babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics

Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Georgia/South Ossetia/Russia/Abkhazia/NATO Part V

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Georgia/South Ossetia/Russia/Abkhazia/NATO Part V
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 07:50 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
OK, just in case anyone was wondering why I would include NATO in the title ...

quote:
The United States has blocked a meeting of the NATO-Russia Council on the situation in South Ossetia, Russia’s Ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin told Itar-Tass.

“I regard this demarche of the US delegation as the unwillingness to hold a serious discussion on the causes and consequences of the Georgian aggression against South Ossetia and as the American side’s unwillingness to answer in the presence of NATO countries’ delegation difficult questions about the degree of the US involvement in the preparation and development of these tragic events,” the official said.


Yes, it might be very embarrassing to have to answer questions in front of your NATO friends. The Russians are really making a strong effort to win the war of public relations.

Russia 1 USA 0

US blocks NATO-Russia Council Meeting

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 August 2008 08:10 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Massive US Naval Armada Heads For Iran Georgian attack on Ossetia a diversion for Russians
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
A_J
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15412

posted 12 August 2008 08:11 AM      Profile for A_J     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
BBC - Civilian emergency hits Georgia
quote:
International aid is being rushed to Georgia to deal with a humanitarian emergency created by the country's conflict with Russia.

The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, says nearly 100,000 people have been uprooted by the conflict over South Ossetia.

Georgia was already struggling to help some 275,000 people displaced in the early 1990s by fighting in South Ossetia and another breakaway region, Abkhazia.

The UNHCR says about 56,000 people fled Gori, a key town just outside South Ossetia, after Russian air raids. That amounts to about 80% of the town's population.

Georgia says dozens of civilians were killed when Russian bombs hit two blocks of flats in Gori. Reporters saw casualties at the scene, but the death toll has not been independently confirmed.

Tskhinvali in ruins

Reports from the UNHCR and Russian media speak of total devastation in the South Ossetian capital Tskhinvali, with few buildings left intact after intense bombardments and street fighting.

Russian television showed pictures of a heavily damaged hospital in Tskhinvali, with wounded civilians lying in makeshift wards in the basement.

Families huddled in cellars, trapped by the fighting. They said they had had very little food and water for several days.

The intense fighting cut off supplies of running water and electricity. In many cases separated families were unable to contact each other by phone. Thousands did manage to flee - but often with few possessions.

Russian officials say more than 1,500 civilians were killed in Tskhinvali after Georgia launched an all-out assault last Friday, using heavy artillery and tanks. The casualty toll cannot be independently verified.

Giorgi Gogia, a researcher for Human Rights Watch in Tbilisi, described the Russian figure for Tskhinvali as "an exaggeration", adding: "It is clear that both sides are exaggerating, and that figures are inflated".

He said HRW, which is based in New York, had not found any evidence to back up Russian claims of atrocities committed by Georgian troops.

More than 30,000 civilians fled the fighting in Tskhinvali, Russian officials say. Most of them went to North Ossetia, which is part of the Russian Federation.

Several thousand fled south into Georgia and up to 12,000 people are estimated to be displaced within South Ossetia, officials say.

. . .



From: * | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 08:12 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
In fact, Georgia has already reloaded during the conflict. They had just under 1,000 combat troops flown back to Tblisi from their active role in the occupation of Iraq ...compliments of the USA.

I rather doubt that US military "aid" will suddenly cease ... I expect it to suddenly increase .


Its only the predictable sources that will agree with that prediction.

And bets as to those troops returning from Iraq? I bet they are positioned close at strategic poits for deterring Russia should Putin decide to take the assault further.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
jrootham
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 838

posted 12 August 2008 08:14 AM      Profile for jrootham     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In the previous thread, remind couldn't see any Russian apologists. I'd say N.Beltov qualifies.

OTOH it's not necessarily a bad thing to opposing counsel in a debate/trial that is as contentious as this.


From: Toronto | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 08:14 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Just to review:

quote:
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday he decided to end the military operation “to compel Georgia to peace”, as the result has been achieved.

Medvedev decides to end fighting.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 08:16 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
By the way Ken, it was 2,000 and not 1,000 combat troops brought back by the US to Georgia. My mistake.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:22 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
Just to review:

Medvedev decides to end fighting.


quote:
Medvedev decides to end fighting in Georgia as aim achieved

12.08.2008, 13.06




MOSCOW, August 12 (Itar-Tass) -- Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday he decided to end the military operation “to compel Georgia to peace”, as the result has been achieved.

“On the basis of your report I have decided to end the operation to compel Georgian authorities to peace. The aim has been achieved,” he said at a meeting with Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov and Chief-of-Staff of the Armed Forces Nikolai Makarov.

However, he ordered the Russian military to “eliminate the aggressor” in case Georgian forces resume hostilities.

“In case hotbeds of resistance and other aggressive attacks take place take decisions to eliminate them,” he instructed Serdyukov and Makarov.

Medvedev said the security in the conflict zone has been restored.



Just to 'review': this statement reported by the Russian state propaganda organ is meaningless.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 08:23 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
The Georgian peacekeepers in South Ossetia (nonexistent according to babble newcomer A_J ) will not be welcome in South Ossetia:

quote:
"Georgian peacekeepers can no longer stay in South Ossetia. They disgraced their title. They committed a crime by shooting at their comrades with whom they had served in the same peacekeeping contingent," [Russian Foreign Minister] Lavrov told a news conference after talks with his Finnish counterpart Alexander Stubb.

Incidently, the FM made reference to Article 51 of the UN Charter as a basis for the actions of his government.

quote:
Russia’s actions in South Ossetia conform to Article 51 of the UN Charter, which fixes the right to individual and collective self-defense," Lavrov stated.

link


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:26 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
Heres a more comprehensive analysis of tthe current situation.
quote:
Russia is no longer the spineless giant of the Nineties: Vladimir Putin's musclebound, oil-fuelled authoritarian regime has aggressively reinvigorated Russia. He had already shown his ruthless determination to master the Caucasus by crushing Chechnya. Nato in Georgia would have made that meaningless. The Kremlin has used its clients, Abkhazia and Ossetia, as Trojan Horses to ruin Tbilisi's independence - recently raising the tension by offering Russian passports to all Ossetians and testing Georgian resolve with cross-border skirmishing: the trap of a practised imperial power.


Timesonline]

Format errors

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: jester ]

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: jester ]


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 08:27 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
As Cueball remarked much earlier, it's amusing as hell to read all this criticism of the role of the Russians here when NATO carried out its attack on Serbia in 1999 to the cheers of all the "cruise missile" leftists. Guffaw.

quote:
ITAR/TASS: In 1999 western countries bombed former Yugoslavia to stop what they said was genocide of Kosovar Albanians and to oust President Slobodan Milosevic. Russia was angered, but did not interfere.

In 2008 Russia interfered to stop the Georgian bloodbath in breakaway Tskhinval and the genocide of South Ossetians, most of who are Russian citizens. Russian resolute retaliation to Georgian aggression triggered sharp criticism in the West showing it would prefer Moscow to be angered, but refrain from intervening, like it did in 1999.

Many Russian publications recall the 1999 events in former Yugoslavia. “US and NATO air force bombed the Serbian soil day and night – military units, towns, bridges, humanitarian convoys and even the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Now we have South Ossetia. In less than in a day Georgian troops razed to the ground Tskhinval and surrounding villages by point blank fire from dominating heights.”

Carpet bombing from Georgian salvo fire systems Grad, heavy artillery, tanks and aircraft destroyed Tskhinval completely and killed 1400 civilian Ossetians in one day. The threat of humanitarian catastrophe emerged. Russia could not but interfere.


And look who's agreeing ....

quote:
In Russia nobody doubts that Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili would never dare attack South Ossetia without western connivance. Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev is convinced the aggression was okayed by the United States, which heavily armed Georgia and trained its military.

“I am convinced it would not have happened without the consent of the United States. It has approved it,” he told Tass.


West would like Russia to close its eyes to the genocide of Ossetians


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 12 August 2008 08:27 AM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
And now, the predictable fit from the Georgian president:


quote:
Georgian leader rails against Russia, announces break from CIS
18:09 | 12/ 08/ 2008

MOSCOW, August 12 (RIA Novosti) - Georgia's president gave a speech in front of thousands of flag-waving supporters outside parliament on Tuesday, denouncing Russia and declaring his country's withdrawal from a post-Soviet alliance.

Mikheil Saakashvili has accused Russia of occupying half his country in a "peace enforcement operation" that ended on Tuesday. Russia says it no longer considers Saakashvili a partner, following Georgia's offensive in breakaway Ossetia last Friday, which killed at least 1,600 people, most of whom were Russian citizens.

"As president of Georgia, I stand before you in very difficult circumstances... Yesterday I saw with my own eyes how we were bombed," he said.

Georgia will "continue to stand firm" against the Russian aggressors, the president told the crowd.

He also announced that his country would leave the Commonwealth of Independent States, and urged Ukraine to follow suit.

"We have decided that Georgia will leave the CIS," he said. "We urge Ukraine and other countries to also leave the Commonwealth of Independent States, which is dominated by Russia."

Excluding Georgia, the CIS has 10 full members - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.

Saakashvili said Georgia now considers Russian troops in the South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Georgia's other rebel region, to be occupiers.



RIA Novosti - Saakashvili removing Georgia from CIS, asks the same from Ukraine

From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 12 August 2008 08:30 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by jester:

Just to 'review': this statement reported by the Russian state propaganda organ is meaningless.


Certainly it is a propaganda organ. But I don't trust it any less than privately owned propaganda organs.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 08:33 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Medvedev decides to end fighting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday he decided to end the military operation “to compel Georgia to peace”, as the result has been achieved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Since Beltov has decided to repeat from the last thread Russian pronouncements as if they are gospel, I'll repeat excerpts from the rest of the story.

quote:
Medvedev's statement notwithstanding, Russia has not yet 'achieved all its goals'.

It remains to be seen if they have stopped attacks in Georgia. Even if they have, the Abkhazians have attacked the Georgian held enclave. On paper, Russian forces are not involved. If they are not now overtly and visibly taking part, that will only last if the Abkhazians succeed in doing most of the visible work of ejecting the Georgian forces.

...and...

Medvedev saying "Georgians returning to original positions" is an obfuscating gloss. Russia won't [nor should] allow the Georgians back into Ossetia that were there allowed there according to the peacekeeping agreements. But "original positions" does not include them staying in the Kordi Gorge of Abkhazia- where they will be expelled by Russia if need be.


I kind of liked the closing paragraph from Medvedev in the Tass mouthpiece Beltov linked to above:

quote:
“I want to stress the high efficiency of actions of our enforced peacekeeping contingent, well coordinated operations of all the units. I would ask you to submit proposals on awarding state decorations to participants in the operation and extend my gratitude to them,” Medvedev told Serdyukov.

Maybe you could recommend some Russian units for medals.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 12 August 2008 08:33 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
No one has answered this fundamental question: Has the U.N. been investigating claims of ethnic cleansing in South Ossetia? I've not seen anything other than Russian and informal claims that there was ethnic cleansing.
From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 08:36 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
By the way Ken, it was 2,000 and not 1,000 combat troops brought back by the US to Georgia.

Getting there. It's 1500. [Maybe Tass says 2,000.]


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:36 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
In his attempts to clamp down on pro-Russian South Ossetian separatists, Mr Saakashvili appears to have made one fundamental, disastrous miscalculation: that the Bush Administration and the West viewed their relationship with Georgia as more important than that with Russia.


Timesonline


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:38 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

Certainly it is a propaganda organ. But I don't trust it any less than privately owned propaganda organs.


I don't more or less trust any of them.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 08:41 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Medvedev's statement notwithstanding, Russia has not yet 'achieved all its goals'.

I assume that their ultimate goal is to install a puppet government in Georgia and for Georgia to be a "satellite" reminiscent of countries in the Warsaw Pact.

We'll see how far they get.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 12 August 2008 08:43 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:

I assume that their ultimate goal is to install a puppet government in Georgia and for Georgia to be a "satellite" reminiscent of countries in the Warsaw Pact.


or Nato.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 12 August 2008 08:45 AM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Just to 'review': this statement reported by the Russian state propaganda organ is meaningless.



How so, jester? Just because it's a Russian agency, its not to be trusted??
Well, from reviewing multiple international media, a ceasefire has seemed to be in operation over the past few hours.

I dont think you understand that Russia doesnt like being seen weak, but at the same time would not risk obvious Western backlash in occupying a country. Their objectives of showing strength, protecting their allies and humiliating Georgia and US have all been accomplished. There is no longer need for fighting, unless Saakashvili pushes it.

Oh and BTW, doesnt the phrase 'regime change' sound familiar?
If it does, its because it was already used before in similar circumstances, but not by Russia.


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 08:45 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Sven: No one has answered this fundamental question: Has the U.N. been investigating claims of ethnic cleansing in South Ossetia?

On the other (specific) thread on this topic I've noted the remarks about 150 investigators hired from the Russian Prosecutor's Office. I'd say they are collecting the evidence as we argue about it.

There is some debate about what is the best way to approach this issue. I don't pretend to have a final answer on that.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:47 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
I imagine that Ukraine is now rethinking their own rash decision to bar the Russian Navy from returning to Ukrainian ports.

This is the dawning of the new,improved Russian superpower that Putin has pined for. While the Americans are engaged elsewhere and powerless to respond, Russia will invade its Caucasus neighbours to assuage the humility of their loss 20 years ago.

While the US has squandered its deterrent capacity chasing goatherds around in ill-thought out invasions, the Russian Bear put some crafty plans in place with careful provocations designed to goad any action Russia could seize upon as a pretext for invasion of its former vassal states.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 08:47 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by jester:
Heres a more comprehensive analysis of tthe current situation.


So, Jester, to you comprehensive means loaded with hyberbolic adjectives that says more about the analyst than the analysis?

Do you take yourself seriously?

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 08:49 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
From the timesonline article linked by jester above:

quote:
Georgia is not guiltless: most Georgians I know care little about Ossetia even though it is part of sovereign Georgia. But in order to join Nato, President Saakashvili wanted to settle Georgia's instability by reclaiming Ossetia and Abkhazia. By seizing Tskhinvali, he took one hell of a gamble...

The retaking of Ossetia is a minor part of the Russian campaign. More significant is the attack on Georgia proper, which reasserts Russia's hegemony over the Caucasus, assuages the humiliations of the past 20 years, subverts Georgian democracy - and defies and defangs American superpowerdom. The swaggering arrival of Vladimir Putin, now the Prime Minister, across the border, macho in his tight jeans and white leather jacket, shows he, not President Medvedev, remains Russia's paramount leader.

...Russia both despises Western hypocrisy and craves Western approval.


And so we have Putin in the war theatre running the show for the iron fist and showing up the US, with Medvedev in Moscow speaking the velvet glove.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 08:49 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I assume that their ultimate goal is to install a puppet government in Georgia and for Georgia to be a "satellite" reminiscent of countries in the Warsaw Pact.

Or Stephen Harper.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
A_J
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15412

posted 12 August 2008 08:50 AM      Profile for A_J     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:
No one has answered this fundamental question: Has the U.N. been investigating claims of ethnic cleansing in South Ossetia? I've not seen anything other than Russian and informal claims that there was ethnic cleansing.

The UNHCR is on the scene documenting the numbers of people displaced in both South Ossetia and Georgia, so I suppose that is a start, but I haven't heard of a formal investigation by the United Nations or any other independant third-party just yet. Hopefully that changes very soon.

From: * | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 08:50 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
So, its OK for a superpower like Russia to throw its weight around and wantonly invade neighbouring countries...I wonder how many of you would be so "understanding" in the US decided to invade Cuba or Mexico.

There is nothing remotely "progressive" about the current Russian regime - so i really don't see why anyone who considers themself "progressive" would want to be an apologist for the Putin regime.

As much as i've had my arguments about Castro etc...at least you could conceivably make the argument that Cuba offers "something" to the world in terms of better health and education etc... but I don't see what there is about Putin and his personality cult crypto-fascist police state in Russia that anyone should be sympathetic to. Russia may have been "communist" for 70 years, but today it has non-existent social programs and some of the worst social inequalities of any country. Moscow has over 90 BILLIONAIRES and almost everyone else living in squalor.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 08:54 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
So, its OK for a superpower like Russia to throw its weight around and wantonly invade neighbouring countries...I wonder how many of you would be so "understanding" in the US decided to invade Cuba or Mexico.

The US invaded both. Even forced a constitution on Cuba and used it, and its people, as play things for Mafia gangsters.

No one said it is "OK" for Russia, no longer a superpower, to do anything. But surely you have apologized long and hard for US actions all over the globe. You even think it is about time Cuba lowered itself the Yankee yolk once more.

In fact, I'm surprised you aren't cheering Russia as they are behaving exactly like Americans. But it is the hypocrisy of your ideology that prevents you from standing up and cheering. Or, at least, that's what I think ...

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 12 August 2008 08:54 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
On the other (specific) thread on this topic I've noted the remarks about 150 investigators hired from the Russian Prosecutor's Office. I'd say they are collecting the evidence as we argue about it.

Like I said, I’ve seen nothing other than Russian claims of ethnic cleansing. If ethnic cleansing was occurring, one would think that there would be international organizations at least commenting on it!!

This is the fundamental issue because Russia’s essential justification for its action is that there was ethnic cleansing occurring in S.O.

Yet, we have several babblers leaping to Russia’s defense with nothing other than Russia’s claims.

Personally, if there was ethnic cleansing on any meaningful scale and it was an issue that the international community was doing nothing about (as usual), then I wouldn’t have a problem with the Russians stepping in to stop it—even though it was exercising unilateral military action.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by BetterRed:

How so, jester? Just because it's a Russian agency, its not to be trusted??
Well, from reviewing multiple international media, a ceasefire has seemed to be in operation over the past few hours.

I dont think you understand that Russia doesnt like being seen weak, but at the same time would not risk obvious Western backlash in occupying a country. Their objectives of showing strength, protecting their allies and humiliating Georgia and US have all been accomplished. There is no longer need for fighting, unless Saakashvili pushes it.

Oh and BTW, doesnt the phrase 'regime change' sound familiar?
If it does, its because it was already used before in similar circumstances, but not by Russia.


Its meaningless because this soothing spin contradicts itself. Ending hostilities means ending hostilities, not using phony 'threats' as an excuse to continue realising objectives.

Its just as meaningless as Saakshivili's 'ceasefire' while his troops shell the Russians.

I don't think you understand Russian strategic objectives. Putin makes no secret of his ambitions.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 August 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:

There is nothing remotely "progressive" about the current Russian regime - so i really don't see why anyone who considers themself "progressive" would want to be an apologist for the Putin regime.


Russians love Putin. A lot more than the U.S.-friendly Yeltsin who brought neoliberal catastroika on their country. Even Groznians like Putin for building up their country. Chechnya's economy is bustling since Islamic Gladios were swept away.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 08:56 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
There has been plenty of independent media confirmation, Sven. Go out and buy a non-US newspaper. You might actually get some news.
From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 08:57 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
More of Beltov's repition of Russian gloss from the mouthpieces:

quote:
ITAR/TASS: In 1999 western countries bombed former Yugoslavia to stop what they said was genocide of Kosovar Albanians and to oust President Slobodan Milosevic. Russia was angered, but did not interfere.

The parallels with Serbia and Kosovo are very real. Just change the last sentence to include the full reality "Russia was angered, but impotent, so did not interfere." Then insert the US for the Georgia and Ossetia situation.

Fits like a glove.

The rest of the Tass gloss about it all being for the protection of civilians is pap.

I suppose that's what Russia is doing in Chechnya too: just protecting the civilians.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 12 August 2008 08:59 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by jester:
While the Americans are engaged elsewhere and powerless to respond, Russia will invade its Caucasus neighbours to assuage the humility of their loss 20 years ago.

While the US has squandered its deterrent capacity chasing goatherds around in ill-thought out invasions, the Russian Bear put some crafty plans in place with careful provocations designed to goad any action Russia could seize upon as a pretext for invasion of its former vassal states.


This is just naďve.

Even if the Americans were not occupied in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Americans would not militarily respond to Russia’s actions, no more than the Russians or the Chinese would militarily react if the Americans militarily annexed B.C. and Alberta.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 12 August 2008 09:01 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by A_J:
The UNHCR is on the scene documenting the numbers of people displaced in both South Ossetia and Georgia, so I suppose that is a start, but I haven't heard of a formal investigation by the United Nations or any other independant third-party just yet. Hopefully that changes very soon.

That’s not the question (i.e., what is happening to civilians in the current clash?). The question is: What was happening before the events of recent days? I’ve seen no international claims of ethnic cleansing in S.O. Only Russian claims.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 09:02 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

So, Jester, to you comprehensive means loaded with hyberbolic adjectives that says more about the analyst than the analysis?

Do you take yourself seriously?

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


Never I'm just another amateur putting in his 2 cents. However, I do admit to trying to grasp the complexities of global tensions rather than freaking out and blaming the west in an orgy of unrestrained emotional innuendo.

Whats your excuse?


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 09:08 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
You call your input "restrained emotional innuendo"? Yeah, right.

C'mon, Jester, stop fooling yourself. In your transparent efforts to present yourself as "independent", you still manage to excuse every American excess while attacking any other excess. Get over yourself.

What we are witnessing is the exercise of global strategic politics and we are flies on the wall without the least amount of influence.

Real analysis looks at what's happening, the stakes, and the possible outcomes and isn't filled with lots of little and colorful adjectives to try and sway the readers mind one way or the other.

If that's what you're reading and regarding as analysis it is little wonder you lack any insight that isn't colored by some ideological lens.

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 12 August 2008 09:10 AM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
More Russophobic hysteria and hyperbole from Stockholm.

Didnt you just see the confirmation that a ceasefire has been in effect?
Russia will not remove Saakashvili by force, unless he continues to provoke and bluster.

And as for nothing progressive - well during Putin's reign, the Western oil companies were shown the door, and the average Russian' standard of life has improved dramatically since Yeltsin days of happy-go-lucky robber barons.

Even now,For example, a US-type food stamps program for the poor have been adopted.
There is no doubt that the oligarchs and corruption are still very much a problem. Lack of democracy is still a problem.

But a bigger problem is relentless expansion of US and NATO forces right up to Russian borders. A bigger problem is a demographic crisis in Russia. A bigger problem is US and Britain attempting to turn Russia's neighbours, especially Ukraine against her. A bigger problem is Western elites treating Russia as a pathetic version of the USSR.


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 09:14 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:

This is just naďve.

Even if the Americans were not occupied in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Americans would not militarily respond to Russia’s actions, no more than the Russians or the Chinese would militarily react if the Americans militarily annexed B.C. and Alberta.


Naive huh?

Whats naive is American thinking that they could park their military and missile deterent ass on Russia's doorstep without incurring consequences.

Of course, as usual, the American stooges act as proxies and bear the consequences while the US mouths pieties and pretends to stop to tie their shoelace.

The upshot of this manoevre to try to gain military advantage from former Warsaw Pact states is that the Russian bear has rubbed the Eagle's beak in its own excement because the Us was not prepared to back up its BS.

After Georgia's self-inflicted humiliation,what chance do you think the Genius's plans for missiles in Poland or Czechoslovakia have? Or, any plans for pipelines through former Caucasus vassal states?


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 August 2008 09:21 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by KenS:
I suppose that's what Russia is doing in Chechnya too: just protecting the civilians.

I suppose the CIA, SAS, and Pakistani ISI were training and funding Shamil Basayev and Al Khattab to become democratic leaders of Chechnya and Dagestan? Don't be naive, Ken. Islamic Gladio was real and ongoing.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jingles
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3322

posted 12 August 2008 09:23 AM      Profile for Jingles     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
I wonder how many of you would be so "understanding" in the US decided to invade Cuba or Mexico.

Cuba backs Russia

quote:
"It's false that Georgia is defending its national sovereignty," (Raul) Castro said in the statement that appeared to reflect recent steps toward renewing Cuba-Russia relations.

"The request for a previous withdrawal of the invaders is just and our government supports it."



From: At the Delta of the Alpha and the Omega | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
KenS
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1174

posted 12 August 2008 09:25 AM      Profile for KenS     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
There's more involved than big power and Islamic terrorist games Fidel. If you hadn't noticed there are some real people that live in Chechnya. They aren't just puppets for whom you and Beltov see Russia as the great protector.

You're one to go using the label naive.


From: Minasville, NS | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Papal Bull
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7050

posted 12 August 2008 09:28 AM      Profile for Papal Bull   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Even Groznians like Putin for building up their country. Chechnya's economy is bustling since Islamic Gladios were swept away.

In my course of studying Russia and its culture I would have to say that I disagree with this statement. Chechens aren't happy at all with Putin for raining destruction upon them. Chechnya was a horrible, horrible war. And the Russians, like everyone else, were not angels. It was a war. Just like this one is.


From: Vatican's best darned ranch | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 August 2008 09:30 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by KenS:
There's more involved than big power and Islamic terrorist games Fidel. If you hadn't noticed there are some real people that live in Chechnya.

I'm not saying these things without sources. Several independent U.S. and Canadian commentators have stated that Islamic Gladio and terror in general are exactly what's been going on in Central Asia and Balkans since the 1980's proxy war in Afghanistan.

Please don't pull the humanitarian card on us now at this point. You're a bit late by about 30 years. What would the Yanks have said had the Soviets and Cubans, Chinese etc began interfering in western politics to the same degree? Blowback? Pfff!

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Fidel ]


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 12 August 2008 09:33 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:

I assume that their ultimate goal is to install a puppet government in Georgia and for Georgia to be a "satellite" reminiscent of countries in the Warsaw Pact.

We'll see how far they get.



The alleged aim, or ability, of Russia to install a (necessarily) iron-fisted Georgian puppet, backed by a (necessarily) willing Georgian army, is an absurd Bushian propaganda fantasy.
Russian assimilation of Georgia-invaded South Ossiatia (which voted overwhemingly a few years ago to be part of Russia) is a real possibility.

From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
al-Qa'bong
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3807

posted 12 August 2008 09:35 AM      Profile for al-Qa'bong   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I've been skimming these Geawgian threads and therefore may have missed any existing references (the Angry Arab is all over it) to this strange angle on the conflict:

quote:
From the moment Georgia launched a surprise attack on the tiny breakaway region of South Ossetia last week, prompting a fierce Russian counterattack, Israel has been trying to distance itself from the conflict. This is understandable: with Georgian forces on the retreat, large numbers of civilians killed and injured, and Russia's fury unabated, Israel's deep involvement is severely embarrassing.

The collapse of the Georgian offensive represents not only a disaster for that country and its US-backed leaders, but another blow to the myth of Israel's military prestige and prowess. Worse, Israel fears that Russia could retaliate by stepping up its military assistance to Israel's adversaries including Iran.


Tel Aviv to Tbilisi: Israel's role in the Russia-Georgia war

Did anyone else hear GeeDubya shaking his little sabre for all he was worth yesterday?

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: al-Qa'bong ]


From: Saskatchistan | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
BetterRed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11865

posted 12 August 2008 09:37 AM      Profile for BetterRed     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Papal Bull:

In my course of studying Russia and its culture I would have to say that I disagree with this statement. Chechens aren't happy at all with Putin for raining destruction upon them. Chechnya was a horrible, horrible war. And the Russians, like everyone else, were not angels. It was a war. Just like this one is.


Fair enough, it was a brutal war. Bombing if Grozny was excessive. But may I remind you that in 1999, Chechen militant armies have attacked the Russian republic of Dagestan? That was the trigger for Putin;s iron-fisted response.

The Dagestanis weren't all that happy either about radical Wahhabi Chechens attacking their villages. They fought the invaders in militia groups even before the Russian fed forces arrived to push them back. I saw the documentary of these battles.


From: They change the course of history, everyday ppl like you and me | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 09:37 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
KenS: I suppose that's what Russia is doing in Chechnya too: just protecting the civilians.

Funny you should mention that ...

quote:
Chechen fighters of the Russian army in South Ossetia. The Chechens are not anti-American, per CNN propaganda. Their grandfathers were heroes of the 2nd Great Patriotic War, and their great-grandfathers were heroes of World War I (the Savage Division, made up mainly of Chechen troopers, was the best Russian unit of that war). A proud tradition continues!

The final caption reads: They are throwing out the Georgian trash!


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 09:43 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
A Russian assessment (not government) ...

quote:

It is hard to make forecasts in a constantly changing situation, but, from what information we have it seems that Russia’s main goal is to destroy Georgia’s military equipment and infrastructure, and deprive it of the ability to engage in active military operations. Russia is likely to continue bombing installations on Georgian territory, oust the Georgian troops from South Ossetia, and create a security belt around it, and around Abkhazia. At the same time, Russia will be limited in using heavy artillery for the reasons mentioned above. (mostly avoiding civilian casualties - N.Beltov)

It is clear that an anti-Russian coalition does not exist. The operation is likely to be completed in the next few days, after which talks will be resumed. The future of the Georgian leadership is the most interesting political issue. Some experts believe that Russia may demand extradition of some of the Georgian leaders for trial for war crimes. To sum up, Russia’s actions have been undoubtedly positive. It has demonstrated its readiness to use all means, including armed force, for the protection of its citizens and national interests.


[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 12 August 2008 10:09 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
To follow fom my previous post, there is a good possibility of a change in the repressive, but elected, leadership in Georgia--brought about by fed-up Georgians.

The civilian suffering on both sides is horrendous and I don't hold with the "reap what they sow" position which suggests civilians (including children) of any side (usually oblivious to the backroom machinations of their "leaders") get what they deserve when their leaders criminal plans go wrong.
=====

"Reuters/Gleb Garanich

A Georgian refugee cries in Gori, about 50 miles from Tbilisi, Aug. 11, 2008.

Aug. 12, 2008 | TBILISI, Georgia -- Vaso Chlukhadze, 25, is one of hundreds of war refugees gathered outside the mayor's office in Tbilisi, Georgia. Chlukhadze has been waiting two days for a place to sleep. He fled South Ossetia after being forced from his home by Russian air raids. War has quickly escalated in this region since late last week, with Georgia agitating for greater control of disputed territory in the Caucasus, and Russia going aggressively on the attack with war planes, tanks and troops. Like many here directly in the middle of it and suffering the consequences, Chlukhadze blames Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili for the violence that left his family homeless.

"The [Georgian] government wasn't right. If they don't have enough force they shouldn't behave like this," he said.

If Vladimir Putin's aim is regime change in Georgia, as American officials claim, it may already be working. Many of the weary-eyed refugees were too angry to speak to journalists. But they are bitterly angry with their government. "Kill Saakashvili," a few hissed. "...


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 10:18 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:
You call your input "restrained emotional innuendo"? Yeah, right.

C'mon, Jester, stop fooling yourself. In your transparent efforts to present yourself as "independent", you still manage to excuse every American excess while attacking any other excess. Get over yourself.


[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: Frustrated Mess ]


Oh, really. Please provide evidence of "managing to excuse every American excess".

You made the accusation so back it up or apologise.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 10:24 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Russians love Putin.

So? A lot of Italians loved Mussolini, that doesn't mean that he had the right to invade Ethiopia.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
guy cybershy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1021

posted 12 August 2008 10:33 AM      Profile for guy cybershy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I can't believe how one sided the BBC coverage is. Every time Saakashvili opens his mouth they report every word despite the fact he is quite obviously deranged.
This whole thing is NATO aggression against Russia, period!

From: Calgary | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 10:40 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Oh, really. Please provide evidence of "managing to excuse every American excess".

You don't? Oh, my mistake. I guess it just seems that way.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 12 August 2008 10:44 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by guy cybershy:
[QB]I can't believe how one sided the BBC coverage is. Every time Saakashvili opens his mouth they report every word despite the fact he is quite obviously deranged.
/QB]

Unfortunately, that is BBC for a number of years now. If I had believed the first BBC report on the conflict, I would believe it had started with a Russian invasion, not the Georgian shelling and incursion.

From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 10:46 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Here's an amusing assessment from a Russian who seems to know what's what ....

quote:
Sarkozy and Merkel are going to fall into line after being taken privately to the woodshed in Moscow. Unlike the USA, which has a penchant for publicly humiliating both its clients and partners, Moscow is going to do it outside of the glare of the cameras, saving the face of the Europeans. Repeat after me… GAZPROM.

ahahahahaha ha!

quote:
The US shall be abandoned by its European allies in this, just as they abandoned the US in its effort to force Georgia and the Ukraine into NATO. The events of the last weekend prove that not only the Saakashvili mob, but, the Ukraine as well, is not long for this world, an outcome that is going to improve world stability and peace. The US shall fuss, fume, and moan, but, it lacks the power, both militarily and financially, to intervene. The world shall be able to breathe much more easily once nationalistic fanatics such as Saakashvili and Yushchenko are removed from the scene.

I'm not willing to share the assessment of Y. But the finish is great ...

quote:
However… Saakashvili is a dead duck. His political opponents, of which there are not a few, shall topple him, kill him, or force him to flee. He has no support left, save in the halls of Foggy Bottom. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
guy cybershy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1021

posted 12 August 2008 10:57 AM      Profile for guy cybershy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
It used to be NDP policy to pull us out of NATO. Does anyone know if that is still the case?
From: Calgary | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 10:58 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
This writer is good. Check out the report she found on the Georgian retreat ...

quote:
The Georgian Army was in complete disarray last night after troops and tanks fled the town of Gori in panic and abandoned it to the Russians without firing a shot ....

The retreat from Gori, the birthplace of Joseph Stalin, was as humiliating as it was sudden and dramatic. ... Jeeps and pick-up trucks filled with Georgian soldiers raced through the streets, their occupants frantically signalling to civilians that they too should flee. The road out of Gori towards Tbilisi was a scene of chaos and fear as cars jockeyed with tanks for a speedy escape.


The Georgians responded, says the author, by more cowardly shelling of Ossetia ...

quote:
The Russian attacks were met with Georgian artillery fire towards South Ossetia, despite President Saakashvili’s statement that he had called a ceasefire. Reporters later witnessed at least six Georgian helicopters attacking targets in South Ossetia.

Gah.


The Editor finishes:

quote:
There one has it. The Georgian forces are falling apart, a sign of low morale, poor training, and abysmal unit cohesion and motivation. in short, a force not worthy of NATO integration. Good thing it was found out now! No one wishes to die for the baby-faced killer with an American college education. He may very well try to flee the country, and if he does, he’ll end as a professor in some small liberal-arts college in the American hinterlands. Taking academic “office politics” into account, a fate worse than hanging! Sic semper tyrannis!

The latin, roughly, means "Thus, always, to tyrants! "


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 12 August 2008 11:11 AM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by guy cybershy:
It used to be NDP policy to pull us out of NATO. Does anyone know if that is still the case?

Layton changes course on NDP's NATO policy

Updated Sun. May. 30 2004 12:38 AM ET

Canadian Press

TORONTO -- Security issues edged into the federal election campaign Saturday as Jack Layton brushed aside a long-held NDP policy that would pull Canada out of NATO, promising instead to work on changing the military alliance.
....
"NATO is an organization essentially of the past. We are going to work for the restructuring of organizations for the future.
People in NATO are already transforming it themselves.""

I believe he said that last sentence without irony or humour.


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 11:12 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Guy, the NDP policy is now to "change NATO from within". Here is a previous, if incomplete, thread ... NATO and NORAD - yes or no?
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
guy cybershy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1021

posted 12 August 2008 11:15 AM      Profile for guy cybershy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
We should get out of NATO and NORAD and spend our military budget on a bigger Navy to soveriegnty in the Arctic.
From: Calgary | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 11:17 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Frustrated Mess:

You don't? Oh, my mistake. I guess it just seems that way.

Apology accepted although it is rather weasely.

You can't find any evidence so,you weaselsmear instead.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
guy cybershy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1021

posted 12 August 2008 11:19 AM      Profile for guy cybershy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Now on NPR they are discussing whether we should have done more to support Georgia, "our beleagered democratic ally". What a crock of shit!
From: Calgary | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 11:22 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
My dearest, Jester, even though everyone knew Harper said Canada should have joined the war in Iraq, but no one could actually quote him having said it. He is the master weasel words. It seems you might be his protege.

Anyway, this just in:

quote:
even as the Reagan administration condemned terrorism in the 1980s, it secretly armed the Nicaraguan contras who engaged in acts of terrorism inside Nicaragua. In 1990, when President George H.W. Bush denounced Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, everyone conveniently forgot that he had invaded Panama in 1989.

It has been as if the rules moved on separate tracks, one set for the United States and one set for everyone else - and it was impolite to notice.

Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, however, it has become harder to ignore Washington's double standards. Also, after the five-plus-year fiasco in Iraq, the Bush administration must confront both the limitations on its own imperial reach and the fact that it has done grave damage to the protocols of international behavior.

As Russia is now demonstrating in its conflict with Georgia, other big powers may want to play by the same do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do rules laid down by the United States.

It is a case of Washington, Bush and the neocons reaping what they have sown.



http://www.truthout.org/article/neocons-now-love-international-law

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 12 August 2008 11:22 AM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by guy cybershy:
Now on NPR they are discussing whether we should have done more to support Georgia, "our beleagered democratic ally". What a crock of shit!
NPR Translation please

From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Frustrated Mess
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8312

posted 12 August 2008 11:23 AM      Profile for Frustrated Mess   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
crock of shit!

Defining the language of diplomacy? See Jester.

From: doom without the gloom | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 11:26 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:
Here's an amusing assessment from a Russian who seems to know what's what ....


Who is it? Rather bang on,old stick.

In my amateur uninformed opinion, this is only the beginning of the humiliations US geoplitical asperations will face due more to a diminished capacity for financial reprisal than military.

The US uses NATO to provide legitimacy for its Pax Americana geopolitical objectives and uses the threat of economic repercussions to keep NATO in line. Hence the reluctance of NATO members' involvement in Afghanistan while paying lip service to American aims.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 11:29 AM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
jester: Who is it? Rather bang on, old stick.

http://02varvara.wordpress.com/

(Barbara-Marie Drezhlo)

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 11:53 AM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Every time Saakashvili opens his mouth they report every word despite the fact he is quite obviously deranged.

Some say the same thing about the leaders of Venezuela and Iran etc... At least Saakashvili was freely elected - more than you can say for a pseudo democracy like Russia where journalists who write articles criticizing Putin get murdered and where the entire mass media is pro-Putin without a single solitary critical voice.

I still can't fathom why people are trying to justify the Russian invasion of Georgia. If any other country in the world blatantly invaded another - you would all be calling for sanctions and reprisals etc...but for some reason Russia (in its current totally regressive, reaction form) is suddenly some sort of sacred cow.

is it that people are nostalgic for the USSR and have some kind of wistful fantasy that if Russia starts recapturing all the former Soviet socialist republics and reasserting itself as an imperialist super-power - before you know people will be singing the Internationale in Red Square again?

I think not. Today's Russia is essentially a Tsarist oligarchy.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
contrarianna
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13058

posted 12 August 2008 12:01 PM      Profile for contrarianna     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:

I still can't fathom why people are trying to justify the Russian invasion of Georgia.


I still can't fathom why people are trying to justify the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia.


From: here to inanity | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 12:16 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
To repeat an earlier assessment ...

quote:
It is hard to make forecasts in a constantly changing situation, but, from what information we have it seems that Russia’s main goal is to destroy Georgia’s military equipment and infrastructure, and deprive it of the ability to engage in active military operations. Russia is likely to continue bombing installations on Georgian territory, oust the Georgian troops from South Ossetia, and create a security belt around it, and around Abkhazia. At the same time, Russia will be limited in using heavy artillery for the reasons mentioned above. (mostly avoiding civilian casualties - N.Beltov)

How long will it take for observers critical of Russia's role here to notice that, although the Russians have their hand around the throat of Georgia - militarily speaking - they aren't squeezing? When the Russians slowly back off, as they surely will?

That is what I expect (and hope for). Saakashvili's plans for NATO membership, founded on the corpses of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is finished. As the same commentator noted ....

quote:
It is clear that an anti-Russian coalition does not exist. The operation is likely to be completed in the next few days, after which talks will be resumed. The future of the Georgian leadership is the most interesting political issue. Some experts believe that Russia may demand extradition of some of the Georgian leaders for trial for war crimes.

Saakashvili may be fighting for something more important than South Ossetia. And sooner, rather than later.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 12:20 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
If you look at any map South Ossetia has always been part of Georgia. If you think that 60,000 people in South Ossetia should secede and have their own Russian-puppet country - who should Chechnya also be free to secede from Russia.

Its funny how the Russians are all for secessionist movements in every country except their own.

If people think that little enclaves like Abhkazia and South Ossetia should secede from Georgia and join Russia - I'd love to hear reasons why if Quebec every voted Yes in a referendum to secede from Canada, every English-speaking or federalist municipality in Quebec shouldn't be free to secede from Quebec and join TROC.

I can just imagine, the scenerio: Quebec declares its independence from Canada, then the Outaouais region of Quebec plus the whole western half of Montreal declares itself to be separate from Quebec and Canada insists that everyone there is still a Canadian citizen - then Quebec tries to reassert sovereignty over these areas that have always been within the historical boundaries of Quebec, then the Canadian government attacks Montreal and pushes Quebecois troops out and starts bombing Quebec City - then Canada and Quebec each compete to see who can be seen as the "victim" in the court of world opinion and there you have it.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 12:25 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Ha ha. Once you master the basics of the national question, in Canada or any other country, then you can argue with the big boys and girls Stockholm.

Mind you, you might be a good satirist with your fine gift for exaggeration. Read some Swift and get back to me, eh?

Back to the topic of the thread. The French President has outlined a 6 point plan for peace:

quote:
“The first principle – not to use force. The second – to definitively stop all military actions. The third – to provide free access to humanitarian aid. The fourth – Georgia’s armed forces must return to the places of their permanent deployment. The fifth – Russia’s armed forces will be withdrawn to the positions preceding the beginning of the military actions. The sixth – the start of the international discussion of issues of the future status of South Ossetia and Abkhazia by means of guaranteeing their solid security,” Medveded said.

From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 12:29 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Here is an extremely important detail

quote:
Russia ’s Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, emphasized that the Georgian troops must return to their barracks.

All the rest will have no point without this condition. South Ossetian residents will hardly understand that they can return and restore their homes without this condition. If Georgia does not accept this condition, we will be forced to take other measures not to let the current situation, which has been formed as a result of Georgia’s aggression, repeat itself. This is the absolute condition for everything else,” Lavrov said.

“The fact that the president of France has completely agreed with that is important. We hope that the president of France will inform the Georgian administration of these principles,” the Russian foreign minister said.


Prevent them from doing the same thing again. Not to do harm. What's wrong with such principles? Don't medical doctors swear an oath to that effect?

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 12:39 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
In other words, the Russian elephant (population 190 million) sees a few Georgians (population 6 million) and screams "Eek! A mouse!".
From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 12:44 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Stockholm, I liked your anti-Quebec diatribes better. At least you weren't trivializing the dead with tales of rodents.

Got anything to say about the 6 points for peace? What's the matter? Did the Russian cat get your tongue?

That's what happens to bad little mice.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 12 August 2008 12:47 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Saakashvili may be fighting for something more important than South Ossetia. And sooner, rather than later

Yeah, like fighting off the Italian solution to Benito Mussolini


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 12:50 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
So, here they are again. The 6 points:

1. Not to use force;
2. to definitively stop all military actions;
3. to provide free access to humanitarian aid;
4. that Georgia's armed forces return to their places of permanent deployment;
5. that Russia's armed forces be withdrawn to the position preceding the beginning of the military actions;
6. begin international discussion on the future status of South Ossetia and Abkhazia by means of guaranteeing their security.


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 12 August 2008 12:53 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stockholm:

Its funny how the Russians are all for secessionist movements in every country except their own.

If people think that little enclaves like Abhkazia and South Ossetia should secede from Georgia and join Russia - I'd love to hear reasons why if Quebec every voted Yes in a referendum to secede from Canada, every English-speaking or federalist municipality in Quebec shouldn't be free to secede from Quebec and join TROC.

I can just imagine, the scenerio: Quebec declares its independence from Canada, then the Outaouais region of Quebec plus the whole western half of Montreal declares itself to be separate from Quebec and Canada insists that everyone there is still a Canadian citizen - then Quebec tries to reassert sovereignty over these areas that have always been within the historical boundaries of Quebec, then the Canadian government attacks Montreal and pushes Quebecois troops out and starts bombing Quebec City - then Canada and Quebec each compete to see who can be seen as the "victim" in the court of world opinion and there you have it.


You forgot to mention the 15 year time frame where the PQ allowed the Eastern Townships and the Inuit and Cree in the North to run their own autonomous regions. You also forgot to mention that to those people they have always been Canadians first just as I am not a BC'er first.

The second problem with your scenario is you forgot the part that after 10 years or so Quebec has decided to try to join the new Chinese lead Coalition of Nations and after receiving massive military aid from the Chinese and in fact after sending their own troops to put down insurgents in Tibet they decide to invade Hull and bomb all public facilities.

The passports of course is another issue. If the PQ were to win a referendum do you think that means the the 40% to 49% of the population that would have voted to remain Canadian would be instantly no longer citizens of Canada. I cannot see any Canadian government telling residents of Quebec that they are no longer entitled to a Canadian passport can you?

Again it seems the US pushes the envelope and people get hurt. What does Georgia have to do with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization? Should we rename it the NAABSTO. North Atlantic and Black Sea Treaty Organization.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 12:56 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Or Russia is pushing the envelope because they don't like having any neighbours that are not satellites.

This is a bit reminiscent of the Soviet invasion of Finland in 1939.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 01:19 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Not Out Of The Woods Yet

Interesting remarks.

quote:
With today’s announcement of an end to Russia’s “peace enforcement operation” in South Ossetia, President Dmitri Medvedev has (just about) rescued Russia’s reputation and brought the world back from the brink of unthinkable geopolitical disaster. But, it was a close call, and could yet be reversed.

Furthermore

quote:
Militarily it is well within Russia’s means to completely destroy the Georgian forces and occupy the country, and that is a temptation that President Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and their generals must have been struggling with. It would once and for all re-establish Russia’s might (especially in the Caucasia), humiliate NATO, and probably be the end of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, who has been a constant irritant to the Kremlin since he came to power in 2004. They could even install a pro-Russian regime. No one, it seemed, was going to stop them.

Yet it appears that Russia has backed off this scenario. The blogger attributes it, in part, to Putin's Orthodox religious views. But then, those are her views as well.

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 01:42 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
The Six Point Plan is a "Go".

So, now the French President will do some shuttle diplomacy. Looks good.

What is Canada doing? Why, providing aid to the aggressor, that's what. And nothing for the victims in South Ossetia. But then, we have a Conservative government, don't we?

quote:
International Co-Operation Minister Bev Oda announced Tuesday that Canada is contributing up to $1 million in aid to provide Georgians affected by the conflict with emergency medical care, safe water and other basic items such as blankets and clothing.

From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 12 August 2008 01:48 PM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:

Yet it appears that Russia has backed off this scenario. The blogger attributes it, in part, to Putin's Orthodox religious views. But then, those are her views as well.

ha! Would that the tsar's Orthodox religious views had restrained him.

ETA: Saakashvili, who no doubt also holds Orthodox religious views, is vowing revenge.

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: RosaL ]


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 01:51 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
What is Canada doing? Why, providing aid to the aggressor, that's what.

I didn't realize Canada provided aid to Russia. Doesn't Russia have enough nuclear bombs and oil revenue not to need Canada's help?


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 12 August 2008 01:55 PM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by N.Beltov:

Yet it appears that Russia has backed off this scenario. The blogger attributes it, in part, to Putin's Orthodox religious views. But then, those are her views as well.

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


I don't suppose that he feels he needs to go all the way and have Georgia's government replaced as Georgians are likely to do it themselves at this point.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
kropotkin1951
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2732

posted 12 August 2008 02:01 PM      Profile for kropotkin1951   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Canada provided aid for the carpetbaggers who stole the public treasury when the USSR collapsed.

That damn Putin though is acting like he heads an independent country with national security interests. I am outraged at any world leader who doesn't say ready aye ready when George II the Leader of the World says jump.

All Hail the Holy American Empire. Now let us rise face the flag and condemn those evil people in Eurasia.


From: North of Manifest Destiny | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:11 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
If the situation holds, and I hope it does, Medvedev and Putin will have done more harm to the planned anti-Russian fatwa than all the cultural exchanges and hockey games put together. Much of the anti-Russian propaganda is simply repetition of the crude cold war propaganda with a new veneer - but it isn't any less successful for all that.

Why hasn't the Russian bear overthrown the Georgian regime? They could have gotten rid of a big annoyance. Yet they haven't. This is going to drive the cold warriors mad with frothing foaming rage at a good war missed.

Maybe Fidel's remark yesterday about a flotilla of ships to attack Iran should be looked at more carefully. There's always Plan "B".

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:22 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Interfax reports that Saakashvili accepts the terms agreed by Russia and France. Woo hoo!
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:30 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
August 13 has been declared a National Day of Mourning in Russia "in connection with the tragic events in the unrecognized republic of South Ossetia and the death of a large number of Russian citizens there."
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 02:35 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Why hasn't the Russian bear overthrown the Georgian regime? They could have gotten rid of a big annoyance. Yet they haven't.

Let's get on our hands knees and express gratitude to the great compassion shown by Putin in not annhilating Georgia and wiping it off the face of the earth...while we're at it, should we also express gratitude to the US for its great "restraint" in not invading Cuba and for not invading Iran?? Let's also bow our heads in gratitude at the great humanitarians who govern Israel for their great restraint. If they wanted to, they could march to Beirut and occupy all of Lebanon - but out of the goodness of their hearts they didn't.

Tell me is "Beltov" a Russian name and that's why you have become the leading proponent of Russian imperialism and expansionism?


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:40 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Cold warrior Richard Holbrook has outlined the zealot's guide to the events of this weekend and suggested that

quote:
The Kremlin must also be put on notice that its own prestige project -- the Sochi Olympics in 2014 -- will be affected by its behavior.

... so the plan may very well be to sabotage the 2014 Sochi Olympics already.

Russia Crossed the Line says neocon Holbrook


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:49 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Stockholm: Tell me is "Beltov" a Russian name ... etc.

Beltov is a pseudonym used by an historical figure to avoid the heavy hand of the censors of the Tsarist autocracy. The author found that his books were burned before they could be distributed. Why don't you look it up?

Back to the subject at hand. The Russians have made it clear that they will respect the wishes of the Ossets and Abkhazians, whatever those wishes are ...

quote:
Can the Ossets and Abkhazians live within Georgia and do they want this? It’s the question to be put to them and they will give an unambiguous answer,” Medvedev said. “It is not for Russia or any other state to answer this question.

Smarter than the average bear. Woo hoo!

Territorial Integrity - It's up to them, not us!

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Agent 204
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4668

posted 12 August 2008 02:53 PM      Profile for Agent 204   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I wonder if any of this would have happened had the "Rose Revolution" not taken place? Would Shevardnadze have been as quick to pick a fight with the Russians as Saakashvili was?
From: home of the Guess Who | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 02:57 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I doubt it. Shevardnadze was Gorbachev's right hand man. Gorbachev himself came from just across the border in the Stavropol area.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
guy cybershy
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1021

posted 12 August 2008 02:58 PM      Profile for guy cybershy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Pravda tells Bush where to get off.

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/12-08-2008/106067-bushshutup-0


From: Calgary | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 03:05 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
That's just nasty. Check this out ...

quote:
President Bush,

Why don’t you shut up? How do you account for the fact that among the Georgian soldiers fleeing the fighting yesterday you could clearly hear officers using American English giving orders to “Get back inside” and how do you account for the fact that there are reports of American soldiers among the Georgian casualties? Kinda odd, eh?


Or this ...

quote:
So, why don’t you shut up? Oh and by the way, send some more of your military advisors to Georgia, they are doing a sterling job. And they look all funny down the night sight, all green. Hahaha!

The author suggests that the Russians look for WMDs ... in Tblisi. Just like in Iraq, etc.

However, it's good to see cooler heads prevail among the Russian leadership.

[ 12 August 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]


From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 03:07 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Can the Ossets and Abkhazians live within Georgia and do they want this? It’s the question to be put to them and they will give an unambiguous answer,” Medvedev said. “It is not for Russia or any other state to answer this question.

I guess that means Medvedev supports letting Chechnya declare its independence from Moscow!!

I notice that Russia was more than happy to funnel arms to Serbia to help it prevent any secession by Kosovo etc...

Let's not delude ourselves - the Russian leadership doesn't give a damn about the poor South Ossetians, this is all just a pretext to interfere in the internal affairs of Georgia and to try to re-establish a "cordon sanitaire" of satellites around Russia like in the good old days of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact.

How long before Russia invades Ukraine and the Baltic states using the pretext of having to protect Russian minorities in those countries. Kinda like how another would be super-power justified invading Czechoslovakia and Poland 70 years ago.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
N.Beltov
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4140

posted 12 August 2008 03:10 PM      Profile for N.Beltov   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Maybe you should put your efforts into a neocon-inspired sabotage of the Sochi Olympics. They're only 6 years away.
From: Vancouver Island | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stockholm
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3138

posted 12 August 2008 03:15 PM      Profile for Stockholm     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Suddenly you're soooo concerned about the Olympics?

Does that mean that if anyone criticized Gordon campbell its all part of a neocon conspiracy to sabotage the vancouver Olympics?

If anyone is a neocon its Putin and his ultra rightwing pseudo-Tsarist regime in Moscow.


From: Toronto | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 12 August 2008 03:18 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Oh golly gosh, would you look at the length of this thread.
From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca