Author
|
Topic: Fictional feminist role models
|
|
|
skdadl
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 478
|
posted 12 November 2004 09:51 PM
It wasn't that they were role models -- I'm not sure I believe in those.But almost all the women in really good fiction are real women, not princesses or goddesses but flawed (like me) and therefore interesting. The Annes and Emilys -- plain, but with imaginations! -- and later the Elizabeth Bennets and Emmas and Dorotheas helped me for a long time to survive a real world wherein women lived lies, where the ideal girl was a cheerleader who acquired a football player for a boyfriend and grew up to marry Father Knows Best. The real-world feminine models I knew were the fictions, the lies. The girls and women in the novels were much more like me. I don't think that I modelled myself on any one of them, but serious fiction taught me more about truth than my own popular culture and society did. And it was probably the authentic, flawed humanity of the women in those novels that was my first path in to understanding and caring about art. In real life, we lie all the time. Great fiction is great because it slices through and past the lies. Fiction is much truer than real life. Did the great women characters of C19-C20 novels become role models for me? No -- but they taught me my life's work; they were part of what drew me into believing in the truth of imaginative writing.
From: gone | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|