babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Pat "The Hulk" Robertson

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Pat "The Hulk" Robertson
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 27 May 2006 06:13 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
God does work in mysterious ways.

quote:

Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says he has leg-pressed 2,000 pounds, but some say he'd be in a pretty tough spot if he tried.

The "700 Club" host's feat of strength is recounted on the Web site of his Christian Broadcasting Network, in a posting headlined "How Pat Robertson Leg Pressed 2,000 Pounds."

According to the CBN Web site, Robertson worked his way up to lifting a ton with the help of his physician, who is not named. The posting does not say when the lift occurred, but a CBN spokeswoman released photos to The Associated Press that she said showed Robertson lifting 2,000 pounds in 2003, when Robertson was 73. He is now 76.

The Web posting said two men loaded the leg-press machine with 2,000 pounds "and then let it down on Mr. Robertson, who pushed it up one rep and let it go back down again." The Web site said several people witnessed the event, and shows video of Robertson leg-pressing what appears to be 1,000 pounds.

Clay Travis of CBS SportsLine.com called the 2,000-pound assertion impossible in a column this week, writing that the leg-press record for football players at Florida State University is 665 pounds less.

"Where in the world did Robertson even find a machine that could hold 2,000 pounds at one time?" Travis asked.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060526/ap_on_re_us/robertson2000


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Boom Boom
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7791

posted 27 May 2006 07:14 AM      Profile for Boom Boom     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Robertson continues to act like a horse's ass. Why am I not surprised?
From: Make the rich pay! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
cco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8986

posted 27 May 2006 09:20 AM      Profile for cco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think the key part of the article is this:

quote:
The CBN Web site attributes Robertson's energy in part to "his age-defying protein shake." The site offers a recipe for the shake, which contains ingredients such as soy protein isolate, whey protein isolate, flaxseed oil and apple cider vinegar.

From: Montréal | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 27 May 2006 09:59 AM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The fundamentalists are really into nutritionist quackery these days. Pat Robertson is far from the biggest player in that court. One popular notion is that modern nutritionist ideas should address God's dietary stipulations given to the Israelites, and incorporate them into a modern dietary system, producing a largely kosher Christian nutrition system.
From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 27 May 2006 10:07 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Not sure why he'd bother telling the world about his "feat". It's actually a lot less impressive than it sounds. If you watch the video of his 1,000 pound leg presses you'll see two things - first, he's using a 45 degree leg press machine so 2,000 pounds of plates equate to a little over 1,400 pounds of force required to move them. Secondly and more importantly, he's doing partial reps - literally moving the plates a few inches. That keeps them well within his strongest range of motion and really lets you pile on the weight.

While a lot of people disagree with the author of the following link he's been pushing static contraction training for years.

quote:
when a power rack or Smith machine is used to limit the range of motion to only the strongest and safest part of the movement, enormously more weight can be used to safely target the same muscles. How much more? I work with clients who have built up to 600+ pound partial bench presses, 1,000+ pound barbell shrugs and 3,000+ pound leg presses. (My 13-year-old daughter can do 1,000 pound partial leg presses.)
emphasis added

While I can't testify for his daughter there is a woman at my gym that regularly cranks of 20 or more reps this way with over 1,000 pounds on the leg press machine - before somebody comments, while not tiny she's hardly big or a bodybuilder type.

[ 27 May 2006: Message edited by: abnormal ]


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
otter
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12062

posted 27 May 2006 10:50 AM      Profile for otter        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Then can we assume that when Robertson has to kick himself in the ass the next time he makes an asinine comment to the press he will really be getting the boot he deserves?
From: agent provocateur inc. | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 May 2006 01:43 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I knew as soon as I read the first sentence of the first post that this was basically Robertson lying in order to push his protein shake. It amazes me that this asshole hasn't been investigated by the IRS yet - doesn't he use his religious mininstry web site to push his products? "Buy my stuff, in Jesus' name, amen."

[ 27 May 2006: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Stargazer
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6061

posted 27 May 2006 02:57 PM      Profile for Stargazer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He has a protein shake? Well, this all makes sense now...
From: Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 27 May 2006 03:10 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Robertson lying
about what??

What part of 3,000 pund plus leg presses don't you understand. Bluntly, 2,000 pounds is chump change. The only impressive thing is his age. The weights really belong to little people.

By the way, the world record squat is in the order of 1,100 pounds - that is order of magnitude beyond a 1,300 pound leg press. And I do mean, orders of magnitude. As an official gym rat, I would stand aside in awe watching a 1,000 pound squat. A ton on a leg press wouldn't attract anyone.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
-=+=-
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7072

posted 27 May 2006 04:20 PM      Profile for -=+=-   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hugo Chavez better watch out.
From: Turtle Island | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 27 May 2006 09:38 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fred Hatfield lifted 1,014 pounds doing it the real way at age 45. That's very good.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 28 May 2006 12:20 PM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Fidel,

Good point - the world record squat is in the neighbourhood of 1,100 pounds. Given that the lifter has to lift his bodyweight as well (which means a grand total of about 1,400 pounds) I'm surprised that the "world record" leg press is only 1,350 or so.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Yst
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9749

posted 28 May 2006 01:53 PM      Profile for Yst     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by abnormal:

What part of 3,000 pund plus leg presses don't you understand. Bluntly, 2,000 pounds is chump change. The only impressive thing is his age. The weights really belong to little people.

You appear to be wrong about this. The various mainstream media publications which bothered to check out the claim or consult outside sources are all in agreement that Robertson has to be lying. For example, from CBS Sportsline:

quote:
There is no way on earth Robertson leg presses 2,000 pounds. That would mean a 76-year-old man broke the all-time Florida State University leg press record by 665 pounds over Dan Kendra. 665 pounds. Further, when he set the record, they had to modify the leg press machine to fit 1,335 pounds of weight. Plus, Kendra's capillaries in his eyes burst. Burst. Where in the world did Robertson even find a machine that could hold 2,000 pounds at one time? And how does he still have vision?

From: State of Genderfuck | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
cco
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8986

posted 28 May 2006 09:59 PM      Profile for cco     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Your link is broken.
From: Montréal | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 08 June 2006 05:38 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey, I'm watching George on The Hour, and he just got around to this story tonight.

Is it a bad thing that I'm actually starting to really like this show?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
paxamillion
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2836

posted 08 June 2006 06:35 PM      Profile for paxamillion   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by -=+=-:
Hugo Chavez better watch out.

Pat's going to squat lift him? Or give him one of those shakes of his?

[ 08 June 2006: Message edited by: paxamillion ]


From: the process of recovery | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca