babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » feminism   » Should the Central Park Jogger be named?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Should the Central Park Jogger be named?
Whazzup?
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1471

posted 15 April 2003 05:42 PM      Profile for Whazzup?     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, the issue is moot now, since it's in the news, but there's been an interesting debate about it over the past few weeks, and I'm interested in people's perspectives on it:

Wolper: It's Time to Name the Central Park Jogger :

quote:
The reason reporters keep the names of rape victims out of their newspapers is to spare them the stigma associated with the crime. There is a reason for that. We are a country that still paints a scarlet letter on rape victims.

But the Jogger doesn't need to be protected anymore. She is lifting her veil because she wants to tell the world who she is and how she came back from near death to conquer life. She overcame. She is doing what many people want her to do: destigmatize the status of rape victims. She is opening her life to scrutiny.

. . .

That story was about a vicious sexual assault. This one is about marketing the victim of that assault. It is about abusing the practice the media use to protect victims.


On the other hand ...

[ 15 April 2003: Message edited by: Whazzup? ]


From: Under the Rubble | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478

posted 15 April 2003 06:00 PM      Profile for skdadl     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
These debates depress me so much, and not because of the central issues.

It's just so obvious that it is next to impossible to do anything public in the U.S., and especially in media centres like NYC and LA, without becoming the flavour of the month. And it's all so pointless. In NYC, even if you're a star in New York, you're not a star in New York, if you see what I mean. Everything is currency, every moral dilemma, every human crisis, every human being.

Something similar happens in U.S. politics. Money sentimentalized -- does anyone get anywhere in U.S. politics any other way?

As far as I can see, the only way to survive the U.S. media omniglorp with honour is to do something like a Nader: forswear the perks; stay on message for forty, fifty years, and maybe 5 per cent of the people will end up genuinely respecting you. I call that success.

[ 15 April 2003: Message edited by: skdadl ]


From: gone | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sisyphus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1425

posted 15 April 2003 06:05 PM      Profile for Sisyphus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
"omniglorp"???!! "omniglorp"?. "Omniglorp". I like it
From: Never Never Land | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
jeff house
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 518

posted 15 April 2003 06:51 PM      Profile for jeff house     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To me, the issue is simple: the identity of sexual assault victims should be kept from the newspapers, unless the victim herself or himself decides to waive that right.

Presumably, a victim who wishes to come forward to assist in eradicating any stigma should be allowed to. Someone who would prefer anonimity should have that respected, also.

Reporters can't name people convicted under the Young Offenders' Act and similar legislation, so why is this supposedly such a great departure in journalistic ethics?


From: toronto | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca