Author
|
Topic: Native Studies 101
|
|
Contrarian
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6477
|
posted 30 March 2005 03:30 AM
It's a big area. You could start by reading the Royal Commission Report on Aboriginal Peoples Report [5 volumes]; or at least read the Highlights book. They are at this link. You can download them in a bunch of PDF files; or check with your public and university libraries; chances are they may have the paper books.This site has a lot of links. There are general histories of aboriginal peoples in Canada by Olive Dickason, J.R. Miller and Arthur Ray; Dickason's is the most comprehensive. I don't know a lot about the art angle; you might try the Glenbow Museum's art collection and museum collection.
From: pretty far west | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594
|
posted 30 March 2005 05:59 AM
I think that Sitting Bull was very heroic in leading the Sioux to the great grandmother's land(Canada) and ferociously defensive of his people's rights to freedom during. His actions spoke louder than any words he may have said, imo.And if Chief Crazy Horse never said this, it still sounds alright by me. quote:
We did not ask you white men to come here. The Great Spirit gave us this country as a home. You had yours. We did not interfere with you. The Great Spirit gave us plenty of land to live on, and buffolor, deer, antelope and other game. But you have come here, you are taking my land from me, you are killing off our game, so it hard for us to live. Now, you tell us to work for a living, but the Great Spirit did not make us to work, but to live by hunting. You white men can work if you want to. We did not interfere with you, and again you say why do you not become civilized? We do not want your civilization! We would live as our fathers did, and their fathers before them. " - Chief Crazy Horse
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 30 March 2005 09:09 AM
From the 19th century, there is "Black Elk Speaks", which I linked to on another page. More recently, there are the writings of Ward Churchill, e.g. "A Little Matter of Genocide". I have some problems with his analysis, and he's definitely controversial, even among indigenous activists, but he's provocative and political. Some people have cast doubts on his claim to be native, or his claim to have been with the AIM. I have no way of verifying either the claim or the doubts, or who their ultimate source is, so there you have it. There is "Stolen from Our Embrace", a book about the mass abduction and forced assimilation of First Nations kids by the Canadian state. There is "As Long as this Land Shall Last", by Rene Fumoleau. It is a meticulous documentation of the signing of Treaty 8 and Treaty 11, including interviews with the surviving elders who attended the ceremony, and whose testimony was crucial in a key court ruling that the Canadian government hadn't acted in good faith and that the intent of the original agreements was not to extinguish aboriginal title (forcing renegotiation of treaties in the Northwest Territories, a process that is still ongoing, I believe). Google Rene Fumoleau and you will find an online collection of 10,000 of his photos of the North at the Prince of Wales Heritage Centre. There is this website of interviews with Saskatchewan elders: http://www.lights.com/sicc/index.html Here is a good collection of stories by Cree and Dene elders: http://collections.ic.gc.ca/tales Check out the other things at the Aboriginal Collections project: http://collections.ic.gc.ca/E/SL_FirstPeoples.asp You should also check out The Indigenous Environmental Network at http://www.ienearth.org/ Red Wire Magazine: http://www.redwiremag.com/ Dene Youth Alliance: http://www.deneyouthalliance.ca/ There's much more but hopefully this is a start.
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rasmus
malcontent
Babbler # 621
|
posted 30 March 2005 11:59 AM
The controversy seems to be about Black Elk's conversion to Christianity, and John Neihardt's agenda in rewriting the interviews. See this website here, which I just found by googling (no idea about the reliablity or bias of this site): quote:
WHY IS BLACK ELK SO CONTROVERSIAL?The undeniable facts are that from 1881 to 1904 Black Elk was an active, respected medicine man among the Lakota and that from 1904 to 1950 he was an active, respected catechist (or instructor) for Christianity among the Lakota. However, interpretations of his life vary widely. Here are several that have been proposed by scholars: 1. Black Elk believed only in his native Lakota religion; he practiced Christianity only to make money. 2. Black Elk totally rejected his native religion for Christianity. 3. Black Elk accepted the truths of both the Lakota religion and Christianity but regarded them separately. 4. Black Elk accepted the truths of both religions and developed a sophisticated framework in which Christianity became the fulfillment of his Lakota religion. In recent years the last hypothesis is gaining some acceptance. Black Elk was a profound religious thinker (far more profound than his elitist biographer John Neihardt). In spite of being nearly blind Black Elk had taught himself the written Lakota language. He not only read the Bible but felt obligated to have scholars (John Neihardt and Joseph Epes Brown) record the ancient, sacred beliefs of the Lakota. To learn Black Elk’s actual testimony, avoid the doctored book Black Elk Speaks in favor of the more accurate The Sixth Grandfather. To get the flavor of the raging controversy, sample The Black Elk Reader (2000)—as supposed scholars fling misinformation, distorted facts and self-serving interpretations at each other.
http://www.heroesofhistory.com/page89.htmlThis book presents the transcripts of the interviews with Black Elk (as opposed to Neihardt's rewritten version). Here is a list of other Lakota/Dakota lives. As to other books, while everything has its problems, books by Norval Morriseau and Basil Johnston (Legends of My People: The Great Ojibway; Ojibway Heritage; Ojibway Ceremonies etc.) recounting Ojibway stories and beliefs are quite useful. There is this history of the Ojibway people.
There is also "The Destruction of California Indians", a documentary history edited by Robert Fleming Heizer, published by Bison Books (University of Nebraska Press). Kohkominawak otacimowiniwawa / Our Grandmothers' Lives as Told in Their Own Words: Told by Glecia Bear, Irene Calliou, Janet Feitz, Minnie Fraser, Alpha Lafond, Rosa Longneck, Mary Wells. Freda Ahenakew and H. C. Wolfart, eds. and trans. Saskatoon: Fifth House Publishers, 1992, 408 pp. Fifth House also reprints "Sacred Tales of the Sweet Grass Cree", transcribed and edited by Leonard Bloomfeld in 1925. The Counselling Speeches of Jim Kâ-Nîpitęhtęw A 6-part televised history of the Ojibwe people There is a lot of material out there. [ 30 March 2005: Message edited by: rasmus raven ]
From: Fortune favours the bold | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
swallow
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2659
|
posted 30 March 2005 01:18 PM
Wright's Stolden Continents is one of the most readable of the histories, and has the great virtue of the comparative approach which ignores colonial borders. Sources are a problem: most books rest on research sources drawn from newcomer archives. One interesting attempt to use indigenous memory as a counter-source is The True Spirit and Original Intent of Treaty 7. It's impossible to read this and still believe that Canada's extension of its rule over the prairies had even an iota of justice about it. The numbered treaties should really be studied as Canada's first foreign relations, not as part of domestic political history. Arthur Ray's Bounty and Benevolence is also good on the numbered treaties. On native-newcomer relations in Canada, J.R. Miller's book Syscrapers Hide the Heavens is good, as is the collection Miller edited, Sweet Promises. The Black Elk stuff reminds me of the different views around the syncretic Iroquois prophet Handsome Lake. Much of what's written about him is controversial. Death and Rebirth of the Seneca by Anthony Wallace is one view. I found Gerald Alfred's Heeding the Voices of Our Ancestors to be the best book on contemproary Mohawk nationalism. These two are good antidotes to the common theme of decline in too many books. First nations nationalism is real and growing, a theme overlooked all too often. Finally, there's all too much romanticism and colonizer-imposed rhetoric in the way first nations are regarded historically and today. Two books look at the construction of images by the dominant culture: The Imaginary indian by Daniel Francis on Canada, and Dressign in Feathers, edited by Elizabeth Bird, on the US.
From: fast-tracked for excommunication | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061
|
posted 30 March 2005 06:04 PM
Rasmus thanks so much for the information re: Black Elk.April, the following forums are pretty decent: Turtle Island.org and First nations forums
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|