babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Pakistan's first gay marriage greeted with death threats

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Pakistan's first gay marriage greeted with death threats
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 06 October 2005 05:48 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
(Lahore) A gay couple has been told to leave Pakistani or be killed after the two men exchanged vows in a traditional ceremony in a remote village.

The Times of India reports that the threats came from village elders in the conservative Islamic region near the famed Khyber Pass.

The paper says that a 42-year-old Afghan refugee fell in love with a 16 year old villager and offered his family a "dowry" of 40,000 rupees - about $650.

The family readily accepted. Arranged marriages of 16 year olds is not uncommon in Pakistan, but this is the first known instance where another male was involved.

[...]

A tribal assembly, or jirga, in the remote area told the newlyweds on Wednesday to leave the area immediately or face death for "breaking all the religious and tribal values and ethics", according to Khan.

Sodomy is punishable by death in Pakistan.


A "dowry"?? Sounds uncomfortably like buying the kid, to me... (Or am I being culturally insensitive?)

[ 06 October 2005: Message edited by: Hephaestion ]


From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Colville
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10448

posted 06 October 2005 05:59 PM      Profile for Colville     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Fazal Amin, 30, a local shopkeeper, said 200 people attended the wedding last Monday, watching the "bride" arrive in costume on a white horse, as tradition demands.

"I didn't know that Liaquat was going to marry a boy. When we discovered, everyone was taken by surprise and many guests went back without eating the traditional walima [feast]," he said

Local reports said the boy's family, who are extremely poor, had agreed to the union after Liaquat, an Afghan refugee, paid a dowry of 40,000 Pakistani rupees (£380) - a huge sum.


A tribal elder, Haji Namdar, recently returned from a year-long pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia to impose a Taliban-style morality law on the area, some of the wildest and least accessible territory in Pakistan.

These guys could use a plane ticket to Canada.


From: Up North | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 06 October 2005 06:19 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Local reports said the boy's family, who are extremely poor, had agreed to the union after Liaquat, an Afghan refugee, paid a dowry of 40,000 Pakistani rupees (£380) - a huge sum.


I am *still* not comfortable with this aspect of the story...

quote:
Originally posted by Colville:

These guys could use a plane ticket to Canada.



No kidding!!!!

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sanitary Engineer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10538

posted 06 October 2005 06:24 PM      Profile for Sanitary Engineer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We shouldn't be too quick to judge another culture and society. They have their ways, we have ours.

Also, this report comes from "The Times of India".

Just guessing, but maybe a Indian newspaper is not the best possible source to get a story out of Pakistan?(Or vice-versa, for that matter).


From: Now Living In Ontario | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 06 October 2005 06:54 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sanitary Engineer:

We shouldn't be too quick to judge another culture and society. They have their ways, we have ours.



You are referring to the "dowry", I assume?

quote:
Also, this report comes from "The Times of India".


Colville's link is actually The Telegraph from the UK. (Although The Telegraph may well just be relying on the reports from The Times of India. But it's not as is India is such a gay-friendly haven, either...)

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
voice of the damned
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6943

posted 06 October 2005 08:29 PM      Profile for voice of the damned     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
deleted

[ 06 October 2005: Message edited by: voice of the damned ]


From: Asia | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sanitary Engineer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10538

posted 06 October 2005 08:39 PM      Profile for Sanitary Engineer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think a "dowry" is rephrenisible, whether for a straight or homosexual arrangement. The "bride" in this case was 16 years old. That is legal in Canada.

I am a straight male, with a "live and let live" philosophy, with those of a different bent.

But, other cultures and countries, might not, for religious or cultural reasons agree with the tolerance that I am willing to show.

I can't condemn them. When in Rome, do as the Romans do.


From: Now Living In Ontario | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Colville
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10448

posted 06 October 2005 08:55 PM      Profile for Colville     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
I can't condemn them. When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

It's more like "live and not let live."

In the face of the evil of executing men for engaging in homosexuality, you simply shrug and say it's a cultural thing?


From: Up North | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sanitary Engineer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10538

posted 06 October 2005 09:02 PM      Profile for Sanitary Engineer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
It's more like "live and not let live."

In the face of the evil of executing men for engaging in homosexuality, you simply shrug and say it's a cultural thing?


In Canada, I would absolutely condemn anti-homosexual incidents and behaviour.

I'm Canadian. I just don't feel comfortable telling other countries/cultures how to handle things.

Sort of like George Bush, telling all those A-rabs to embrace "democracy". I think he is a food to dictate American values to them.

I like the tolerance this country has, but we have to be "tolerant" of countries/cultures that may not agree with it.


From: Now Living In Ontario | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 06 October 2005 09:11 PM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
... counting to ten...
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Diane Demorney
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6183

posted 06 October 2005 09:14 PM      Profile for Diane Demorney   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sanitary Engineer:

I like the tolerance this country has, but we have to be "tolerant" of countries/cultures that may not agree with it.



No, we don't. Human Rights violations are universal. Any violation, anywhere, should be roundly condemned, regardless of country or culture.

From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014

posted 06 October 2005 09:17 PM      Profile for Hinterland        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Spidey-sense tingling.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sanitary Engineer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10538

posted 06 October 2005 09:26 PM      Profile for Sanitary Engineer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
No, we don't. Human Rights violations are universal. Any violation, anywhere, should be roundly condemned, regardless of country or culture.

Yes, of course condemn it. It might be counterproductive, and hurt the people, that you might want to help though.

quote:
Spidey-sense tingling.

Muslim fundamentalists in Pakistan, or Christian fundamentalists in the States might have a problem with the way things are here. It's really none of their business, though.


From: Now Living In Ontario | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014

posted 06 October 2005 10:36 PM      Profile for Hinterland        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's not how tolerance works. You can be tolerant of different approaches and paths in life that end up doing pretty much the same thing (lead to happiness, health, security, etc. etc.), but you don't have to tolerate things that cause anyone, whether here or elsewhere, harm. The point is not that progressives would be cultural chauvinists to condemn a practice in another country, but that they are expressing dismay, sadness and concern for the people in that country who are being subjected to misery.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Colville
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10448

posted 06 October 2005 11:06 PM      Profile for Colville     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For the most part, however, interest was short lived. Last month, when Iran's hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came to New York to visit the United Nations, he was greeted by thousands of Iranian protesters from the United States and overseas. America's gay and lesbian activists did not join in. Ireland, who has tirelessly reported abuses against gays and lesbians in Iran, was livid; he wrote that the failure of gay activists to protest Ahmadinejad represented the "the death of gay activism."

quote:
The strategic rationales are not especially compelling, but it is the moral argument that is particularly troubling, because it suggests that some gay and lesbian leaders feel more allegiance to the relativism of the contemporary left than they do to the universality of their own cause. Activists are more than willing to condemn the homophobic leaders of the Christian right for campaigning against gay marriage; but they are weary of condemning Islamist regimes that execute citizens for being gay. Something has gone terribly awry.

What has gone awry is exemplified by the stance of Sanitary Engineer. How dare we condemn others when we are not perfect ourselves?

quote:
Foreman's and Alam's comparisons are specious. America and Iran may both have flawed systems of punishing criminals; and, to be sure, juvenile executions are an illiberal practice, whether carried out in Houston or Tehran. But only Iran convicts those criminals simply because of their sexual orientation. That's a pretty important distinction. Furthermore, U.S. gay rights organizations don't have an inherent responsibility to take up the crusade for the rights of juvenile criminals; they do, however, have a responsibility to speak up when gays are executed simply for being gay. There's nothing admirable about using one injustice as blinders for another.



quote:
Muslim fundamentalists in Pakistan, or Christian fundamentalists in the States might have a problem with the way things are here. It's really none of their business, though.


By extension then, the murder of Muslim gays is not "our" business? Allrighty then, let's just mind "our" own business.

A great silence descends...


From: Up North | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 07 October 2005 01:51 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well said, Colville (and Hinterland). I knew someone eventually would.
From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 October 2005 06:12 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hephaestion:

A "dowry"?? Sounds uncomfortably like buying the kid, to me... (Or am I being culturally insensitive?)


I think a bride price is the norm again in Afghanistan.

But will the bride of them have to wear a head-to-toe veil in public and be barred from higher education and working outside of the home/hovel ?.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 07 October 2005 06:24 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:

But will the bride of them have to wear a head-to-toe veil in public and be barred from higher education and working outside of the home/hovel?



Well considering that already

quote:
A tribal assembly...told the newlyweds... to leave the area immediately or face death for "breaking all the religious and tribal values and ethics"...


I would guess not, as they seem prepared to flout hoary old customs and norms. Don't you think?

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 October 2005 07:13 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And just think, if the Afghan dictator, H. Amin, hadn't have executed his political opposition and Chairman of the Revolutionary Council of Afghanistan, NM Taraki, then the Soviets might never have invaded. Afghan women would never have had to bother educating themselves to be doctors, engineers and teachers in Eastern Europe and Moscow, and the women's movement in that country could have been held in check semi-permanently during the 1980's. Because it would have been a moment without hope for them. This whole mess could have been avoided. The PDPA might have simply lost a war of attrition with Amin's government of militant Islam, and the war lording "hill people" might still only be lobbing rocks and musket shot at each other instead of RPG's and SAM missiles for the right to repress basic human rights in that country. They never needed a revolution at all. They might have worked things out over the long run, like Iraq or Iran after western intervention to prevent people's revolutions there in the 1950's - 70's.

[ 07 October 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 07 October 2005 09:44 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 


Fidel, WTF are you on about?

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Hephaestion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4795

posted 07 October 2005 10:52 AM      Profile for Hephaestion   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, according to this BBC story:

quote:
Although it remains a taboo subject, homosexuality is relatively common in Pakistan, says the BBC's correspondent Aamer Ahmed Khan in Islamabad.

Increasingly, gay couples are living together in some of the big cities such as Karachi and Islamabad, but gay marriages remain unheard of, he says.

Pakistani law punishes sodomy with imprisonment ranging from two years to life.

Some Islamic provisions prescribe 100 lashes for the act or even death by stoning.

A gay couple caught having sex were lashed publicly in the Khyber region in May.

From: goodbye... :-( | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Rufus Polson
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3308

posted 07 October 2005 02:49 PM      Profile for Rufus Polson     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sanitary Engineer:

Sort of like George Bush, telling all those A-rabs to embrace "democracy". I think he is a food to dictate American values to them.

OK, cultural relativism going a bit far here--no way will I endorse cannibalism. George Bush is not a food. For that matter, even if I were a cannibal I think I'd consider him tainted meat . . .

Meanwhile, yeah, there's often this tension between rights questions and cultural imperialism questions. I generally end up on the "rights" side. I mean, I wouldn't advocate *invading* someone because I don't like their culture. Doesn't mean I have to say arranged marriages with dowries are *OK*, and it certainly doesn't mean I have to say stoning gays to death is *OK*. They're not OK, they're wrong. Such practices trample on people's rights and freedoms, and the latter one, hello, involves killing innocent people. That's a *bad thing*. I don't give a damn if it's traditional. We used to have plenty traditions like that in Canada. We got better, mostly. We still have some. They need to be fixed. They're *wrong*. And the ethical reasoning involved is not restricted to any particular culture.

Incidentally, it occurs to me that from the description, we don't even know if the 16-year-old in this case is gay. Quite likely not. Brings an extra focus to the general problem of kids being married off without being consulted to people they may be utterly incompatible with.


From: Caithnard College | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 07 October 2005 06:11 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Hephaestion:

Fidel, WTF are you on about?


But isn't the groom from Afghanistan ?. I mean, both nations' mullah clergies seem to be providing the backdrops to this human rights scenario.

Hmmm, militant Islamic nations stuck in a sixth century time warp, and where men are men and women know their places and not to read books or wear nail polish. I think their gay marriage rights agendas must rank right up there with the plan for redistribution of farmland from poppy-growing warlords to the peasantry. The transition from militant Islamic rule to democratic imperialism should go smoothly for both nations.

And Pakistan. Oh ya, gotta love that country for aiding and abetting terrorists in the 1980's and penchant for subtle threats to incinerate India every now and then. Gotta love our cold war era friends over there. They just have to be nation members of the "axes of good" by default.

Ahem, as Rosanne Rosanna Dana would have said, "Nevvvv-er mind."


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 07 October 2005 06:30 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sanitary Engineer:
Also, this report comes from "The Times of India".

Just guessing, but maybe a Indian newspaper is not the best possible source to get a story out of Pakistan?(Or vice-versa, for that matter).


This story confirms the basic facts of the Times of India story, and says that they were confirmed by AFP and 'a local Urdu-language newspaper.'

quote:
It has also been reported that the pair have been told to leave the area or be killed for breaking religious and ethics.

Gay sex and marriage are both illegal in Pakistan and can result in life imprisonment or a public torture.

A gay couple caught having sex were flogged in public in the Khyber region during May of this year.


[ 07 October 2005: Message edited by: Tape_342 ]


From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 18 October 2005 03:22 PM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Appparently it's forbidden to even talk about such things:

Daily Times:

quote:
PESHAWAR: Town elders from Khyber Agency on Monday threatened a local Urdu newspaper with legal action if it did not apologise for its October 5 news reporting a gay marriage in Tirah Valley.

“If the newspaper does not carry a front page statement contradicting the fake story within the next two days an immediate ban will be imposed on the paper in the Khyber Agency,” said Maulana Abdul Aziz....
...
Aziz said that journalistic ethics had not been observed in filing the ‘baseless’ report and demanded the expulsion of the reporter from the paper.



From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
DrConway
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 490

posted 18 October 2005 03:41 PM      Profile for DrConway     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Also, in India, dowries are illegal because the practice has been abused in the past. (This came up because of a related story I'll be putting into the British Columbia forum)
From: You shall not side with the great against the powerless. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Crippled_Newsie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7024

posted 20 October 2005 10:11 AM      Profile for Crippled_Newsie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Weel, now we know why there was an earthquake.

Daily Times (Pakistan):

quote:
We do not need science at all. Consider this widely circulated e-mail: “Has it occurred to you that the most severe earthquake in Pakistan’s history has struck just five days after the first gay marriage in the country?”
...
Such pearls of wisdom, however, are not confined to our co-religionists, although they are far more prevalent among them. “Although the loss of lives is deeply saddening, this act of God destroyed a wicked city,” stated Repent America director, Michael Marcavage, referring to the devastation caused in New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina. “New Orleans was a city that had its doors wide open to the public celebration of sin. From the devastation may a city full of righteousness emerge.”
...
The high-profile American preacher Pat Robertson has gone further, saying that “recent natural disasters around the globe point to the end of the world and the imminent return of Jesus Christ.” Even so, he is no match for our very own Dr Israr Ahmad in terms of both frequency and stridency, when it comes to making dire doomsday predictions.
...
If you ask the Jewish rabbis, God not merely punishes moral depravity but also bad foreign policy. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the “spiritual leader” of Israel’s Shas party declared: “The hurricane [Katrina] is God’s punishment on George Bush”. Rabbi Avraham Shmuel Lewin, executive director of the Rabbinic Congress for Peace, explained why: “The US should have discouraged Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon from implementing the Gaza evacuation rather than pushing for it and pressuring Israel into concessions”.
...
Mankind, it would seem, is wasting its time and resources on geology, seismology, cosmology, meteorology and medical science, when all it needs are rabbis and monks, priests and pastors, mullahs and maulanas, dervishes and sadhus to show us the way.

From: It's all about the thumpa thumpa. | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca