babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » A Question of Empathy

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: A Question of Empathy
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 27 July 2005 08:45 PM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I want to preface my question with the following:

I am ambivalent about abortion rights. I’m not "ambivalent" in the sense of "I don't care about the issue, one way or the other, because it makes no difference to me." Rather, I am "ambivalent" in the sense that I am pulled in (at least) two directions on the issue.

Part of me says that, as a very practical matter, abortion should be freely available because it’s going to happen anyway and, therefore, it should be safe. That same part of me looks at the tremendous harm caused to society by bringing an unwanted child into the world (or, even if the child is wanted, the child may not be properly cared for because the mother is far too young). I also think about the control a woman needs to have over her body in order to have an equal footing with me.

Another part of me says that there’s a little piece of life that get extinguished (regardless of whether that life is "human" or not) and it bothers me because, personally, I couldn’t even kill a rabbit if my life depended on it.

On balance, I tend to fall on the side of choice. But, there is an uneasiness about that position that bothers me.

Questions: For those who have gone through an abortion, what were your thoughts about the part of you that was being removed from your body? In your mind’s eye, was it a formless fetus or did you think about its hands and feet and whatnot? I really want to get a sense of what a person "feels" because I think it will help me to better empathize with a person (one of my nieces) who is going through that process. I also realize that I may not get any answers to these questions because the questions are so very, very personal. And, that’s okay. But, for those who may be willing to share their thought about this, I think it would be helpful to me as well as others in my position and it would be much appreciated.

Thanks.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 27 July 2005 09:34 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sven, while I definitely won't discuss anything personal with you regarding my self in this sense, I do understand how you feel torn. I think most people do. Deciding to have an abortion is not an easy thing, and the aftermath of that abortion is not easy either. Again, I err on the pro choice side, as I assume most here do. That doesn't make the woman having the abortion an awful person. For the most part it is a very hard decision, and this decision IMO is not made lightly, nor taken lightly by the woman. If this is your niece, and you care about her, respect her choice and be supportive of whatever choice she makes. It is her body and her life that will be affected. So the choice and what she has to live with will also be solely borne by her but you can help by not imposing any of your personal moral dilemmas on her.

[ 27 July 2005: Message edited by: Stargazer ]


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 27 July 2005 10:49 PM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sven,

I agree with Stargazer.

What you have asked is a rarely-talked-about issue for women, and feminists. That is, how emotionally difficult abortions are. As a pro-choice and pro-child feminist (remember the slogan "every child a wanted child"?) I can share this:

Every woman I know who had an abortion did not do it lightly, nor did she ever forget it. Women remember the anniversary of the day they had the abortion, the date the child would have been born, and over the years, how old the child would have been and what her life would have been like if she made a different choice. Nobody I know who had one regretted her decision either. And, I'm of the generation that had safe and legal abortions available (mostly. We turned 20 in the mid-late 80s).

This is a deeply private set of feelings that I'm always afraid to share, knowing that anti-choice, anti-abortion factions can try to take it to use in their arguments. But what I described is very widespread and I don't know anyone who waltzes in and does it and never looks back.

I think this is the crux of the abortion debate, that pro-choicers can be portrayed as unfeeling towards the potential life that is being deliberately ended. This is not the case at all.

Please remember that when abortion is not safe, free (in Ontario anyways) and available, women are put at great risk, including death.

Thank you for your question.


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 28 July 2005 01:45 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bigcitygal:
Thank you for your question.

And thank you, and Stargazer, for your very thoughtful responses. Because the questions I asked are so personal, it would seem to me that they would be a wonderful topic for a book (with actual names changed). Really understanding the emotional burden of that decision would be a good thing for all to understand.

If there is one single thing that everyone should agree upon, it is to try and help avoid unwanted pregnancies in the first place. Why the two groups can't work together on that common ground is beyond my understanding. Birth control should be free and kids need to learn about sex in school. That would save so many from suffering so much angst and grief.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327

posted 28 July 2005 01:54 AM      Profile for Aristotleded24   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:
If there is one single thing that everyone should agree upon, it is to try and help avoid unwanted pregnancies in the first place. Why the two groups can't work together on that common ground is beyond my understanding. Birth control should be free and kids need to learn about sex in school. That would save so many from suffering so much angst and grief.

I agree with the general principle, but I'm not sure about dispensing birth control in the schools. A question I have is do abortion counsellors discuss the possible emotional ramifications of abortion with women who are considering making that choice?

I believe that girls should be informed about abortion at an early age. I believe that an unwanted pregnancy is too late to learn about the issues surrounding abortion, and I think women need to be prepared well ahead of that. (To avoid misunderstanding, I am not trying to imply that the woman in question is at fault.)


From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 28 July 2005 02:03 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've provided legal counseling to innercity students and I will never forget the conversation I had with a 14-year old girl who wanted me to help her get child support from the father of her new-born. I asked her what kind of job the father has. "He's in prison." When will he be getting out? "In about 18 months." What kind of job did he have before he went to prison. "He dealt drugs."

If that doesn't make a guy cry, nothing will.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
flushd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9877

posted 28 July 2005 06:08 AM      Profile for flushd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There was some very good information posted here.

Thank you for dealing with this issue so sensitively.


From: winnipeg | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 28 July 2005 06:33 AM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Sven,

like you, i'm pro-choice, but there's a big part of me that just feels terrible for saying it's okay to take away a life. so, admittedly, being pro-choice is a difficult stance for me, though i stand firm in my decision to be pro-choice. i won't repeat what stargazer and bigcitygal have already said. i just wonder if your niece has been given the alternative to abortion - the option of carrying the child to term, and giving it up for adoption. it's a difficult issue to think through, and a difficult decision to make, especially if she's very young. i wish your niece and family all the best.


From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 28 July 2005 07:41 AM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, I'm very glad this has its chance to be expressed. Openly discussing the experiences of women in practice with regard to abortion seem critical, even despite the ways in which Christian fundamentalists might misuse or misconstrue such information. Frankly, they'll find (or just invent) and misuse such information anyway, so having a feminist contribution to the discussion on the personal impact of abortion on women can only help. Allowing, instead, the religious right to dominate these areas in the abortion debate can only harm. Shoving the profound emotional and personal aspects of this modern feminist experience into the corner and pretending it doesn't exist simply because it contains realities which opponents of progressive politics find appealing strikes me as abhorrent, in that it amounts to allowing conservatives to set the agenda for the feminist discourse.

Speaking as a long-time vegan, there is no credible way for me to figure, within my philosophy of the good, the ending of any recognisable form of 'animal' life as morally irrelevant. To borrow a metaphor from another thread, I cannot treat the ending of any life as equivalent to a routine operative procedure like a knee operation without opportunistically and hypocritically throwing away the very foundations of my ethical outlook on the world by doing so.

In every other situation I encounter in my life, I have long applied a valuing of "life" which is not myopically focused on human adults of normal intelligence and in practice is extended to all organisms with a functioning nervous system. In all other scenarios, I consider myself not empowered or entitled to end (or to exploit in any way) these lives.

There was another thread recently on the reasons for and the meaning of the term 'pro-choice'. Well, among self-identied vegans, you have a generally secular (sometimes spiritualist) group who can very personally identify with all the moral implications of that term. Ending of life is always regretable. Christian fundamentalists like to portray pro-choice advocates as cold and crass regarding the ending of life. As this thread demonstrates, that impression is presently as far from the truth as it could ever possibly be. But I hope that in keeping with the sentiments of this thread, all within this debate continue to maintain such sentiment as the both real and apparent serious and yet sympathetic demeanour of the pro-choice movement.


From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 28 July 2005 08:38 AM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here is the website for CARAL, Canadian Abortion Rights Action League.

The abortion rate (as of 2000) is 15.4 abortions per 1,000 women. That's 1.54%. Such a small number for all the fuss it raises, and this is not meant to diminish any of the words above, including mine.

Compare that to people with low incomes (11.5%) found on Stats Canada's page
here


From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 July 2005 11:53 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Stargazer wrote:

quote:
you can help by not imposing any of your personal moral dilemmas on her.

I am going to try to use that immensely controlled and wise statement as my own guiding star.

The tone of this thread bothers me a lot. It bothers me because of other kinds of experiences I have had with health / medical issues, and with the tremendously important role that I have seen a sense of autonomy play in the maintenance of people's health.

Sven, you haven't told us whether your niece has ever expressed to you, directly, the ambivalence that you say you feel (and the general discussion seems to have gone on to anguish). Do you know what she feels? Do you think it is possible that she feels no ambivalence and no anguish at all? I have certainly known women who felt none over their decisions to obtain abortions, and I think they would rather resent the implication that their straightforward decisions were being derided as insensitive or callous or trivial.

The only serious way to empathize, I think, is to listen to the Other and to follow her. If what you genuinely care about is her feelings, rather than your own, then you will be able to practise what Keats called "negative capability" -- to follow her logic, to avoid projecting your feelings on to her, perhaps to help her to clarify her thoughts -- that always helps. But it is her thoughts that matter.

And she may not be feeling anguish or ambivalence at all. Would that bother you? Would that hurt you?

To me, the heavy tone of this discussion is unwarranted, or at least a great many women are going to feel that way. I know what it is like to be burdened by the "help" of others who tell me how bad, how hopeless, how utterly lugubrious I should be feeling about something, and I know that, for me, when I am doing my best to work through a serious human problem, that kind of help is no help at all. I often end up empathizing with the well-intentioned person who thinks s/he is helping me, but then that just becomes an extra burden for me.

The more serious one's own ambivalence or anguish, I think, the more likely that one should be looking for therapy for oneself, not trying to offer it to others.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 12:16 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I felt a tremendous sense of relief. My mother came with me. I remember her telling me that I was lucky not only because it was legal, but because I didn’t have to justify my decision in front of a medical panel who would decide whether I was ‘fit’ or not. She told me lots of stories of women she’d known who’d had abortions. (She hadn’t had one herself.)

I’ve found this to be very much the case. Lots of women I know have had abortions and, if they didn’t feel pressured into having one, the experience was generally positive. I don’t recall the exact day I had an abortion and I don’t really think of that pregnancy as a baby I wish I’d seen grow up. I have two children, it’s not at all that I’m insensitive to the delights of children. I do remember that experience as one where I was wholly supported by my mother and by her insistence that the ability to do this safely, in a hospital, and strictly on my own say-so was a great victory.

I think we often frame this question the wrong way. I mean, why aren’t we asking how we’d all feel about being forced to carry a pregnancy against our will? Or how we feel about getting permission from our spouses for the birth control we decide on (and you can forget about getting some without a spouse)?


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 July 2005 12:21 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
saskatchewan: Sounds as though you have quite the mother -- and as though you are quite the mother yourself. That story really cheers me up, and inspires me.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 28 July 2005 12:32 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The tone of this bothers me a lot too. First, Sven, you could have done some googling. You would probably have come up with these sites:

USianweb page

Canadian web page

I have had two abortions, nine years apart. I don't remember the exact dates (I do remember the months). One was in New York, because we still had the patriarchal three-doctor panel system in Ontario (that I would not participate in), the other was in Ontario. I do not regret, hardly ever think of them. I really really really resent it when it is implied or stated that I have killed, murdered, taken life, or whatever. I really really really resent it when it is implied or stated that I am heartless, selfish, or whatever. No one but me knows my circumstances, my mind. So anybody who wants to tell me what I did or didn't or should or shouldn't have felt, can fuck right the hell off.


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 12:43 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My mother is rather tremendous.

This conversation and much about the abortion debate reminds me so very much of the 1970s attitude about being a gay man – that is, you couldn’t help it and everything, but you were probably going to have to kill yourself because being gay was obviously and only a one-way ticket to depression and self-loathing.

It’s amazing to me that what seems to be really taboo is discussing an abortion you’ve had without a lot of hand-wringing. Why is it so radical to say, “I had one and, actually, I’m fine with that. It was the right decision for me at the time”? Because I think that the vast majority of women who’ve had abortions would fall into that camp – myself included.

If I had a niece who was having an abortion I’d provide some good practical information – that you’re really going to need some resting time in bed and that you need to have an in-the-know adult stay with you in case you start running a fever (if you do, you’ll start to get a little out-of-it and you might not think to get yourself to a doctor when you should). I’d provide the latest copies of Bitch and Bust. I’d hang out and make tea and talk if it seemed wanted and keep quiet if that was preferred. It’s important for any woman having an abortion to understand that they're not alone – both in the sense that lots of women have had abortions and that there’s someone around to drive you home from the appointment.

[edited for grammar -- good god!]

[ 28 July 2005: Message edited by: saskatchewan ]


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bacchus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4722

posted 28 July 2005 12:44 PM      Profile for Bacchus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
No one but me knows my circumstances, my mind. So anybody who wants to tell me what I did or didn't or should or shouldn't have felt, can fuck right the hell off.

When I was in the midst of my marriage breaking down and suffering from ED this was my reaction.

When its about my death, coma and hospital travails, then I freely talk about it. It helps me deal.

We decide on our feelings, no one else. Everyone else can bite me.

Its a medical proceedure, it isnt fun, it hurts and can be uncomfortable for days (from the women I have seen go through it). Some people can suffer thru remorse, others dont. Its like anything you go thru, we all experience it differently.

You feelings of remorse, or elation at any experience in life should ALWAYS be secondary and hidden when helping someone go through it too, that needs your help. If they ask your opinion then give it but otherwise you are there for them because they need you and you car eenough to want to help, not to feed your beliefs or justify your experience/feelings.

So I sympathize Sven, but it does make me feel uncomfortable


From: n/a | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 July 2005 12:47 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure that everyone grasps just how insulting the heavy tone can be, but it really is.

The women I've known who have coped with profound life-long anguish have been those who bore their children (often in humiliating circumstances) and then gave them up for adoption. If you want to hear stories of endless heartbreak, listen to those women.

I have, and I find it hard to hold my temper on the subject.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 28 July 2005 02:08 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The women I know who have had abortions did not make the decision lightly, and have carried the decision with them.

It isn't an easy decision, and it is a hellish position to be in.

The main point, for us men, is that it is not our decision. Our role is to be supportive of whatever choices a woman makes with her body. Period. It is also to provide support, where appropriate, before, during and after the decision.

It is also our role to be a part of the ongoing fight to make damn sure that decision is available to all women.


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
v michel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7879

posted 28 July 2005 02:46 PM      Profile for v michel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This thread is weird. Substitue "death in the family" or "birth of a child" or any less-controversial life event for "abortion" in the OP, and see how weird it is.

It's not like there's a playbook for how people react to abortion. It's a human experience, there's infinite variety in what she might be feeling about it.

It sounds like your heart is in the right place Sven, but how would you counsel someone who had a niece who just had a baby, or had a miscarriage, or gave her child up for adoption?

I think you should just be nice to her.


From: a protected valley in the middle of nothing | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mr. Magoo
guilty-pleasure
Babbler # 3469

posted 28 July 2005 03:08 PM      Profile for Mr. Magoo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The women I know who have had abortions did not make the decision lightly, and have carried the decision with them.
It isn't an easy decision, and it is a hellish position to be in.

I'm a bit leery of overgeneralizations like this.

I have a friend who has had at least two abortions, each time because she made a conscious decision to "wing it" with regard to birth control. She was fearful of the Pill, and she dislikes condoms because she says that she can't feel anything when her partner uses them. So she winged it. And when she became pregnant she had an abortion, twice. She became pregant a third time, and decided to have the child.

So there you have it. No "failed birth control", no great remorse.


From: ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°°¤ø, | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 28 July 2005 04:29 PM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by vmichel:
This thread is weird. Substitue "death in the family" or "birth of a child" or any less-controversial life event for "abortion" in the OP, and see how weird it is.

It's not like there's a playbook for how people react to abortion. It's a human experience, there's infinite variety in what she might be feeling about it.


Exactly. I'm glad someone has finally said this. I just cannot accept overtly proscriptive generalisations about how women respond to abortion(full-stop). Not only are the responses of individuals to life experiences such as these usually widely varied, but in the case of abortion, the nature of the experience itself, what it even constitutes on a metaphysical and personal level, is something each individual will necessarily define differently even among advocates of access to abortion. That's unavoidable, seeing as we all define life, the value of that quantity and the experience and process of its creation, in sometimes subtly, but sometimes quite drastically different ways. I, a long-time ideological vegan on the one hand and your average meat-eating MacDonald's customer on the other hand might both be Pro-Choice circumstantially, but the way we describe and categorise and value the category 'life' could not be more functionally different. The spiritual and emotional implications, therefore, if any at all, of something as metaphysically nuanced as abortion which so directly deals with that category is something that it seems to me no one can or should proscribe, inasmuch as no one can or should proscribe their own understanding of the metaphysical nature of the experience for all others.


From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938

posted 28 July 2005 04:35 PM      Profile for bigcitygal     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In case there's been a misunderstanding, when I referred to "women" in my earlier post, I meant the women I know who have had abortions.
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 July 2005 04:45 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
[Edited to say: response to Yst.]

Perhaps. But when I first read this thread, it was dominated by heavy male voices, and heavy male voices that seemed to be framing abortion as an unavoidably tragic experience. And slowly, slowly, people who write about tragedy always seem to end up writing more about themselves than about anyone else.

Demonstrably, abortion is not an unavoidably tragic experience, not unless you want to deny the testimony that has appeared on this thread since. Many many women, in all cultures we know of at all times, have not equated abortion with a death in the family.

Those who wish to, may. We fought for women to have the right to that choice.

But return to Stargazer's opening caution. The greatest danger I have ever met in caregiving is the ego of the caregiver. If you can't listen and follow, then back off, and find a therapist for yourself.

[ 28 July 2005: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 05:20 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think women who do not view their own abortions as a particularly tragic experience are heavily discouraged from saying so. Particularly by men. This thread opened by a poster looking for reports of a particular kind of experience.

Here’s part of the question – I’ve bolded parts I think are designed to especially elicit a one-sided, overly emotional response:

“In your mind’s eye, was it a formless foetus or did you think about its hands and feet and whatnot? I really want to get a sense of what a person "feels" because I think it will help me to better empathize with a person (one of my nieces) who is going through that process. I also realize that I may not get any answers to these questions because the questions are so very, very personal.”

The niece in question seems to have already made up her mind. I don’t know if she’s really looking for a big helping of avuncular empathy at all. I’ll tell you what I would find intrusive – someone telling me they wanted to know how I felt even though it was ‘so very, very personal.’


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 28 July 2005 05:28 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
saskatchewan, I hear you. From a very different context, I hear you.

It feels creepy, doesn't it. I know what it is like to be driven to silence because someone is bearing down on me with his/her preconceptions of how I MUST feel, and it is creepy.

That is not empathy. (See? I'm still on topic.)

That is someone working out his/her own psychic conflicts on someone else's life, and unfortunately, all too often, on the life of someone much more vulnerable.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 28 July 2005 08:12 PM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
well, you know that comment by stargazer made an impact on me too. but, not having any details about what sven's niece is going through in her mind exactly (and afraid to ask cause it seemed personal), i decided to assume that she must be going through some sort of mental anguish that inspired sven to post the kind of questions that he did. why else would he ask such one-sided questions that lean toward the tragedy of abortion? or perhaps, sven is looking for empathy for himself, more so than for his niece. *shrug* which is why i offered the alternative of adoption. i don't really know what sven's niece is feeling. but, anyway, i hope the posts in this thread help sven understand how abortion can be a different experience for different women; that yes, sometimes, it's a hard thing to do, and sometimes, it's really not a tragedy at all, and either way, the decision made is given plenty of thought, and it's usually the wisest in every woman's different circumstance. so, i guess the only advice i can provide to sven is: listen to your niece.
From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 28 July 2005 09:19 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think abortion is a pretty unique experience that can't really be compared to a death or anything similar; the closest experience might be a miscarriage, and women go through that with all kinds of different feelings and thoughts.

Historically though, women didn't seem to perceive abortion as a tragedy; a necessity most likely, and a relief if all went well and they survived it without complications. Right now we're being taught to frame it as a personal trial when ironically it is safer than it has ever been, medically at least. Maybe it's because the element of personal risk, the risk of irreparably damaging our bodies is no longer as crucial, that has made us project those emotions onto something more intangible, a potential life, is perhaps how I'd put it.

A woman who goes through that with mixed emotions might be mourning the road not taken instead of the birth she's not choosing. So obviously, each woman will see it differently.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 09:26 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ugh. I just checked out the links that fern provided and they're hecka creepy.

But perfect for projecting all sorts of weird societal anxieties on women!


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 28 July 2005 09:53 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yow. I was going from notes and got the wrong Canadian site. This one is the parallel to the I'm not sorry USian one. web page

[ 28 July 2005: Message edited by: fern hill ]


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 09:55 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fern! I wasn't even offended -- I just thought you were making a point. But thanks for posting the other site.
From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 28 July 2005 10:00 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, well, I may check into old threads, but there was a discussion not so long ago about mostly USian women who had had abortions 'recanting' in a typically USian way, now seeing the light and realizing how they had damaged themselves blahblah. The Xian Reich welcomed them of course and the Canadian site (our audra has something to do with it, I think) was started in reaction, as was the USian I'm not sorry one
From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 28 July 2005 10:07 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
OK, here's the old babble thread:babble thread.

edited because I hit the wrong damn button

[ 28 July 2005: Message edited by: fern hill ]


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 28 July 2005 10:58 PM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thanks again, Fern. Reading the stories on the clarification site I realize that I was probably treated very well during the abortion because my mother came with me. Certainly the nurse at the clinic who told me I was pregnant was just totally testy and bitchy with me -- but I went to the clinic alone and nineteen.
From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 28 July 2005 11:01 PM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Saskatchewan, you are so lucky to have such a mum.

Mine is wonderful of course in her own way, but even if she had been secretly supportive, which I can't even say one way or the other, I can't imagine having gone with her.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 28 July 2005 11:05 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
saskatchewan: yup, the f***king nurses. During my second, legal in Ontario, I had one rotten b***h. You know how you're real cold after a general? I kept asking for extra blankets, then drifting off. And the nurse kept smirking at me. I'd ask again when I came round again. Same thing. I woulda popped her, if I hadn't been so stoned.
From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
flushd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9877

posted 29 July 2005 05:16 AM      Profile for flushd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I gotta admit, I find it kinda creepy when women talk about their abortions lightheartedly. They're coming from a different space then me, where maybe they had good support and different circumstances.
It's totally fine if a chick is ok with her abortion, hey that's where all women want to get to, but realize that not everyone is there yet.
Like you guys stated, again and again, it's an individual thing and no one needs to be told how they should or should not feel.
I was never given the opportunity to talk about mine. The circumstances sucked. I hated it, and it was a difficult decision. I didn't get pregnant because of risky behavior, and I wasn't poor. My family and friends would not support me on my decision. My fiance was torn the same as I.
I made the decision I felt was right.

I have no advice to give, except:
Treat her like you normally would!


From: winnipeg | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
belva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8098

posted 29 July 2005 10:58 AM      Profile for belva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by fern hill:
saskatchewan: yup, the f***king nurses. During my second, legal in Ontario, I had one rotten b***h. You know how you're real cold after a general? I kept asking for extra blankets, then drifting off. And the nurse kept smirking at me. I'd ask again when I came round again. Same thing. I woulda popped her, if I hadn't been so stoned.

A tangent-- I never had an abortion. However, I had three babies. I was "awake & aware" with all three deliveries,'tho in some severe pain with my second child. I was amazed that some of the nurses--women who selected to work with women--were so d--n nasty to women in labor & to new mothers. I wondered why they wanted to work in maternity units!

On the other hand, I had some excellent care from other nurses. I remember with my first baby, a tall, silver-haired nurse who said & did all the right things & made me feel like me, my little girl & my life were wonderful! But the nasty ones I'll never understand.


From: bliss | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
saskatchewan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9644

posted 29 July 2005 11:55 AM      Profile for saskatchewan   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When I was in labour with my son I had a really wonderful nurse. She was there for twelve hours, played a hand of cards with me, treated me like a human being and was a general all-round, kick-ass, excellent person. Then her shift ended and I got the nurse (just in time for pushing!) who refused to wait for me to vomit before wheeling me down the hall – “you can throw up on the way!” and was just horrible. After my son was born a older nurse giggled with me and showed me how to wrap him up “like a little taco, see?” and then a nurse who refused to give me anything to eat (after seventeen hours of labour) and yelled at me for having my bedside light on and reading a magazine “do you think you’re queen of the ward?”

I had my daughter at home. Labour and delivery is such an intense time – it’s so not worth it to leave the people helping you through up to chance.


From: Ontario | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 29 July 2005 12:03 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I know I'm continuing a bit of drift here (although we are still talking empathy, aren't we), but I've had both sorts of nurses too.

I owe a lot to most of the ones I see regularly now, caring for my husband, but I feel I received something close to abuse when I was in hospital myself and desperately drugged. Those nurses were just generally cold, and one of them was horrible to me, at one point pushed me down into the bed and told me to "Shut up." As an empathetic friend said to me afterwards, "A hospital is no place for a sick person."


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
marcella
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9772

posted 29 July 2005 03:58 PM      Profile for marcella     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I’m jumping into this late, but need to say my piece.

Fern: thank you for raising the issue of not feeling guilty about an abortion.
Saskatchewan: thanks for pointing out the implicit nature of the openers discussion.

My mother (who has been working on abortion rights for over 25 years in Manitoba, just opening up a new clinic, btw) often talks to me about the reality that most womyn are happy afterwards because the burden of having an unwanted child is finally off their backs. Most womyn who get an abortion do it because they don’t want a child.

As a young womyn who may at some point have an abortion (especially considering I'm allergic to condoms, and I'm vegan), I always appreciated my mother who told me to have one (I lived in a town with Canada's 3rd highest teen pregnancy rate). She told me to f*** all those people who say it's emotionally difficult. She did this not because she felt that everyone's abortion was emotionally pain-free, but rather because she knew that everywhere else I turned, 14 year olds where popping out babies because abortion would be just too difficult. I think you must always consider the societal implications to what you are saying.

A lot of people in our society have been coopted by the Right into believing that most womyn do (and should) feel bad. In reality, as many of my old profs (womyn and health related classes) and the womyn I know working in abortion rights (such as my mother)tell me, those emotions are a minority and we can’t treat womyn as though they should feel hurt by their decision.

This issue is one feminists have been fighting for ages. I dates back to the judgement that womyn are more emotional than men, that we have an inherent attachment to child-bearing (we're born mothers). My mother always laughed at how prevelant (and normal) abortion would be if men could get pregnant.

To those who say we must allow everyone to feel every which way about their abortions...you are whole heartedly true. But we work in steps...right now, most womyn are shamed by their abortions (so we counter it by urging to womyn to remember that it is okay to not be sad/depressed). I believe that the pro-abortion movement recognizes that some womyn will require additional support (and we must provide that), but as the situation currently stands, society requires that womyn (or clinics simply make it policy) to counsel womyn, doctor's insist on laying out womyn's other options in a very biaised manner, we get Plan B (morning after pill) over the counter but the pharmacist has to provide you with counselling and they can refuse it if you are not fit for it (oh, and you will be paying for that counselling).

We examine the majority, the majority (to my knowledge) don't feel ashamed about an abortion but think that they should feel ashamed (it's kinda like rape). We stigmatize abortion. Those of us who argue that it is okay and, dammit, that we need to shout that it is okay to not feel depressed about an abortion are doing so in direct response to general societal pressures, not in an attempt to minimize the pain felt by other womyn.


From: ottawa | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
belva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8098

posted 29 July 2005 04:28 PM      Profile for belva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by marcella:

My mother always laughed at how prevelant (and normal) abortion would be if men could get pregnant.

Wise woman your mother!

I thought for a long time that if women & men had to take turns bearing the children, no family would ever be bigger than two, or at most three, children.


From: bliss | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
flushd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9877

posted 29 July 2005 09:23 PM      Profile for flushd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
marcella, a lot of that information is new to me.
I'm going to think about that.
I didn't know that I was amongst the minority
That certainly gives me a different perspective!

Aside from the pressures and opinions others place on a woman concerning this, maybe the key here is the difficulty with which she comes to her decision to abort? I wavered hard: I WANTED the child. Other factors made it clear that I wasn't capable of raising one. Some women may have choosen adoption in my position, and I can sympathize with that.
My point is: maybe it's less about the abortion, and more about the hard choices we sometimes have to make as women and mothers.

I think it's great that so many of you have mothers who are educated in this. That's awesome. My own mum, who is a wonderful woman, is pretty traditional. As a teenager, I was the one who wanted to talk about sex and condoms and all, and she wanted to avoid the subject as much as possible! lol She's always just said "you know more about this than me, dear"
She still looks at me funny for not being married with two kids yet

cheers


From: winnipeg | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 29 July 2005 09:54 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey Sven, what do you think of the responses so far? Have we helped you in deciding how to support your niece?
From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346

posted 30 July 2005 03:43 AM      Profile for Ken Burch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I just wanted to commend all of you for the tremendous restraint you showed in not telling Mr. Magoo to fuck himself slowly with a chainsaw in response to his incredibly snide post.
From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 30 July 2005 05:17 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Um, excuse me? Magoo did nothing to warrant that kind of reaction. Chill.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Loretta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 222

posted 30 July 2005 02:58 PM      Profile for Loretta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am a mother who lost a child to adoption in 1975. While I certainly don't speak for all such mothers, I am involved with the Canadian Council of Natural Mothers and thus am in contact with many women who have had this experience. Many of us lost our children over decades of public shaming of unmarried pregnant women, no support, manipulation and lies (especially in the infamous maternity homes that prevailed).

Losing a child to adoption affects many women deeply and for many years although, I'm sure that like abortion, the effects vary depending on the circumstances and the woman. Women are beginning to come out from under the societally imposed shame and tell the horror stories of how they were separated from their children without benefit of legal advice, counselling or protection from coercion. This is especially true more recently in part because of the debate over Ontario's proposed Bill 183. It proposes to open adoption records so that women can discover the fate of their lost children and so that adopted adults can find their roots, explore their genetic health issues and perhaps find some answers to their questions.

Anyway, all that to say that adoption, for many women, was never really a choice -- it was a decision imposed on them by others through pressure, lies and an overall lack of support (including inadequate social programs). Perhaps that's true of abortion as well -- a decision made from a place of one's own power and process is probably one that will sit OK through the years, whereas one reached against the person's real desires will probably cause long-term distress.

Given what I've lived with for years as a result of losing my child to adoption (depression, PTSD and increased suicide rates have been well documented in numerous countries among women who have surrendered their children), I would say that, while abortion is not an easy decision for a women, it is the preferable option for those who are not wanting/able to raise a child.

So Sven, all that to say I support what others have said -- listen to your niece. You may be the only one who really does since so many others around us try to impose what they think is right for us. Try and genuinely support what she decides, no matter how it sits with you. She needs someone she can trust so that, whatever her decision, she can live with it.


From: The West Kootenays of BC | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
fern hill
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3582

posted 30 July 2005 03:38 PM      Profile for fern hill        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Great post, Loretta. Especially this:

quote:
Originally posted by Loretta:

Perhaps that's true of abortion as well -- a decision made from a place of one's own power and process is probably one that will sit OK through the years, whereas one reached against the person's real desires will probably cause long-term distress.

I think you've got to the crux of the matter. Someday, maybe all child-bearing (or not) decisions made by all women will sit OK with them through the years. Well, heck, I can dream, can't I?


From: away | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Loretta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 222

posted 30 July 2005 04:11 PM      Profile for Loretta     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think that's a wonderful dream -- imagine a society in which women can really, truly make decisions based on what's right for us and what we can live with rather than what we have to live with...wow! Things would look very different in ways far beyond reproductive issues, wouldn't they?
From: The West Kootenays of BC | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 30 July 2005 04:40 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Great post, Loretta. I come from that time too. From a couple of friends, I have heard similar stories over the years, and for them, anyway, those are stories that don't end, although I should add that time and greater freedom and their own growth have changed things a great deal for them both.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
flushd
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9877

posted 30 July 2005 08:11 PM      Profile for flushd     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
great post, loretta.

you expressed what i was trying to get at.


From: winnipeg | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lukewarm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8690

posted 03 August 2005 11:01 AM      Profile for Lukewarm        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I just wanted to commend all of you for the tremendous restraint you showed in not telling Mr. Magoo to fuck himself slowly with a chainsaw in response to his incredibly snide post.

What's wrong with his post? Simply showing that not all women who have abortions are disturbed by the very act but simply don't care. However few there are, they still exist.

From: hinterland's dark cubby hole | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca