly.com

cbs3.com

An opinion piece from The Angry Black Woman's blog:

quote:

The tattoo was not at all medical in nature. She had surgery for a herniated disc and the next morning discovered a rose tattoo had been placed on her abdomen below her panty line. The doctor doesn’t deny doing it. In fact he claims he does this with all his patients to lift their spirits after surgery. Now, the really interesting (and disturbing) thing about this situation is how people have reacted to this woman’s decision to sue. The comments on this article are just the tip of the iceberg. Many people seem to be outraged by this woman being willing to sue this doctor for marking her (however temporarily) in her pelvic area without her permission.

We’ve all gone the rounds about the politics of choice as it applies to reproduction. But the idea that women’s bodies are public property doesn’t stop there. Catcalling, comments on weight, comments on hair or makeup from strangers are all just symptoms of a larger societal delusion that women’s bodies are a commodity first. Somehow we’ve gotten stuck in this idea that a woman’s valuing of her body as a part of her self comes second because her first role is to belong to the world at large. Women who refuse to accept that paradigm and insist on being recognized as people first whether it be by yelling back at catcallers, refusing to let strangers touch them, or filing suit when they feel they’ve been violated are then castigated for having the temerity to think that they can dictate what happens to their bodies. Apparently we’re just supposed accept these “lesser” intrusions and not take steps to reclaim that sense of safety because nice girls know their place and don’t delude themselves that they have a right to feel safe and comfortable.


The Angry Black Woman: The Audacity of Bodily Autonomy


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 24 July 2008 12:16 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'd feel completely violated. Good on the patient for suing the arrogant SOB.

That's one of the reasons I am terrified of ever having surgery -- you don't know what they're doing when you're out, you can't defend yourself.

Creepy.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 24 July 2008 12:41 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Its the principle, not the particular. In other words a rose may be in offensive, even desired by all. But its the unasked for violation of the body thats the principle. It could easily have been something totally offensive, offensive only to some, not offensive to most or whatever.

You cannot say its not a violation if its something you like and is when its something you don't.


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
WendyL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14914

posted 24 July 2008 01:52 PM      Profile for WendyL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The subject/content of the tattoo is a non-issue. Patronizing, misogynist bastard needs to keep his surgical fingers where they belong!
From: PEI Canada | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 25 July 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's disgusting ! Where does he get off putting a temporary tatto right below her navel, whithout her permissuion ?!
From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Pride for Red Dolores
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12072

posted 25 July 2008 08:58 AM      Profile for Pride for Red Dolores     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
With regards to the excerpt from "Angry", this sort of makes think of the connection to abortion in the sense of a women's right to control over her own body, the state not being involved because it is a private space.

Edited to add : Didn;t realise she had already mentioned it.

[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: Pride for Red Dolores ]


From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 25 July 2008 09:31 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I can't imagine why anyone would make excuses for this (not here, but it's mentioned in the article BCG posted). That is such a violation, and no matter what his motives are.

Even if, on the off chance, he really just is completely and totally socially clueless and wasn't even thinking of it in terms of being patronizing or pulling a power trip - even if he thought it was just a really nice thing to do, a nice little touch to cheer someone up - he needs to learn, in a way he won't forget, that this is a total violation.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 25 July 2008 09:45 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If it happened in Canada, taxpayers would end up footing all the bills for the sue job, and the whole thing would be smoothed over by a provincial medical association. Besides, we have a shortage of them across the country. Blame the ONDP and Bob Rae!!!
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 25 July 2008 09:51 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But it didn't happen in Canada. Can you please not derail this thread Fidel?
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 25 July 2008 09:55 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I recommend that people read the comments on the two news sites, of which I could only get through about a dozen or so. They tell us a number of things, including how male the internet is, but also the level that the commentators understand that women's autonomy over our own bodies is insignificant and how dare we stand up for ourselves, in this particular case, and ever. The fact that all this is so completely normalized is the issue that needs challenging, is what I'm thinking.
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
reglafella
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15348

posted 25 July 2008 10:04 AM      Profile for reglafella     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I remember reading once about a guy who woke from his hernia operation to find that the surgical team had used iodine to paint his unit like a barber pole.

My guess is that if most men heard that story, magically, suddenly, they might get why crap like this isn't OK.

If a surgeon wants to brighten a patient's day, they should pop by for a visit and say "it all went well and you're going to be fine". I would think most patients would prefer that to being graffitied.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 25 July 2008 10:09 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bigcitygal:
But it didn't happen in Canada. Can you please not derail this thread Fidel?

Sorry, I was trying to relate to it from a Canadian point of view. Scuse


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 25 July 2008 11:47 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bigcitygal:
The fact that all this is so completely normalized is the issue that needs challenging, is what I'm thinking.

Exactly correct, IMV.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca