babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » "Fanatic" kills Pakistani woman minister

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: "Fanatic" kills Pakistani woman minister
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 21 February 2007 05:29 PM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

LAHORE, Pakistan, Feb 20 (Reuters) - A suspected Islamist zealot opposed to women in politics shot dead a Pakistani provincial government minister at a political meeting on Tuesday, officials said.

Zil-e-Huma, social welfare minister of the Punjab government and a supporter of President Pervez Musharraf, was about to give a speech to dozens of people when the lone attacker shot her in the head.

The accused, identified as Mohammad Sarwar, was immediately arrested by police.

Punjab Law Minister Raja Basharat told Reuters the gunman had been implicated in six previous murder cases but had never been convicted because of a lack of evidence.

"He revealed during interrogation that he is against the involvement of women in politics and government affairs," Basharat said.

Basharat said the gunman was not a member of any Islamist group.

"He is basically a fanatic," he said.



http://today.reuters.com/News/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=ISL33535

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 21 February 2007 07:53 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why is fanatic in quotation marks? Is there any doubt that the killer is a fanatic?
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 21 February 2007 08:50 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Religious parties carried little favour with Pakistanis until General Mohammed Zia ul-Haq ruled through the Talibanization years in the 1980's. Meanwhile, General Musharraf in this decade promised to promote de-Talibanization but then banned two main opposition leaders of secular parties from running in elections:former prime ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif.

Religious parties have since filled the vacuum. Pakistan's ISI, equivalent of the CIA, is pro-Taliban since the proxy war against the Soviets. It's said that most of the Army sympathizes with the Taliban and waive these religious zealots past checkpoints into Afghanistan on a regular basis. General Musharraf is a dictator and needs to go before Pakistan can ever be democratized, and the chaos in Afghanistan helped along the road to social democracy. It's chaos, and I believe it's by design and not accidental. The goal for western imperialists is to prevent an outbreak of democracy and social justice in those countries. Warfiteering and chaos rein merrily in spite of opinion polls suggesting troop withdrawals. So our western governments will eventually withdraw troops announcing that chaos rules, and social democracy is delayed for millions of desperately poor people subsisting under a yoke of theocratic feudalism and militant Islam.

And who could possibly mistake the fanatical Mohammad Sarwar with Mohammad Sarwar, the Scottish MP for Glasgow Govan ?.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca