Author
|
Topic: This soup kitchen isn't kosher
|
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44
|
posted 25 December 2005 05:02 AM
quote: A charity run by an extreme-right group in the south of France has caused anger by serving the homeless only pork soup, which Jews and Muslims do not eat.The soup kitchen is set up one night each week in the port of Nice and has drawn numerous protests. The charity has defended offering what it calls traditional cuisine to French and European homeless people.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4557034.stm Doesn't seem very Nice to me.
From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ghost of the Navigator
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11029
|
posted 25 December 2005 02:56 PM
Why can't Hamas and similar militant groups go after these guys?It would make them look more like John Brown (A hero of God who went around Kansas smiting evil slave owners in their sleep) than like Al Qaeda. [ 25 December 2005: Message edited by: Ghost of the Navigator ]
From: Canada | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
fast_twitch_neurons
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10443
|
posted 25 December 2005 04:24 PM
Technically, for orthodox Jews, no soup kitchens are kosher unless they're supervised by a Rabbi, which costs money. Hallal is less strict than kosher though, and in any case I suspect this has more to do with Muslims than with Jews. I don't eat porc though, I'm wondering, is it an expensive meat? I'm curious if they would have the capacity to feed more people if they went vegetarian. Muse, Non-muslims can eat Hallal food just fine. [ 25 December 2005: Message edited by: fast_twitch_neurons ]
From: Montreal | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245
|
posted 25 December 2005 06:03 PM
quote: I suspect nearly every palate in France is capable of handling a menu limited to "Things Other Than Pork".
As Fast Twitch pointed out, without Rabbinical oversight, Orthodox Jews would not be able to handle this. I hesitate to go so far as to say "anyone that keeps kosher" since kosher can range everywhere from "I don't eat bacon at home" to ultra-orthodox. Traditional Muslim cuisine doesn't cut it. Does anyone know if the simple fact that a knife was used to cut pork makes anything it touches unclean and inedible to a Muslim? Having said that, I suspect the group running the original soup kitchen knows exactly what they are doing. While they could have done worse (much worse) by simply adding pork byproducts to the meals they were serving without telling anyone it looks like they are definitely making a statement. [ 25 December 2005: Message edited by: abnormal ]
From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fake_oxygen
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8898
|
posted 26 December 2005 03:00 PM
quote: I'm going to get accused of being pedantic but Islam is a religion, not a race. The fact that we in the west tend to think of Arabic people when we think of Islam doesn't change the fact.
I see your point, I still think the word racist sums up hte discrimination and hatred inherent in the actions of this group. quote: Charity does not need to be accepted,and is often directed at one segment of the population.Perhaps an area farmer donates the pork.Tensions in france seem very high but casting doubt on a charities motives is not helpful.
However, if the charity is in fact run by a right wing extremist group, then the motives are clear. THey are purposefully going out of their way to tick off the Muslim population, which is huge in France. At least thats what I gathered from a glance. Its important to remember that in the Middle East, militant groups have long done the role of charitable providers. Not only that, but they have outperformed the state in many places at providing social services, which only deligitimizes the state and draws more support to the fundamentalist militants.
From: Peterborough | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 26 December 2005 04:00 PM
The subject of the debate is a soup kitchen set up deliberately to exclude those who cannot eat what its proprietors term the diet of "compatriots" and "Europeans." I have agreed, above, that the more basic problem is an economy that leaves many people needing soup kitchens. Further, I'm a democrat: if fascists and racists want to run purposefully exclusionary charities, I would never argue in favour of laws to stop them. If that is happening, though, I would argue all the more publicly against fascism and racism, not to censor but to educate, the first duty of every committed democrat, of course. I do not want the law to shut down offensive operations like this. I want to see the citizenry rise up in revulsion against them.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308
|
posted 26 December 2005 04:43 PM
Oh, come off it, Dad. This is ludicrous. Even if I didn't already know about the motivation, it would be easy as hell to tell it's no accident. You're trying to tell me French cuisine is so heavy on the pork that just by accident they serve only pork-based soup? Ya right. If it was Germany I might just barely accept that they just happened to be serving nothing but pork sausage. But pork isn't even that big a freakin' deal in France. Wine, yes. But think of all the signature French (Christian, if you will) dishes. What's in 'em? Beef. Chicken. In some areas, seafood. Goose, fer cryin' out loud. Onions. It would kill them to serve a nice onion soup? It would be just beyond the pale to serve a fish chowder in Marseilles, fer fucksake? Pork soup, the ancient tradition of Marseilles. What-ev-er. You are so full of it, and so are they.
From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 26 December 2005 04:44 PM
"The food that is customary to them" - By "them," muse, I take it you mean French people? muse: there are few foods that are not "customary" to the French. Och, what the French can do with food - any food, anyone's food, all food - yay, food! Rufus already said this above: it is hard to imagine the French palate that could not adjust to a diet without pork once in a while. M'self, I like pork pretty much, but I would never think of inviting guests over without checking on dietary restrictions. Some of my friends could die eating the stuff I normally cook and consume (like bread, eg), and I don't want that, so I try to be civilized about these things. And you? [ 26 December 2005: Message edited by: skdadl ]
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560
|
posted 26 December 2005 11:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ghost of the Navigator: Why can't Hamas and similar militant groups go after these guys?
This kind of comment is really not necessary. Also, Dad and muse are trolling, and they have almost exactly the same IP address, writing style, typos, and point of view. They're going bye-bye. [ 26 December 2005: Message edited by: Michelle ]
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 27 December 2005 03:10 PM
There are MANY traditional French soups that contain no pork. Even quite a few that are vegetarian ... provided one eats butter, that is. The group in question is definitely a far-right, racist group. There are many Muslims in Nice, also many Jewish people have retired there, and no, they are not all affluent by any means. [ 27 December 2005: Message edited by: lagatta ]
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Boarsbreath
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9831
|
posted 27 December 2005 10:49 PM
The group's --1 -- pointing up the absurdity of religious injunctions 2 -- fostering racism, since in the French context 'religious' means Muslim, and Muslim means North African-descended. The first point is the rational version, but it's surely pretty clear which is the real point it's dressing for. Smooth move, calling for disdain of the Jon Stewart variety, not debates about the rational point or hot indignation, both of which serve the Front national types. (Anyway, among friends here, doesn't Leviticus permit the breaking of kosher to save a life? Indeed the breaking even of Sabbath-keeping?)
From: South Seas, ex Montreal | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
lagatta
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2534
|
posted 25 January 2006 08:59 AM
French authorities are clamping down on the far-right group behind the "racist soup". I've read a few articles in French and in German about the very nasty group behind the soup distribution in Strasbourg (with ties to neo-nazi groups accused of such things as desecrations of Jewish and Muslim cemeteries, and harassing migrants and people of colour). Alsace has an ancient Jewish population (like all the Rhineland) and is of course home to a growing number of Muslims. It is also a gathering point for boneheads from both banks of the river, as anti-Nazi laws are not as draconian as they are on the German side. There have been many protests against the "tradition and identity" based soup kitchen, by anti-racist and human rights groups in Strasbourg. Crackdown on racist soup kitchens in France.
From: Se non ora, quando? | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|