babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » walking the talk   » anti-racism news and initiatives   » 'Extinct' First Nation gets ancestral bones back

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: 'Extinct' First Nation gets ancestral bones back
April
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7882

posted 27 April 2005 01:59 PM      Profile for April     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
It is in this article:

[QUOTE] In March, the bones of two people were found near a traditional burial ground of the Sinixt First Nation in the West Kootenay region.

The federal Department of Indian Affairs declared the Sinixt people extinct in 1956 for the purposes of the Indian Act, so the provincial government asked two neighbouring First Nations if they wanted the remains.

But Marilyn James, the appointed spokesperson for the Sinixt or Arrow Lakes Indians, stepped forward to claim the bones instead.

"Because of our distinction of extinction, it's very hard for people to officially make contact with us," said James, who estimates there are still 6,800 Sinixt descendants alive in British Columbia and Washington state.
[QUOTE]


From: Montreal | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
verbatim
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 569

posted 27 April 2005 02:14 PM      Profile for verbatim   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Extinct according to the Indian Act? That's a new one for me. I understand that aboriginal rights can be extinguished by operation of law, but I've never heard of a tribe being extinguished. I mean, they're still there, right, so how can they be extinguished? It must be their rights the article is talking about, surely?
From: The People's Republic of Cook Street | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 27 April 2005 02:41 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
...extinct in 1956 for the purposes of the Indian Act...
They would not be legally defined as status Indians any more. I don't know details about their case. But I think it was around that time that the Dept of Indian Affairs tried to remove the status of a number of Cree people in Alberta because their ancestors were said to have been non-Indians; a noisy public campaign with lots of bad publicity forced the Dept to drop the attempt.

From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477

posted 27 April 2005 03:10 PM      Profile for Contrarian     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hugh Dempsey's book The Gentle Persuader, about the life of James Gladstone, talks about the events in Alberta. A new Indian Act was passed in 1951. Indian political groups had worked to get rid of some proposed measures for the Act, but it still contained a clause allowing the Minister to expel people from reserves if there was doubt that they belonged on the band list. In 1956-57 one judge ruled that over 100 people living on the reserves at Hobbema could be expelled; this was eventually overturned on appeal. Meanwhile it was a big political football with the Conservatives attacking the Liberal governmen for being callous, breaking promises, etc., and may have contributed to the Conservative election victory.

Over the years Indians have always had the ability to become enfranchised, that is to choose to cease to be status Indians and to vote, pay taxes etc. Some have chosen this, most have not. But there was always some movement back and forth; people ceasing to be Indians and taking half-breed scrip, and vice versa. Sometimes the Indian Act also allowed the Dept of Indian Affairs to enfranchise Indians against their will, though I do not think that was exercised very much. And sometimes an Indian band would become extinct, if the members became enfranchised, or transferred membership to a different band. I don't know just what happened with the Sinixt.

[ 27 April 2005: Message edited by: Contrarian ]


From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
BleedingHeart
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3292

posted 27 April 2005 03:20 PM      Profile for BleedingHeart   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
My brothers firm did some work in the Castlegar area and were required by law to subcontract some work to First Nations and actually had a Mohawk contractor do the work because they couldn't find a local FN contractor.
From: Kickin' and a gougin' in the mud and the blood and the beer | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
arborman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4372

posted 27 April 2005 07:40 PM      Profile for arborman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And that is vaguely relevant because why?
From: I'm a solipsist - isn't everyone? | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Coyote
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4881

posted 27 April 2005 07:52 PM      Profile for Coyote   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by BleedingHeart:
My brothers firm did some work in the Castlegar area and were required by law to subcontract some work to First Nations and actually had a Mohawk contractor do the work because they couldn't find a local FN contractor.
My brother says your brother smells. Phbbbt.

From: O’ for a good life, we just might have to weaken. | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca