Author
|
Topic: Food or crack?
|
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195
|
posted 03 October 2007 06:39 PM
quote: Food or crack. The choice is yours.That's the message one northern B.C. aid group has issued to people knocking on the door for help, saying they must now provide proof of financial need to gain assistance. The requirement stems from bureaucracy — an audit of the Dawson Creek Salvation Army last year slammed the fact people didn't need to show what they were earning to gain free food — but now workers hope it could help break the poverty cycle. Kim Mulligan, director of family services for the Dawson Creek Salvation Army, said blithely handing out assistance without proof of need was “enabling people to destroy themselves.” “If you pay $700 rent and the cheque you get is $800, clearly you need us to help you. But if you've got someone who brings in their information and they're making $5,000 a month, I want to know where that money's going,” Ms. Mulligan told The Globe in a telephone interview. “One guy today had $100. He could have bought food, but he bought crack. He didn't get anything [from the Salvation Army]. How are we to help if we continue to enable them?” Drugs, particularly crack, are the greatest challenge. Workers at the Dawson Creek Salvation Army guessed that up to 90 per cent of people they see are choosing to buy drugs instead of food. Meanwhile, soaring rent prices mean a rising number of families who simply can't make ends meet are also coming to the door. In the end, the organization has to help those people who really need it, Ms. Mulligan said.
Globe and Mail
From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
bigcitygal
Volunteer Moderator
Babbler # 8938
|
posted 05 October 2007 05:16 AM
This is exactly the "worthy versus unworthy" dichotomy that is so unhelpful to these kinds of discussions.Are we so classist (this is rhetorical, I know the answer is yes) as a society that the idea of judging a poor person's behaviour is accepted as the norm? The majority of the comments after the article were grotesque, just a bland fall-into-line "way to go Sally Ann kinda drivel. Of course, this is the kind of "leadership" I expect from the Salvation Army, duh. And of course this is the kind of story the Globe would run. So yeah, what about Fidel's question about corporate welfare, or cronies/buddies getting multi-million dollar government contracts, or even the bad behaviour of people who are higher than middle class? Why are the poor continuously targetted for (lack of) morality? (Rhetorical again. I guess I'm in a mood ) "A hand up, not a hand out" Give me a fucking break.
From: It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent - Q | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cueball
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4790
|
posted 05 October 2007 04:56 PM
When a well meaning French journalist asked Spike Lee about drug use among black Americans (oh those many years ago when he released "Do the Right Thing,") in a press conference at Cannes Film Festival, he pointed out that issue of drugs is most often framed in the context of poor black Americans (in the case of the USA of course) and this is actually a media distortion, because drug use is not at all exclusive to those communities, and exists in all stratas of society.He was more or less paraphrasing Malcolm X's famous retort to an American journalist who asked him about the existence of "black gun clubs." Malcolm noted that gun clubs only became an issue of concern when they were black gun clubs, as it is quite evident that there are numerous white gun clubs. Spike was quite frosty in his response to the inquiring entertainment industry journalist, probably because between the hundred odd music industry schmoozers gathered for his presentation there were numerous attendees coming down off cocaine highs from the night before. [ 05 October 2007: Message edited by: Cueball ]
From: Out from under the bridge and out for a stroll | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|