Author
|
Topic: Separate Changerooms Discriminitory?
|
|
|
|
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438
|
posted 13 July 2005 09:57 PM
I think it's unacceptable to have them share a change room. I think that some type of compromise can be worked out so that she has the briefest of time outside of the change room so that she is not missing out on anything that she feels is valuable.And the only person to consider here isn't the person changing - it's the people they are changing in front of. I mean when I go to the gym they wouldn't let a man come and change in our facilities based on him feeling comfortable with it. They'd be attentive to how all of the people around would feel. And lets not forget the boys have to change as well. I'd remove my son from the team the moment this kind of a challenge arose if that the was the solution found.
From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by Boom Boom: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Aristotleded24: What are your thoughts on this?Since you raised the subject, let's hear your thoughts first.
Good question to raise. Personally, I lean towards having separate changerooms, but I have other questions. As a society we have very strict norms about bodies being exposed. I understand the coach's point about harassment; heck, many teens that age feel uncomfortable being seen naked by anyone. In some cultures, that's not a big deal. Yet, am I a conservative traditionalist? Do we as a society need to re-examine our attitudes on the issue? Would people be so self-conscious of their body image if they weren't bombarded by messages about that the body should look like? My reason for asking these questions is that I have my own opinion, but I simply do not know.
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
puzzlic
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9646
|
posted 14 July 2005 07:56 PM
Come on, it's hockey. There's no real need for anyone to get naked while changing. Both girls and boys can wear their hockey long underwear or sports bra/bike shorts to the rink, under their clothes, and get changed in front of each other without any violation of the usual standards of modesty in North American culture. If they forget or don't have time to put on the hockey underclothes before they get to the rink, well, they can change that bit in a bathroom stall. I think a good solution would be to have one big common changeroom with separate men's and women's toilet/shower facilities. Although, as BleedingHeart points out, it's pretty rare in my experience that anyone showers at the rink (except the one indoor rink that has a real women's changeroom with a clean shower, perhaps attributable to its large figure skating program). But in general, rink showers? Eeeeuw! I play on a co-ed (mostly male) team here. There are so few women hockey players that at the outdoor rink where I play in winter, the two changerooms are in practice broken down, not girls vs. boys, but pleasure skaters vs. hockey players. If women are there, we have to use an equipment room that you get to by walking through the hockey changeroom. So occasionally I've gotten an unexpected eyeful Even when there *are* two changerooms, the rinks typically don't mark them "men" and "women" (often using them for two opposing teams of the same sex), so men will often go into all of them. As a result, it's pretty common, if you play on a co-ed team, you'll end up having to change in front of men. As for the delicate sensibilities of hockey players, I don't see the big deal. I dress so I'll be decent in front of them, and my teammates don't care. Once or twice, at pickup hockey, I've had some old guy glare at me, but tough luck. Where am I supposed to change -- outdoors? I've never had a young guy (under, say, 45) complain about it. They try to be modest if there's a woman in the changeroom ... well, most of them do One thing I've learned through this: middle-aged beer-league players don't always look so hot in a jockstrap ... [ 14 July 2005: Message edited by: puzzlic ]
From: it's too damn hot | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 15 July 2005 09:00 AM
In terms of the guys' feelings, that question was settled long ago in the pro leagues when women sportswriters successfully pressed for equal access: they didn't have an equal chance to do their jobs otherwise. There was some adolescent snickering at first, but then the guys just got over it. Here, though, we are dealing with actual adolescents. Still, if the showers are the only problem and even then not much of a problem, as others have said above, then someone's suggestion of redesigned showers sounds good. [ 15 July 2005: Message edited by: skdadl ]
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
James
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5341
|
posted 15 July 2005 09:33 AM
quote: Here, though, we are dealing with actual adolescents. Still, if the showers are the only problem
Well, skdadl, I was reading this thread and wondering "so what's the problem, so long as the gril player is cool with it?". And, "I can't imagine that her male team-mates would mind". But somehow, your post brought to mind the real *problem*. As a male oldfart, way back in the dep recesses of memory I recall a certain irrepressible phenomenon in adolescent boys, that of unintended, unwanted physical response. And it is a *problem* even absent full nudity. In fact, I distinctly recall that beeath an athletic support and protective cup, it is a quite unfortable and even painful condition, not to mention distracting. And I could see that being a real problem for even the purest of mind (thinking Hailey's youngsters here ) fellows on the team. I'm sure there are guys here with more recent recollections ....
From: Windsor; ON | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202
|
posted 15 July 2005 09:39 AM
As I recall, that happened in classrooms, too.Hell, I remember one time during the playing of "O Canada" in the 8th grade that one boy, who was unfortunately wearing sweatpants, was unable to stop himself from saluting, much to the (admittedly cruel) amusement of half the class. I don't think you can blame the girl for that. It just happens and the best solution, I think, it not to draw attention to it. Separately, to clarify my earlier remarks on harassment, I was referring to initiation rituals (done by boys to other, younger boys) that are clearly sexual harassment. I won't go into details (this was something of a minor scandal in my hometown), but I highly doubt anyone on this board would dispute that it constituted sexual harassment, even though all involved were male.
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 15 July 2005 09:44 AM
James, if you think that that just twanged any of my empathy strings, think again. The reason I think separate shower arrangements -- if any showering is needed, and some above don't seem to think it is, much -- would be a good idea is the problem Ron Webb raises: this female player might be comfortable even with those, but would others? If showers are needed, separate showers should be available. I am smiling at the memory of an attempt to make the washrooms in the editorial department of U of T Press co-ed. Hee. What a failure. There was really only one denizen -- female -- who was seriously committed to the plan, and she made her scorn for the rest of us pretty plain for a while, but it just did not work. People kept behaving in segregated ways, as it were, even when the co-ed signs went up on the two little rooms. And as I recall, it was the men who were more nervous, and especially when our firebrand invaded their space.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791
|
posted 15 July 2005 10:34 AM
In 1980 I was doing some work at the Toronto General Hospital and roomed for the weekend on the medical resident's floor. Got up in the morning in my bathrobe to go out and have a shower, and, holy crap, I walked into the one shower/changing room provided for the floor and there was a female nurse fully in the nude drying off and completely nonchalant about my walking in! I'm quite bashful or shy and I mumbled words to the effect "sorry" and went back to my room until I was sure she left. I never did ask if male and female showered together because the idea of such sounded so far out of the pale to me, although there were four shower heads and space for four people to shower. I thought perhaps I had broken an unstated rule that I didn't see posted anywhere.(In my youth I was a member of the YMCA in Ottawa and we had communal showers - no big deal, but male only.) In 1975 - 77 when I did my undergraduate at Trent I lived in the Traill College Residence, second floor, where we had co-ed washrooms. Each washroom had three private toilets, three private cubbies with wash basin, mirror, shelf, and a curtain for privacy. There was just one shower stall - private, with a lock on the door handle. It didn't present any problem until the weekends when folks were drinking and were a bit more boisterous and loose, and I think using these coed washrooms during those times became more uncomfortable for all concerned. I know we had a Head of College Meeting where we discussed enforcing rules of conduct on resident floors, and these rules were subsequently adopted. Still, I was completely aghast that no one saw these problems developing when co-ed washrooms were first proposed. BTW, yes, I was an older, more mature student at the time than most in residence, having decided to return to higher ed and make a change of career. It's my conviction that proposals for co-ed arrangements involving changing clothes or using washroom facilities need to be carefully thought out. [ 15 July 2005: Message edited by: Boom Boom ]
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|