babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » The Right loves Hungary 1956?

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: The Right loves Hungary 1956?
blake 3:17
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 10360

posted 29 July 2006 04:02 AM      Profile for blake 3:17     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So how does our side respond to this?

Bush: Hungary proof Liberty cannot be denied

And in Pravda:

quote:
1956 anti-communist uprising commemoration takes place in Poznan
Front page / World
06/28/2006 13:18 Source:


President Lech Kaczynski was joined by counterparts Horst Koehler of Germany, Laszlo Solyom of Hungary, and Vaclav Klaus of Czech Republic to remember clashes that broke out between workers and communist militia in June 1956 in the western Polish city.

With a military band playing, Kaczynski gave a red-carpet welcome to his fellow presidents in the picturesque old town square. Later, they were to take part in a Mass and then wreath-laying ceremony at a monument to the victims of the uprising.


Pravda story.

From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ken Burch
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8346

posted 29 July 2006 12:36 PM      Profile for Ken Burch     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It's a bit weird for a Republican president to invoke Hungary in '56, given that one of the reasons the revolt, with its ultimately tragic consequences occurred, was that the Eisenhower administration or someone within in implied to the Hungarian rebels that, if the Soviets intervened, the U.S. would defend them. When the Soviets did, in fact, intervene, the U.S., apart from a few rather mild denouncements, did nothing.

This was probably due in part to the fact that Imre Nagy and the rest of the rebels did not, in fact, want to repudiate socialism but to build a genuinely democratic and socialist alternative to the Leninist model that the USSR had forced on them. Had the Soviet leadership displayed the slightest degree of sense, it would have allowed this, as an attractive, nonrepressive form of Communism in the Eastern Bloc would have done more to enhance Soviet security than any number of tanks and troops.

Unfortunately, the Soviets were led by people who thought like Western conservatives on security issues.


From: A seedy truckstop on the Information Superhighway | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca