Author
|
Topic: Anyone making minimum wage in Calgary?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reality. Bites.
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6718
|
posted 29 June 2005 04:04 PM
quote: Originally posted by HeywoodFloyd:
Oh Please. Like they're hiring Calgarians.
Isn't Harper's (ahem) "brain trust" based in the University of Calgary?
From: Gone for good | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804
|
posted 05 July 2005 03:39 PM
quote: Originally posted by Wicked Chicken:
The Superstore on Macleod Trail is unionized (UFCW) so that probably has an impact on the starting wage.
As far as I know, all of them are. The unionization of course has both advantages and disadvantages. It brings slightly higher starting wages, but poisons the work atmosphere and severely limits advancement of newer employees.
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Amy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2210
|
posted 07 July 2005 08:30 PM
Y'know, I'd have to say that I'd rather work in a place where I had a group to turn to if I was being screwed out of OT or pay for staff meetings... Cos, well, I've worked a few minimum wage jobs, and none of them had *real* "advancement oppurtunities". The positions were there all right, but hiring was done from the outside, and not because the staff were lacking in qualifications. In one job I was constantly being phoned up to fill in at the last minute, with no call-time or OT if applicable. I would have loved to have someone advocate on my behalf cos if I'd have done it myself, my hours would have gone from 20 a week to 0-4. I saw it happen, but I needed a job.Granted, I *don't* live in Calgary, but my experience doesn't sound all that different from my friends', who do/did.
From: the whole town erupts and/ bursts into flame | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 08 July 2005 12:58 PM
quote: Originally posted by Gir Draxon:
What a tragedy. We should have a nation where EVERYONE can afford to drive an SUV and live in suburban super-sprawl
Never mind SUV's, how about more living wage jobs for Canadian's ?. In the 13.25 years before FTA, Canada created over 3 million full time payroll jobs. In the 13.25 years after FTA was signed, about 1 380 000 full-time payroll jobs were created. And we have more people now than then, but the participation rate in the Canadian economy has dropped since the 1970's. Pathetic you say, Gir?. And our exports of energy, fossil fuels and raw materials to the States has never been greater. Industry Canada says our economic performance during that period was probably the worst among 25 other developed nations. SUV's Gir ?. If something is doing harm to the environment, then tax it or price it out of range. No need to have Canadian's living 50 percent below the poverty line while we're the second largest exporter of oil to the States next to Saudi Arabia. Perhaps, though, it's advantageous for rich Canadian's and foreign investors if wages are low and unemployment high. It's called insulating the wealthy from free market forces while people on web sites make dark comments to justify political impotence on the Canadian economy. ~ "Never let the colonies make so much as a hair pin." - Benjamin Disraeli [ 08 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804
|
posted 08 July 2005 06:46 PM
Continued discussion from the child labour thread quote: Originally posted by Rufus Polson:
What it's reasonable to expect and what certain rah-rah types have been claiming are not necessarily the same thing. Nam didn't say he was surprised--he was saying that his anecdotal evidence contradicts the claims put forward with no evidence at all, that jobs are always $8.50 or more. Now you may not have said that, in which case you might surmise that he's not arguing with you.
Oh.. yeah you're right in regards to Nam's purpose. I hope (s)he takes no offense.The claim that any idiot can come to Alberta and get a great paying job with no qualifications and minimal effort is BS. What I disagree with is acting as if this fact is somehow a tragedy. As a farily inexperienced cook, I don't really expect to make more than $10/hour. Now someone can exist on $5.90/hour full time in Alberta. It's hard, but possible. I don't see why any capable person who lacks the ambition to do something more challenging than cleaning a deep fryer should be entitled to the same standard of living as me after I get a better education and a job with qualifications more extensive than having a pulse and showing up for work.
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 10 July 2005 04:42 PM
Canada has a history of raiding skilled workers from other countries instead of investing in Canadian's. In the past, the feds have made it easy for machinists, tool and dye designers from Britain to take jobs in Canada; we've imported bricklayers, concrete finishers and plumbers from Italy and Spain, engineers from Germany and so on. Canada has a tradition of neglecting the needs of Canadian workers, and that's the reality of the situation. I think it's entirely unnecessary to blame Canada's youth for not having anything more to choose from than what is the second or third largest low wage economy in the developed world. Not when university and college tuition fees have skyrocketed over the last several years in direct comparison with how easy it was to obtain a degree in the 1970's. Conservatives in New Zealand put a similar choke-hold on the economy there after pointing to an imaginary monetary crisis and labour was given the gate. College and university tuition fees soared along with unemployment rates under conservative government in NZ, and young people left the country in droves for freely accessable education in Europe and elsewhere. I tell kids the same thing today, "Get the hell out of Canada, go see the world. Have some fun, but mainly, get the hell out of Canada." [ 10 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 11 July 2005 02:35 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: Canada has a history of raiding skilled workers from other countries instead of investing in Canadian's. In the past, the feds have made it easy for machinists, tool and dye designers from Britain to take jobs in Canada; we've imported bricklayers, concrete finishers and plumbers from Italy and Spain, engineers from Germany and so on. Canada has a tradition of neglecting the needs of Canadian workers, and that's the reality of the situation. I think it's entirely unnecessary to blame Canada's youth for not having anything more to choose from than what is the second or third largest low wage economy in the developed world. Not when university and college tuition fees have skyrocketed over the last several years in direct comparison with how easy it was to obtain a degree in the 1970's.
For many, it seems the options are either low wages or to go to school to learn the skills for high paying jobs but having to pay back debt for a long time. Not very pleasant. On the topic of education, columnist Thomas Friedman recently commented on Ireland. Friedman is a staunch advocate of free market capitalism, yet he praised the Irish for providing accessible education. quote: Ireland's turnaround began in the late 1960's when the government made secondary education free, enabling a lot more working-class kids to get a high school or technical degree. As a result, when Ireland joined the E.U. in 1973, it was able to draw on a much more educated work force.
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 11 July 2005 03:32 PM
Ireland's good fortune was past due, and they deserve it. I think that whatever the case with the economy is, economists are only ever concerned with allocation of resources, growth or the lack of it. Middle class capitalism based on consumption is unsustainable for even the five or six percent of the world that currently practices it. Scientists are telling us that it's a pipedream for the other 90 percent to want the same, and globalism, therefore, could well be a lie. I think there are ways in which we could create wealth while at the same time, curbing consumption. Economic growth doesn't necessarily have to mean increased consumption of non-renewable, finite resources. We don't have to poison the planet, but I'm afraid that old world colonialism will have a difficult time letting go of this comparative wealth-based system we've always had in one form or another. People are critical of Ronal Wright's opinions on the collapse of societies throughout history. But what I find true of Wright's commentary is that the wealth gap between rich and poor has never been as wide as it is now. And those societies that existed to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the few always seemed to create an irrepairable crisis within by consuming more and making a mess of their agricultural situations. Either that or the poor eventually caught on to the fact that they needed to work harder and longer for the sake of making the rich richer. Revolution or catastrophe. So with Canada owning one of the largest low wage, low skill job sectors in the developed world, I think we can expect the centres for science and technology to shift gradually to what were traditionally the largest economies in the world in Asia and Europe. Asia will become the largest economy again in the coming decades while we in the west try to revive failed laissez-faire capitalism after several spectacular failures in Chile, Argentina and now Africa and Russia. We're seeing it now, imo. China is currently building 12 new MIT-style engineering universities. The economy there has been on fire for 21 years in a row. That economy has evolved from fourth world imperialist state with infant mortality worse than India's to that of a bustling economy in world record time. They are making environmental and human rights mistakes, yes, but what country hasn't over the last 100 years?. Al in all, China is moving in a direction at a velocity not observed before. Capitalists from around the world are now bowing to the people of China. And it's an amazing sight to behold, don't you think ?.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 11 July 2005 04:01 PM
quote: There were no jobs in Toronto for new graduates. Headlines were pronouncing liberal arts degrees as “useless” and PhDs were driving cabs. I packed up my stuff and moved back home to Winnipeg. I joined the staff of the Winnipeg Harvest food bank and soon started to see the impact of the job-scarce economy, up close and personal.
And Reagan waged war on the working poor in his country and Latin America. The rich began noticing the working class slobs treading on the best beaches of the world during their well-earned vacations. A coal miner in post-WWI England, my grandfather, commented that peace and prosperity wouldn't last. It didn't. When the powerful and wealthy begin to feel safe from communism, our standard of living and worker's rights tend to suffer. Stats Canada reports that the percentage of Canadian incomes under $21K a year has increased since 1980.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Nam
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3472
|
posted 11 July 2005 05:48 PM
quote: Originally posted by Gir Draxon:
The unionization of course has both advantages and disadvantages. It brings slightly higher starting wages, but poisons the work atmosphere and severely limits advancement of newer employees.
What??? Poisons the work atmosphere??? Is this statement simply regurgitating the myth of how unions just bring trouble into the workplace? How does a union limit advancement of newer employees? I, and I'm sure others, wait for the answers.
From: Calgary-Land of corporate towers | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 11 July 2005 06:30 PM
quote: Originally posted by Nam:
What??? Poisons the work atmosphere??? Is this statement simply regurgitating the myth of how unions just bring trouble into the workplace? How does a union limit advancement of newer employees? I, and I'm sure others, wait for the answers.
To begin with, union environments tend to focus on seniority rather than merit with regards to promotions. Newer employees with ambition who want to climb the ladder quickly are far better off in a non-union environment where they can negotiate their advancement on a personal basis rather than as part of a collective. (unless they lack ambition, then they are better in a union environment)
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Gir Draxon
leftist-rightie and rightist-leftie
Babbler # 3804
|
posted 11 July 2005 06:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by Nam:
What??? Poisons the work atmosphere??? Is this statement simply regurgitating the myth of how unions just bring trouble into the workplace? How does a union limit advancement of newer employees?
My comments are based on my experience in labour/service oriented jobs. Trade unions are likely a different story. But in the unionized places where I have worked, it isn't how hard you work or how good you are that determines advancement. It was seniority. And especially for someone like me... I can't compete with people who have been working the same job for 13 years... I was busy going to elementary school when they started! How on Earth am I supposed to compete with these people? I *could* stay and hump the pooch for 15 years, but I have better things to do with my life than wait for a meager raise or promotion at a place that hires people straight out of high school.
From: Arkham Asylum | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 11 July 2005 07:22 PM
Canada and the States have the lowest rates of unionized workforce along with the highest rates of child poverty. Happy now, Gir ?. I've worked non-union jobs, and boy, let me count the slackers, the time off'ers and goldbrickers and the ones who'd have been more useful to the company if they'd stayed home and simply waited for their cheques. What these people who bash unions never let on is that they were always free to join the private sector and give up their union wage rate. They were entirely free to negotiate their worth with the thousand dollar suits in the private sector. Nobody in the union holds a gun to your head. No sir, the private sector was always there for your enjoyment. [ 11 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 11 July 2005 08:56 PM
quote: Originally posted by C.Morgan:
Hmmmm. Lets compare what we consider to be child poverty in Canada with what I have seen in Cuba.
I think that we are doing alright.
I dunno, Morg. Check our native infant mortality rates in Northern communities against Cuba's. I think Nunuvut has touched the 15 per 1000 mark at some point. There are over 5000 people in my N. Ontario hometown who have no family doctor. The Cuban's have more physicians per capita than any other western nation. Our socialized medicine is being short-changed by liberal and conservative governments right now so that fine Canadian's like yourself will be highly suggestable to privatisation of health services and other gimmicks designed to blow our minds and allow foreigners to pick our pockets. [ 11 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 11 July 2005 10:55 PM
I understand that it is near impossible for you to make it more than a couple postings without bringing up Cuba's dubious child mortality rates Fidel, but if your chart is indeed accurate it shows that Canada is still ahead of Cuba in that regard. If I am not mistaken, we were not speaking of the USA but Canada. You are predictible if nothing else. You should add a couple new points to your crusade though.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 12 July 2005 12:07 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: Ok, I will. Thanks to socialized medicine in Canada, and in spite of the fact that we are pumping the second greatest amount of oil to the States, next to Saudi Arabia year-in year-out, Canada has a better infant mortality rate than the Yanks do while they spend more on health care than anyone else in the world. And so does the politically isolated island of Cuba have an infant mortality lower than that of the most privatised, most expensive health care system in the world. Kids in Cuba are happy, Morg. They're not so happy in El Salvador or any of the other shitholes off Uncle Sam's back doorstep. Kids in Cuba may not have wireless Nintendo or have the choice to be prematurely obese from eating McCrap, but they can see a doctor if and when they need to, unlike poor American kids and those in Canada's northern communities. Cuban kids aren't considered to be just another market for plastic throw-away widgets or human waste disposals for capitalism.
Guess all that happiness is what drives them to sniff all that glue eh? You ever notice all the baggies in the gutters in the residential areas Fidel? It must be all that happiness that drives them to risk their lives to cross the ocean on rickety boats to seek refuge in other countries too. Paradise indeed.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 12 July 2005 01:11 AM
I've been to Havana, shitforbrains. I doubt you've been anywhere farther south than the farmers market.But you've got enough homeless people in Calgary to start another town, Morg. All that all oil/gas and old Ralph had to empty the Heritage Fund to look good. Krist, socialist Norway was a net creditor nation years ago, and their oil is more expensive to drill than Leduc. Where in the hell has all the money gone out there, hockey players ?. Moose pasture, Morg ?. That's right, Aristotleded24, Havana used to be a haven for drug traficking, gambling and child sex for well-heeled tourists. Morg must be confusing Havana with a ten day drunk he had in Santo Domingo. Wrong island altogether there, Morg. [ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 12 July 2005 01:51 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: I've been to Havana, shitforbrains. I doubt you've been anywhere farther south than the farmers market.But you've got enough homeless people in Calgary to start another town, Morg. All that all oil/gas and old Ralph had to empty the Heritage Fund to look good. Krist, socialist Norway was a net creditor nation years ago, and their oil is more expensive to drill than Leduc. Where in the hell has all the money gone out there, hockey players ?. Moose pasture, Morg ?. That's right, Aristotleded24, Havana used to be a haven for drug traficking, gambling and child sex for well-heeled tourists. Morg must be confusing Havana with a ten day drunk he had in Santo Domingo. Wrong island altogether there, Morg. [ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
That must explain all those Calgarian kids getting on boats for Cuba eh? Get real Fidel. You are living in a dream world if you think that any level of Canadian poverty comes even close to the levels that exist in the "worker's paradise" of Cuba which you view with rose colored glasses. For further referrence for you, may I suggest you seek how many people were climbing the Berlin wall to get to the East side when they were communist.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 12 July 2005 02:08 AM
Do you realize how many Canadian's and American's there are who can't afford a greyhound bus ticket to the next province or state, never mind another country ?. I've worked in northern communities and with native Canadian's who'd think Cuba really is a paradise, tractor boy. 1500 without a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, right there in Calgary, diesel breath. Here's an idea. You and your chums down at the Legion should save your haying money and take a road trip through Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador. Maybe your gas money will last til Honduras before you get diarrhea and wanna go home to dum, mad and the dog. And while you're driving the Pan-Am highway chatting with armed soldiers at road blocks and watching out for bandits, have a look around at the children and the haunted look in their eyes. Have a good look around, amigo. Come back here and tell us what you know besides nothing. [ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 12 July 2005 02:47 AM
quote: Originally posted by C.Morgan: That must explain all those Calgarian kids getting on boats for Cuba eh?Get real Fidel. You are living in a dream world if you think that any level of Canadian poverty comes even close to the levels that exist in the "worker's paradise" of Cuba which you view with rose colored glasses.
In the case of the whole boat situation, there is an inherent anti-Cuba bias in American media. Cuba nationalised operations under the control of American companies and basically told the United States to take a hike, and the American business establishment has never forgiven him. Given that American media outlets are owned by major American corporations, they are not going to do Cuba any favours. I remember when Elian Gonzales was in the news, and the argument for keeping the child away from his father was effectively that his Miami relatives didn't like Castro. That country has survived despite being shunned by the US and being stung by the collapse of their largest trading partner, the former USSR. (Organic agriculture, anyone?) The fact that Cuba survived that shows resilience in a time when many countries are fracturing and losing their way. I don't like Castro personally, I think he's an authoritarian thug, but he's an authoritarian thug who provides health care to all of his people. As for the levels of child poverty in Canada approaching Cuba's? Have you been to any First Nations communities in Labrador, Manitoba, or the North? These people do not have basic essentials-they live in Third World type poverty right here in Canada. Fidel, you asked how many people cannot afford a greyhoud ticket, how about being able to eat? You said you've been both to Cuba and many of the types of communities I've just described. Has C.Morgan been there and experienced anything that would refute your assertions? [ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: Aristotleded24 ]
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 12 July 2005 03:25 AM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: Do you realize how many Canadian's and American's there are who can't afford a greyhound bus ticket to the next province or state, never mind another country ?. I've worked in northern communities and with native Canadian's who'd think Cuba really is a paradise, tractor boy. 1500 without a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, right there in Calgary, diesel breath. Here's an idea. You and your chums down at the Legion should save your haying money and take a road trip through Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador. Maybe your gas money will last til Honduras before you get diarrhea and wanna go home to dum, mad and the dog. And while you're driving the Pan-Am highway chatting with armed soldiers at road blocks and watching out for bandits, have a look around at the children and the haunted look in their eyes. Have a good look around, amigo. Come back here and tell us what you know besides nothing. [ 12 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
Tractor boy? Diesel breath? Man now, you really are sad. You sure hate facts getting in the way of your flawed faith in communism don't you? I have been through Mexico and Guatemala by the way. I don't doubt that those impoverished Albertans you refer to are scrambling to get there either. I was lucky enough to tour the Soviet Union in my youth as well. I was part of a ski jumping team and I must admit that there is no better experience than travel. Rest assured that we had no North American defectors eager to stay in the communist countries no matter how awesome they were to tour. If you really think that things in Alberta are nearing the bad levels that we can see in third world nations, may I suggest that you adjust your dose of medication. Lets look at some of the other aspects of Cuba however aside from their widespread poverty. How about human rights? Human Rights Watch Keep at it Fidel.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 12 July 2005 03:44 AM
quote: Tractor boy? Diesel breath? Man now, you really are sad. You sure hate facts getting in the way of your flawed faith in communism don't you?
So someone who believes that no-one should be without essentials is a communist? Oh wait, isn't there an expression that goes like, "when I feed the poor, they call me a saint when I ask why so many are poor they call me a communist?" quote: I was lucky enough to tour the Soviet Union in my youth as well. I was part of a ski jumping team and I must admit that there is no better experience than travel. Rest assured that we had no North American defectors eager to stay in the communist countries no matter how awesome they were to tour.
Nor do tourists who come here to travel defect to Canada in large numbers. That point is irrelevant. quote: If you really think that things in Alberta are nearing the bad levels that we can see in third world nations, may I suggest that you adjust your dose of medication.
You have not addressed any of either Fidel's or my own points about the deplorable conditions on many First Nations in Canada. quote: Lets look at some of the other aspects of Cuba however aside from their widespread poverty. How about human rights?
Did I not call Castro an "authoritarian thug" in my last post?
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 12 July 2005 03:56 AM
quote: So someone who believes that no-one should be without essentials is a communist?
No, I am calling Fidel a communist. Look up his past postings.
quote: Nor do tourists who come here to travel defect to Canada in large numbers. That point is irrelevant
How many tourists do we see from the few remaining communist countries? When I used to jump, the jumpers from the Soviet countries were allowed here, but it was made clear to them that their families would remain at home. Why do all these "workers paradises" have to work so hard to keep their own people from escaping? quote: You have not addressed any of either Fidel's or my own points about the deplorable conditions on many First Nations in Canada.
Rest assured that I have discussed the state of our natives at length on other threads before. While conditions on our reservations are deplorable, they do not even come close to matching those of third world countries. How many third world children are offered free education, tax exemtions and business grants. Piss poor comparision to say the least. quote: Did I not call Castro an "authoritarian thug" in my last post?
I will not disagree with you a bit there. I am replying primarily to Fidel (who's handle kind of indicates his hero) in my postings. Rest assured he will not call Castro the monster that he is.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 12 July 2005 04:12 AM
quote: How many tourists do we see from the few remaining communist countries? When I used to jump, the jumpers from the Soviet countries were allowed here, but it was made clear to them that their families would remain at home. Why do all these "workers paradises" have to work so hard to keep their own people from escaping?
Well, in the former communist countries, corruption is now running rampant, and many believe they were better off under communism. Many people who come here from those countries are women bought and sold in the sex trade. I never thought of the communist countries as "workers paradises." What the main problem in those countries was the concentration of power in a few hands. The communist revolutions began because of widespread oppression and poverty, unfortunately the communists ended up replacing those at the top with their own representatives and not much changed. But that's not the only way that power is concentrated. Privatisation, contracting out of government services places the decision-making capabilities in the hands of a few corporations whose goal is to make profit for their shareholders, and they are often removed from the people who their decisions affect. quote: Rest assured that I have discussed the state of our natives at length on other threads before. While conditions on our reservations are deplorable, they do not even come close to matching those of third world countries. How many third world children are offered free education, tax exemtions and business grants. Piss poor comparision to say the least.
How can conditions on reserves "not even come close to matching those of third world countries" when several have infant mortality rates that match those of third world countries? What about substandard housing? Yes, those Natives who have high infant mortality rates, low literacy rates, and live in substandard housing don't recognise how gracious we are with our tax exemptions, free education, and business grants. Ungrateful bunch they are.
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 12 July 2005 04:19 AM
quote: How can conditions on reserves "not even come close to matching those of third world countries" when several have infant mortality rates that match those of third world countries? What about substandard housing? Yes, those Natives who have high infant mortality rates, low literacy rates, and live in substandard housing don't recognise how gracious we are with our tax exemptions, free education, and business grants. Ungrateful bunch they are.
The outcomes are the same as third world countries, but the opportunities certainly are not. Apples and oranges we are dealing with here and worthy of a different thread.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nam
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3472
|
posted 13 July 2005 05:47 PM
quote: Originally posted by canadianpatriot: back to the minimum wage question, I believe Min Wage in AB is under $6.00 a hour, plus people won't take those jobs, when the cost of living is so high, so there has to be some sort of incentive.
Yes, minimum wage right now is $5.90, set to go to $7.00 in September. Vibrant Communities Calgary is starting a Living Wage Initiative in Calgary, and after long discussion has settled on $10.00 as a figure to go forward with. The first phase of the initiative will approach the City as an employer, including "civic partners" that include organizations that are supported by the City such as FCSS-funded agencies, Zoo, community associations etc. This is a pretty major step, coming in Ralph and Stephen's backyard, and is even supported by some surprising partners.
From: Calgary-Land of corporate towers | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
mellowyellow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9159
|
posted 13 July 2005 07:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by Fidel: What does Morg say about the fact that anywhere from six to thirteen million children starve to death around the capitalist third world each and every year. It's an annual holocaust.
Between 6 and 13 million, eh? Let's see, that's only a margin of error of +/- 116%, so the actual number could easily be zero, and still fall well within Fidel's margin of error. Fidel, when will you give up boring everyone with your ridiculous made-up statistics and completely bogus facts. I still remember laughing like hell when someone called you out on your ridiculous claim that the United States had somehow started forcing Haiti to export millions of tonnes of non-existent rice. You painted such a colourful picture describing Haitian babies starving, while US Marines cracked the whip, forcing Haitian peasants to load bags of rice onto conveyor belts into freighters in Port au-Prince. What a clown.
From: Salt Spring Island | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
mellowyellow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9159
|
posted 13 July 2005 07:21 PM
quote: Originally posted by Aristotleded24: It is also worth mentioning that many people in the Third World, in spite of their material poverty, experience a joy for life that most of their counterparts in the materially wealthy First World do not. Americans own 50% of the world's wealth despite constituting 6% of the worlds population, and many are quite miserable.
Holy crap, that has got to be the most racist and condescending remark I've seen in a long time. Yessiree, those darkies are having so much fun dancing, clapping their hands, and playing the banjo -- they don't even realise how poor they are! At the same time, we wealthy Westerners are suffering with clothes on our backs, full bellies, and roofs over our heads -- it's a spiritual poverty we suffer from, doncha' know.
From: Salt Spring Island | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 07:25 PM
I don't know; I think he has a point. Certainly, the most affluent North Americans tend to be the most ill-tempered, angry anti-social miseries you'd ever want to come across.When I lived in the 3rd World, I certainly did not see that kind of inexplicable unhappiness. [ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: Hinterland ]
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 13 July 2005 08:18 PM
quote: Originally posted by mellowyellow: Holy crap, that has got to be the most racist and condescending remark I've seen in a long time.Yessiree, those darkies are having so much fun dancing, clapping their hands, and playing the banjo -- they don't even realise how poor they are! At the same time, we wealthy Westerners are suffering with clothes on our backs, full bellies, and roofs over our heads -- it's a spiritual poverty we suffer from, doncha' know.
You missed my point entirely. I realise that people in the Third World suffer, and I do not for one minute advocate that anyone go without basic essentials. I know that misery exists in the Third World, yet there is also a sense of community forged in the struggle to survive, and people there, experiencing the poverty that they do, are content to simply have their basic needs met. They also accept that certain things are beyond their control, and they simply accept that, unlike us Westerners who feel we have a divine right to control every circumstance of our lives. We are a miserable bunch of people. Can you not see the problems we have with drugs, alcohol, people with psychological disorders, depression, suicides, and psychotic people who go around shooting people before shooting themselves? These problems persist despite a large number of them experiencing a material wealth that most people in the Third World can only dream of? Oh, and I can see why you think Fidel made up those stats that he did. You can't really trust the statistics on infant mortality that come from the Central Intelligence Agency in the US now, can you? If you wish to respond to a post, I suggest you get your own facts in order first.
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 09:19 PM
quote: Um, remind us, would you? Exactly how many of these "most affluent North Americans" have you come across?
Huh? What? ...definitely loony.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 09:26 PM
quote: Certainly given to questions of a highly personal nature, anyway.
Even then, I don't get the relevance. I think hate-bag thought I meant the super-rich, when I'm mostly thinking of affluent middle-class people (you know, the ones who are all 'self-made' and won't stop griping.) [ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: Hinterland ]
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
mellowyellow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9159
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:02 PM
quoting Aristotle24: quote: I know that misery exists in the Third World, yet there is also a sense of community forged in the struggle to survive
Oh, you "know" this, do you? I guess a 25-year-old, sitting in front of his computer in Brandon Manitoba, with a bag of Doritos, waiting for his pogey cheque (or for mom and dad to kick him out), has the inside track on Third World misery? I should have guessed. I wonder how many calories are in "a sense of community"? Is this "sense of community" what drives all those rampant never-ending civil wars in the Republic of Third World? Or have you just confused "sense of community" with clannishness? Even maximum security prisons have "a sense of community". quote: and people there, experiencing the poverty that they do, are content to simply have their basic needs met
At any rate you certainly seem to be content believing such an inane fantasy. quote: They also accept that certain things are beyond their control, and they simply accept that, unlike us Westerners who feel we have a divine right to control every circumstance of our lives.
That is far out, man! That is, like, totally Zen of those people! But then, you're right. Who are we Westerners to impose our control-freak trip on all those content starving, diseased people? quote: We are a miserable bunch of people.
When you say "we", what you really mean is "you". If you're so miserable, why not take your sack-cloth and ashes, and emmigrate to the Third World. You'd finally find contentment, while tucking into your big, steaming bowl of "sense of community". I can assure you nobody is standing in your way. Bon apetit. quote: Can you not see the problems we have with drugs, alcohol, people with psychological disorders, depression, suicides, and psychotic people who go around shooting people before shooting themselves?
True, in the Third World, people generally don't go and shoot themselves -- usually someone else takes care of that for them. So tell me, Aristotle, exactly how many of these drug-fueled, psychotic murder-suicide sprees have you personally witnessed, sitting in front of the computer in your parent's basement, in Brandon, Manitoba? Your laughable exaggerations aside, you commit the error of extrapolating a general rule from a specific case. If the real Aristotle were alive, he'd probably tune you up good with a doric column over the head. So, my suggestion to you, Aristotle, would be to take your sanctimonious pile of slacker horseshit, and see if anyone in the actual Third World is buying whatever it is you seem to be peddling. In addition to their "contentment", I'm sure they could also use a good laugh, as they rip your soul-patch from your lower lip, and beat you to death with your own toque. [ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: mellowyellow ]
From: Salt Spring Island | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:11 PM
It's a hissing, spitting, cold-hearted rage that mellowyellow (sic) seems to direct at anyone he/she/it interacts with. It's vulgar in its coarseness.[ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: Hinterland ]
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
mellowyellow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9159
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by Hinterland:
Even then, I don't get the relevance. I think hate-bag thought I meant the super-rich, when I'm mostly thinking of affluent middle-class people (you know, the ones who are all 'self-made' and won't stop griping.)
Oh, I see. So the "super-rich" are actually not "the most affluent North Americans"? The most affluent are actually "affluent middle-class people"? It's all so clear now. Pass the bong, dude. The only ones I see here, who won't stop griping, are people like you.
From: Salt Spring Island | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mellowyellow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9159
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:21 PM
quote: It's a hissing, spitting, cold-hearted rage that mellowyellow (sic) seems to direct at anyone he/she/it interacts with
Actually I'm laughing my ass off. And, no, not with you. I can assure you, the rage is all yours. quote: It's vulgar in its coarseness.
Yet with a light, refreshing aftertaste.
From: Salt Spring Island | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
'lance
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1064
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:22 PM
quote: Nope, on the wagon. Booze and hot weather don't mix well with me. I'll just have another hit off my bong (man) and wait to see what other mellow things pop up.
Sounds like a plan. Now, where'd we leave off in our discussion of '60s and '70s kids' TV? Or has that old horse been proverbially flogged long enough? [ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: 'lance ]
From: that enchanted place on the top of the Forest | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Aristotleded24
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9327
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:30 PM
quote: Oh, you "know" this, do you? I guess a 25-year-old, sitting in front of his computer in Brandon Manitoba, with a bag of Doritos, waiting for his pogey cheque (or for mom and dad to kick him out), has the inside track on Third World misery? I should have guessed.
That is a personal attack. You have no business responding to a post by ignoring it and using my personal situation against me. You don't know the specifics of my personal situation, nor are they your business. I didn't call you a "God-freak," tree hugger, or any other such derogatory name, or suggest that you find a "real occupation," I expect the same respect for you. Back off. quote: I wonder how many calories are in "a sense of community"? Is this "sense of community" what drives all those rampant never-ending civil wars in the Republic of Third World? Or have you just confused "sense of community" with clannishness? Even maximum security prisons have "a sense of community".
Not following what you're getting at. Yes, I am well aware of the problems with the civil wars in the Third World. That has more to do with government policy than anything else. quote: That is far out, man! That is, like, totally Zen of those people! But then, you're right. Who are we Westerners to impose our control-freak trip on all those content starving, diseased people?
You missed my point completely. The point is not about contentment, it is about accepting that certain things (ie the weather, for one) are beyond one's control, so there's no sense complaining about it. Unlike Westerners who complain at every situation that doesn't go their way. Suffering from starvation and disease, on the other hand, is mainly a result of human decisions, and that is something we do have control over. quote: When you say "we", what you really mean is "you". If you're so miserable, why not take your sack-cloth and ashes, and emmigrate to the Third World. You'd finally find contentment, while tucking into your big, steaming bowl of "sense of community". I can assure you nobody is standing in your way. Bon apetit.
Actually, when I said "we" in that context, I meant "our society." I thought that was clear. quote: So tell me, Aristotle, exactly how many of these drug-fueled, psychotic murder-suicide sprees have you personally witnessed, sitting in front of the computer in your parent's basement, in Brandon, Manitoba?
None, but I do know of people who have done drugs, drank alcohol, and have attempted to take their own lives in order to escape from what they feel as misery, and these people, by and large, have a level of material comfort that people in the Third World can only dream of. quote: So, my suggestion to you, Aristotle, would be to take your sanctimonious pile of slacker horseshit, and see if anyone in the actual Third World is buying whatever it is you seem to be peddling. In addition to their "contentment", I'm sure they could also use a good laugh, as they rip your soul-patch from your lower lip, and beat you to death with your own toque.
What are you trying to say? I am well aware that people in the Third World are often short of material essentials. Yet, I also know that they find joy in life that many people in North America do not. I know this because I have talked to people who have gone there. Are there things I don't know? Yes. If I were to go to the Third World, I would attempt to learn as much about what people experience as possible. I'm open to learning from other people, unlike some babblers who ignore posts to respond with personal attacks and ignorance. [ 13 July 2005: Message edited by: Aristotleded24 ]
From: Winnipeg | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 10:35 PM
quote: Actually I'm laughing my ass off. And, no, not with you.
Kinda like Regan McNeil giggling over Father Merrin's lifeless body in The Exorcist. eh? ...yes, I've used that before on babble. But that's always the image I get when unbelievably mean and coarse people like mellowyellow claim they're "laughing their asses off."
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hinterland
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4014
|
posted 13 July 2005 11:05 PM
quote: Now, where'd we leave off in our discussion of '60s and '70s kids' TV?
Well, it's the next day, and Sonny, upset over the disturbing behavioural changes that Skippy has undergone, radios his teacher in...Alice Springs, was it?...in a panic. Suddenly, Skippy jumps at him, opens his pocket and out pops a... *ding dong* Oops. Doorbell.
From: Québec/Ontario | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 14 July 2005 04:34 AM
quote: Originally posted by mellowyellow:
Between 6 and 13 million, eh? Let's see, that's only a margin of error of +/- 116%, so the actual number could easily be zero, and still fall well within Fidel's margin of error.
Does this have anything to do with my pointing out that you couldn't read a 2-D graph showing rising incidence of cancer over several decades if your life depended on it, mellowyellow ?. Your mother paid for all those books, and you're still a moron. quote: "Food is what the world needs the most," he stressed, noting that a UN Food and Agricultural Organization's report of December 8 revealed that 5 million children starve to death every year and 852 million people suffer from famine
Fidel Castro "12 million children starve to death every year" Rice U - pdf quote: 10 million children starve to death every year
Intern'l research, Japan - pdfAnd Haiti is described by Washington as the freest trading nation in the Carribe, mellowyellow. And what a shithole it is as they, too, export food to "the market" while children in Port Au Prince suffer malnutrition and ridiculous infant mortality. You're not very big, but you sure are stupid. [ 14 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Nam
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3472
|
posted 14 July 2005 03:54 PM
quote: Originally posted by Aristotleded24: So, back onto the main topic, how is the living wage initiative being received? Are Albertans receptive, or do they think, "it's Alberta, there are lots of jobs, anyone can find one, it's not a big deal?"
Trying to keep this on topic (Hint - if what you post has dick-all to do with the thread title, it probably isn't on topic, but you are welcome to start your own thread) The support so far comes from a surprisingly wide variety of players. The usual, expected crowd such as Labour, poverty-groups, agencies dealing with poverty issues are involved but also a rep from the Chamber of Commerence, some small-business owners, faith communities, and various levels of government. The campaign hasn't launched in the wider, public venue as yet, because we are waiting for some social-marketing to take off around the issue of poverty in Calgary, so can't give a read on the reception of the broad Calgary audience. The attitude of "lots of jobs" is an interesting one. That attitude is very common, but when challenged, giant holes easily appear. I put it down to Alberta making a big public deal of having paid off its debt. (An argument can be made about whether this actually has happened but that's another thread) People, ordinary people who usually don't give the topic much thought, are starting to look around and ask "So what? We've paid off our debt, but we have an increasing number of families sleeping in the streets and can Ralph explain how that is an Alberta Advantage?" I honestly feel a shift is occuring in Alberta, and I noticed it in the last Provincial election, and well the tide by no means has turned, I think more people are questioning our society's values like never before. So much wealth, but so little to show for it, except for the rich guys.
From: Calgary-Land of corporate towers | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 18 July 2005 07:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by Nam: To actually answer the question of the thread title, yes, there are many people making minimum wage in Calgary. Through figures from Stats Can for 2002, a total of 4,300 Calgarians were earning $5.90 or less an hour. A total of 26,600 were earning $7.00 or less, of which 8,600 were over 25 years old. So, yes, a lot of people are making minimum wage in Calgary.
Don't forget that the vast majority of those people are working in jobs that involve gratuities which usually double or more the ammount of their hourly wage. Many others are part-timers just looking to make a few extra bucks.
You can keep looking, but you will be hard pressed to see any realistic, large-scale rampant poverty in Calgary. There is simply too damn much opportunity here right now. Those who can't make ends meet in Calgary at this time would be better served to look at themselves rather than try and blame the world for their own state.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Nam
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3472
|
posted 18 July 2005 07:51 PM
quote: Originally posted by C.Morgan:
You can keep looking, but you will be hard pressed to see any realistic, large-scale rampant poverty in Calgary.
Wow. I'm assuming you don't work/go downtown because nowadays any trip downtown means literally tripping over street people who don't have a lot of loonies to rub together. Also, I assume you don't volunteer for an organization such as Inn From The Cold, which each night shelters many families who don't have a home, and would otherwise be sleeping on the streets. BTW, how many people have to be realisticly living in poverty before we should care about it? 10, 500, 20,000? How many in this very rich city, in this very rich province, in this very rich country? Or should we only see a realistic issue if it is you who gets affected?
From: Calgary-Land of corporate towers | Registered: Dec 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:08 PM
quote: Originally posted by Contrarian:
How the hell would you know this? Do you have facts to back it up, or did you dredge it up, dripping ichorous slime, from your own deep well of prejudice?
No actually I see these things in those crazy little things called want ads. Or the radio ads screaming for employees, or the signs on the windows of most of the businesses in the province. No slime at all.
Businesses in Alberta that offer only minumum wage have no employees.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:12 PM
quote: Originally posted by Nam:
Wow. I'm assuming you don't work/go downtown because nowadays any trip downtown means literally tripping over street people who don't have a lot of loonies to rub together. Also, I assume you don't volunteer for an organization such as Inn From The Cold, which each night shelters many families who don't have a home, and would otherwise be sleeping on the streets. BTW, how many people have to be realisticly living in poverty before we should care about it? 10, 500, 20,000? How many in this very rich city, in this very rich province, in this very rich country? Or should we only see a realistic issue if it is you who gets affected?
Considering the labor crisis in Alberta, it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the people currently on the streets are there due to mental issues, addictions etc.
Bandaid solutions such as raising minimum wage will not help these people.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
shaolin
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4270
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:12 PM
quote: Many others are part-timers just looking to make a few extra bucks.
How do you know part-timers are just looking for a few extra bucks? Maybe they're trying to feed themselves as they continue with their schooling. Maybe they are single parents who can only work around their child care responsibilities. The 'working for pin money' argument is so old and tired that was used to justify unequal pay for women. Now we see it manifesting itself as a justification for shit paying McJobs. [ 18 July 2005: Message edited by: shaolin ]
From: Edinburgh | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
C.Morgan
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5987
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by shaolin:
How do you know part-timers are just looking for a few extra bucks? Maybe they're trying to feed themselves as they continue with their schooling. Maybe they are single parents who can only work around their child care responsibilities. The 'working for pin money' argument is so old and tired argument that was used to justify unequal pay for women. Now we see it manifesting itself as a justification for shit paying McJobs.
I saw one of those rental signs on the side of the road in Lloydminster offering $11 per hour plus benefits.
Not bad for unskilled fry cooks. Mcjobs indeed.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:35 PM
Low minimum wages are one of the leftovers of the free-trade and anti-inflation economic policies of the 1980s through the roaring 90s. The plan was to Reduce inflation and make manufacturers more competitive. Mulroney and Chretien-Martin pursued policies aimed at creating a "flexible labour market" in Canada, similar to what has taken place in the USA since 1980. Interest rates were raised slowing down the economy as unemployment nudged up. In the 1980's, and early 90's, the U rate soared to new heights in Canada. At the same time, employment insurance and social welfare was made more difficult to access, and deep cuts were made to what was left of social assistance programs at the municipal-provincial level. Then the federal Liberal government stopped setting its own minimum wage, and provincial governments stopped adjusting minimum wages to keep up with inflation. The result was the creation of a low-wage economy.
Too, Canada actually has a highly educated workforce capable of supporting a high-productivity, knowledge-based economy. Canada could have just as easily chosen the economic strategy adopted by many European and Asian countries, some of which rank high in the top ten for Economic Competitive Growth Index for several years running while Canada, alas, can only boast that we are a good place for wealthy people to hide their money from the erosionary effects of inflation; iow's a vibrant and bustling economy ours is not. The more of us there are with low wages and savings, the more the rich are comparatively better off because of it. Canadians have suffered for too long as a result of this deliberate political choice to protect and insulate wealth from free market forces rather than an economy that promotes job growth and prosperity. Next to the States in a comparison of rich economies, Canada has the next largest low wage work force as a percentage of total. The percentage of families with incomes below the national median, about $21K today, has increased instead of dropping since 1980. Given those facts, it's not difficult to realise that next to the USA, Canada also owns the highest child poverty rates among rich nations as well as the second lowest rate of unionized labour, second only to the USA and among countries that matter. [ 18 July 2005: Message edited by: Fidel ]
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Amy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2210
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:44 PM
quote: Originally posted by C.Morgan: Just the one while working in Lloydminster. I don't browse the want ads often. It is rather indicitive though. I have limitted tears for those who claim not to be able to find good employment in Alberta.
Well, pardon me, but I don't recall anyone looking for your sympathy. I do recall people wondering what decent-paying entry jobs in Lloydminister have to do with people working at mom'n'pop shops in Calgary though. The statement below is not about this boad, but about the general atmosphere that I encountered while working as a sales clerk. For the most part, when people speak of how shitty their low-paying jobs are, they're told to find another one or shut up. Or better yet, get more training. When people with a little training are being treated like crap from employers, they're told they have chips to play, and that they should play those chips. Those are people with atleast a little bit of something on their side, so I don't get why they get more compassion than people with pretty much nothing-in terms of the employment fields, from the eyes of the employers- going for them. It makes me so angry.
From: the whole town erupts and/ bursts into flame | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477
|
posted 18 July 2005 08:48 PM
Government of Alberta Human Resources site: quote: ...Less than 1% of working Albertans earn minimum wage, or about 11,000 people......The average hourly wage Albertans make is $18.55 an hour...
National Council of Welfare report based on 2000 figures; comparison of four provinces and effects of living at different wages.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|