babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Ambiguous sexual advances

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Ambiguous sexual advances
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 12 July 2005 03:18 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Has anyone been involved in a situation where a physical advance was made in a wholly inappropriate context, yet because it wasn't overtly sexual, didn't know how to react or what to make of it?

Something bizarre happened to me at work yesterday. I'm a veterinarian, working occasionally and part time in a small clinic. I usually work at home (writing and translation) so sometimes I figure I just don't get out much. Anyways, I was treating this guy's cat Bill for an ingrown claw. I'd say he was in his late 50s, maybe early 60s - the guy that is, not the cat. There was lots of blood and pus and angry cat noises....and lots of talking; I have a pretty easy rapport with almost all pet owners and clients, and this guy was no exception.

When I was finished and he took Bill back in the car, he came back into the consultation room (which nobody else has ever done) while I was writing up Bill's file, and started to touch me on the nape of the neck while smiling and trying to look into my eyes while making jokes about the bill and about how I shouldn't charge too much because vets shouldn't profit from animals' distress - or something to that effect, I really wasn't listening anymore. My mind had gone on to "how am I going to get this guy out of here as quickly and as neatly as possible" - which I managed to do (though I found out later he went on to try the same trick with our 16-year-old receptionist (my boss' daughter.) My 25-year-old tech was also there the whole time, and none of us had the feeling it was an overtly sexual advance. He was just way too far into our personal spaces, a bit too sure of himself and we weren't about to make a big deal out of something we felt was harmless though definitely inappropriate.

I guess I feel bizarre about it because I've never been in a situation where I've felt sexually harassed, and I wonder if there's a definite line to be drawn between weird/inappropriate/ignorant individual behaviour and obnoxious harassment.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 12 July 2005 03:26 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Personally I feel the touching is inappropriate. If you know me you can offer a hug and when I meet you, I'll OFFER to shake your hand or do the air kiss kiss thing but touching as you told about Brebis, is a no no and should have be recognized as such by him.

Gives me the willies thinking about it. Been there done that


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 12 July 2005 03:27 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've never been sexually harassed either, but I've been in those creepy, get-me-outta-here situations. Seems to me to be a gut feeling. It you feel it, it's probably really happening.

Weird how immobilizing it is, though, isn't it? You're not sure what's going on, so you don't want to over-react, so you don't do anything emphatic. . .

Lucky you, though, to have the co-workers there so you could check your reactions with theirs.


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 12 July 2005 03:29 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The nape of your neck is unambiguously off limits.

I assume you had all the tools needed to neuter the bastard?


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646

posted 12 July 2005 03:33 PM      Profile for puzzlic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I dunno, brebis, I admire your generosity in characterizing this guy's behaviour as merely "weird/inappropriate/ignorant". I can't believe that a man of his age and normal intelligence could possibly be "ignorant" of the fact that it is inappropriate to touch the nape of the neck of a woman he knows only in a business context. I'm guessing he wouldn't, for example, try any such uninvited behaviour with his boss (even if the boss was a woman) because he'd know he'd get fired immediately.

This guy's behaviour, to me, sounds like a pretty clear-cut case of (a relatively mild form of) sexual harassment. It seems to me that he, like many harassers, may have thought you and the 16-year-old receptionist might be too shy or intimidated to call him out for his behaviour (not that you are, just that his behaviour suggests he assumed that). And, apparently, he assumed that his dollars would be more important to your employer than your physical integrity.

Given that one of the recipients of his uninvited touching turns out to have been the boss' daughter, I'm sure your employer would be more than happy to fire him as a client. Which might teach him a lesson about what he thinks he can get away in terms of touching strange women (and girls) without asking.

I gather you're not as pissed off about this as I would have been if it had happened to me (and it has, occasionally, and I was so weirded out by it that I didn't say anything, either) ... a milder way to deal with it might be to tell him right away that his behaviour is inappropriate and that he should not touch anyone in your office. I would definitely put it in "you" terms, rather than "I felt uncomfortable" -- this is about teaching the guy (1) that it is not appropriate (which he knows, whether he admits to it or not), and (2) that you don't have to apologize for calling him on it -- the problem is not that you're particularly sensitive or uptight, it's that he's a boor. Ignoring it might only encourage his assumption that he's entitled to go around touching women he doesn't know whenever he feels like it.

All that being said, you were there, so you're in the best position to judge what you feel is the best way of dealing with it ...

[ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: puzzlic ]


From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 12 July 2005 03:33 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
started to touch me on the nape of the neck while smiling and trying to look into my eyes

Um. That would sure be a problem for me, brebis noire. I'm not surprised that you're feeling shaken. I'm also not entirely sure what I would have done, but I know what I would like to think I would do, which is raise an arm and strike his off.

I think you're right that there are many people who just have a different sense of social distance, although it is also true that a lot of men (maybe especially older, but who knows?) make proprietary assumptions about women, just can't get past seeing us more or less in the way they would see children or pets.

But his hand on your neck?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646

posted 12 July 2005 03:35 PM      Profile for puzzlic     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I assume you had all the tools needed to neuter the bastard?

From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 July 2005 03:36 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think most of us have been in that kind of ambiguous, uncomfortable situation. I hate that too, brebis, and I'm sorry you went through it.

Even if it wasn't specifically a sexual advance, it was extremely inappropriate in the kind of professional situation you were in. I've never, ever gone up to a doctor or dentist or any other professional that I'm friendly with, and started rubbing their neck while joking around with them and trying to make eye contact.

People who do that sort of thing do it because they think they're a charmer. They leave themselves just enough plausible deniability that the recipient can't accuse them of anything without sounding "strident".

And it's true. Afterwards, you think, "I could have told him politely that I'm not comfortable. I could have pulled away. I was well within my rights to do that." But you don't do it, because you're frozen in the moment, trying to process the fact that the guy is doing this, and trying to figure out a) whether it's threatening, b) whether you should do anything or wait it out, and c) whether you should acknowledge it or just let it go. And by the time you unfreeze, it's over and you wonder what the hell that was all about.

Yes, I've been there and probably most of us have. And it sucks.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
belva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8098

posted 12 July 2005 04:11 PM      Profile for belva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To tie this into another thread--another reason to wear high heels: they make lovely defensive weapons!
I would have ever so firmly put my high heel on his toes or the top arch of his foot! A moment's pressure usually suffices. Then I make a sweet, womanly face, smile and say "oh, I'm so sorry". They get the message & the time or two I've done it, I never had to repeat against the same jerky guy.

From: bliss | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 12 July 2005 04:16 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
But I look crappy in high heels *sigh*

But I have found a incredulous look and a "excuse me" often works since it makes them look like the jerk they are


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 12 July 2005 04:23 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
People who do that sort of thing do it because they think they're a charmer.

I can think of some examples in my past, for sure.

A friend once suggested that I take a straight pin or a sewing needle with me to a dinner I was dreading. For some reason, in that group of old friends, I almost always got seated next to one of the husbands who thought himself a charmer and would begin fiddling with my knees below the table. Whenever that happened, I felt stuck because I really liked the guy's wife -- I didn't want to cause a scene because I didn't want to hurt her. But it had happened repeatedly.

Take a pin, said my friend. And as soon as his hand ventures on to your knee, apply yours, with pin in hand, to his. Smile serenely as you do that.

I never did it, actually. Sort of wish I had, though.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 July 2005 04:25 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The problem is, Bacchus, before you get to that action stage, you go through the whole debate in your mind about whether to take action or not. That's the "frozen" part. And by the time you figure it out, it's often over. Or, if you decide on "action" after a few moments have passed, you feel like you've missed your opportunity to give an immediate polite signal that it's unwanted, that you've let it go this long, etc.

I know none of that makes sense afterwards, but right in the moment, it's the thought process, at least for me.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 12 July 2005 04:27 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh I understand Michelle. I used to freeze myself and often still do, with a "why the f**k didnt I do or say something"

And a lot of headshaking over my freezing


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
EFA
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9673

posted 12 July 2005 04:33 PM      Profile for EFA        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Way, way, way over the line. I wish you had called him on it immediately. Unsolicited touching? Forget it.
From: Victoria, BC | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 12 July 2005 05:24 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My instinct and experience with kooky individual clients leads me lump this guy in with them. (pet owners aren't all kooky but I've seen a fair amount.)However, most don't get physical - although my boss, who is a guy, had a similar experience with a woman who wouldn't stop touching him and was acting way too familiar throughout the consultation.

He didn't make much of it, and that was my reaction as well. While I was reflecting, I remember thinking that any kind of overt negative response on my part would have been an overreaction. I could be wrong, and I understand the responses on this thread in that sense.
As well, I am always aware that I'm operating in a different culture than my own over here (I'm anglophone). This is not to say that my francophone colleagues don't recognize sexual harassment and invasion of personal space when it happens, it's just that there may be a different emotional-outlet reaction going on wherein they don't get as uptight in reaction to physicality as English culture people do. That was the feeling I got from my tech and the receptionist. (lagatta might be able to help me out here, too. )

Actually, apart from the touching which was obviously inappropriate, I was more concerned with the fact that he was trying to influence me in a very clumsy way to reduce the bill.

[ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: brebis noire ]


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341

posted 12 July 2005 06:00 PM      Profile for James        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Unless francophone culture is something *way* different than I comprehend, there was nothing ambiguous, nor ambivalent about it. Far over the line, and I suspect the "fee quantum" nothing more than cover.

In my opinion, a rather sharp "Don't be touching me, please", was called for and probably would have been effective. I say that as a man who occasionally, and regrettably in the past has played such games.

Editted to add: though I'd have never had the audacity to "touch", even back of neck, without something that I could misinterpret as an "O.K. so far".

[ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: James ]


From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534

posted 12 July 2005 06:13 PM      Profile for lagatta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Francophones do touch more readily - kisses on both cheeks are normal social greetings here, and they are not "air kisses". But I do think this guy is being overly "friendly" and patronising, even if he isn't a sexual harasser.

Magoo's idea is a useful one for your profession - just bring up the subject: "En passant, est-ce que votre matou est castré?"

You could wave a sharp knife about for emphasis.


From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 12 July 2005 07:20 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lagatta:
Magoo's idea is a useful one for your profession - just bring up the subject: "En passant, est-ce que votre matou est castré?"


That would actually have been an appropriately ambiguous and yet very authoritative response in the situation. I so wish I could think on my feet.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 July 2005 10:08 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by brebis noire:
He didn't make much of it, and that was my reaction as well. While I was reflecting, I remember thinking that any kind of overt negative response on my part would have been an overreaction. I could be wrong, and I understand the responses on this thread in that sense.

No, I think if, reflecting upon it, you feel that your reaction was right for the situation, then it probably was. Only you can know what was called for in that situation. Sometimes "overtly negative" responses are called for, but other times, just being calm and not being confrontational is the best thing to do. When feminists talk about it afterwards, I think our first reaction is to think of the ways we "should have" confronted the person, as though by not doing so it was a sign of weakness or acquiescence. But it's not. Sometimes discretion really IS the wisest course.

If, a day later, you feel you handled it well, then you did.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
anne cameron
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8045

posted 12 July 2005 10:44 PM      Profile for anne cameron     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Brebis, as an old, long-time feminist dyke... you did just fine! In any situation we do what we need to do to survive. Obviously, you can't send a hypo needle into his eyeball or drive your elbow into his gut or... you're on the job, you're a professional, he is acting inappropriately but that is no reason for YOU to lose your professionalism.

Whatever you did...worked! Chummy will be back when his cat needs something...and next time you'll make sure the examining table is at all times between you..and at the first sign of his smarmy bullshit you'll be emotionally prepared to say Fuck Off in some appropriate way ... we freeze because of inexperience. But just thinking about it, writing about it, getting supportive feedback from other feminist women give you the equivalent of a black belt where this dork is concerned.

I do hope you discuss this with the 16 year old young woman who was similarly violated..because it was a violation and this old fart KNOWS it! This young woman probably has little or no experience with this kind of slime...probably in her young eyes this was a grandfatherly guy, she likely thought him too old to even remember how to put the tap on someone...and then he betrayed her and she's probably confused and angry. If you, a more mature woman, obviously if you're a vet you're highly educated, I believe you wrote something once about having children..in her eyes you are "woman" and if YOU froze..and if you tell her that, and validate her by saying you found the whole thing creepy, then another amazon joins the ranks and if he tries it again with her he's apt to hear Back off, dude, meathooks to yourself.

Good on you for your restraint. What you need now is either a good romp with your kids or a nice long hot bath with lots of bubbles, perfumed soap and a flickering candle or two. And if there's a Mr. Brebis Noir, invite him in, do your ecological thing, save water, bath with a sweetie.

next time Chummy comes in he'll be outmaneuvred before he gets his touchy-feely little mitts out of his pockets. And bill him for the air he breathed!!


From: tahsis, british columbia | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 13 July 2005 03:13 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
I think you're right that there are many people who just have a different sense of social distance, although it is also true that a lot of men (maybe especially older, but who knows?) make proprietary assumptions about women, just can't get past seeing us more or less in the way they would see children or pets.


I don't know what was going on in his head, but from the words we exchanged during Bill the cat's procedure, I got the definite impression he considered himself to be a colourful and interesting person. When I remarked that Bill's teeth appeared to be sticking out at strange angles, he told me that several years ago his neighbour had broken Bill's jaw with a shovel - and that the neighbour ended up eating meals through a straw for a week or so as well.

Then, when I remarked that Bill's claw had stopped bleeding rather quickly, he said he was a faith healer (une personne qui arrête le sang, as they're called around here.)

From those exchanges, I considered him to be somewhat of a child and treated him accordingly (in the sense that I don't consider it appropriate to discipline someone else's child, I figured that if he didn't already know that his behaviour was beyond the limits, nothing I said or did was going to teach him anything!)

I've found everyone's reactions really interesting and some very helpful suggestions for dealing with any future situations.
Thanks Michelle for your most recent words, I found them very wise.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 13 July 2005 03:42 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I was present but didn't see a similar situation this summer.

While walking with some associates to the car, I heard the following comment from a woman, who was speaking to "John".

"John, only my husband touches my neck. If anyone else does, they go to jail."

That seems to have done the trick, though I know reference to a husband may not be appropriate for many.


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 13 July 2005 03:48 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe that did the trick in that situation, and I'm not saying it's a strange thing to say, but I personally wouldn't be comfortable saying that. It definitely puts the touching in a proprietory and sexual context in the same breath: I belong to my husband, only he gets to touch certain parts of my body.
I dunno, but that makes me go 'ick'.
Also: they go to jail? Who is she, the Queen of England?

[ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: brebis noire ]


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bookish Agrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7538

posted 13 July 2005 04:08 PM      Profile for Bookish Agrarian   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
brebis, it's strange but I have had three simular kinds of situations at my work locations in the last week. Two different towns even. Made me feel very wierd to have these women touching me in such overly familar ways. Can't figue it out, unless I'm looking even more 'buff' than usual what with handling all those square bales, because I can't recall it happening ever before.

I handled it by just moving out of the line of fire. No doubt that's maybe easier for me to do than a woman. It was definately odd though.

Maybe it's the heat


From: Home of this year's IPM | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 13 July 2005 05:13 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by brebis noire:
Also: they go to jail? Who is she, the Queen of England?

I was thinking the same thing...I might adapt that by replacing "jail" with "the hospital"!

In any case, I wouldn't be overly sensitive about the "husband" part, personally. The idea is supposed to be, only men I'm intimate get to touch me that way. And you don't qualify, so hands off!

[ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 13 July 2005 05:32 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
About the Queen of England, that reminds me it was a guy from Quebec who caused an uproar because he put his arm around the Queen when she came to visit a few years ago.
It wasLouis Garneau.
I don't know how far that goes to prove my theory that men here are more touchy-feely. Probably not far at all.

From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 13 July 2005 05:44 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, yeah, but ...

I will admit to being an uptight anglo bitch, ok? (And I really am: I internalized all these rules of social distance, and I've never entirely got over them.)

All the same, I don't know how many times I've heard European men trying that out as a line. Their physical insinuations are just expressions of a more joyful and free culture than mine, and my reactions to them are a measure of how uptight I am ... Yeah, sure.

Follow your guts.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
steffie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3826

posted 13 July 2005 05:55 PM      Profile for steffie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hear, hear. Go with the gut. I'm considering tattooing some of the above retorts as well as one from another thread ("What's a... hooter?" LOL) on the insides of my middle fingers.

My experience is that many men will push as far as they can get away with. They need to be put in their place sometimes.


From: What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow / Out of this stony rubbish? | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
nonsuch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1402

posted 13 July 2005 06:00 PM      Profile for nonsuch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Funny story.
Back when i worked in a big city hospital, that kind of experience was rather common - not just for me, but all the young women. (I suspect, though can't prove, that, in those days, health-care personnel tended to take more physical and verbal liberties, in a casual way, than men in other occupations.)
Usually, we saw it coming and just sidled out of reach, or turned away, or got very busy, without making an issue of it.
One time, i was standing in the gross-room doorway, talking to somebody, when one of these habitually over-familiar types came up behind me and put his arms around me. It was so unexpected - i hadn't heard him, didn't know who it was - that i reacted instinctively: jabbed both elbows, hard, into his stomach.

We both apologized, and he didn't sneak up on people anymore... at least, not for the rest of the time i worked there. Gut-reaction is sometimes the most appropriate reaction.


From: coming and going | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca