Author
|
Topic: Who Copy-edited my Shampoo Bottle?
|
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 10 July 2002 02:36 AM
In other shampoo-related news, I am doing an experiment. Since I got a buzz cut some weeks ago, I have shampooed my hair only twice. Now I'm going to go as long as I can without shampooing it to test my theory that shampoo is a scam. All that is needed is a very thorough rinsing, a massage, and a vigorous drying with a towel. My hair is now healthier than it has ever been, and it neither smells nor appears in any way offensive. I never believed it before, but a friend of mine in university said he never shampooed. His hair was very healthy, not smelly or greasy at all. Perhaps, if it continues to be healthy, at some point I will shampoo with a raw egg, which I have been told is good for your hair.
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Arch Stanton
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2356
|
posted 10 July 2002 02:44 AM
Heresy!However will you maintain ph balance? Your hair's protein levels will drop to critical levels! You will have neither full body nor a lustrous shine! Isn't the medicare system in enough difficulty already without crazy people thumbing their noses at personal hygiene? It's folly! Follicular folly. funicili funicila
From: Borrioboola-Gha | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zatamon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1394
|
posted 10 July 2002 11:43 AM
John Ralston Saul's “The Doubter’s Companion” is a fun book and it is actually a dictionary with hundreds of entries in alphabetical order. He included all those words that need clarification because they are not clearly understood by most people, often due to corporate propaganda.The entry under “Dandruff” includes the following (please forgive me John, for the copyright liberty I am taking!) quote: The ANSWER is usually vinegar. To some problems there are solutions. What we call dandruff is often the result of PH imbalance on the skin, which shampoo exacerbates. Wash your hair with a simple non-detergent shampoo, soap, olive oil, beer, almost anything. Rinse. Then close your eyes and pour on some vinegar. The extremely cheap but natural sort – apple cider, for example – is probably the best. The smell will stimulate interesting conversation in changing-room showers and your explanations will win you friends. Wait thirty to sixty seconds. Rinse it off. The smell will go away. So will your dandruff. All dermatologists, pharmacists and pharmaceutical companies know this simple secret. They don’t tell you, because they make money by converting dandruff into a complex medical and social problem. By most professional standards this would amount to legally defined incompetence or misrepresentation. Dandruff shampoos that promise to keep your shoulders and even your head clean are harsh detergents and may promote baldness, which ought to constitute malpractice
[ July 10, 2002: Message edited by: Zatamon ]
From: where hope for 'hope' is contemplated | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 10 July 2002 02:40 PM
I found this on the internet today. Unfortunately, the design of the site makes it impossible to read easily, at least on my browser, so I'm duplicating it here.
Reality Cracking Taken from the Fravia Reality Cracking website before it disappeared. Reversing Shampoo by Makoli September 6, 1998 Well, a small pebble of reality cracking, yet NOTHING is insignificant in this world of ours where toothpastes that actually damage your teeth are advertised by "beautiful" smiling models with false teeth
Enjoy!
Reversing Shampoo I didn't actually crack the shampoo scam, all I did was write this. But as with any other protected thing, at least somebody knows the truth all along. The truth here is that shampoo's bad for your hair. It cleans out dirt, but also the oil that makes your hair shiny and strong. However shampoo's sold as something your hair really needs, and the truth is suppressed. There are several common sorts of soapy things. They attract oils by electric charge, allowing the oil to be emulsified with the water. For some reason, these cleaners are themselves made from fats. Soap is made from animal or vegetable oil, and detergent is made from mineral oil. Detergents can be made more powerful. Shampoo is detergent, just like dishwashing detergent, bathroom cleaner, and engine block cleaner. People used to use soap to wash their hair, as well as their dishes, clothes and bathrooms (and horses, before there were engines.) Soap was better suited to washing hair, because it didn't remove so much of the oils that are naturally in hair.
But the water supply slowly changed. It's now generally more alkaline, which people call hard water. When this started happening, soap didn't work so well. The chemicals which make water alkaline make soap stop lathering well, and form insoluble scum (eg. the ring in the bath.) So soap got less and less effective for all its cleaning uses. I guess the water was always pretty alkaline in some places, so soap was never an ideal cleaner. Around the beginning of the twentieth century, household detergents became available. Detergents have no problem with alkaline water, so they were really popular. They soon became cheaper than soap, too.
So that's why people stopped using soap for almost everything, and started using detergents. Detergents are excellent cleaners for most uses. If you've tried using soap to wash your hair, you probably know how your hair goes all rough and tangly. This is worse if your water's harder (more alkaline.) I moved recently, and suddenly started having problems using soap in my hair. The problem is that hair reacts to acids and alkalis. Each hair has little scales, like scales on a snake or shingles on a roof. Acid makes the scales lie down flat, which makes your hair shiny and smooth. (Ever heard that lemon juice is good for your hair?) Alkali makes the scales stand up, which makes your hair look dull and feel rough and tangly. Therefore hard water, which is common these days, makes it harder to wash your hair. If you use soap to wash your hair in hard water, then the combination of your hair's scales standing up and the soap forming scum makes your hair into a terrible mess. Then, since your hair's all tangled and rough, it's impossible to rinse out all the soap, which makes it look terrible. Shampoo, being detergent, can rinse out of your hair fine even in alkaline water. That's its only good point. Its fundamental, but covered up, bad point is that it's very harsh, and damages your hair permanently. Conditioner was soon introduced as people noticed that shampoo sucked the oils out of their hair dry and left it all dry and brittle. Conditioner puts artificial oils in your hair, and they stay there just long enough so that you don't associate the damage to your hair with the shampoo that caused it.
You have to wash your hair every day, not because it always gets dirty so fast but because the oils from the conditioner don't last and have to be replenished. Conditioner wasn't used until shampoo came about. But the real cheat in shampoo is when it's sold as being especially good for your hair. Expensive shampoos are in a way better, but only because the conditioner that comes with them is better at covering up the damage done by the shampoo. The actual shampoo itself is pretty much the same as any cheap shampoo. The professional formula, which will nourish your hair and make it grow more healthy, with vitamins and natural nutrients, gentle seaweed extracts, jojoba oil. . . . Remember that your hair's dead. That exposes half of shampoo advertising as lies. Remember that shampoo is just detergent. That shows that most of the remaining half is lies too. Remember that the oils your hair needs come naturally out of your scalp, as they've been doing for thousands of years before conditioner was invented. When you think about it, nothing that is claimed about shampoo and conditioner is true. In a way, we really do need conditioner, as advertising implies. But the real reason why we need it is because our hair gets damaged by shampoo. This is just another case of using lies to help a bad product (shampoo) gain dominance over a good product (soap), then introducing another product (conditioner) to compensate for the bad product's faults, and then tricking people into accepting huge price increases once they forget the good product. The only good thing about shampoo is that it doesn't work any worse in hard water.
Does that ever get mentioned in advertising? The rest is lies, to fool you into paying $10 for a $1 bottle of perfumed detergent. What to do Soap is good to wash your hair with. Forget all the dregs of misinformation spread by shampoo manufacturers, and forget that soap is "harsh". Remember that the problem with using soap is in the water, not the soap. You just need to solve the problem of the hard water, and soap is fine to use. I can recommend two ways. If your water's not too hard, just substitute soap for shampoo, and use any old cheapish conditioner. The conditioner will make the scales on your hair lie down, and let the last of the soap get rinsed out. You might have to experiment with different soaps and conditioners. Maybe some conditioner which is pH balanced is best. Some "good ol" plain soap with no added water and perfume is probably best. Otherwise, you can add some weak acid at some point in the washing process. Since you need just a tiny amount, even cheap vinegar will do, without leaving a smell. You could make a soap goo out of soap and water, and add a bit of lemon juice. You could have a jug of water with a teaspoonful of vinegar in it, to rinse your hair with after soaping. Or how about pouring it into a plastic squirty bottle, so you don't spill it. Another good thing is oil of rosemary. It stimulates your scalp, to encourage the natural oils to flow. Actually I haven't worked out how to get it onto my scalp, since there's all that hair in the way, but I've heard it's possible. So in summary, shampoo had a legitimate claim as an alternative for soap. But now it's not sold by that claim, it's sold by lies. Soap's better for your hair, and you can still use it if you compensate for hard water. Makoli
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 10 July 2002 03:29 PM
Not gross, Michelle. I believe you. I use soap in very limited quantities. I've stopped using it for sensitive areas like the face, unless it's actually grubby, and really only use it for parts of my body that need it. Also, deodorant is a scam. I don't use it. I smell a little sweaty sometimes at the end of the day, but big whoop. Get over it or get out of my way. Anyway, lots of people actually like smelling other people, as opposed to some horrid cheap perfumed deodorant. The main thing is to make sure that the soap is fully, fully rinsed out of your armpits. Otherwise, in my experience, you will have bad BO. Don't know the chemistry of that. [ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: rasmus_raven ]
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slick Willy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 184
|
posted 10 July 2002 04:40 PM
quote: Well, deodorant is something I can't do without.
I wanted to mention something I discovered a few weeks ago but it slipped my mind. And no it doesn't really have anything to do with Michelle's personal grooming habits other than I am using that as a segway. My wife asked me to pick up so deoderant for her while I was out an about. What's the big deal right? Sometimes I get stuck on words. Like deoderant. Not something else like anti-persperant but deoderant. so I'm looking and looking and finding lots of antipersperant but nothing for womens deoderant. Huh??? So I get caught up on finding deoderant made for women. Look at the mens deoderant section. Tons to choose from. Womens section, lots of anti-persperant but where is the deoderant? Finaly I find a stick of degree deoderant those it looks kinda generic gender wise and so I get that. After the total lack of outrage from my wife, I guess I kinda let the wind get taken outta my sails over it. But for the record what the FUCK IS THAT SHIT! I haven't seen anything different when ever I remember to look. Not that there isn't deoderant for women, it just seems that anti-persperant is seriously being pushed here. And we perspire for a reason don't we.
From: Hog Heaven | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
meades
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 625
|
posted 11 July 2002 01:50 AM
This is really interesting. First, I shower everyday, shampoo, conditioner - the whole sh'bang (Daily Defence! protects my hair from all of those harmful pollutants that are actually being blown over to Sault-Michigan by the wind, instead of up here in the boonies. Plus it's "specially formulated" for Dry/Damaged hair! ) wash my face with "special cleasers" (god, that Clean & Clear company is full of shit. But I already bought the stuff, so I figured I should finish it off) and then after my shower, I clean my face again with astringent (the "gentle" formula after a shower, and the "oil fighting" one if I'm about to go out, or if my face just feels icky).I try a lot of different stuff, like sometimes I just use plain dial soap instead of the "special cleansers" or whatnot. But nothing really seems to work really well. I do notice a slight improvement though if I jump from the "special cleansers" to the regular soap and vice versa. But it's only when I switch- it's not consistant. I think that's wierd. Anyway, I'm gonna try just rinsing for a while, and see if that makes any difference. As for hair, it didn't really occur to me until I read though this, but this thread made me realise that I don't notice that much of a difference with regard to how much or how little shampoo I use (I always forget to buy more shampoo, so often I'm stuck in the shower shaking the bottle like crazy to try and get that last drop out so I can at least work up a lather). Anyway, just before a shower, my hair usually looks a bit like this so it's not too bad, but my hair and my face feel terribly greasy and overall icky, and if I wait any longer to have a shower, I look totally greasy and it's not pleasant- so I just can't go more than 40 hours without a shower. On a regular day, though, my hair is straight, but kind of wiry. It's sort of all over the place, but without being a total mess. As for deodorant/anti-perspirant, I find that "old spice" is really bad. I mean, it smells nice-ish, as far as cheap anti-perspirant is concerned, but it leaves your pits feeling all gooey. And when it starts to break down, you stink even worse than before you put it on, and you actually sweat more. Because it's summer now, though, I only put on deodorant or anti-perspirant if I'm about to go out or if I really stink, and just want something to mask the odour. Otherwise, I use it everyday. Yes, I am a bit superficial, I'll admit it. The thing that really bugs me though, is tooth-paste. I see comercials for Crest or Colgate's "Best ever formula!". If it's the best ever formula, isn't all your other stuff crap by comparison, and shouldn't you remove it from the market? Other than how the tooth-paste comes out of the container, the colours that are included, and the flavours, what's the real difference between all of those types of toothpaste? I don't mean brands, but the actual different types of toothpaste that the major brands put out- is there any meaningful difference?
From: Sault Ste. Marie | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 11 July 2002 02:43 PM
Whether I shampoo or not, I have to get my head wet every day. I have horrific cowlicks which create a condition I refer to as "Franken-head" -- the hair literally makes my head look square in the morning. Bad scene. And with natural curl along with those cowlicks, I really need gel or something like it to tame down the whoop-di-doos my hair likes to curl up into.I find soap leaves my skin way too dry, event the glycerine stuff. Whether I use a cleanser or not, I always have to moisturize. It's really hard to find moisturizer for face that isn't really badly scented, which gives me a rash. The Body Shop carries one that is pretty good. Alas, we have no Lush store here. We like to stock up when we're in Banff or Vancouver, though. (Edited because I can't type today, either... Must be the weather...) [ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 12 July 2002 02:42 AM
I don't want to seem like a grouch-off about Lush, and honestly wouldn't have replied here (tho I was tempted!) - but, uh, I got paged.I won't launch into a great screed about the trials and tribulations of Lush's labor practices because I prefer not to go into details. I worked at Lush Manufacturing in Vancouver, so my information is somewhat specific to that place. However, a quick summary of what got Lush unionized in 2001, in my opinion (I worked there from 1997 to 2000): - The lack of consistency in allotting raises and bonuses, as well as inconsistent starting wages. - The lack of concrete action to improve the lot of employees even though several promises were made by management; one glaring example is that proper benefits (i.e. medical and dental) were only grudgingly provided after the IWA successfully got a contract negotiated. - Management simply cheaped out on everything possible. It got to the stage where penny wise and pound foolish was the operative motto. Now, I don't know how much things have improved, but the management certainly didn't take the unionization very well, so there's still quite a bit of conflict. However, the one big benefit I think it did allow was it forced the use of internal hiring first then going outside for people. Nothing is so irritating as watching someone get parachuted in and get paid way more than you ever will be, even if he or she is a crackerjack. ---- Addendum: I would still recommend the use of Lush products as the flip side of my experience there is that I got to see how actual products got made. And I can tell you that the people who do the work do very good work these days, and the smells are heavenly! My car used to always smell really nice because I'd carry the smell on my clothes after working there 8 hours a day 5 days a week. [ July 12, 2002: Message edited by: DrConway ]
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 12 July 2002 08:43 AM
I have pretty much the same reaction when people rave about The Body Shop. The products are nice, and as minimum wage jobs go, The Body Shop is really pretty good. But, well, their whole advertising campaign is based on being great corporate citizens and empowering women. Except that most of their employees are women and they're getting paid minimum wage or slightly more while The Body Shop rakes in huge profits. From what I understand, they have completely resisted any effort on the part of their workers to unionize.They have a big advertising campaign about being against violence against women. Except that if their female employees needed to get away from an abusive partner, making an unlivable wage would probably not allow them to do it too easily. On the flip side, though, they do encourage their employees to volunteer in shelters for women, and have programs where they support local shelters with fundraising, and do things like bringing their stuff to shelters and giving makeovers and facials as "confidence boosters" for the women there. I tried not to be too cynical about billing women's cosmetics as confidence boosters. I figured this was also female bonding time, and I can appreciate the value of that. They advertise that women should feel confident about themselves the way they are instead of reaching for an unattainable beauty ideal. Except that they have an aggressive sales policy where staff push products on the customers that they don't need or want in order to increase each sale (sales staff have to maintain a minimum average sale and conversion rate, while receiving no financial incentive to do so - no commissions). So they're pushed like commissioned sales staff without the benefit of commissions. And women have make-up and other beauty products (that they didn't come into the store to buy) pushed on them despite women being fine just the way they are. Oh, and the employees have to wear Body Shop make-up for every shift - they have to wear a minimum number of items of make-up on their faces. Even if you don't normally wear make-up. Also, although their posters have encouraging messages, most of them feature drop-dead gorgeous models. They advertise that they are against environmental destruction. But they seem to have forgotten the first two R's of Recycling. As I said above, they don't encourage Reducing at all - if anything, they advocate more and more consumerism, more and more stuff people don't need, and it all comes in bottles and packaging. The idea is to sell as much as possible and to encourage as much impulse buying as you possibly can. As for Reusing - there has been a move away from encouraging customers to bring in their empties for refilling. They'll still do it for people who ask, but they don't go out of their way to advertise or encourage it anymore - it's too much of a hassle because a) the bottles have to be perfectly clean, and b) exactly the same product has to go into the bottle - so if you bought one type of bubble bath, you couldn't refill with another type. The excuse is, "Well, the bottles are recyclable anyhow." So that leaves the third R, Recycling, and at least everything they sell comes in recyclable packaging. But then again, most body products do these days, so that's not really all that distinctive for The Body Shop. Basically, you're buying a brand from The Body Shop. Their products are pretty good (although not hypoallergenic), and I like them. Their advertising campaigns are a lot more positive than those for other products. But their concern for the environment and for the empowerment of women is, at least in my opinion, superficial at best. I see it as a marketing campaign rather than a philosophy, although they do try to promote it as a philosophy, even to their employees. I still buy their products, but only because I don't think anyone else is any better, not because I think they're particularly conscientious.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 13 July 2002 02:14 PM
quote: It's easier to go without shampoo when your hair is buzzed off
It's interesting you say this, Zoot, because this is the observation that finally convinced me that shampoo was probably a scam. I also noticed it was easy to go without shampoo when I got my hair buzzed. But why should this be so? If the problem is oil from your scalp, surely there's the same amount of oil going to much less hair when it's buzzed -- shouldn't your hair be swimming in grease? But no, it isn't. It's perfectly fine. So why does longer hair start to feel gross after as little as a day? Sure, sometimes it could be external dirt, but not mostly. There must be another problem, and the most likely suspect is shampoo. That's how I figured it, anyhow, and so far the hypothesis is holding up. I washed my hair with soap today and rinsed it with a weak vinegar solution. My hair doesn't smell bad, and it feels quite good.
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vaudree
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1331
|
posted 13 July 2002 04:43 PM
My problem is that I just found the best shampoo in the world - it does not damage my hair, it does not make me sick, and I don't feel the need to lie down after I wash my hair - EXCEPT that it contains coconut oil which stuffs up my son's nose and makes his throat hurt.Does anybody know of any shampoo that is just like Prairie Naturals' Indian Summer but without the coconut oil? PS. I don't want short hair and if I use Nature Clean I'll end up having to have a crew cut because it is so damaging. There has to be something good out there. -------- Secondly, why are school supply lists for grades 4 and 5 including deoderant? Boys at that age don't even want to take baths. Making one take a bath 2 or 3 times a week is hell because they fight you every inch of the way AND THEN the kid still has the mistaken belief that now it is summer and you don't have to wash the school off them anymore that they don't have to bathe. I may be old fashion but a boy should not start using deoderant until ONE he wants to bathe regularly without you pressuring him and TWO he has atleast gone through puberty. [ July 13, 2002: Message edited by: vaudree ]
From: Just outside St. Boniface | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 17 July 2002 06:28 PM
quote: Why wash out all the natual oil just to put in some sort of 'mud' or 'taffy'?
'Cause natural oils don't make it stand up like beeswax does... Silly questions!! I was young and in my prime in the '80s... There is nothing anybody can teach me about hair products and altitude.... [ July 17, 2002: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490
|
posted 28 April 2003 04:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by meades: Also, when it comes to longer hair, maybe your head gets hotter, which makes your head sweat more, as opposed to when you have shorter hair, in which case it's much easier for any perspiration to just evaporate. I have no idea, actually, I'm just guessing.
Incidentally, this is true. I mentioned above I liked haircuts in summer; what would happen is when my hair would get a tad long for comfort, I'd be walking down to the library or whatever, and my head would feel unbearably hot, especially if I'd had a warm shower that morning. So what I started taking to doing was after a shower, I'd blast my head with cold water to see if that improved things any. ... it seemed to, but the real solution is to get a haircut to promote heat transfer.
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 28 April 2003 07:18 PM
quote: Which demon afflicts your hair? My hair was possesed by the terminally dry and limp genie. Avoiding shampoo has suffused my hair with the spirit of Tom Waits.
The big one, Beelzebub himself. I'm convinced. I have constantly awry cowlicks which can create bedhead of titanic proportions. I have just enough natural curl to make it unruly, but not enough to make unruly an actual fashion statement. It will mold to the most unfortunate shape possible, should I attempt to wear a hat for more than 5 minutes. It knows frizz like nobody's business, especially after having been slept on. No, this is no garden variety demon possession or imp infestation. The Prince of Darkness himself wreaks havoc on this head.
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
TommyPaineatWork
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2956
|
posted 29 April 2003 03:31 AM
That's funny, my hair acts exactly the same way. After waking up it has to be washed-- no amount of brushing or combing will get rid of the bed head, and my aversion to hats is for the same reason you indicate.I think it would be easier to have this kind of hair for a woman. Well-- it would be easier for me if I didn't associate short hair with small and capital "C" politics. So, no short Republican hair for me. My daughter and Rebecca both came to the conclusion, independantly, that I should stop "fighting the curl" and I have. Except the last time I got it cut, I left it too long on top, fearing they'd cut too short and leave no curl. So now I've got this 50's thing with the curls coming down on my forehead. I'm also told that I might do better if I spent more than ten bucks on a hair cut. Probably good advice.
My hair is a visual representation of my self depricating sense of humour. I go on about not knowing what to do with it, but in reality, at my age, it's what I call a "happy problem", and most of my angst is affected mellodrama.
From: London | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Timebandit
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1448
|
posted 29 April 2003 04:03 PM
Yes, let's be thankful for our small blessings! I, too, have a ringlet that goes right in front of my face. I don't exactly "fight" the curl... That leaves me with even greater grief. And oddly, in spite of the peculiarities, I would not change it, which may be part of learning to be comfortable with myself just as I am as middle age approaches. But in order to have the occasional good hair day, I've had to accept that a certain level of chaos is going to have to be allowed for my hair. (This has me thinking of the Robert Munch story, "Aaron's Hair", where the little boy says he hates his hair, the hair runs away from home, and he spends the rest of the story trying to get it back...) I also have to add that Rebecca is absolutely right -- it takes a talented cutter to do something with a cowlicky, curly head of hair. Invest in a good stylist, you'll not regret it! [ 29 April 2003: Message edited by: Zoot Capri ]
From: Urban prairie. | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
ronb
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2116
|
posted 29 April 2003 04:17 PM
Interesting. I have quite a few natural curls and cowlicks myself, but my years of shampooing merely added dry, limp and flyaway to the misery. "Product" generally solved one problem by giving me a far worse one, terrible skin. It took a couple of weeks off the shampoo for me to see what the super-cool musicians I hung out with at the time were getting at, but eventually I did. Much happier for it, love my weird, lush hair now. Wish I'd known back when I was dating, a lot of anguish could've been avoided.And to clarify, attempting to go a day without thouroughly rinsing my hair is usually a disaster, for bedhead reasons. Plus I'm addicted to showering, need a daily fix. Skipping the shampoo doesn't really have much to do with taming the bedhead, for me. Just enough water so I can run a comb through if there's a wedding that day, or run the fingers through on any other day. Gee. Aren't we the narcissists?
From: gone | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873
|
posted 30 April 2003 10:54 AM
Hair care products that make outrageous claims are a pet peeve of mine. I mean, what the fuck are "pro-vitamins"?I buy whatever shampoo's on sale, I don't use conditioner, I wash it two or three times a week (but run damp fingers through it every morning to 'tame' it), I keep it very short and messy, bleached an unnatural shade of blond-ish. I've tried every kind of hair product on the market, and the only thing I've stuck with is a bit of hair spray to keep the spiky mess ... well ... a spiky mess. Occasionally, I'll add a bit of purple. But only a bit. Two babblers in particular may recall my failed experiment with purple hair. When I was younger I agonized over how limp and fine it was. Now, I don't really care. Having endured years of unsolicited advice on the subject from my mother and various hairdressers, I tend to ignore what anyone might have to say about my hair. And, after all, it IS only hair.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|