babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » labour and consumption   » Gate$ dumps on $100 laptop per child project

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Gate$ dumps on $100 laptop per child project
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 16 March 2006 12:38 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you want proof that this is a good project, Bill Gate$ is dumping on it.

Reuters via Yahoo News item

quote:
"If you are going to go have people share the computer, get a broadband connection and have somebody there who can help support the user, geez, get a decent computer where you can actually read the text and you're not sitting there cranking the thing while you're trying to type," Gates said.

Blah Blah Blah...he's just ticked-off because it runs Linux instead of Window$


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 12:46 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So the guy supposedly donating all that money to help alleviate poverty and disease in developing nations really has no idea what it means to live in a developing nation?

His PR people should brief him better.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 12:48 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Anyone see the IT guy? My highspeed is down and I was in the middle of downloading "Shaggy Dog".

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621

posted 16 March 2006 01:13 PM      Profile for rasmus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To be completely fair to Bill Gates, whose funding has just helped produce a brand new, effective, low-cost meningitis vaccine developed in the "developing" world for the "developing" world...once when asked about the idea, then bandied about, of bringing an internet-connected PC into every village in Africa, he said, how is that going to help? Is a mother whose baby needs food or medical help going to surf E-Bay? I run Linux and passionately hate Windows. So, criticize away. But at least do so fairly and with sufficient information.
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 16 March 2006 01:25 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm quite aware that Gate$ has a charitable foundation and has given funds to numerous worthy causes.

With the profits that he's generated from his monopolistic practices he can afford to. He's got more cash then most third world governments. Obscene eh?

So I find it rather self-serving that Gate$ dumps on a computer project that just so happens not to use his particular software...and won't end up generating future "customers" for Micro$oft.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 02:17 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
As well, not every every mother in Africa is short food and care for her children. Some ae just short decent educational opportunities, delivery of which the $100 computer is geared.

Even right here, in Canada, there are families and communities who could use a $100 computer and can't afford Bill Gate's pay support programs or broadband Internet.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 16 March 2006 02:26 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Gates isn't the only one skeptical about this project.

quote:
The $100 price point is the obvious grabber—Negroponte's computer wouldn't make it out of the back of the business section if it cost $499. But is it possible to build such a computer so cheaply? Negroponte says on his site that the screen alone costs $35. A 1 gig flash drive retails for around $70, a WiFi card for at least $25, the RAM perhaps $50, and the hand crank who knows how much. Add in labor, distribution, service, and maintenance costs, and you're over $100 by a couple hundred dollars. If you're willing to assume that MIT can somehow keep the cost at or near the century mark, there's still the question of who will support the computers (and who will pay for that support). When the computers are already in India, there's nowhere to outsource the help desk.

Negroponte claims he won't have a problem hitting the $100 mark because he's only selling to government buyers who purchase a minimum of 1 million computers. But it doesn't seem likely that any client will buy a single computer, much less a million, until they're convinced the computer will work and be as cheap as advertised. Besides, does the Thai Ministry of Education really have a couple hundred million dollars sitting around? According to the MIT Web site, "[m]anufacturing will begin when 5 to 10 million machines have been ordered and paid for in advance." Don't wait around for those conveyor belts to start cranking.

What Negroponte doesn't want Brazil, Thailand, and his other clients to know is that this isn't the first time a $100 computer has briefly seduced the press. Just like the little green laptop, each of these machines came with a gigantic catch.

...

In 2001, a group of computer scientists in Bangalore, India, developed the Simputer. It was supposed to be a cheap (around $200), robust computer for India's rural poor. But according to the Associated Press, the brains behind the Simputer have sold only 4,000 of an expected 50,000 units in 2004 and 2005. In addition, only about 10 percent of Simputer buyers live in rural areas. Why? Probably because they have more important things to do than write e-mail.


This isn't sour grapes. Microsoft sold Slate magazine to the Washington Post about a year before this article was written. And the author, an assistant editor at Macworld, speaks very highly of cheap Linux boxes.

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: 'lance ]


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
skeptikool
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11389

posted 16 March 2006 03:32 PM      Profile for skeptikool        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Perhaps more would become computer-literate if Mac were to bring its prices down.
From: Delta BC | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 03:38 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
The $100 price point is the obvious grabber—Negroponte's computer wouldn't make it out of the back of the business section if it cost $499. But is it possible to build such a computer so cheaply? Negroponte says on his site that the screen alone costs $35. A 1 gig flash drive retails for around $70, a WiFi card for at least $25, the RAM perhaps $50, and the hand crank who knows how much. Add in labor, distribution, service, and maintenance costs, and you're over $100 by a couple hundred dollars. If you're willing to assume that MIT can somehow keep the cost at or near the century mark, there's still the question of who will support the computers (and who will pay for that support). When the computers are already in India, there's nowhere to outsource the help desk.

Uh, huh. If you go and buy each component, a $500 dollar system can run upwards to $1,000. There is something to be said for economies of scale.

Then there is the question of support that is always raised whenever MS apologists raise their heads. Who gets MS support right now other than businesses?

And what Linux user has ever paid for support? You need support on Linux? The help desk is called google.com.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 16 March 2006 03:40 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Then there is the question of support that is always raised whenever MS apologists raise their heads. Who gets MS support right now other than businesses?

If you read the last paragraph in my post, the author of that piece is, by definition, not an MS "apologist."


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 03:45 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Perhaps it is not sour grapes, but it is sour something and my criticism about "help desks" still stands.

It is quite possible the $100 computer won't fly. And if not, it might be because of the only real and credible argument offered in that article: "because they (the youth for whom they are intended) have more important things to do than write e-mail."

However, even with that, is it not worth trying (Gate's concern about lack of broadband aside)?

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 16 March 2006 03:50 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't know. But if something sounds too good to be true, it likely is.

And as the author says, were I in charge of the Thai Ministry of Education (say), I'd likely have better things to do with any spare $200 million or so I had lying around than buy computers. What will it cost in addition to put a sufficient number of Wi-Fi access points in Thailand so that all those computers could actually connect to something?

Not to cast aspersions on Thailand, but I have a hard time believing that education there is so generously funded that it can spare that kind of money.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 16 March 2006 03:51 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Meningitis vaccine =good. Not to mention some of the other 'challenge' funds he's circulated, which none of our governments or corporate research entities (aka universities) have bothered to pursue (i.e. malaria cure/vaccine etc - not successful yet, but at least someone is trying)

Cheap computers = potentially good, it depends. What would people use it for? $100 wouldn't get much in the way of downloading speed - many sites would be inaccessible. Computers can be useful, for some kinds of work and some kinds of learning, but they can also be a total waste of time.

A computer might benefit a community, it might not. Depends on the community, the cultural values and mores, and the aspirations of its members.

Edited to remedy case of mistaken identity.

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: arborman ]


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 16 March 2006 03:54 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by arborman:
As for the two opposing personalities, I'll take Gates. Death squad Negroponte vs too rich for decency Bill Gates. At least Gates hasn't arranged the deaths of anyone, that we know of.

No, but this is a character called Nicholas Negroponte we're talking about. You're probably thinking of John Negroponte.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 03:58 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
And as the author says, were I in charge of the Thai Ministry of Education (say), I'd likely have better things to do with any spare $200 million or so I had lying around than buy computers.

I think that is valid criticism. And perhaps that will kill it. Criticizing it based on the retail costs of building one system I don't think is so valid.
quote:
As for the two opposing personalities, I'll take Gates. Death squad Negroponte vs too rich for decency Bill Gates. At least Gates hasn't arranged the deaths of anyone, that we know of.

Not valid criticism, in my view. He is applying guilt by association. For all we know, the Negrponte brothers don't even like each other.

And Gates should be giving his money away for good causes. He can't possibly spend it all on himself. And while he hasn't killed anyone (has Negroponte from MIT?) he has killed family owned businesses with his singleminded pursuit of sucking up every single licensing penny regardless of the billions MS is worth.


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 16 March 2006 04:03 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
Not valid criticism, in my view. He is applying guilt by association. For all we know, the Negrponte brothers don't even like each other.

It had never occurred to me that they were related, but of course. It's not an extremely common name.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 16 March 2006 04:16 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yes, they are brothers:

quote:
He is the brother of Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Lab. Negroponte and his wife, Diana, have five children.

But it's not like you can choose your family


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 16 March 2006 08:48 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
BTW here's the previous thread:

link

Sure other folks may critique the project for legitimate reasons. I simply find Bill Gate$ critique extremely self-serving.

When you've just about completely controlled the PC desktop for a decade or more and there's a project that doesn't use your "product"...even if its to help connect the poor you dump on it.

BTW for those who are skeptical about a $100 laptop, a Chinese company plans to market a Linux laptop aimed at rural China for about $187.

International Herald Tribune article

[ 16 March 2006: Message edited by: radiorahim ]


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 16 March 2006 11:56 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

Not valid criticism, in my view. He is applying guilt by association. For all we know, the Negrponte brothers don't even like each other.


Oops - my mistake. I'll delete the reference...


From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 17 March 2006 12:27 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
It is quite possible the $100 computer won't fly. And if not, it might be because of the only real and credible argument offered in that article: "because they (the youth for whom they are intended) have more important things to do than write e-mail."

Actually the author makes another real and credible argument, though not explicitly. In effect, Negroponte is asking a lot of poor countries to sink a lot of venture capital into his scheme.

Surely they've been burned too many times by World Bank and other such megaprojects to go for that.

The word "megaproject" sounds weird when you're talking about a $100 machine, but not when you're talking about buying a million of the things.


From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jacob Two-Two
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2092

posted 17 March 2006 03:23 PM      Profile for Jacob Two-Two     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, if no one buys them, he'll probably lower his minimum order. $25 million for 250,000 computers could be doable for many countries.
From: There is but one Gord and Moolah is his profit | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064

posted 17 March 2006 03:30 PM      Profile for 'lance     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Maybe so. We shall see. That's when I'll believe it, anyhow.
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 02 April 2006 04:00 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
bump

quote:
Well, this explains the strangely nasty comments that Intel's Craig Barrett was making last December about the $100 hand-cranked PCs from Nicholas Negroponte's One Laptop Per Child initiative. Back then, Barrett said the OLPC device wasn't a laptop, but a gadget, and that what people in the third world need is a real PC, "not dependent on servers in the sky to deliver content and capability to them, not dependent for hand cranks for power."

You'd almost think that $100 hand-cranked laptop was competing with something from Intel. Which, it turns out, it is, sort of.


Gate$ isn't the only one cut out of the $100 laptop that's dumping on the project...Intel's dumping on it too. Could it be that its because it'll run on an AMD processor? (Intel's main competitor)...and that Intel plans to put out a competing product?

article


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 06 April 2006 11:43 PM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

And what Linux user has ever paid for support? You need support on Linux? The help desk is called google.com.

Uh huh. Which is why I will never experiment with Linux unless I have a working Windows PC that I can use to research, download, and burn to CD the things I need to fix my Linux system. Funny how that works...


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 07 April 2006 12:12 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Uh huh. Which is why I will never experiment with Linux unless I have a working Windows PC that I can use to research, download, and burn to CD the things I need to fix my Linux system. Funny how that works...

Nothing wrong with that approach actually. I did that for several years before giving M$ the heave-ho.

Most governments that have made the decision to move to FOSS are doing it in stages over a few years. IIRC most governments are making the change over a 3-5 year period.

But certainly you can indeed research, download and burn to CD anything you need to research using a Linux PC.

Understand you've been playing with Ubuntu. I don't like it that much either...mostly I don't like the Gnome desktop. I prefer the KDE desktop and if you're mucking about with Ubuntu you might want to try Kubuntu instead. I understand that with version 6.1 Kubuntu will become part of the "official" Ubuntu project.

IIRC I read that Mark Shuttleworth...the "money" behind the Ubuntu project is using Kubuntu himself. The KDE CD burning programme "k3b" is really quite nice I think. Much better than anything Windows-based IMHO. I don't much like the Gnome-based CD burning programme. Although of course you can install KDE software on a Gnome based system and vice-versa.

If you want a "live-CD" distro where you can write to your hard drive you can try Slackware-based "Slax".


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 07 April 2006 12:57 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by radiorahim:

But certainly you can indeed research, download and burn to CD anything you need to research using a Linux PC.


Assuming that said PC is working, or that I have a few months to troubleshoot by going to the library every couple days to "Google" for a few hours and take a day or two back home to perform the steps I find. *I* can do it because I am a tech geek who enjoys this kind of thing and has the spare equipment to have a known good system I can use to support the other. Most people are not like me, and therefore Linux is not ready for most people.

quote:
Originally posted by radiorahim:

Understand you've been playing with Ubuntu. I don't like it that much either...mostly I don't like the Gnome desktop. I prefer the KDE desktop and if you're mucking about with Ubuntu you might want to try Kubuntu instead. I understand that with version 6.1 Kubuntu will become part of the "official" Ubuntu project.


Actually I heard the new version will contain vast improvements, especially concerning wireless networks.

Anyways, to get this thread back on track:

Those comments seem pretty asinine on the part of Gates. Does he plan on providing the electricity grids and communication networks his solitions would entail?


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
aRoused
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1962

posted 07 April 2006 08:15 AM      Profile for aRoused     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Assuming that said PC is working, or that I have a few months to troubleshoot by going to the library every couple days to "Google" for a few hours and take a day or two back home to perform the steps I find.

So pretty much like troubleshooting a wonky Windows installation without a backup computer, then? Unless you're going to try and convince me that a Windows PC can stay connected to the internet when its OS goes tits-up...

Not the most effective argument you've got there.


From: The King's Royal Burgh of Eoforwich | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 08 April 2006 12:16 AM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by aRoused:

So pretty much like troubleshooting a wonky Windows installation without a backup computer, then? Unless you're going to try and convince me that a Windows PC can stay connected to the internet when its OS goes tits-up...

Not the most effective argument you've got there.


If I really had to, I could install a paralell copy of windows very easily. I don't think you can go installing multiple copies of Linux. Though the boot-from-CD concept helps A LOT. So like I said- yeah, *I* can do it, but would I encourage my mother to try using Linux? No, I am still not convinced that would be productive.


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 08 April 2006 01:36 AM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Those comments seem pretty asinine on the part of Gates. Does he plan on providing the electricity grids and communication networks his solitions would entail?

Nah...just sour grapes IMHO because it runs Linux instead of Windows...and now Intel is mouthing off the same way because it'll run on an AMD processor instead of an Intel processor.

quote:
If I really had to, I could install a paralell copy of windows very easily. I don't think you can go installing multiple copies of Linux. Though the boot-from-CD concept helps A LOT. So like I said- yeah, *I* can do it, but would I encourage my mother to try using Linux? No, I am still not convinced that would be productive.

You can multi-boot different versions of Linux or dual boot Windows and Linux but I find that a pain in the ass.

For a Linux newbie I thing the best thing is to simply run a second "clunker" machine on Linux and play with it till you get comfy with it.

However if you're setting up a machine for someone with minimalist needs (i.e. web surfing, e-mail and some basic office tasks) a good way to go would be to something like Linspire and/or Xandros. These are "commercial" Linux distros...(they're not free) and are designed as Windows desktop replacements.

To be quite honest, Windows isn't easy to run for a newbie computer user either. They have to know about anti-virus software, anti-spyware software and firewalling...and most don't.

With Linspire and Xandros these are complete non-issues. If you want to try Linspire they have a "live CD" version you can download from their website. With Xandros they have an "open circulation edition" that you can only download via bittorrent. They remove anything "proprietary" from the open circulation edition and slow down the CD burning speed to 8X.

I've run Xandros for over a year on one of my machines and its fine if you stick to installing stuff from Xandros Networks. If you go crazy installing stuff from the Debian repositories you can hose the system...but a novice wouldn't even know what a Debian repository is...so wouldn't be doing that.

So...for someone who's a "power" Windows user I'd say run a Linux box in parallel till you feel like you've come up to speed with it.

But for a complete "novice" who's just starting to learn to use a computer and has minimal needs I'd say to stick to Linspire or Xandros and don't touch Windows at all. Otherwise that machine will be toasted within a few months. I guarantee it because I've fixed so many of them for folks.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804

posted 08 April 2006 12:33 PM      Profile for Gir Draxon     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by radiorahim:
Nah...just sour grapes IMHO because it runs Linux instead of Windows...and now Intel is mouthing off the same way because it'll run on an AMD processor instead of an Intel processor.

But the modern 'Wintel' is designed with power and connectivity in mind. The $100 laptop is not for the average North American home user, it's for people who would never be able to use a computer designed for such. If Gates or whoever wants no part of it, then fine, that's their choice. But to shit on something because it's not "decent", that is, powerful and epxpensive with the NA consumer in mind. It's not even about monopoly or profits. It's pure ignorance to the fact that what works for someone like you or I will work for everyone in the world.


From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
radiorahim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2777

posted 08 April 2006 01:07 PM      Profile for radiorahim     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My understanding is that this machine was tested in a remote Cambodian village that doesn't have electricity.

One of the things that it gets used for...aside from being a computer...is as a "light source" at night!

I can see the wireless mesh networking built into this computer as a real bonus. Most textbooks are printed in "developed" countries and shipped to the third world. They're heavy, expensive and in short supply. Hell even pens,pencils and paper are in short supply.

With the wireless mesh networking a teacher would be able to "zap" a textbook in .pdf format to every student in the class in a matter of a few minutes.

One piece of software lacking in the open source world that would be helpful for educational purposes is a decent typing tutor...something like "Mavis Beacon". The best I've seen in the FOSS world is "Tux Typing" ... a typing game that's really aimed at grade school kids.


From: a Micro$oft-free computer | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca