babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Who Copy-edited my Shampoo Bottle?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Who Copy-edited my Shampoo Bottle?
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 09 July 2002 04:33 PM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's marketing, so it's Earning-and-Spending. Deal with it. Anyway ...

quote:
Like the grammar problem, diction is also sometimes merely sloppy. A medicated facial scrub advertises that it cleans “without over-irritating” and “special comforters soothe” skin. Other products invent new words entirely, touting their ability to “bodify” and “volumize,” or create non sequiturs with words such as “melting gel.”

There's some good old-fashioned redundancy: The term “clean rinsing,” sometimes with a hyphen and sometimes without, is extremely pervasive. The phrase, “Long-lasting protection protects women for hours” once made me laugh out loud in a drugstore.


There's more!


From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 09 July 2002 04:56 PM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In his sketch, The Slip-Knot, Fringe Festival performer TJ Dawe pointed out that 80-90% of the products in a Shoppers Drug Mart deal with "feminine hygiene" in one form or another.
From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 09 July 2002 05:38 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't pay any attention to the special vitamin/proteins/complexes stuff they use to advertise cosmetics. It's all crap.

What really gets me with the marketing is baby formula -- What's the one that claims it has special "comfort proteins"? What a load of bull. I hate advertising...


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 10 July 2002 02:36 AM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In other shampoo-related news, I am doing an experiment. Since I got a buzz cut some weeks ago, I have shampooed my hair only twice. Now I'm going to go as long as I can without shampooing it to test my theory that shampoo is a scam. All that is needed is a very thorough rinsing, a massage, and a vigorous drying with a towel.

My hair is now healthier than it has ever been, and it neither smells nor appears in any way offensive.

I never believed it before, but a friend of mine in university said he never shampooed. His hair was very healthy, not smelly or greasy at all.

Perhaps, if it continues to be healthy, at some point I will shampoo with a raw egg, which I have been told is good for your hair.


From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356

posted 10 July 2002 02:44 AM      Profile for Arch Stanton     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Heresy!

However will you maintain ph balance?

Your hair's protein levels will drop to critical levels! You will have neither full body nor a lustrous shine!

Isn't the medicare system in enough difficulty already without crazy people thumbing their noses at personal hygiene?

It's folly! Follicular folly. funicili funicila


From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2002 03:02 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You got your hair buzzed!? Wow.

Neat experiment. If I don't wash my hair I look like a greaseball within 24 hours.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 10 July 2002 11:28 AM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think rasmus is right. My old roomate Europa didn't wash her hair for 7 weeks at camp, and eventually it "stabilized" and wasn't greasy at all. She was swimming in lakes everyday, so it was getting rinsed, but that's all, no shampoo. And it looked fine. (It is pretty long, to about the middle of her back.)
From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2002 11:38 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So as long as you rinse it every day, without shampoo, then you don't need to wash it?

Actually, come to think of it, There are times when my son goes for days without shampooing his hair, and it never looks greasy. Maybe I should try it, although I would be horrified at the first couple of weeks of grease.

[ 23 July 2004: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394

posted 10 July 2002 11:43 AM      Profile for Zatamon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
John Ralston Saul's “The Doubter’s Companion” is a fun book and it is actually a dictionary with hundreds of entries in alphabetical order. He included all those words that need clarification because they are not clearly understood by most people, often due to corporate propaganda.

The entry under “Dandruff” includes the following (please forgive me John, for the copyright liberty I am taking!)

quote:
The ANSWER is usually vinegar. To some problems there are solutions. What we call dandruff is often the result of PH imbalance on the skin, which shampoo exacerbates. Wash your hair with a simple non-detergent shampoo, soap, olive oil, beer, almost anything. Rinse. Then close your eyes and pour on some vinegar. The extremely cheap but natural sort – apple cider, for example – is probably the best. The smell will stimulate interesting conversation in changing-room showers and your explanations will win you friends. Wait thirty to sixty seconds. Rinse it off. The smell will go away. So will your dandruff.

All dermatologists, pharmacists and pharmaceutical companies know this simple secret. They don’t tell you, because they make money by converting dandruff into a complex medical and social problem. By most professional standards this would amount to legally defined incompetence or misrepresentation.

Dandruff shampoos that promise to keep your shoulders and even your head clean are harsh detergents and may promote baldness, which ought to constitute malpractice


[ July 10, 2002: Message edited by: Zatamon ]


From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 10 July 2002 12:46 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's easier to go without shampoo when your hair is buzzed off (I know this from experience, I've had hair lengths from waist-length to brush cut over the last decade and a bit). But you also have to remember that some people tend to have oilier skin than others.

Also, the raw egg thing works best for longer hair, which needs to be moisturized because it's basically dead and will dry out and break off if you don't. Short hair never needs that kind of care. Banana is also good for your hair, but definitely needs to be washed out.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 10 July 2002 01:18 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I like shampooing very short hair. Feels so clean.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 10 July 2002 02:40 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I found this on the internet today. Unfortunately, the design of the site makes it impossible to read easily, at least on my browser, so I'm duplicating it here.




Reality Cracking

Taken from the Fravia Reality Cracking
website before it disappeared.

Reversing Shampoo

by Makoli

September 6, 1998

Well, a small pebble of reality cracking, yet NOTHING
is insignificant in this world of ours where toothpastes
that actually damage your teeth are advertised by
"beautiful" smiling models with false teeth

Enjoy!



Reversing Shampoo

I didn't actually crack the shampoo scam, all I did was
write this. But as with any other protected thing, at least
somebody knows the truth all along.

The truth here is that shampoo's bad for your hair. It
cleans out dirt, but also the oil that makes your hair
shiny and strong. However shampoo's sold as something your
hair really needs, and the truth is suppressed.

There are several common sorts of soapy things. They
attract oils by electric charge, allowing the oil to be
emulsified with the water. For some reason, these cleaners
are themselves made from fats. Soap is made from animal or
vegetable oil, and detergent is made from mineral oil.
Detergents can be made more powerful. Shampoo is detergent,
just like dishwashing detergent, bathroom cleaner, and
engine block cleaner.

People used to use soap to wash their hair, as well as
their dishes, clothes and bathrooms (and horses, before
there were engines.) Soap was better suited to washing
hair, because it didn't remove so much of the oils that are
naturally in hair.

But the water supply slowly changed. It's now generally
more alkaline, which people call hard water. When this
started happening, soap didn't work so well. The chemicals
which make water alkaline make soap stop lathering well,
and form insoluble scum (eg. the ring in the bath.) So soap
got less and less effective for all its cleaning uses. I
guess the water was always pretty alkaline in some places,
so soap was never an ideal cleaner. Around the beginning of
the twentieth century, household detergents became
available. Detergents have no problem with alkaline water,
so they were really popular. They soon became cheaper than
soap, too.

So that's why people stopped using soap for almost
everything, and started using detergents. Detergents are
excellent cleaners for most uses.

If you've tried using soap to wash your hair, you
probably know how your hair goes all rough and tangly. This
is worse if your water's harder (more alkaline.) I moved
recently, and suddenly started having problems using soap
in my hair. The problem is that hair reacts to acids and
alkalis.

Each hair has little scales, like scales on a snake or
shingles on a roof. Acid makes the scales lie down flat,
which makes your hair shiny and smooth. (Ever heard that
lemon juice is good for your hair?) Alkali makes the scales
stand up, which makes your hair look dull and feel rough
and tangly. Therefore hard water, which is common these
days, makes it harder to wash your hair. If you use soap to
wash your hair in hard water, then the combination of your
hair's scales standing up and the soap forming scum makes
your hair into a terrible mess. Then, since your hair's all
tangled and rough, it's impossible to rinse out all the
soap, which makes it look terrible.

Shampoo, being detergent, can rinse out of your hair
fine even in alkaline water. That's its only good point.
Its fundamental, but covered up, bad point is that it's
very harsh, and damages your hair permanently. Conditioner
was soon introduced as people noticed that shampoo sucked
the oils out of their hair dry and left it all dry and
brittle. Conditioner puts artificial oils in your hair, and
they stay there just long enough so that you don't
associate the damage to your hair with the shampoo that
caused it.

You have to wash your hair every day, not because it
always gets dirty so fast but because the oils from the
conditioner don't last and have to be replenished.
Conditioner wasn't used until shampoo came about.

But the real cheat in shampoo is when it's sold as being
especially good for your hair. Expensive shampoos are in a
way better, but only because the conditioner that comes
with them is better at covering up the damage done by the
shampoo. The actual shampoo itself is pretty much the same
as any cheap shampoo. The professional formula, which will
nourish your hair and make it grow more healthy, with
vitamins and natural nutrients, gentle seaweed extracts,
jojoba oil. . . .

Remember that your hair's dead. That exposes half of
shampoo advertising as lies. Remember that shampoo is just
detergent. That shows that most of the remaining half is
lies too. Remember that the oils your hair needs come
naturally out of your scalp, as they've been doing for
thousands of years before conditioner was invented. When
you think about it, nothing that is claimed about shampoo
and conditioner is true.

In a way, we really do need conditioner, as advertising
implies. But the real reason why we need it is because our
hair gets damaged by shampoo. This is just another case of
using lies to help a bad product (shampoo) gain dominance
over a good product (soap), then introducing another
product (conditioner) to compensate for the bad product's
faults, and then tricking people into accepting huge price
increases once they forget the good product.

The only good thing about shampoo is that it doesn't
work any worse in hard water.

Does that ever get mentioned in advertising? The rest is
lies, to fool you into paying $10 for a $1 bottle of
perfumed detergent.

What to do

Soap is good to wash your hair with. Forget all the
dregs of misinformation spread by shampoo manufacturers,
and forget that soap is "harsh". Remember that the problem
with using soap is in the water, not the soap. You just
need to solve the problem of the hard water, and soap is
fine to use. I can recommend two ways.

If your water's not too hard, just substitute soap for
shampoo, and use any old cheapish conditioner. The
conditioner will make the scales on your hair lie down, and
let the last of the soap get rinsed out. You might have to
experiment with different soaps and conditioners. Maybe
some conditioner which is pH balanced is best. Some "good
ol" plain soap with no added water and perfume is probably
best.

Otherwise, you can add some weak acid at some point in
the washing process. Since you need just a tiny amount,
even cheap vinegar will do, without leaving a smell. You
could make a soap goo out of soap and water, and add a bit
of lemon juice. You could have a jug of water with a
teaspoonful of vinegar in it, to rinse your hair with after
soaping. Or how about pouring it into a plastic squirty
bottle, so you don't spill it.

Another good thing is oil of rosemary. It stimulates
your scalp, to encourage the natural oils to flow. Actually
I haven't worked out how to get it onto my scalp, since
there's all that hair in the way, but I've heard it's
possible.

So in summary, shampoo had a legitimate claim as an
alternative for soap. But now it's not sold by that claim,
it's sold by lies. Soap's better for your hair, and you can
still use it if you compensate for hard water.

Makoli



From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2002 03:09 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Speaking of soaps and shampoos, one thing I have discovered over the years is that you don't need to wash your body with soap.

This probably sounds really gross, but I have found that by bathing every day (immersing myself in a bathtub of water), I get clean, no soap at all. Even if I shower that way, it works. The skin on my body (my face is another matter) is perfectly healthy. If I notice dead skin has built up a lot, then I just use a facecloth to rub it away.

My skin is always soft, and it's always clean. So I guess I could believe that about shampoo too.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 10 July 2002 03:29 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not gross, Michelle. I believe you. I use soap in very limited quantities. I've stopped using it for sensitive areas like the face, unless it's actually grubby, and really only use it for parts of my body that need it.

Also, deodorant is a scam. I don't use it. I smell a little sweaty sometimes at the end of the day, but big whoop. Get over it or get out of my way. Anyway, lots of people actually like smelling other people, as opposed to some horrid cheap perfumed deodorant. The main thing is to make sure that the soap is fully, fully rinsed out of your armpits. Otherwise, in my experience, you will have bad BO. Don't know the chemistry of that.

[ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: rasmus_raven ]


From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2002 03:32 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, deodorant is something I can't do without. If I forget, you can smell me for a mile. I also worked in a place with people from another country who didn't use deodorant, and, well, it wasn't pleasant at all. I'm not just talking normal person-smell, I'm talking big honking disgusting BO smell.

I can't handle that, I have to use deodorant.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 10 July 2002 03:39 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I confess. I don't actually bathe at all. I just use perfumes and powders and wear a white wig.
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 10 July 2002 03:40 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
hee hee hee
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 10 July 2002 03:44 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
'Tis true. And he won't offer anyone else any of his snuff, the unsociable blackguard.
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
sherpafish
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1568

posted 10 July 2002 03:49 PM      Profile for sherpafish   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm with Rasmus on this one.
It's actualy the left over detergent or soap in your pits that stimulates your glands to produce the oily fat laden underarm sweat that will eventualy stink.
It's not the sweat itself that had a pungent odor, it's the bacteria that feed off of it. The bacteria is supposed to be there, always has been, so the trick is to keep the oily secretions down.
If your pits are over-dry then those little glands will just keep on pumpin' out the jams, as it were.
I like to use glycerine soap, it's not harsh or drying at all, and then rinse well with plain old water. Sometimes the soap isn't even nessesary.
Anti-perspirant is bad news too, not only are there unproven links between its active ingrediant (aluminum) and brain illness (alzhiemer's) but the very second it stops stupifying your sweat glands they go into hyper-drive to try and catch up for they party they missed out on. Those little guys just love to sweat it out on the dance floor of your underarm!
A bit of sandalwood or cedar oil soaked into a block of wood makes a good deoderent, and lush makes some nice pachuli products, if you're into that kind of thing.

From: intra-crainial razor dust | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Victor Von Mediaboy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 554

posted 10 July 2002 04:36 PM      Profile for Victor Von Mediaboy   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The gf makes all our soap. Perhaps I'll suggest she start making shampoo as well. Right now I use no-name shampoo. Cheap and plentiful.

Actually, I also cut my hair really short recently. I don't wash it very often when it's this short, and it doesn't get greasy. But my body feels really icky if I don't shower daily in the summer. When I do have a shower, it's just a reflex that I reach for ye old shampoo bottle.


From: A thread has merit only if I post to it. So sayeth VVMB! | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184

posted 10 July 2002 04:40 PM      Profile for Slick Willy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Well, deodorant is something I can't do without.

I wanted to mention something I discovered a few weeks ago but it slipped my mind. And no it doesn't really have anything to do with Michelle's personal grooming habits other than I am using that as a segway.

My wife asked me to pick up so deoderant for her while I was out an about. What's the big deal right?

Sometimes I get stuck on words. Like deoderant. Not something else like anti-persperant but deoderant.
so I'm looking and looking and finding lots of antipersperant but nothing for womens deoderant.

Huh??? So I get caught up on finding deoderant made for women. Look at the mens deoderant section. Tons to choose from. Womens section, lots of anti-persperant but where is the deoderant?

Finaly I find a stick of degree deoderant those it looks kinda generic gender wise and so I get that.
After the total lack of outrage from my wife, I guess I kinda let the wind get taken outta my sails over it.

But for the record what the FUCK IS THAT SHIT!

I haven't seen anything different when ever I remember to look. Not that there isn't deoderant for women, it just seems that anti-persperant is seriously being pushed here. And we perspire for a reason don't we.


From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 10 July 2002 05:01 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not ladylike to perspire, doncha know...

Me, I've never sweated much, so I gave up using antiperspirant in my early 20s. I'm fairly certain I don't stink, I have friends, loved ones and colleagues who would quite honestly tell me so if I did.

I wonder if the soap thing works with artificially softened water... Most people here have water softeners, the water is naturally very hard.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 10 July 2002 08:04 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hmm. Excess soap under arms = bad BO... never heard of that. Now I'm curious.

*makes mental note to research the chemistry of underarm sweat*

At a guess, and I'll edit this later if I find out more, the soap, being slightly basic (soap is prepared using a base reacted with fatty acids, so there's almost always excess base in premade soap), causes your sweat to go bad - similar to how unstable esters cause perfumes and some foods to go rancid.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 10 July 2002 09:44 PM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Slick Willy: You're singing my song, sister. I have tried and tried to find women's deoderant, and it's all antiperspirant. So I use men's deoderant. When I am near a place that sells those solid Lush deoderant bars that sherpa spoke of, I use those instead.
From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
meades
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 625

posted 11 July 2002 01:50 AM      Profile for meades     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This is really interesting. First, I shower everyday, shampoo, conditioner - the whole sh'bang (Daily Defence! protects my hair from all of those harmful pollutants that are actually being blown over to Sault-Michigan by the wind, instead of up here in the boonies. Plus it's "specially formulated" for Dry/Damaged hair! ) wash my face with "special cleasers" (god, that Clean & Clear company is full of shit. But I already bought the stuff, so I figured I should finish it off) and then after my shower, I clean my face again with astringent (the "gentle" formula after a shower, and the "oil fighting" one if I'm about to go out, or if my face just feels icky).

I try a lot of different stuff, like sometimes I just use plain dial soap instead of the "special cleansers" or whatnot. But nothing really seems to work really well. I do notice a slight improvement though if I jump from the "special cleansers" to the regular soap and vice versa. But it's only when I switch- it's not consistant. I think that's wierd. Anyway, I'm gonna try just rinsing for a while, and see if that makes any difference.

As for hair, it didn't really occur to me until I read though this, but this thread made me realise that I don't notice that much of a difference with regard to how much or how little shampoo I use (I always forget to buy more shampoo, so often I'm stuck in the shower shaking the bottle like crazy to try and get that last drop out so I can at least work up a lather). Anyway, just before a shower, my hair usually looks a bit like this so it's not too bad, but my hair and my face feel terribly greasy and overall icky, and if I wait any longer to have a shower, I look totally greasy and it's not pleasant- so I just can't go more than 40 hours without a shower. On a regular day, though, my hair is straight, but kind of wiry. It's sort of all over the place, but without being a total mess.

As for deodorant/anti-perspirant, I find that "old spice" is really bad. I mean, it smells nice-ish, as far as cheap anti-perspirant is concerned, but it leaves your pits feeling all gooey. And when it starts to break down, you stink even worse than before you put it on, and you actually sweat more. Because it's summer now, though, I only put on deodorant or anti-perspirant if I'm about to go out or if I really stink, and just want something to mask the odour. Otherwise, I use it everyday. Yes, I am a bit superficial, I'll admit it.

The thing that really bugs me though, is tooth-paste. I see comercials for Crest or Colgate's "Best ever formula!". If it's the best ever formula, isn't all your other stuff crap by comparison, and shouldn't you remove it from the market? Other than how the tooth-paste comes out of the container, the colours that are included, and the flavours, what's the real difference between all of those types of toothpaste? I don't mean brands, but the actual different types of toothpaste that the major brands put out- is there any meaningful difference?


From: Sault Ste. Marie | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 11 July 2002 02:38 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I use this arm and hammer stuff that's got good ole sodium bicarbonate in it. Yes, it's gritty as hell, but I'll be damned if it doesn't feel like you've just taken a layer of crap right off your teeth.

I know what you mean about deodorants going bad. I remember I used some Old Spice roll-on that was well past its prime and towards midday I wondered why there was this odd smell of... well, something. So I skipped the next day and sure enough no smell. So I junked the deodorant.

Now that they have aerosols that don't harm the ozone layer, I've switched back to spray deodorants. Much more sanitary, too.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
meades
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 625

posted 11 July 2002 07:09 AM      Profile for meades     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
but I'll be damned if it doesn't feel like you've just taken a layer of crap
right off your teeth.

That's probably because it did take a layer of crap off your teeth, what with all the Coke you drink


From: Sault Ste. Marie | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
audra trower williams
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2

posted 11 July 2002 11:15 AM      Profile for audra trower williams   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
meades: I used to use a boatload of face cleansers, too. Then I ran out, and was trapped in my house in the woods of Kentville with no car last winter, so I had to go without for 3 days. I started just scrubbing my face with a wet facecloth a few times a day, and my skin cleared right up. I still use the Clean and Clear "microscrubbers" doo-dad, but only about once or twice a week. My skin is way softer and more healthy looking. I've actually stopped wearing makeup almost entirely. I put on a bit of Ponds Dry Skin moisturizer sometimes, and that's pretty much it, except for the lipgloss that I'm hooked on.

Uh. Thus ends my commercial for "wash your face with water".


From: And I'm a look you in the eye for every bar of the chorus | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 11 July 2002 01:20 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I use glycerine soap on my face and a couple of Lush products on the rest of me. Lush's honeysuckle solid shampoo pucks smell really nice and don't dry out my hair (I never use conditioner and only wash my hair a couple times a week - except in really hot weather) and their Skinny Dip shower gel feels really good, and smells good. I hate those fake perfumes they put in women's cosmetics - they make us all smell like deodorant tampons! I wear a minimal amount of deodorant in the summer and use deodorant crystal in the winter.

Edited: because I can't bloody well type today!

[ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: Rebecca West ]


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 11 July 2002 02:43 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Whether I shampoo or not, I have to get my head wet every day. I have horrific cowlicks which create a condition I refer to as "Franken-head" -- the hair literally makes my head look square in the morning. Bad scene. And with natural curl along with those cowlicks, I really need gel or something like it to tame down the whoop-di-doos my hair likes to curl up into.

I find soap leaves my skin way too dry, event the glycerine stuff. Whether I use a cleanser or not, I always have to moisturize. It's really hard to find moisturizer for face that isn't really badly scented, which gives me a rash. The Body Shop carries one that is pretty good.

Alas, we have no Lush store here. We like to stock up when we're in Banff or Vancouver, though.

(Edited because I can't type today, either... Must be the weather...)

[ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 11 July 2002 04:43 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, the weather...that must be it.

I love Lush products, but they're damned expensive (even though they last a long time). I've made my own bath bombs and assorted handmade cosmetics and bath goodies, but they never turn out quite as well. Make great gifts though when you wrap them in froofie ribbons in baskets.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
vickyinottawa
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 350

posted 11 July 2002 05:03 PM      Profile for vickyinottawa   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I find the lush stuff a bit much. Prefer to make my own as well.

As for Zoot's dilemma:

quote:
It's really hard to find moisturizer for face that isn't really badly scented, which gives me a rash.

I have the same problem. I am way allergic to perfumes, lanolin and various other things they put in creams and soaps. But I discovered Oil of Olay's Complete Care facial lotion - there's an unscented, hypoallergenic version, and it has a 15 SPF so there's no need for additional sunscreen (which is another issue my delicate skin has...).


From: lost in the supermarket | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 11 July 2002 06:27 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't know what exactly I'm allergic to, but some fragrances just leave me damaged if I wear them. Almost like being burned, red skin and then flaking after a couple of days. Does not leave on feeling attractive.

Although I hate the way sunscreen feels on my skin, I often use factor 30 and up... Usually use the kind they make for kids to avoid irritation. I figure I've had more than my quota of sunburns so far, and don't want to tempt the fates. Melanoma is definitely not the way I want to go.

Rebecca, I love the bath bombs from Lush -- a real treat. I don't think I have the time to figure out how to make them just now, too much else to keep up with. Making me think about Christmas, though.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
sherpafish
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1568

posted 11 July 2002 10:54 PM      Profile for sherpafish   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I hate to throw the brakes on all the Lush pimping going on- I like some of their products, mostly just the massage bars - but their labour practices leave a lot to be desired. I believe Dr. Conway has the um... dirt.

*Paging the good Doctor*


From: intra-crainial razor dust | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 12 July 2002 02:42 AM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't want to seem like a grouch-off about Lush, and honestly wouldn't have replied here (tho I was tempted!) - but, uh, I got paged.

I won't launch into a great screed about the trials and tribulations of Lush's labor practices because I prefer not to go into details.

I worked at Lush Manufacturing in Vancouver, so my information is somewhat specific to that place.

However, a quick summary of what got Lush unionized in 2001, in my opinion (I worked there from 1997 to 2000):

- The lack of consistency in allotting raises and bonuses, as well as inconsistent starting wages.

- The lack of concrete action to improve the lot of employees even though several promises were made by management; one glaring example is that proper benefits (i.e. medical and dental) were only grudgingly provided after the IWA successfully got a contract negotiated.

- Management simply cheaped out on everything possible. It got to the stage where penny wise and pound foolish was the operative motto.

Now, I don't know how much things have improved, but the management certainly didn't take the unionization very well, so there's still quite a bit of conflict. However, the one big benefit I think it did allow was it forced the use of internal hiring first then going outside for people. Nothing is so irritating as watching someone get parachuted in and get paid way more than you ever will be, even if he or she is a crackerjack.

----

Addendum: I would still recommend the use of Lush products as the flip side of my experience there is that I got to see how actual products got made. And I can tell you that the people who do the work do very good work these days, and the smells are heavenly!

My car used to always smell really nice because I'd carry the smell on my clothes after working there 8 hours a day 5 days a week.

[ July 12, 2002: Message edited by: DrConway ]


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 July 2002 08:43 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have pretty much the same reaction when people rave about The Body Shop. The products are nice, and as minimum wage jobs go, The Body Shop is really pretty good. But, well, their whole advertising campaign is based on being great corporate citizens and empowering women. Except that most of their employees are women and they're getting paid minimum wage or slightly more while The Body Shop rakes in huge profits. From what I understand, they have completely resisted any effort on the part of their workers to unionize.

They have a big advertising campaign about being against violence against women. Except that if their female employees needed to get away from an abusive partner, making an unlivable wage would probably not allow them to do it too easily. On the flip side, though, they do encourage their employees to volunteer in shelters for women, and have programs where they support local shelters with fundraising, and do things like bringing their stuff to shelters and giving makeovers and facials as "confidence boosters" for the women there. I tried not to be too cynical about billing women's cosmetics as confidence boosters. I figured this was also female bonding time, and I can appreciate the value of that.

They advertise that women should feel confident about themselves the way they are instead of reaching for an unattainable beauty ideal. Except that they have an aggressive sales policy where staff push products on the customers that they don't need or want in order to increase each sale (sales staff have to maintain a minimum average sale and conversion rate, while receiving no financial incentive to do so - no commissions). So they're pushed like commissioned sales staff without the benefit of commissions. And women have make-up and other beauty products (that they didn't come into the store to buy) pushed on them despite women being fine just the way they are. Oh, and the employees have to wear Body Shop make-up for every shift - they have to wear a minimum number of items of make-up on their faces. Even if you don't normally wear make-up. Also, although their posters have encouraging messages, most of them feature drop-dead gorgeous models.

They advertise that they are against environmental destruction. But they seem to have forgotten the first two R's of Recycling. As I said above, they don't encourage Reducing at all - if anything, they advocate more and more consumerism, more and more stuff people don't need, and it all comes in bottles and packaging. The idea is to sell as much as possible and to encourage as much impulse buying as you possibly can. As for Reusing - there has been a move away from encouraging customers to bring in their empties for refilling. They'll still do it for people who ask, but they don't go out of their way to advertise or encourage it anymore - it's too much of a hassle because a) the bottles have to be perfectly clean, and b) exactly the same product has to go into the bottle - so if you bought one type of bubble bath, you couldn't refill with another type. The excuse is, "Well, the bottles are recyclable anyhow." So that leaves the third R, Recycling, and at least everything they sell comes in recyclable packaging. But then again, most body products do these days, so that's not really all that distinctive for The Body Shop.

Basically, you're buying a brand from The Body Shop. Their products are pretty good (although not hypoallergenic), and I like them. Their advertising campaigns are a lot more positive than those for other products. But their concern for the environment and for the empowerment of women is, at least in my opinion, superficial at best. I see it as a marketing campaign rather than a philosophy, although they do try to promote it as a philosophy, even to their employees. I still buy their products, but only because I don't think anyone else is any better, not because I think they're particularly conscientious.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 12 July 2002 01:43 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think the Body Shop is any better than any other cosmetic company -- Didn't the founder opt out a while back, saying that going public was the worst thing she ever did and that the heart and soul was gone out of it? I thought I read something to that effect... (Goes to my theory of creating a monster, never a good idea if you want control over quality.)

Anyway, I buy their stuff because they tend not to use the kind of fragrances that give me a rash. Purely selfish, I know. But I really hate having a rash....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 13 July 2002 02:14 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It's easier to go without shampoo when your hair is buzzed off


It's interesting you say this, Zoot, because this is the observation that finally convinced me that shampoo was probably a scam. I also noticed it was easy to go without shampoo when I got my hair buzzed. But why should this be so? If the problem is oil from your scalp, surely there's the same amount of oil going to much less hair when it's buzzed -- shouldn't your hair be swimming in grease? But no, it isn't. It's perfectly fine. So why does longer hair start to feel gross after as little as a day? Sure, sometimes it could be external dirt, but not mostly. There must be another problem, and the most likely suspect is shampoo. That's how I figured it, anyhow, and so far the hypothesis is holding up. I washed my hair with soap today and rinsed it with a weak vinegar solution. My hair doesn't smell bad, and it feels quite good.


From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 13 July 2002 04:27 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The thing is, if your hair is really short, it doesn't lie funny, it isn't hard to style, and it doesn't need to be moisturized. I never found unwashed long hair to get all that greasy, as I tend to have very dry skin. But it does tend to sit funny and get very hard to manage.

I think it gets just as oily, you just don't notice 'cause it isn't long enough to "misbehave". Take it from a gal with "naturally misbehavin'" hair....


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
meades
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 625

posted 13 July 2002 04:39 PM      Profile for meades     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Also, when it comes to longer hair, maybe your head gets hotter, which makes your head sweat more, as opposed to when you have shorter hair, in which case it's much easier for any perspiration to just evaporate. I have no idea, actually, I'm just guessing.
From: Sault Ste. Marie | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 13 July 2002 04:42 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oil doesn't really evaporate, though, meades. I really think it just doesn't feel as yucky when it's super short because it has less contact with your skin.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 13 July 2002 04:43 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My problem is that I just found the best shampoo in the world - it does not damage my hair, it does not make me sick, and I don't feel the need to lie down after I wash my hair - EXCEPT that it contains coconut oil which stuffs up my son's nose and makes his throat hurt.

Does anybody know of any shampoo that is just like Prairie Naturals' Indian Summer but without the coconut oil?

PS. I don't want short hair and if I use Nature Clean I'll end up having to have a crew cut because it is so damaging. There has to be something good out there.

--------

Secondly, why are school supply lists for grades 4 and 5 including deoderant? Boys at that age don't even want to take baths. Making one take a bath 2 or 3 times a week is hell because they fight you every inch of the way AND THEN the kid still has the mistaken belief that now it is summer and you don't have to wash the school off them anymore that they don't have to bathe.

I may be old fashion but a boy should not start using deoderant until ONE he wants to bathe regularly without you pressuring him and TWO he has atleast gone through puberty.

[ July 13, 2002: Message edited by: vaudree ]


From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 13 July 2002 06:08 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I used to love getting haircuts in summer because my head would feel less hot.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 13 July 2002 06:19 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Believe me good Dr. that the style looks better on you than it does on me.
From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 13 July 2002 07:18 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hair? Who needs it.
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
sherpafish
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1568

posted 17 July 2002 02:20 AM      Profile for sherpafish   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How about all those hair goop products that make your hair look dirty? That's the actual marketing.
Why wash out all the natual oil just to put in some sort of 'mud' or 'taffy'?

And what's the deal with 'seasonal' hair and fragrance products?
Can we all say planned obsolecence?


From: intra-crainial razor dust | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 17 July 2002 06:28 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Why wash out all the natual oil just to put in some sort of 'mud' or 'taffy'?

'Cause natural oils don't make it stand up like beeswax does... Silly questions!!

I was young and in my prime in the '80s... There is nothing anybody can teach me about hair products and altitude....

[ July 17, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331

posted 17 July 2002 07:22 PM      Profile for vaudree     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Zoot, what do you recommend that is nontoxic for dry and damaged hair. Even though it is not permed or colour-treated, pretend that is is when you give your recomendation.
From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 17 July 2002 11:30 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You could try a heated oil treatment that you wash out afterward. You warm up oil in a baggie in a bowl of warm water, rub into hair, wrap hair in a shower cap and let sit for about 20 minutes, then shampoo as usual.

I also have a friend who has some allergies who likes the "banana putty" treatment from the Body Shop, but I'm not sure they carry it anymore. I'm in a short hair phase, so I haven't done a lot of deep conditioning in the last while.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 28 April 2003 04:41 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by meades:
Also, when it comes to longer hair, maybe your head gets hotter, which makes your head sweat more, as opposed to when you have shorter hair, in which case it's much easier for any perspiration to just evaporate. I have no idea, actually, I'm just guessing.

Incidentally, this is true. I mentioned above I liked haircuts in summer; what would happen is when my hair would get a tad long for comfort, I'd be walking down to the library or whatever, and my head would feel unbearably hot, especially if I'd had a warm shower that morning. So what I started taking to doing was after a shower, I'd blast my head with cold water to see if that improved things any.

... it seemed to, but the real solution is to get a haircut to promote heat transfer.


From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mandos
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 888

posted 28 April 2003 04:55 PM      Profile for Mandos   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm told that if your hair is excessively greasy then it will also promote baldness. Is this true?
From: There, there. | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 28 April 2003 05:42 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When I saw this thread title, I automatically assumed we were talking about Dr. Bronner's verbose peppermint soap.

Personal endorsement: I have gone six years simply rinsing my hair daily in water. No adverse effects whatsoever. Occasional odour that is easily controlled with a dab of sandalwood oil. I struggled for years with dandruff and crappy looking hair until I was let in on this little secret... "product" was invented to replicate the look of un-shampooed hair.


From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 28 April 2003 05:47 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, geez, Dr Bronner's... I kept losing time in the shower, felt compelled to read the bottle before my coffee and self-discipline kicked in in the morning. Very strange stuff.

Actually, "product" doesn't mimic unwashed hair at all. Believe me, if you had my hair, you'd use gel. The devil lives in my hair.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 28 April 2003 06:07 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Which demon afflicts your hair? My hair was possesed by the terminally dry and limp genie. Avoiding shampoo has suffused my hair with the spirit of Tom Waits.
From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 28 April 2003 06:47 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mandos:
I'm told that if your hair is excessively greasy then it will also promote baldness. Is this true?

I doubt that. If you're genetically programmed to lose hair, like I am, no amount of cleaning or application of assorted goop is going to stop it. The same thing if you're losing hair because of stress or medication.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 28 April 2003 07:18 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Which demon afflicts your hair? My hair was possesed by the terminally dry and limp genie. Avoiding shampoo has suffused my hair with the spirit of Tom Waits.

The big one, Beelzebub himself. I'm convinced.

I have constantly awry cowlicks which can create bedhead of titanic proportions. I have just enough natural curl to make it unruly, but not enough to make unruly an actual fashion statement. It will mold to the most unfortunate shape possible, should I attempt to wear a hat for more than 5 minutes. It knows frizz like nobody's business, especially after having been slept on.

No, this is no garden variety demon possession or imp infestation. The Prince of Darkness himself wreaks havoc on this head.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
TommyPaineatWork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2956

posted 29 April 2003 03:31 AM      Profile for TommyPaineatWork     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's funny, my hair acts exactly the same way. After waking up it has to be washed-- no amount of brushing or combing will get rid of the bed head, and my aversion to hats is for the same reason you indicate.

I think it would be easier to have this kind of hair for a woman. Well-- it would be easier for me if I didn't associate short hair with small and capital "C" politics.

So, no short Republican hair for me.

My daughter and Rebecca both came to the conclusion, independantly, that I should stop "fighting the curl" and I have. Except the last time I got it cut, I left it too long on top, fearing they'd cut too short and leave no curl. So now I've got this 50's thing with the curls coming down on my forehead.


I'm also told that I might do better if I spent more than ten bucks on a hair cut. Probably good advice.

My hair is a visual representation of my self depricating sense of humour. I go on about not knowing what to do with it, but in reality, at my age, it's what I call a "happy problem", and most of my angst is affected mellodrama.


From: London | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 29 April 2003 04:03 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, let's be thankful for our small blessings!

I, too, have a ringlet that goes right in front of my face.

I don't exactly "fight" the curl... That leaves me with even greater grief. And oddly, in spite of the peculiarities, I would not change it, which may be part of learning to be comfortable with myself just as I am as middle age approaches. But in order to have the occasional good hair day, I've had to accept that a certain level of chaos is going to have to be allowed for my hair.

(This has me thinking of the Robert Munch story, "Aaron's Hair", where the little boy says he hates his hair, the hair runs away from home, and he spends the rest of the story trying to get it back...)

I also have to add that Rebecca is absolutely right -- it takes a talented cutter to do something with a cowlicky, curly head of hair. Invest in a good stylist, you'll not regret it!

[ 29 April 2003: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116

posted 29 April 2003 04:17 PM      Profile for ronb     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Interesting. I have quite a few natural curls and cowlicks myself, but my years of shampooing merely added dry, limp and flyaway to the misery. "Product" generally solved one problem by giving me a far worse one, terrible skin. It took a couple of weeks off the shampoo for me to see what the super-cool musicians I hung out with at the time were getting at, but eventually I did. Much happier for it, love my weird, lush hair now. Wish I'd known back when I was dating, a lot of anguish could've been avoided.

And to clarify, attempting to go a day without thouroughly rinsing my hair is usually a disaster, for bedhead reasons. Plus I'm addicted to showering, need a daily fix. Skipping the shampoo doesn't really have much to do with taming the bedhead, for me. Just enough water so I can run a comb through if there's a wedding that day, or run the fingers through on any other day.

Gee. Aren't we the narcissists?


From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448

posted 29 April 2003 04:25 PM      Profile for Timebandit     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh, I am a vain creature, I admit it readily.

Sounds like you have an allergy. There are some products I can't use, myself, and many shampoos and conditioners make my hair like straw and leave me super-itchy. But from my camping experiences, just rinsing isn't going to work well for me, either. Luckily, I've managed to find stuff that doesnt irritate. Now I just have to hope they don't discontinue it.


From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 30 April 2003 10:54 AM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hair care products that make outrageous claims are a pet peeve of mine. I mean, what the fuck are "pro-vitamins"?

I buy whatever shampoo's on sale, I don't use conditioner, I wash it two or three times a week (but run damp fingers through it every morning to 'tame' it), I keep it very short and messy, bleached an unnatural shade of blond-ish. I've tried every kind of hair product on the market, and the only thing I've stuck with is a bit of hair spray to keep the spiky mess ... well ... a spiky mess. Occasionally, I'll add a bit of purple. But only a bit.

Two babblers in particular may recall my failed experiment with purple hair.

When I was younger I agonized over how limp and fine it was. Now, I don't really care. Having endured years of unsolicited advice on the subject from my mother and various hairdressers, I tend to ignore what anyone might have to say about my hair. And, after all, it IS only hair.


From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca