babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Minnie Driver to give up Hollywood for Cambodian sweat shop

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Minnie Driver to give up Hollywood for Cambodian sweat shop
Pimji
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 228

posted 30 October 2003 09:32 PM      Profile for Pimji   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Minnie Driver to give up Hollywood for Cambodian sweat shop

quote:
Minnie Driver is putting her Hollywood career on hold to work in a sweatshop in Cambodia.

She will leave behind her tennis star boyfriend, Robby Ginepri, and her Notting Hill flat to experience poverty in South-East Asia.

The actress wants to highlight how Western clothing companies use "slave labour" in Third World countries by working for "weeks, perhaps months" alongside teenagers in Phnom Penh.

Driver, 32, currently filming the movie version of Phantom Of The Opera, told the Evening Standard she will use her fame to raise awareness of unfair global trade agreements.



My wife says Minnie won't last very long. I think what she is doing is very noble. Good for her.

From: South of Ottawa | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sara Mayo
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3714

posted 30 October 2003 11:13 PM      Profile for Sara Mayo     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Is she even qualified? I doubt she'd ever get hired... This is an important issue, but I think this stunt stinks of thespian egocentrism to be effective.
From: "Highways are monuments to inequality" - Enrique Penalosa | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
kuri
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4202

posted 31 October 2003 11:20 AM      Profile for kuri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Although Minnie's intentions are probably noble, I highly doubt any sweatshop is going to want to hire her. One of the reasons for sourcing that labour out to places like Cambodia is precisely to get away from the kind of publicity that makes sweatshop conditions difficult to get away with (in western countries). Any company wanting to continue getting the Nike and Gap contracts will avoid her like the plague.
From: an employer more progressive than rabble.ca | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Sisyphus
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1425

posted 31 October 2003 12:05 PM      Profile for Sisyphus     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I applaud it. MD is what she is: rich and famous; she doesn't have to do anything like this.

She can afford to bribe the owner of a particular sweatshop with more money than he'd see in five years, and if she keeps the identity of that particular sweatshop confidential --probably easy to keep it from mainstream "reporters", tougher from the tabloids-- she could still do a successful expose.

I don't care if it's self-serving or not. Her detractors remind me of the crabs in the pot, pulling the ones who are almost out back down.

Investigative journalism, much as I admire what's left of it, preaches to the choir. If it takes crass celebrity to raise public awareness of important issues, then we should embrace it.

[ 31 October 2003: Message edited by: Sisyphus ]


From: Never Never Land | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Rebecca West
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1873

posted 31 October 2003 01:41 PM      Profile for Rebecca West     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What, do we have rules now about who gets to be an activist? Are only the obscure and non-rich worthy of a worthy cause? If the end result is that the public conscience is tweaked, even if only a few thousand people start to think more about what they buy and how it's made, it'll be worthwhile.
From: London , Ontario - homogeneous maximus | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mimichekele2
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3232

posted 31 October 2003 05:05 PM      Profile for Mimichekele2        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We have a landmine treaty because of that egomaniac Lady Diana, and major pressure for debt relief because of that rockstar diva Bono, so go for it, Minnie. Won't hurt.

P.S. Why Cambodia?


From: More lawyers, fewer bricks! | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged
Pimji
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 228

posted 31 October 2003 09:38 PM      Profile for Pimji   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Good question. I'd like to speculate. Prior to 1968 Camboadia was a decent place to live, according to the Cambodians I've spoken to. However dysfunctional Sihanouk's reign was, the decades of the 50's and 60's were the golden years. Then the bombing, then the KR holocast, then this...The heavy price of WTO membership
quote:
Cambodia is already obligated through its membership of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) to remove most import tariffs by 2015, but will have to implement much of this package earlier to meet the WTO requirements. It will be unable to levy duty on agricultural goods, the main income source for 80 percent of the population, above 60 percent. In contrast, European Union farm tariffs range up to 252 percent, the US levies a maximum of 121 percent and Canada 120 percent.

9 October – Government policies to reduce poverty in Cambodia, one of the poorest countries in the world, are not in line with the country's obligations to improve human rights, a situation that calls for informed public debate, a senior United Nations official says in a reportreleased today.

quote:
"Policies and strategies allegedly aimed at reducing poverty have been developed without sufficient regard for Cambodia's obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and are hampered by problems of disbursement in the education and health sectors," UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's Special Representative for human rights in Cambodia, Peter Leuprecht, says.

"Many problems persist in the delivery of the right to housing, such as forced evictions and the lack of adequate shelter for displaced Cambodians."

The National Assembly elections of July 2003, the third since the 1991 peace agreement, was better run and marked an important step in establishing a multiparty democracy. He expresses concern, however, about intimidation, vote buying and violence during the electoral campaign and a "perception among many state actors and institutions that criticism of the government may amount to criminal incitement."

Cambodia was set to become one of the first two least developed countries to complete its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), a move that "may adversely impact on the fulfilment of its human rights obligations," he says. "(The Special Representative) believes that there is a need for informed public debate on this issue." (Pimji's note: This cannot happen if opposition party members and supporters are continually gunned down.)

Cambodia has an annual per person gross national income of $260 and is ranked 130th out of the 174 countries surveyed in the UN's "Human Development Report 2003," Mr. Leuprecht notes.


I'm in full support of high profile celebs using their status to bring to light the crushing living standarsd of the worlds poor.

I think many celebs are more lucky, than talented, and doing something positive with their wealth, status and high media profile is positive. Then again there is Arnold although I predict he will quickly tire of the daily drudgery of work and retire back to his cushy playboy lifestyle. The regular folks of all social strata, I would say, feel more in tune with celebs rather than their own government. Government departments tend to communicate best with other government departments; including government departments who are fronts for criminal gangs.

[ 31 October 2003: Message edited by: Pimji ]


From: South of Ottawa | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca