babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » laura bush

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: laura bush
somersol
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7836

posted 02 June 2005 09:36 PM      Profile for somersol   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Understanding that feminism is not a monolith and opinions vary, I wonder what feminists think of Laura Bush, generally?
A vacant Presidential accoutrement? A bright woman with pathologically contained reservations about her husband? Representative of an middle-class American ideal? Icon?

From: ontario | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
A longsuffering conservative
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9425

posted 02 June 2005 10:00 PM      Profile for A longsuffering conservative     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I vote for number two. The president has acknowleged publicly that he and Laura do not see eye to eye on many issues.

However, Karl Rove has made sure that she, mostly, keeps her differences with Bush VERY VERY PRIVATE...

(Too bad Karl can't coach Anne Colter. She is definitely a work in progress but I digress.)


From: The Sovereignist Dark Side | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 02 June 2005 10:20 PM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i don't know too too much about laura bush. i think she's becoming more prominent in george bush's 2nd term in the white house. she has said encouraging things about women being involved in democracy, education and women's health (having suffered from breast cancer herself). i also get the definite impression that she cares more about the environment than her husband. however, i still have my reservations about anybody who chooses to go to bed with a greedy, brainless, pathological liar and warmonger at the end of the day.
From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
A longsuffering conservative
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9425

posted 02 June 2005 10:23 PM      Profile for A longsuffering conservative     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Have they got good ole republican and dependable twin beds???
From: The Sovereignist Dark Side | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 02 June 2005 11:13 PM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i don't know, but they had better not be using birth control. why, that would make george (edit) bush an immoral hypocrite!

[ 02 June 2005: Message edited by: ephemeral ]


From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Hailey
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6438

posted 02 June 2005 11:16 PM      Profile for Hailey     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mrs. Bush is prochoice but has chosen to be silent on that issue.

I don't really think she's much of a sincere feminist. It's a bit of a strategy is all.


From: candyland | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
ShyViolet
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6611

posted 02 June 2005 11:43 PM      Profile for ShyViolet     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
i don't care for her. she reminds me of a stepford wife. i don't know if that's how she really is, but that's how she appears to me.
From: ~Love is like pi: natural, irrational, and very important~ | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
A longsuffering conservative
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9425

posted 02 June 2005 11:46 PM      Profile for A longsuffering conservative     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And all this time, I thought she wasn't just watching Desperate Housewives. (Remember her monologue, which by the way was hilarious.)

No disrespect intended to Mrs. Bush, but I somehow doubt that she is on the pill.


From: The Sovereignist Dark Side | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 03 June 2005 12:02 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"A bright woman with pathologically contained reservations about her husband", I would say. There is no way out for her. It simply would not be tolerated.

Personally, I think Bush and Condi are getting it on, and have been for a long time. A kinda Charles and Camilla scenario if you will.


From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 03 June 2005 12:05 AM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Eeeeeeuuuww! Each of them is less appealling than the other!
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 03 June 2005 12:44 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Check out the google ad that comes with this thread "American Husband". LMAO, and here I was just thinking about Condi's faux pas in calling Georgie her husband at that dinner.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 03 June 2005 05:08 AM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think anyone should care about Laura Bush one way or another. I find the whole idea of First Ladies ridiculous. It's like electing a King and Queen. No one should gain influence solely on who they marry.
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 03 June 2005 05:16 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wish those across the border would hurry up and elect a woman Prez so we'd have a First Man or First Gent . Just so long as the Prez is not Hillary or Condi.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Vansterdam Kid
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5474

posted 03 June 2005 05:57 AM      Profile for Vansterdam Kid   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Now a days though, Hillary is looking quite appealing (compared to the Incumbent of course).
From: bleh.... | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 03 June 2005 07:15 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by kurichina:
I don't think anyone should care about Laura Bush one way or another. I find the whole idea of First Ladies ridiculous. It's like electing a King and Queen. No one should gain influence solely on who they marry.

THANK YOU! I think I once wrote a rant on babble on this very subject.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 03 June 2005 07:25 AM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That may have been what influenced my thinking. I hope I wasn't unconsciously plagiarizing you!
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 03 June 2005 07:31 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Oh no, no. I think it was during the election, when we were talking about who would make a better first lady, Heinz-Kerry or Bush. I can't remember now, though, because I can't find that old election 2004 forum. I thought it was in the archives, but I don't see it there. Wonder what happened to it.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
brebis noire
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7136

posted 03 June 2005 07:51 AM      Profile for brebis noire     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by A longsuffering conservative:

No disrespect intended to Mrs. Bush, but I somehow doubt that she is on the pill.


Which pill - Ritalin? Prozac? Xanax? No, it's probably one I don't even know about.

But seriously, every time I see either of them speak in public, pharmacological assistance is the first thing that pops into my mind. And I'm totally serious.


From: Quebec | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Albireo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3052

posted 03 June 2005 09:44 AM      Profile for Albireo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Is there any truth to the claim, put forward in Kitty Kelly's book The Family: The real story of the Bush dynasty, that Laura Bush sold marijuana in her university days? For example:
quote:
Both George and Laura used to go down to the island of Tortola in the British Virgin Islands to visit Laura’s college roommate Jane Clark and her boyfriend, the former baseball great Sandy Koufax. Elsewhere on the island, the Bushes used to attend and enjoy heavy pot-smoking parties. This was not inconsistent with Laura’s past. She graduated from Southern Methodist University in 1968 and had been known in her college days as a go-to girl for dime bags of marijuana. “She not only smoked dope,” said public relations executive Robert Nash, an Austin friend of many in Laura’s SMU class, “but she sold dope.”

From: --> . <-- | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718

posted 03 June 2005 01:09 PM      Profile for Reality. Bites.        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If it's true, it's nice to know someone in the family once had a legitimate job!
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 03 June 2005 05:59 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
raccunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9151

posted 03 June 2005 08:01 PM      Profile for raccunk     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe Laura Bush hides away so much because she is so ashamed of her choice in a husband! I'm sure she's been kicking herself internally for years. But, being her husband is part of some sort of death cult(that skull and bones group) she's afraid he'll hunt her down and kill her if she leaves him.

She probably doesn't need the pill. I figure George is shagging Condi.


From: Zobooland | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
steffie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3826

posted 03 June 2005 10:05 PM      Profile for steffie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Boom Boom:
Wish those across the border would hurry up and elect a woman Prez so we'd have a First Man or First Gent . Just so long as the Prez is not Hillary or Condi.

Then Laura Bush, perhaps?


From: What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow / Out of this stony rubbish? | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 03 June 2005 11:22 PM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Laura as Prez? I think she'd be a lot less harmful than Condi. But I don't see any political ambition in Laura whatsoever. She reminds me of white bread - er, hash brownies, actually.
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
raccunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9151

posted 04 June 2005 10:05 PM      Profile for raccunk     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I never thought of Laura for president. That would be a surprise. I'm sure it would shock her husband.
From: Zobooland | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 04 June 2005 10:25 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
she reminds me of a stepford wife.

Shy took the words right out of my mouth. Sort of creepy, Laura Bush is.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
A longsuffering conservative
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9425

posted 05 June 2005 02:23 AM      Profile for A longsuffering conservative     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I prefer steely.
From: The Sovereignist Dark Side | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Bobolink
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5909

posted 05 June 2005 01:18 PM      Profile for Bobolink   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Has anybody thought that Mrs. Bush holds no elective office? Perhaps she realises that as such she shouldn't be pushing any political agenda. How many of us have intimate partners who do not agree lock-step with all the opinions we might hold? The wives of Canadian Prime Ministers have usually been out of the public view. Although one has to admire Arlene Chretien for using and Inuit soapstone carving to cold-cock an intruder at 24 Sussex Drive.
From: Stirling, ON | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 05 June 2005 01:46 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Personally I would never date anyone who has such divergent ideals from my own. There is a line to be drawn and Laura Bush has decided that standing by her man is more important than oh, little things like loss of civil liberties, torture, illegal wars...
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Bobolink
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5909

posted 10 June 2005 09:41 PM      Profile for Bobolink   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes Stargazer, but would you give a potential date a checklist to see if that person is politically correct? On how many points would that person have to agree? Should your date be a cypher for yourself?
From: Stirling, ON | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
somersol
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7836

posted 11 June 2005 11:29 AM      Profile for somersol   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Bobolink:
Although one has to admire Arlene Chretien for using and Inuit soapstone carving to cold-cock an intruder at 24 Sussex Drive.

This post has had me laughing uncontrollably all week. I haven't heard the expression "cold-cock" since I was about 15 (1989).
Thank-you Bobolink. Take pride in knowing that your post was related aloud at a party last night to hysterics and lexical approval.


From: ontario | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 June 2005 11:43 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Mme Chretien's first name is Aline.

Bobolink, you surprise me. I can imagine disagreeing with a partner in all kinds of quotidian ways, but I can't imagine living intimately with anyone whose most basic values seriously diverged from mine. I mean, "Are you in favour of trashing international law in order to authorize torture?" would, yes, kinda be a breaking-point for me.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bobolink
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5909

posted 11 June 2005 12:53 PM      Profile for Bobolink   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Skdadl, thank you for the correction on Mme. Chretien's first name.

The point I am trying to make is that we cannot expect our bedmates to share all of our goals and aspirations. Frankly, I don't see anything appealing in the character of George W. Bush. But then again, I'm not Laura Bush.

The media usually, raises scandal when it is learned that a spouse of a politician has differing viewpoints from that politician. Most political spouses just learn to keep their mouths shut. This doesn't always help them. The IRA tried to murder Dennis Thatcher to strike at his wife.

[ 11 June 2005: Message edited by: Bobolink ]


From: Stirling, ON | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 June 2005 12:56 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, of both Laura Bush and Cherie Blair we know some pretty disgusting facts, actually.

The two of them were willing to smarm on TV about how important the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq would be to the women of those two countries.

Had either one of them bothered to talk to RAWA, eg, or to any Iraqi women's organization?

Are they evil, or just conventionally too-comfortable-to-be-well-informed? One or the other. Neither alternative looks attractive to me.

Why should we care about them? Remind me?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 11 June 2005 01:01 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Yes Stargazer, but would you give a potential date a checklist to see if that person is politically correct? On how many points would that person have to agree? Should your date be a cypher for yourself?

Bobo, you have got to be kidding right? Please!!! And hell yes I check to see if the person I am or may become deeply involved with is a right wing nutbar or has vastly different views from my own. For gripes sake, why the hell would I want to be involved with someone whose views I find distressing at best, and replusive at worst? I am not sorry that I apply criteria to those I plan to spend time with and get emotionally and physically involved with.

I cut Laura Bush zero slack. I do not have the same opinion, that standing by your man, no matter how replusive he is, is the right thing to do. If I was married to someone I found out through actions, deeds, and words, to be a murderous person with low intellect, no comapssion and a need for bloodlust his ass (or mine) would be out the door.

I will not apologize for holding whom I choose to be with to higher ideals than murder for oil.


From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 11 June 2005 01:02 PM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Why should we care about them? Remind me?

Because they use their position to make money, and sometimes illegitimately use government money to do this. (or so it's alleged that Cherie did this)

[ 11 June 2005: Message edited by: kurichina ]


From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Melsky
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4748

posted 11 June 2005 01:04 PM      Profile for Melsky   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:

"Are you in favour of trashing international law in order to authorize torture?" would, yes, kinda be a breaking-point for me.

Yeah!

I disagree with my husband on a lot of things, even big ones like religion. But I draw the line at torture and lying to start wars. Actually I would probably draw it a lot sooner, I wouldn't want to be married to a hit man, a white supremacist, someone who tortures animals, a child molester, etc.


From: Toronto | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 11 June 2005 01:44 PM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
when i was 13, and read "the day of the jackal" by frederick forsythe (sp?), for a couple of years, i thought it would be quite interesitng and exciting to be married to an assasin. well, actually, not married, but to have a relationship with one since i never gave a hoot for the institution of marriage. that was before i realized that assassins just work for money, and usually have few political opinions of their own. i don't know what laura bush's story; i really can't imagine she has extremely divergent views from her husband. heck, maybe she's just another ignorant britney spears type, ready to support her president and husband no matter what. that's about as dangerous as having the same opinons as georgie boy.
From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 11 June 2005 01:53 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
when i was 13, and read "the day of the jackal" by frederick forsythe (sp?), for a couple of years, i thought it would be quite interesitng and exciting to be married to an assasin. well, actually, not married, but to have a relationship with one since i never gave a hoot for the institution of marriage. that was before i realized that assassins just work for money, and usually have few political opinions of their own.

ephemeral, that is too funny. Did you also see the movie? I certainly know what it is like to have a mad crush on Edward Fox.

Weren't you a li'l worried about how he could snap a lady's neck while kissing her?


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 12 June 2005 12:07 AM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
skdadl, no, i never got to see the movie.

quote:
posted by skdadl:
Weren't you a li'l worried about how he could snap a lady's neck while kissing her?

yea, i was... but then i read 'the godfather' (mario puzo), and i convinced myself that it would be smarter for me to get married into the mafia. same sort of thrill, but i was sure i would be protected by all my new mafia family members.


From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
siren
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7470

posted 12 June 2005 12:55 AM      Profile for siren     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
Had either one of them bothered to talk to RAWA, eg, or to any Iraqi women's organization?

I'm sure Laura and Cherie met "real" Afghan and Iraqi women of the same ilk as those to whom "the boys" were talking -- Karzai and Chalabi. When planning an invasion, one must always speak to the well heeled, elite exiled crowd. After all, it worked so well for the States with respect to Cuba circa the '60's.

I think "talking to the elite exiles" may have been how Martin got us so horribly involved in Haiti. The wealthy are different than the rest of us -- they have different friends.


From: Of course we could have world peace! But where would be the profit in that? | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
nuclearfreezone
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9059

posted 13 June 2005 08:33 PM      Profile for nuclearfreezone     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As far as Laura Bush is concerned, "you're known by the company you keep".
From: B.C. | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 14 June 2005 02:03 AM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Laura Bush on "The Daily Show."
Warning! Parental Advisory! Disturbing Livestock Anecdotes!

From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
somersol
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7836

posted 18 June 2005 09:20 AM      Profile for somersol   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by skdadl:
Weren't you a li'l worried about how he could snap a lady's neck while kissing her?

I call this the "Jimmy Stewart Kiss." Yank the woman to your breast, kiss once upon the lips, then slide your face across her cheek with a force about equal to that required to punch your head through a screen door.
Success is determined by the level of abject discomfort and spinal contortion shown by the recipient.


From: ontario | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 18 June 2005 09:27 AM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
somersol:

Except Edward Fox is better. When he let go that pretty lady, she was daid!

ephemeral, you must rent the movie. It is brilliant. When I'm watching it, my heart races, even though I've seen it a dozen times.


quote:
Originally posted by siren:

I'm sure Laura and Cherie met "real" Afghan and Iraqi women of the same ilk as those to whom "the boys" were talking -- Karzai and Chalabi. When planning an invasion, one must always speak to the well heeled, elite exiled crowd. After all, it worked so well for the States with respect to Cuba circa the '60's.

I think "talking to the elite exiles" may have been how Martin got us so horribly involved in Haiti. The wealthy are different than the rest of us -- they have different friends.


Precisely. Very elegant post, siren.


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
vorlon
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6789

posted 18 June 2005 09:33 AM      Profile for vorlon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by A longsuffering conservative:
I vote for number two. The president has acknowleged publicly that he and Laura do not see eye to eye on many issues.

However, Karl Rove has made sure that she, mostly, keeps her differences with Bush VERY VERY PRIVATE...

(Too bad Karl can't coach Anne Colter. She is definitely a work in progress but I digress.)


With respect to Ann Colter, I happened to stumble upon this website--I suspect that it's a gag, but it's still hilarious....

http://www.straponvets.com/


From: Canada | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged
ephemeral
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8881

posted 18 June 2005 10:40 AM      Profile for ephemeral     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
lol, somersol!

skdadl, i'll remember to rent the movie when i can get my hands on a tv. i do have a vcr though. must rent the godfather too, ent seen that one either.

speakin' of movies, - detraction from laura bush - i would really be interested in starting a rabble movie club (once i have a tv). i would like the club to watch activist type movies - like thirst, haiti-killing the dream, corporation, supersize me, micheal moore's movies, etc... except i don't know how easy/difficult it would be for rabblers to get these movies. i don't think places like blockbuster's, jumbo video, etc. carry many movies like this. any ideas/suggestions? perhaps i oughta start this in a new thread.

vorlon - it didn't have anything to do with laura bush, but i can see why you posted the link. i laughed my head off. thanks! we all need a good belly laugh at least once every day.


From: under a bridge with a laptop | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca