Author
|
Topic: Getting my A, B, and C's - Have multivitamins become a basic food group?
|
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 16 February 2007 04:40 AM
I would recommend a powder multi-vitamin called Multi-Force by Prairie Naturals. As a vegetarian, who eats no junk food and a lot of greens, I still do not get my recommended dosage of vitamins thus the Multi-Force (also contains Minerals), which I mix in a blender with two scoops of Soy and/or Whey protein, Udo's essential oils, some pineapple juice, some soy yogurt and some fresh fruit (usually a banana for maximum potassium). This combination is recommended for active people, as the Multi-Force contains 21g of carbohydrates, which are essential for working out. One of these shakes a day and I feel great the entire day, have much more energy and feel healthy physically.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
malex
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13797
|
posted 16 February 2007 12:06 PM
quote: Originally posted by Sineed:Though if foods have gotten less nutritious over the last 50 years, why are kids bigger than ever? I don't mean obesity; I mean height. Seems commonplace these days for teenage boys to be well over six feet.[/QB]
yeah, i hear you...girls too...but i'm not sure this is a matter of mere nutrients...i'm sure genetics play some role as well...
From: toronto | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
malex
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13797
|
posted 16 February 2007 12:09 PM
quote: Originally posted by Stargazer: I would recommend a powder multi-vitamin called Multi-Force by Prairie Naturals. As a vegetarian, who eats no junk food and a lot of greens, I still do not get my recommended dosage of vitamins thus the Multi-Force (also contains Minerals), which I mix in a blender with two scoops of Soy and/or Whey protein, Udo's essential oils, some pineapple juice, some soy yogurt and some fresh fruit (usually a banana for maximum potassium). This combination is recommended for active people, as the Multi-Force contains 21g of carbohydrates, which are essential for working out. One of these shakes a day and I feel great the entire day, have much more energy and feel healthy physically.
thanks for the tip! i will have to investigate...i forgot to mention i'm a student with little income to spare...
From: toronto | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sineed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11260
|
posted 16 February 2007 07:21 PM
Even though I (sometimes) take a multivitamin just to make sure I get a little bit of everything, I'm not sure all these supplements are a good thing. We did not evolve under circumstances where we consumed large quantities of any single nutrient, so I doubt we need them. I'm kinda leery about all these protein powders, Greens, etc, which may have long-term toxicities of which we are not yet aware.When I was in school, we were taught that taking large amounts of fat-soluble vitamins had the potential to be toxic (such as Vitamin A) and taking large amounts of the water-soluble vitamins made for expensive urine. In the past twenty years, I have seen or read nothing to moderate this opinion. Basically, I figure looking after your health in a general way is going to do more for you than popping bee pollen or cider vinegar, whatever. Though speaking of not looking after your health, in my younger days, when I would go out drinking and then have to open the drug store way early in the morning, I would take Maltlevol to help set things right. I haven't worked regular retail in a while and don't know if they still make the stuff, but basically it's sherry with lots of B vitamins and was my favourite hangover remedy especially if one has to work an 8 to 10 hour shift under banks of painfully bright fluorescent lights.
From: # 668 - neighbour of the beast | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 18 February 2007 11:28 AM
I think if you lift weights and work out at least 4 - 5 times a week, a large amount of protein is absolutely necessary. I also don't think there is anything wrong with taking multi-vitamins, especially if you cannot manage the 6 small meals recommended daily. My goal is not to bulk up, but to gain weight through adding muscle mass naturally. Your body needs carbs and protein in order for it to work at this level. I also prefer the defined look. To me the back is incredibly sexy and a nice defined back is even better. Likewise arms and abs. Thanks for that info 500_apples. I'm not really aware so much of the effects of creatine. All I have heard is that it increases water retention but what you said makes sense. Here is a good link on protein: Protein for Active People
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Sineed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11260
|
posted 18 February 2007 04:05 PM
quote: There's many a pro level athelete (Shawne Merriman being most recent) who claim "tainted" supplements as a reason they've failed performance enhancing drug tests. Maybe they aren't all lying.
Yeah, I think it's possible. Sometimes Health Canada does inspections of "traditional" medicines being sold in downtown Toronto, and they find them containing real pharmaceuticals, like warfarin, furosemide, antibiotics, etc. If I were an elite-level athlete, I'd try to do it with diet only, other than multivitamins manufactured in Canada. I'd avoid imported supplements at all costs.Farmpunk, what's your opinion of organic produce/meats? Better? A scam? I have sometimes bought them, but it makes me uneasy to spend all this money when often I can't tell the difference. I've noticed the organic meats taste a lot better, however. But with something like carrots, well, a carrot's a carrot.
From: # 668 - neighbour of the beast | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955
|
posted 18 February 2007 04:48 PM
Putting aside the politics and production of food (like I've ever been able to do that while posting on babble... but moving on), from what I've read the biggest gains in nutrition are to be had through the proper production of meat, which just so happens to be the most sustainable production methods, as well. Like managed pasture, grass fed and finished beef. Of course, that's where I get into discussions with vegetarians and vegans. There's also quite a lot of evidence about organic veggies producing more nutritous food, but the lines aren't as clear, to me, and the gains not as obvious. Taste is very subjective. Being honest, picky eaters make me cringe. The cost of organics is also hard to put a finger on. I've argued on many occasions that high quality, low cost food would be one of the easiest societal changes to enact through the political process, and should be high on the list of any progressive person's agenda. But the food industry and government status quo is so immensely stacked against a change like that (farmers as paid public servants, for instance; rural-urban partnerships) that it's not even on the radar.
From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955
|
posted 18 February 2007 05:30 PM
All plants, and animals, need to eat to live. Agriculture is nothing but managing a natural process, tweaking it, or improving it in a way to get the results you want. Would people rather get their vitamins from a plastic container labeled Multivitamin, or eat apples? I know, as a consumer, exactly what an apple is. I don't know what a supplement is made of, where it comes from, how far it's traveled to get into my system, nothing. It's a manufactured product, in every sense. There's nothing a supplement can do that nature hasn't provided in one food or another.
From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 20 February 2007 04:30 AM
quote: Being honest, picky eaters make me cringe.
I don't consider being a 'picky eater' a bad thing. After all, isn't that what you are advocating? Picky eating? Jesus what is with the people who have issues with other people's food intake? I eat what is healthy for me. Not to please you or other vegan\vegetarian haters. Meat is NOT healthy, especially the crap bought at grocery stores. No amount of propaganda from anyone is going to convince me eating anything without first doing research and deciding what is best FOR ME is an issue they need to be concerned with. You don't see or hear me deriding meat eaters for all their shitty choices in food do you? How about I start in on people who eat eggs, and fast foods, and fill their bodies up with junk food. What I put in my body is my business. I'll be 42 next year and I can guarantee you my health is better than a lot of people half my age.
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sineed
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11260
|
posted 20 February 2007 07:02 AM
But there's a difference between picky eaters and being particular about what you eat. Making appropriate food choices is a separate issue from people who kick up a fuss over the food not being prepared exactly the way they like.For instance, now that my kids are older, they are less picky. That is to say, they are now less likely to treat me like a server in a fancy restaurant who will take the food back and switch it if there's too much pepper or if the peas accidently got mixed in with the mashed potatoes. AND, because my kids are now less picky, I am finding it easier to make appropriate food choices because they are more willing to eat (or at least try) tofu, sweet potatoes, bok choy, and other healthy things. I would even argue that pickiness is an enemy of good nutrition. Picky eaters like a small number of foods, good for them or no. Two-year-olds who will only eat macaroni and cheese and peanut butter sandwiches on white bread would be a classic example.
From: # 668 - neighbour of the beast | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684
|
posted 20 February 2007 10:21 AM
Hey,Can someone suggest a link to an eating locally for dummies article, benefits and such? It doesn't strike me as self-evident that it's necessarily bad for fruits to come from california, florida... the only argument I can think is that invasive species destroy local ecosystems. What do local eaters do for fruits/vegetables in the winter? Relatively local foods like stuff from latin america? Thanks.
From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
oreobw
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13754
|
posted 20 February 2007 11:19 AM
Local stores do carry lots of local stuff during season (in my area of Toronto).But it is hard to find local green vegs,tomatoes, etc in February. Also, local orange juice in Ontario? So what's wrong with Florida orange juice. Actually, I have the feeling I might be missing the point here, but for most stuff (food and otherwise) I try to buy local, and if I can't then US then elsewhere. [ 20 February 2007: Message edited by: oreobw ]
From: Toronto | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 20 February 2007 12:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by 500_Apples: It doesn't strike me as self-evident that it's necessarily bad for fruits to come from california, florida... the only argument I can think is that invasive species destroy local ecosystems.
Anything's possible when political conservatives are running the show. There's been tainted spinach from California to dirty water in Walkerton and Kashechewan. Timeline: E. coli contamination in Canada Even though food supply is a top priority for every civilization since time immemorial, Canada subsidizes its farmers the least among developed nations. And after the most idiotic free trade agreements in the history of the world were signed, our food regulations and health standards will suffer by integration with the world's most wasteful and dangerous economy to the south of us.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955
|
posted 20 February 2007 04:48 PM
The idea is that a person should attempt to eat the food of your region, that CAN be grown locally, ahead of anything else, year round. I know the Ontario market best, so that's where I'll place my examples.Winter\February veggie eating, and what should be availible "fresh": sweet potatoes, cabbage of different types and hues, potatoes, carrots, onions, squash... Roots crops, easily stored, likely with little refridgeration. I grow and eat a long storage cabbage that gets as big as bowling balls and keeps for six months or better. The outside layers might get mucky but they peel off easily. I also eat my own red onions until spring. I should grow my own carrots and sweet potatoes, and potatoes, but don't. I do freeze and preserve all kinds of food that isn't locally availible in the winter. Making preserves is a lost art, and it's very simple. I do not buy hot house tomatoes. They taste like shit, for one thing, in comparison to the real outdoor deal, and growing tomatoes in a greenhouse in the winter does not make sense to me. Eat locally, eat seasonally, buy whole foods. In southern Ontario, we are, weather permitting, only a couple months away from asparagus season. Follow the natural cycles of what's growing in your backyard (literally, or locally) and you'll be very surprised at the variety. The reasons why people should concentrate on these types of eating patterns is simple, when you think about it. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Cali produce in our grocery stores (or the Washington state apples that drive me insane) are sold at a cost that does not reflec the true cost of getting that item into your grocery bag. If you're on the west coast, Cali produce makes sense. Cali produce in Toronto does not. Of course, that's just vegetables. In a true seasonal, local arrangement, a lot of nutrition would come from meat. Wintertime being the slaughter season for pork and beef. But, as the original post reminds us, there's often times not a lot of nutrition in the food we eat. A problem I believe is exaggerated in meat production.
From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
500_Apples
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12684
|
posted 20 February 2007 08:55 PM
quote: The reasons why people should concentrate on these types of eating patterns is simple, when you think about it. Suffice it to say, for now, that the Cali produce in our grocery stores (or the Washington state apples that drive me insane) are sold at a cost that does not reflec the true cost of getting that item into your grocery bag. If you're on the west coast, Cali produce makes sense. Cali produce in Toronto does not.
Why is the cost of Cali produce so low? Ignorant answer: Probably agriculture is an easier profession in California. I mean, it's california, so I really doubt it's cheap wages. Are pesticides subsidized in California? I'm not trying to argue anything, just trying to know what's going on.
From: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Farmpunk
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12955
|
posted 21 February 2007 02:03 AM
500-A,Labour not cheap in Cali? Not to be an enourmous dick, but you have to be kidding. Big agriculture, including the organic operations, in Cali is based almost entirely upon the modern day version of slave labour in the US: illegal Mexicans. Even grown in Ontario produce is subject to a version of this. The migrant worker programs. 20 thousand of them in ag last year, I believe, with many more coming to many industries across the board very soon. Who's outsmarting whom here? US ag is subsidized, across the board, and is likely tied in with trucking-shipping business. Only so much mixed lettuce can fit into a transport. How much does it cost to get that produce to Toronto, say, or Montreal, in diesel alone? Not counting the cost of the driver's salary? Plus the basic production cost of the produce itself.
From: SW Ontario | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|