babble home
rabble.ca - news for the rest of us
today's active topics


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
FAQ | Forum Home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» babble   » current events   » international news and politics   » Spitzer cont'd

Email this thread to someone!    
Author Topic: Spitzer cont'd
robbie_dee
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 195

posted 12 March 2008 05:31 PM      Profile for robbie_dee     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
New York Times: The Woman at the Center of the Governor's Downfall

quote:
She left a broken home on the Jersey Shore at 17 and came to New York City to work the nightclubs as a rhythm and blues singer. Now, at 22, she is the unwitting, and as yet unseen, star of the seamy drama that is the downfall of Gov. Eliot Spitzer of New York.

Kristen, the high-priced prostitute described in a federal affidavit as having had a rendezvous with Mr. Spitzer on Feb. 13 at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, has spent the last few days in her ninth-floor apartment in the Flatiron district of Manhattan. On Monday, she made a brief appearance in federal court, where a lawyer was appointed to represent her. She is expected to be a witness in the case against four people charged with operating a prostitution ring called the Emperor’s Club V.I.P.

In a series of telephone interviews on Tuesday night, she said she had slept very little over the past week, with all the stress of the case.

“I just don’t want to be thought of as a monster,” the woman said as she told the tiniest tidbits of her story.

Born Ashley Youmans but now known as Ashley Alexandra Dupré, she spoke softly and with good humor as she added with significant understatement: “This has been a very difficult time. It is complicated.”

She has not been charged.



From: Iron City | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 12 March 2008 05:42 PM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Alan Dershowitz weighs in.
quote:
True to form, political journalists are towing the “boys will be boys” and “the leak was political” party line. Likewise, Alan Dershowitz’s statements about Spitzer, his former research assistant, occupied a crowning position in a March 11 New York Times article:

“Men go to prostitutes — big deal, that’s not a story in most parts of the world,” Mr. Dershowitz said.

But he also said he had been surprised when Mr. Spitzer prosecuted a prostitution ring in 2004. “I always thought he was somebody who would come down on crimes with real victims,” Mr. Dershowitz said. “Prostitutes aren’t victims — they’re getting paid a thousand dollars an hour, and the johns aren’t victims. What upset me the most was that they wiretapped thousands of e-mails and phone calls. In an age when terrorism needs to be stopped, they’re devoting these kinds of resources to a prostitution ring?”

What’s wrong with this picture?

Liberal apologists seeking to normalize Spitzer’s behavior are forced to resort to the same lies about prostitution indulged by Dershowitz. They ignore the fact that by defending men’s right to paid sex with women, they applaud the atrocious exploitation of the same sorts of market inequalities they decry when the victims are blue-collar workers.

Long duped into believing that treating the sex industry as legitimate work will foster a more “humane prostitution” while satisfying natural, male impulses, such liberals deny prostitution’s well-documented harms. In fact, the condescension that allows the confounding of prostitution with legitimate, but unpleasant labor betrays a strong bias, both against workers and against women. - Source



From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 12 March 2008 06:12 PM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Spitzer is also a superdelegate for Hillary Clinton. So Clinton is now down one superdelegate as well with the resignation.

Spitzer spoils it for Clinton. Another woman he's let down.

[ 12 March 2008: Message edited by: mary123 ]


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 12 March 2008 06:44 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Myth of the Victimless Crime
By MELISSA FARLEY and VICTOR MALAREK

WHAT do we know about the woman Gov. Eliot Spitzer allegedly hired as a prostitute? She was the one person he ignored in his apology. What is she going through now? Is she in danger from organized crime because of what she knows? Is anyone offering her legal counsel or alternatives to prostitution?
"I'm here for a purpose," she said in a conversation with her booking agent after meeting with Governor Spitzer, according to the affidavit of the F.B.I agent who investigated the prostitution ring. "I know what my purpose is. I'm not a ... moron, you know what I mean."
Her purpose, as a man who knew patiently explained, is "renting" out an organ for 10 minutes. Men rent women through the Internet or by cellphone as if they were renting a car. And now, in response to the news about Governor Spitzer, pundits are wading into the age-old debates over whether prostitution is a victimless crime or whether women are badly hurt in prostitution no matter what they're paid.
Whose theory is it that prostitution is victimless? It's the men who buy prostitutes who spew the myths that women choose prostitution, that they get rich, that it's glamorous and that it turns women on.
But most women in prostitution, including those working for escort services, have been sexually abused as children, studies show. Incest sets young women up for prostitution -- by letting them know what they're worth and what's expected of them. Other forces that channel women into escort prostitution are economic hardship and racism.
The Emperor's Club presented itself as an elite escort service. But aside from charging more, it worked like any other prostitution business. The pimps took their 50 percent cut. The Emperor's Club often required that the women provide sex twice an hour. One woman who was wiretapped indicated that she couldn't handle that pressure. The ring operated throughout the United States and Europe. The transport of women for prostitution was masked by its description as "travel dates."
Telephone operators at the Emperor's Club criticized one of the women for cutting sessions with buyers short so that she could pick up her children at school. "As a general rule," one said, "girls with children tend to have a little more baggage going on."
Whether the woman is in a hotel room or on a side street in someone's car, whether she's trafficked from New York to Washington or from Mexico to Florida or from the city to the suburbs, the experience of being prostituted causes her immense psychological and physical harm. And it all starts with the buyer.

Melissa Farley is the author of
Prostitution and Trafficking in Nevada: Making the Connections.
Victor Malarek is the author of The Natashas: Inside the New Global Sex Trade.


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
SubHuman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7740

posted 12 March 2008 08:23 PM      Profile for SubHuman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Melissa Farley, Get a Life!, by Karly Kirchner
quote:
"Whose theory is it that prostitution is victimless?.."
Um, to many of the women who do it, that's not just a theory. Do their voices matter at all? Unlike you, Ms. Farley, we actually have some experience to base our perspective on and we understand the realities of the sex industry better than you ever will...
New York Sex Worker Organizations Respond to Spitzer Scandal

[ 12 March 2008: Message edited by: SubHuman ]


From: nexus of the crisis | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 March 2008 08:49 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
That's what he gets for trying to give Wall Street a black eye. He's lucky they didn't have him stuffed in an oil drum and floated to Ireland, or thrown out a tenth story window.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 12 March 2008 09:53 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
That's what he gets for trying to give Wall Street a black eye. He's lucky they didn't have him stuffed in an oil drum and floated to Ireland, or thrown out a tenth story window.
Ya, I kinda agree with that observation, and would add that is what he gets for thinking more about his dick than his family and his Govenorship.

From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 12 March 2008 10:01 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He's human and has human desires and needs. And so Spitzer frigs around on the side. They were probably watching him for months on end and making notes of his routines, his appetites, and always the very human weaknesses for sure. I bet plan-b was that he suicided himself or maybe hit by a car while crossing the street. Oh, but accidentally of course. I don't doubt Spitzer enjoys recreational sex. Maybe he was setup?
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
-=+=-
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7072

posted 13 March 2008 12:52 AM      Profile for -=+=-   Author's Homepage        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If you support the ability of sex trader workers to operate safely and without prosecution, then you also have to support the ability of men or women to buy sex if they want it.

Anything else is inconsistent, to put it mildly.

Spitzer's problem is that he was a foe of the sex trade, so from that point of view, he was rightly hoist on his own petard.


From: Turtle Island | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 13 March 2008 03:13 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Spitzer's problem is that he was a foe of the sex trade, so from that point of view, he was rightly hoist on his own petard.

Exactly. He built his career on, among other things, prosecuting people over prostitution. He destroyed reputations and careers by charging people for doing exactly what he was doing. He definitely shouldn't get off any easier than the people he indicted.

As far as his treatment of Wall Street, he was abusive and high handed and used illegal tactics there as well. But that's not what they got him for.

Now, if his wife plays her cards right, she can become the next Senator from New York.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 13 March 2008 03:51 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
He's human and has human desires and needs. And so Spitzer frigs around on the side. They were probably watching him for months on end and making notes of his routines, his appetites, and always the very human weaknesses for sure. I bet plan-b was that he suicided himself or maybe hit by a car while crossing the street. Oh, but accidentally of course. I don't doubt Spitzer enjoys recreational sex. Maybe he was setup?

Cheating on your wife, embrassing your family, treating women like disposible commodities and ignoring your vows of marriage are human needs?


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
triciamarie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 12970

posted 13 March 2008 04:46 AM      Profile for triciamarie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Aside from the ten diamond hypocrisy of this thing, what I don't understand is, where the hell did he get all that money on an ongoing basis? How much did this guy make as a governor? Was he paying market rates for those services, or what?

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: triciamarie ]


From: gwelf | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 13 March 2008 05:22 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it's pretty clear that he's getting a special rate. The women cost $1,000 an hour, but he spent only $4,000 to fly her to Washington and have her spend the night?

One of the articles was saying that, as the go-to guy for prosecution of prostitution rings, he kept The Emperor's Club off the radar. That's probably worth a special rate to the owners.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 March 2008 05:48 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by triciamarie:
Aside from the ten diamond hypocrisy of this thing, what I don't understand is, where the hell did he get all that money on an ongoing basis? How much did this guy make as a governor? Was he paying market rates for those services, or what?

He is the son of a very, very wealthy real estate developer. In essence, he's a trust-fund baby.

His wife's outside income is zero and his salary as governor was $179,000. Yet, their tax return last year showed an income of $1.9 million. So, he's worth in the neighborhood of $20 million to $30 million.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
writer
editor emeritus
Babbler # 2513

posted 13 March 2008 05:51 AM      Profile for writer     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In the court papers, an Emperors Club employee was quoted as telling Kristen that Client 9 — Spitzer, according to investigators — "would ask you to do things that ... you might not think were safe," and Kristen responded by saying: "I have a way of dealing with that. ... I'd be, like, listen, dude, you really want the sex?"

A law enforcement official said Tuesday the discussion had to do with Spitzer's preference not to wear a condom and the call-girl's insistence that he use one.

Spitzer's vast personal wealth would have made it easy for him to spend thousands of dollars on prostitutes. The scion of a wealthy Manhattan real estate developer, Spitzer reported $1.9 million in income to the IRS in 2006.

Spitzer may have spent big on call girls


Maybe Kristen should run to take Spitzer's place. She seems to be the most sensible person involved.


From: tentative | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 13 March 2008 06:13 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by writer:

Maybe Kristen should run to take Spitzer's place. She seems to be the most sensible person involved.



She does sound like she has overcome a lot. Perhaps this exposure will help her music career.

Her
My Space page is very interesting.


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 13 March 2008 06:20 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well, that's lovely. Not only might he have duped his wife, but also put her at risk for STDs by trying to get away with not wearing a condom while doing it.

If I were her, and didn't know about the prostitutes and was still having unprotected sex with him, I'd be getting tested for STDs immediately. And if I had caught ANYTHING from him, I'd be suing his nasty ass.

BTW, this is not to imply that he'd be any more likely to get an STD from a prostitute than from anyone else. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if you were LESS likely to catch something from a prostitute since they're likely a lot more up-front about safe sex. But if he's succeeding in finding sex trade workers who will have unsafe sex, then chances are they're doing that with other clients who want that too, in which case it's just as likely that he'll wind up with an STD as if he was being promiscuous with non-sex trade workers.

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 13 March 2008 06:27 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Well, that's lovely. Not only might he have duped his wife, but also put her at risk for STDs by trying to get away with not wearing a condom while doing it.

If I were her, and didn't know about the prostitutes and was still having unprotected sex with him, I'd be getting tested for STDs immediately. And if I had caught ANYTHING from him, I'd be suing his nasty ass.


Most definitely. I still cannot understand his wife and her desire to stand up there with him and be humiliated. She follows in a long line of political wives who just smile and take it.

An interesting point was made in the Globe I believe today, that it is a recent phenomenon for politicians cheating to become pulic knowledge and/or cause their careers to end.

Thomas Jefferson is now known to have cheated with one of his slaves, Sally Hemmings and JFK also cheated. Perhaps JFK would still be around had his cheating gone public and his career been ruined?


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 13 March 2008 06:28 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
They might have an arrangement. Who knows? There are worse things than adultery that people live through in their marriages. Maybe they're not having sex anymore anyhow. Who knows? All I'm saying is that if he put her at risk, he's scum.

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: Michelle ]


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 March 2008 07:20 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:
Perhaps JFK would still be around had his cheating gone public and his career been ruined?

It probably would have ended JFK’s career. But, the press ignored politicians' dalliances in those days.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 13 March 2008 07:27 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
He may have been a scummy individual, but he was a scumbag among a long list of scummy politicos. He pointed out the corruption in a financial system that's continuing to fail Americans today, a much more serious crime against society, imo.

They caught him having sex. It's been a crime of many a Liberal and Conservative politician in various western countries.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 March 2008 07:31 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Spitzer’s complete arrogance pissed off way too many people. It was “my way or the highway” in every aspect of his life. I think Governor Paterson will be a breath of fresh air in New York. By all accounts, he seems like a fair, smart, and decent person.
From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 March 2008 07:34 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
They caught him having sex.

No, they didn’t just catch him “having sex”. If it was merely an affair, he’d still be governor. Instead, he very likely broke a series of laws over a long, long period of time.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 13 March 2008 07:42 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm sure "Kristen" will make some money out of this but I wouldn't count on it helping here musical career much. If you listen to her (plenty of. Clips on youtube) you'll understand why she was hooking.
From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 13 March 2008 08:14 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:

Most definitely. I still cannot understand his wife and her desire to stand up there with him and be humiliated. She follows in a long line of political wives who just smile and take it.


Yup these political Stepford wives are not the best feminist role models for women. Public humiliation for some dumb guy's ego is not a feminist virtue. I would have said "You're on your own bubba -sayonara!"


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Khimia
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11641

posted 13 March 2008 08:21 AM      Profile for Khimia     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Spitzer family fortune is estimated to be about 500M. That may be one reason why his wife has chosen to remain at his side thus far. The rich are different from u and I after all
From: Burlington | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 13 March 2008 08:24 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
haha nothing like a 500 million dollar leash to keep a woman stuck in her place --- suckas!!!

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: mary123 ]


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ghislaine
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14957

posted 13 March 2008 08:31 AM      Profile for Ghislaine     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Khimia:
The Spitzer family fortune is estimated to be about 500M. That may be one reason why his wife has chosen to remain at his side thus far. The rich are different from u and I after all

Very true... although wouldn't she be entitled to 50%... especially with aldultery?


From: L'Î-P-É | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 13 March 2008 08:36 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I am stunned by the deflection on Ms. Spitzer of everyone's moral broadsides.
Great cartoon (#6)from La Presse's Serge Chapleau (Translation: I must have been out of my head...)
Other North American cartoons

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 13 March 2008 08:45 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:

Very true... although wouldn't she be entitled to 50%... especially with aldultery?


I think in California it's an automatic 50%. Maybe not so in New York. Ah to be a divorce lawyer for wealthy New Yorkers!!


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 13 March 2008 08:47 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
it is cartoon No.8 above ....

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: Geneva ]


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
MCunningBC
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14903

posted 13 March 2008 08:53 AM      Profile for MCunningBC        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:
Most definitely. I still cannot understand his wife and her desire to stand up there with him and be humiliated. She follows in a long line of political wives who just smile and take it.

For some people, this is a major beef they have with Hillary Clinton. I don't share that beef myself, but I do hear it brought up.


From: BC | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
abnormal
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1245

posted 13 March 2008 08:58 AM      Profile for abnormal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Very true... although wouldn't she be entitled to 50%... especially with aldultery?

Except that it's the family fortune, not Elliots. I'd be surprised if it's not tied up in trusts etc. so that she won't be able to get at most of it. And if that's not already the case I'm sure Spitzer's father is talking with the lawyers as we speak to be sure that it is.


From: far, far away | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 13 March 2008 09:00 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In response to Ghislaine and McCunningBC: Maybe we are following the age-old tradition of expecting wives to act as moral arbiters and to pass judgment when we don't, our way of treating men's lies and abuses of the law as "a private matter" when committed in a sexual context. William Clinton remains, after all, a highly sought keynote speaker and moral authority throughout the world.

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 13 March 2008 09:28 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
When there are children involved it makes the situation even more difficult for women caught in this situation. Think of the children eh?

quote:
McGreevey (She's the now ex-wife of former New Jersey Gov. James McGreevey and she stood by his side back in 2004, as he publicly confessed to having a gay love affair with one his workers. He resigned and the couple later divorced) makes it clear Spitzer's wife was placed into the no-win spot in a matter of hours and hopes the woman with the law degree from Harvard isn't judged too harshly by the public. She was seen walking off stage after his admission of wrongdoing, holding his hand.

But McGreevey warns looks can be deceiving. "I was criticized for standing there," she remembers. "Hillary Clinton was criticized for standing there with her husband. We all do it for very personal reasons," adding that most keep their children at the top of their priority list in situations like this.

"You don't know what it's like unless you're in the person's shoes," she concludes.


Eliot Spitzer's Wife Placed In Impossible Position After Prostitution Story Emerges

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: mary123 ]


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Guêpe
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 4757

posted 13 March 2008 09:40 AM      Profile for Guêpe   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by MCunningBC:

For some people, this is a major beef they have with Hillary Clinton. I don't share that beef myself, but I do hear it brought up.


CNN interviewed Dina Matos McGreevey, asking her why she stood up there to be “humiliated”. Her answer was interesting and fair.

She says it has nothing to do with “standing by her man” – and has everything to do with standing by the father of your children. What the guys did was an act against their her and their marriage, and killed not only their relationships and their careers but when the dust settles you still have family issues to work through.

She says it’ll be eaisier for your kids to still love/respect their father who did wrong by them, to make amends for it. These men aren’t evil, dishonest and disloyal – yes, but what are you going to do with them when everyone else has lost interest?

A few other comments to think about….doesn’t it make the media circus worse if you start going through seperation and divorce in the middle of the bloody storm?? As for Clinton, she’s damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t….either she’s spineless/self serving for staying with Bill or promoting broken homes for leaving him…


From: Ottawa | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 13 March 2008 09:44 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Nicholas D. Kristof comments on the scandal in the New York Times.
quote:

March 13, 2008
Do As He Said
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

The last time I saw Eliot Spitzer, he encouraged me to write about his work involving prostitution. So here goes.
The governor buttonholed me because he wanted credit for passage of a tough state law against sex trafficking. Frankly, he deserves credit, for the law took the innovative step of cracking down on johns by increasing penalties.
The big worry now among those working to stop trafficking is that the Spitzer scandal will add to perceptions of prostitution as a "victimless crime." (...)
Yet the evidence is overwhelming that, in the United States, prostitution is only very rarely just another career choice. Studies suggest that up to two-thirds of prostitutes have been sexually abused as girls, a majority have drug dependencies or mental illnesses, one-third have been threatened with death by pimps, and almost half have attempted suicide.
Melissa Farley, a psychologist who has written extensively about the subject, says that girls typically become prostitutes at age 13 or 14. She conducted a study finding that 89 percent of prostitutes urgently wanted to escape the work, and that two-thirds have post-traumatic stress disorder -- not a problem for even the most frustrated burger-flipper.
The mortality data for prostitutes is staggering. The American Journal of Epidemiology published a meticulous study finding that the "workplace homicide rate for prostitutes" is 51 times that of the next most dangerous occupation for women, working in a liquor store. The average age of death of the prostitutes in the study was 34.
"Women engaged in prostitution face the most dangerous occupational environment in the United States," The Journal concluded. (...)
We're not going to end the world's oldest profession, any more than we'll ever end the world's oldest crime, murder. But mounting evidence from around the world suggests that a demand-side crackdown would drive some pimps to peddle pirated DVDs instead of pubescent flesh - and that would be a positive legacy of Governor Spitzer's tenure that might balance its tawdry hypocrisy.

Comment on this column on my blog at: www.nytimes.com/ontheground.



From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 13 March 2008 10:34 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Guêpe while I can sympathize with these women caught in a no win situation when children are involved there's something to be said for standing up for yourself against the egotistical narcissistic self indulgences of a man who should know better and still disrespects you and your children.

I first saw Dina McGreevey on Oprah and she struck me as the ultimate Stepford wife. She was the humiliated one always smiled by her husbands side. She seemed like someone who married for the thrill, the lifestyle and all the perks that come with marrying a political star. No wonder these types of women don't want to leave even when humiliation ensues.
Even Oprah had trouble comprehending how she could stick with him after all the humiliation he put her thru (especially the creepy smiling part).

quote:
"I smiled because I didn't want to break down. But, as his world was falling apart, he was still choreographing the entire day and how everything would play out. [He] told me when to smile, what to say if I was asked a question by reporters," she says.

"He was telling me what to do, and he said, 'You have to be Jackie Kennedy today,'" she says. "And I'm thinking, 'Jackie Kennedy—her husband was murdered. You lied and cheated on me, and I have to be Jackie Kennedy?'"


Oprah and I have a zero tolerance for male stupidity I guess.

Oprah interviews Dina former Stepford wife.
~~~~~
Here's the direct link to why the (creepy) smile and on the next page why did you attend the news conference?

[ 13 March 2008: Message edited by: mary123 ]


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Polly Brandybuck
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7732

posted 13 March 2008 10:44 AM      Profile for Polly Brandybuck     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by mary123:
Guêpe while I can sympathize with these women caught in a no win situation when children are involved there's something to be said for standing up for yourself against the egotistical narcissistic self indulgences of a man who should know better and still disrespects you and your children.


I think in the end I would rather have my kids see me NOT putting up with it and smiling, especially my daughter. What kind of a message is mom sending if she nods and smiles while her husband drags the whole family through the muck?


From: To Infinity...and beyond! | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 13 March 2008 10:50 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Several years ago British quiz show presenter Angus Deayton was caught in a prostitution and coke scandal that received a lot of tabloid attention. He was the host of a current affairs quiz/comedy show called Have I Got News For You and had the reputation of being something of an arrogant, condescending jerk. He was not well liked by the two regular panelists on the show (Private Eye editor Ian Hislop and comedian Paul Merton).

Incredibly, immediately after the scandal was exposed in the tabloid, Deayton showed up for work and tried to host the show as usual. Didn't really work out and what resulted is one of the most infamous, funniest, and most uncomfortable, half hours ever in British television. When asked a few years later if he'd stabbed Deayton in the back, Merton replied "no we stabbed him in the front").

Part 1:

code:
  

Part 2:

code:
  

Part 3

code:
  


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Sven
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 9972

posted 13 March 2008 11:38 AM      Profile for Sven     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ghislaine:

Very true... although wouldn't she be entitled to 50%... especially with aldultery?


Not necessarily. In most states, only “marital assets” get split in a divorce. “Marital assets” are assets that are accumulated during a marriage. Wealth from his family would likely be excluded.

As far as “adultery” goes, most states have “no-fault” divorce laws (naughty behavior isn’t taken into account when splitting assets). The “no-fault” divorce laws supersede the divorce laws that use to require bad behavior in order to obtain a divorce. Modern divorce laws simply give a person a right to sue for divorce, whether or not there is bad behavior.


From: Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!!! | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 13 March 2008 11:53 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:

No, they didn’t just catch him “having sex”. If it was merely an affair, he’d still be governor. Instead, he very likely broke a series of laws over a long, long period of time.


So you're saying it's easier to nail someone for having sex than it is to nail crooked Wall Street bankers and financiers for ripping off Americans to the tune of billions of dollars? Because I'd be inclined to acquiesce.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
wage zombie
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7673

posted 13 March 2008 01:01 PM      Profile for wage zombie     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Sven:

If it was merely an affair, he’d still be governor. Instead, he very likely broke a series of laws over a long, long period of time.

I thought that if you're the governor then it's not breaking the law. Or i guess that only applies to the president.

It looks like Spitzer's quite the hypocrite--but i don't doubt that all the outrage in the media is politically motivated.


From: sunshine coast BC | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
MCunningBC
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14903

posted 13 March 2008 09:49 PM      Profile for MCunningBC        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
Maybe we are following the age-old tradition of expecting wives to act as moral arbiters and to pass judgment when we don't, our way of treating men's lies and abuses of the law as "a private matter" when committed in a sexual context.

I don't follow what you're saying here. I wonder if you could elaborate.


From: BC | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
MCunningBC
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14903

posted 13 March 2008 09:54 PM      Profile for MCunningBC        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Guêpe:
CNN interviewed Dina Matos McGreevey, asking her why she stood up there to be “humiliated”. Her answer was interesting and fair.


I didn't see this interview, but it's good to know she gave a great reply.


quote:
Originally posted by Guêpe:
She says it has nothing to do with “standing by her man” – and has everything to do with standing by the father of your children.


Well, this is a distinction too subtle for me to grasp. Two roles, same guy.


From: BC | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 14 March 2008 07:28 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
And what if Spitzer had been shot down in flames because he was standing in the way of the Big Money people?

Investigative reporter Greg Palast reveals a link between the subprime mortgage scandal and the massive bail-out of the culprits by the Bush administration a few days ago.
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked

quote:

While New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was paying an ‘escort’ $4,300 in a hotel room in Washington, just down the road, George Bush’s new Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Ben Bernanke, was secretly handing over $200 billion in a tryst with mortgage bank industry speculators.

Both acts were wanton, wicked and lewd. But there’s a BIG difference. The Governor was using his own checkbook. Bush’s man Bernanke was using ours.

This week, Bernanke’s Fed, for the first time in its history, loaned a selected coterie of banks one-fifth of a trillion dollars to guarantee these banks’ mortgage-backed junk bonds. The deluge of public loot was an eye-popping windfall to the very banking predators who have brought two million families to the brink of foreclosure.

Up until Wednesday, there was one single, lonely politician who stood in the way of this creepy little assignation at the bankers’ bordello: Eliot Spitzer.

Who are they kidding? Spitzer’s lynching and the bankers’ enriching are intimately tied.

How? Follow the money. (...)



From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 14 March 2008 08:32 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 

Much like the cause of the scandal, it seems overpriced.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 14 March 2008 10:02 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The Mann Act, which looks like it might be Spitzer's most serious legal concern, is a turn of the last century statute that makes illegal "interstate transport of females for immoral purposes". Not only is it offensive for treating women like cargo but it was used frequently for several decades to prosecute African-American men who buy a train ticket for their white girlfriends. It was also used to charge several men, including Frank Lloyd Wright, Charlie Chaplin and W. I. Thomas, who similarly paid the passage of their mistresses or girlfriends.

Elizabeth Smart and her lover were similarly arrested when they "crossed state lines".


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 14 March 2008 10:09 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Probably the most famous, or infamous, use of the Mann Act was the prosecution of heavyweight champion Jack Johnson.

quote:

Johnson, the first African-American heavyweight boxing champion, was among the first to be charged under the act. In 1913, he was accused of ostensibly transporting a prostitute from Pittsburgh to Chicago. Johnson was convicted and given the maximum sentence: one year and one day. Critics, however, believe that Johnson's case was racially motivated — the "prostitute" was his white girlfriend.


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88104308


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 14 March 2008 10:10 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
So this is a men's rights issue, that to ship/import women across State lines when it suits their fancy...
From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 14 March 2008 10:25 AM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
So this is a men's rights issue, that to ship/import women across State lines when it suits their fancy...

I think Elizabeth Smart sees it differently. Her book "By Grand Central Station I Sat Down And Wept" is a fictionalized account of her ordeal.

No, the point is it's an arcane law designed to enforce the concept any sexual relationship outside of marriage is immoral (particularly if it involves a Black man and a white woman).

[ 14 March 2008: Message edited by: aka Mycroft ]


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 14 March 2008 10:58 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ashley/Kristen cashes in.


http://www.nypost.com/seven/03142008/news/regionalnews/dupre/photo01.htm


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 14 March 2008 12:00 PM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I fail to see how you get that perspective josh? There are just pictures, no story that I could see was present.
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 14 March 2008 12:43 PM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm pretty sure she was paid to pose for those pictures, and I think that's what he's referring to. Free publicity for an aspiring musician always comes in handy.

(Not that there's anything wrong with that. I'd do it too, in her place!)


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 14 March 2008 02:11 PM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The New York Post is a paper of integrity. They would *never* pay for a story. Just like I'm sure the London Sun did not pay Rachel Marsden for this story
From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
aka Mycroft
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6640

posted 14 March 2008 02:27 PM      Profile for aka Mycroft     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
So this is a men's rights issue, that to ship/import women across State lines when it suits their fancy...

Also, let's not forget that the official name of the Mann Act is the White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910. "White slavery" was one of the great American moral panics of the early 20th century, the phrase used to accompany lurid (and fabricated) tabloid accounts of young white women being lured into opium dens by "Chinamen" who would then enslave them in prostitution - mocked by Daffy Duck's cry "Help, I'm being held prisoner in a Chinese laundry." And if it wasn't Chinese men then it would be "Negros" kidnapping white girls or, in Europe "Ottoman" sheiks kidnapping white women in order to enslave them in their harems. There were a number of variations, all of which included non-white men defiling white women. The underlying message, of course, is that no white woman would willingly date or marry a non-white man; they must either have been lured, seduced, kidnapped, drugged or have been prostitutes to start with.


From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 14 March 2008 04:06 PM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Looks like the Bush criminal cartel gets away with more criminal activity because the only person with the guts the call them on their crap gets busted.

quote:
Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.

Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.

What did the Bush administration do in response? Did it reverse course and decide to take action to halt this burgeoning scourge? As Americans are now painfully aware, with hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing foreclosure and our markets reeling, the answer is a resounding no.

Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.


Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime
How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Noah_Scape
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 14667

posted 14 March 2008 05:41 PM      Profile for Noah_Scape     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ya, isn't that some story eh? Good old Global Research. And good Babblers too - You guys are on top of stuff!!

This is pretty serious news... Spitz could have saved so many American homeowners from this suffering. He could have stopped the crisis before it got bad.

Now, Bush bails out the banks and leaves the people without homes to live in, while those homes sit empty. What use it that.

The thing is to shovel money towards the elite wealthy that help Bush, and to harm average people so that ... why?


From: B.C. | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 15 March 2008 09:07 AM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
For more background info on this subprime loan scandal and outrage here's a previous babble thread Is subprime fiasco race based ... is it class based??

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: mary123 ]


From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
N.R.KISSED
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 1258

posted 15 March 2008 09:39 AM      Profile for N.R.KISSED     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
This Greg Palast story originally posted by succubus on a now closed thread is worth re-posting I think.
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked

From: Republic of Parkdale | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 15 March 2008 09:42 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Betting the Bank
By Paul Krugman
The New York Times

Friday 14 March 2008

Four years ago, an academic economist named Ben Bernanke co-authored a technical paper that could have been titled "Things the Federal Reserve Might Try if It's Desperate" - although that may not have been obvious from its actual title, "Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Investigation."

Today, the Fed is indeed desperate, and Mr. Bernanke, as its chairman, is putting some of the paper's suggestions into effect. Unfortunately, however, the Bernanke Fed's actions - even though they're unprecedented in their scope - probably won't be enough to halt the economy's downward spiral.

And if I'm right about that, there's another implication: the ugly economics of the financial crisis will soon create some ugly politics, too.

To understand what's going on, you have to know a bit about how monetary policy usually operates.

The Fed's economic power rests on the fact that it's the only institution with the right to add to the "monetary base": pieces of green paper bearing portraits of dead presidents, plus deposits that private banks hold at the Fed and can convert into green paper at will.

When the Fed is worried about the state of the economy, it basically responds by printing more of that green paper, and using it to buy bonds from banks. The banks then use the green paper to make more loans, which causes businesses and households to spend more, and the economy expands.

This process can be almost magical in its effects: a committee in Washington gives some technical instructions to a trading desk in New York, and just like that, the economy creates millions of jobs.

But sometimes the magic doesn't work. And this is one of those times. (...)

[ 15 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 15 March 2008 09:53 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Everything Spitzer has done in public life was to selfishly furthur his political career. The moral crusade is a pose and he is caught out as the hypocrite he is.

It continually amazes me that powerful people have such an arrogant blind spot regarding their vulnerability to political payback.

Spitzer attempted to make a political name for himself at the expense of very powerful people. it is not by coincidence that the present treasury secretary, Henry Paulson and past secretarys come to the position directly from CEO positions in the Wall Street financial industry.

The fix is in but thank the sky fairy for George W. Bush. With his single-minded pursuit of Pax Americana, he and his cabal of like-minded devotees of American global pre-eminence have reduced American influence in the global pecking order.

Dubya is responsible for the deficits that will make the US a third world economic state in future. The hidden costs of his reckless spending will soon appear. Unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare will drive these programs into insolvency at the time that American program spending must be reduced.

Guess which program spending? It won't be defense.The drastic reduction in US government fiscal capacity will be the grounds for a neo-con assault on social programs and the average American will suffer badly.

No matter what sleazy back door liquidity injections the federal Reserve donates to the moneyed class on Wall Street,the coming derivatives implosion will doom American financial global domination and ALL of the forced clients of Pax Americana will be very happy to push the monster over the edge,contrary to public meowings of support.

At least with the Spitizer outing,there will be one less self-serving hypocrite around to pick up the pieces.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
mary123
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6125

posted 15 March 2008 01:21 PM      Profile for mary123     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No one is really clean in politics. But if Spitzer had kept his pecker out of a illegal prostitutes place he could have gone after the bad guys now. No he had to go straight into the hornets next of an industry he had previously prosecuted.
Why not just find another lonely married woman and do your thing or something else discreet if that's your thing. Bizarre turn of events.

From: ~~Canada - still God's greatest creation on the face of the earth~~ | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 15 March 2008 08:24 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think if I was Eliot Spitzer discovering how hopelessly corrupt Wall Street is, I might tend wonder if there was any point to working for the good guys, or if team good guy even exists anymore. Gotham City needs Batman and Robin to clean it up.
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 15 March 2008 10:34 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
I think if I was Eliot Spitzer discovering how hopelessly corrupt Wall Street is, I might tend wonder if there was any point to working for the good guys, or if team good guy even exists anymore. Gotham City needs Batman and Robin to clean it up.

Eliot Spitzer wasn't working for the good guys,Eliot Spitzer was working for Eliot Spitzer.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
SubHuman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7740

posted 16 March 2008 09:42 AM      Profile for SubHuman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by martin dufresne:
Nicholas D. Kristof comments on the scandal in the New York Times.

Dan Gardner of the Ottawa Citizen comments on reaction to the Spitzer scandal, and the supposed "studies" and "evidence" cited by prohibitionists Melissa Farley, Victor Malarek, and Nicholas Kristof.
http://dangardner.ca/Colmar1408.html
quote:
... "studies show." Which studies are those? Malarek doesn't say in the text. And there is no footnote...

From: nexus of the crisis | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
M. Spector
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 8273

posted 16 March 2008 09:50 AM      Profile for M. Spector   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Thank you, Subhuman, for that spirited defence of the prostitution industry.
From: One millihelen: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Geneva
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 3808

posted 16 March 2008 10:02 AM      Profile for Geneva     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
well, the text he cites above is a wee bit more complex than that:

Swedish street prostitution did indeed go down immediately after the law came into force in 1999, the report said. Numbers soon stabilized, although at a level lower than before. But the working group also noted that it was uncertain how much prostitution there was off-street and so it wasn't clear whether the law pushed prostitutes indoors, or, worse, into dark streets hidden from the eyes of the police.

What was certain is that the law had unintended consequences. "The police informed us that it is more difficult to investigate cases of pimping or trafficking in human beings because prostitution does not take place so openly on the streets anymore," the working group reported. Street prostitutes are "probably" more dependent on pimps as a result of the law. Overall, the working group concluded, the law "has made working as a prostitute harder and more dangerous."

Same old story. Criminalizing prostitution -- whether by arresting men and women together, or men alone -- cannot eliminate the sex trade.


From: um, well | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 16 March 2008 10:33 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
While there are undoubtedly opportunistic individuals who will choose to engage in prostitution for their own reasons,I doubt that anyone with a healthy self-esteem will choose to demean themselves if other options are available.Vulnerable women are manipulated into prostitution.

Weasels like Spitzer only enable a more sophisticated form of demeaning others. Its not about sex,its about power and control- hence the pimp's reference to kinky requests from Spitzer- Spitzer doesn't want kinky sex,he wants the prostitute to submit to him so he can get off on the power trip,not the sex.

Maybe his wife,Silda was too much woman for him and the chump has to buy his power trips.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
RosaL
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 13921

posted 16 March 2008 10:40 AM      Profile for RosaL     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jester:
While there are undoubtedly opportunistic individuals who will choose to engage in prostitution for their own reasons,I doubt that anyone with a healthy self-esteem will choose to demean themselves if other options are available.

I've had lots of jobs that no one with a healthy self-esteem would choose if there were other options available. I do think that prostitution is often near the end of the "demeaning job" continuum. On the other hand, it usually pays a lot better.


From: the underclass | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 16 March 2008 11:06 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RosaL:

I've had lots of jobs that no one with a healthy self-esteem would choose if there were other options available. I do think that prostitution is often near the end of the "demeaning job" continuum. On the other hand, it usually pays a lot better.


Sure,but there is a difference between scrubbing toilets or standing on a corner wearing a demeaning costume and a sandwich board because you have the pride to pay your own way and allowing a stranger to play with your private bits for money because others are reinforcing your insecurities for their own profit or enjoyment.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 16 March 2008 11:14 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
...Maybe his wife, Silda was too much woman for him and the chump has to buy his power trips.
I think it is demeaning to men to suggest that any untoward choice we make in the sexual realm is due to a woman being too X or not enough Y to keep us on the straight and narrow. Please acknowledge our agency and self-interest, if sometimes misguided. "I'm just so easily led when the little head does the thinking"

From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
SubHuman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7740

posted 16 March 2008 05:57 PM      Profile for SubHuman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M. Spector:
Thank you, Subhuman, for that spirited defence of the prostitution industry.

Odd that the prohibitionists are opposed by those they claim to be protecting. The ones advocating decriminalization, here in Canada are sex worker organizations like Sex Professionals of Canada and ChezStella, much like others around the world such as the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective, who were instrumental in the process that led to decriminalization in NZ in 2003.
BTW, that year a survey was conducted by a NZ government committee, finding 5,932 sex workers. NZ's population is 4.25 million, so that could extrapolate to about 46,000 of them in Canada. That's quite plausible, given the general non-enforcement (see "How cities 'license' off-street hookers") that has made a mockery of the existing laws in Canada. The police lobbying here to preserve the laws they've stopped sincerely enforcing sound very much like the ones in Australia in the 1980s and 1990s, who were really only protecting their ability to continue getting paid off by the "massage parlours".

And Swedish sex workers are apparently very much against the prohibition there.
http://www.bayswan.org/swed/swed_index.html


From: nexus of the crisis | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 16 March 2008 06:01 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think it is demeaning to men to suggest that men as a whole are chumps like Spitzer. He is in a relationship and if the look on Silda's face is anything to go by,kinky frivolity with comely rentgirls isn't in the pre-nup.
From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 16 March 2008 06:09 PM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by SubHuman:

Odd that the prohibitionists are opposed by those they claim to be protecting.

You seem to be conflating decriminalising the activities of sextrade workers with support for the practice of prostitution.

The process of decriminalising prostitution acknowledges that sex trade workers are victims while supporters of prostitution merely want the sex trade workers to remain victims.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 16 March 2008 06:32 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Odd that the only women in prostitution quoted by most male pundits are the ones who say they love it, it's just a job, I'm all right Jack, touche pas à mon pimp, etc.
Many many other experienced women have said and written the opposite, speaking of coercion, violence, humiliation and loss of self-esteem, but they are not the ones chosen as spokespersons of the industry or deemed representative by men of women's experiences, needs and agency.
I think these men who cherry-pick what women they prefer listening to, who publish and promote these women and not all the others, are simply eager to retain their fundamental(ist) right to turn all their extra cash into blow jobs and subordination, from women and youths, at the drop of a bill or a credit card. It's sexual politics and it really has zero tolerance for women's rights.

[ 16 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
SubHuman
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 7740

posted 16 March 2008 08:24 PM      Profile for SubHuman     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How dare the sex workers actually speak up for themselves, particularly when they disagree with those who disingenuously claim to be helping them.
quote:
Originally posted by jester: ...The process of decriminalising prostitution acknowledges that sex trade workers are victims...

That doesn't seem to be their idea of decriminalization.
Sex Professionals of Canada (who are challenging 3 of the existing CCC sections in court)
quote:
Our profession is legitimate and necessary and is here to stay. It's about time the federal government deal with this in an intelligent and mature fashion.

ChezStella.org

quote:
Decriminalization...
This would mean we could no longer be arrested because of the work we do, or because of how we market what we have on offer. Basically, what that means, is that anyone doing any type of sex work would be considered in the same way as any other self-employed worker. She would have the same rights and responsibilities as any other self-employed worker from any other field! We would be protected by the same laws as those regulating and protecting other workers. It would mean sex work and other fields are equal and would help remove stigma from our work.


L.A. Times
(by Patty Kelly, anthropology professor)
quote:
...I have met hundreds of men who have paid for sex. Some seek any kind of sex; others want certain kinds of sex; a few look for comfort and conversation.

Saying that all sex workers are victims and all clients are demons is the easy way out. Perhaps it's time to face this fact like adults... with a little less moralizing and a good deal more honesty.


[ 16 March 2008: Message edited by: SubHuman ]


From: nexus of the crisis | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 16 March 2008 09:21 PM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by jester:

Eliot Spitzer wasn't working for the good guys,Eliot Spitzer was working for Eliot Spitzer.


Ayn Rand said in the 1960's, "Businessmen are the symbol of a free society-the symbol of America. If and when they perish, civilization will perish."

I guess she can be excused then for not having been introduced to the CEO's and CFO's of ENRONg, Adolphia, Global CrossUp, Arthur Andersen, Nortel, WorldCoN, or the sub-prime mortgage fraudsters of this decade.


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 17 March 2008 04:22 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Fidel:
Gotham City needs Batman and Robin to clean it up.

Robin's such a rent-boy. If Bruce Wayne ever runs out of money, he's gone.


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 17 March 2008 06:33 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Why should New York have all the fun? Jim McGreevey back in the news:

quote:

A former driver and aide to former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey yesterday made the bombshell claim that Dina Matos McGreevey must have always known her husband was gay - because he was the other man in bed with them.

. . . .
"It's frustrating to hear her call Gov. Spitzer a hypocrite while she's out there being as dishonest as anyone could be about her own life," said Pedersen, 29.

"She's framed herself as a victim - yet she was a willing participant. She had complete control over what happened in her relationship," he said. "She was there, she knew what was happening, she made the moves. We all did. It's disgusting to watch her play the victim card."

The trio's trysts started after Pedersen was hired as a campaign driver when McGreevey was mayor of Woodbridge, NJ, the former chauffeur said.

"We called it the Friday Night Special," Pedersen said. The "intense" escapades, he said, usually began with a "couple of drinks" at a local T.G.I. Friday's and culminated in "a hard-core consensual sex orgy" between the three of them at McGreevey's Woodbridge condo.


http://tinyurl.com/2wjsux


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 17 March 2008 06:55 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
Maybe they're not having sex anymore anyhow. Who knows? All I'm saying is that if he put her at risk, he's scum.

She's a high-priced call girl. Spitzer's wife can take some comfort in knowing he doesn't fool around with just anybody. Still, I don't approve of what Sven refers to as this trust fund baby's lifestyle.

Babblers have made some interesting comments about who Spitzer is and the other things on his agenda in recent years, like being a party delegate for the Democrats. Oh yes, and Spitzer was a prosecuting attorney in charge of cleaning up Wall Street between investment bubble scandals in the U.S. Spitzer and a handful of others were all that stood between the American people and corporate fascism. State of the union: worried


From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 17 March 2008 08:58 AM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To refocus this on prostitution, here is an ex-prostitute's response to one of the countless Op-Eds being published by men to argue that "the life" is no big deal:
quote:
As a formerly prostituted child and young adult, I disagree that prostitution should be legalized. Prostitution is an industry of sexual exploitation, predominately of women and youth. Prostituted women and youth are raped, beaten, and otherwise tortured by pimps and johns. A study in Canada reveals that prostituted women and girls have a 40% higher mortality rate than non-prostituted women and girls. Also, women-of-color are disproportionately used in prostitution. Many of the women don't have high school educations. Many of the women end up with severe physical, mental, and emotional disabilities after being in prostitution. Another study reports that prostituted women have higher rates of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder than war veterans. Most prostituted women and youth are coerced into prostitution by poverty, racism, lack of opportunity, and drug and alcohol addictions. The vast majority are primed to be used by pimps and johns because they were abused in the home as children. The average age of prostitution is thirteen-years-old in the U.S. and even lower in other countries. This means that the average prostituted woman has been abused for five years when she turns that "magical" age of eighteen and then supposedly "chooses" to be a whore. Another study conducted with thousands of prostituted people by Melissa Farley states that 89% of the prostituted people interviewed wanted to get out of prostitution immediately. This backs up what those of us used in prostitution know from experience: prostitution is organized rape and battery of women and youth and the vast majority of those in it want out now.

The U.S. should not legalize prostitution. Studies in countries where prostitution is legal reveal that when prostitution is legalized international and domestic trafficking into the area increases, child prostitution increases, and the women are actually treated worse because the state sanctions prostitution which explicitly lends support to the johns who become more violent. Prostitution must remain illegal, but that does not equal support of the status quo. The status quo targets the prostituted women and youth, the victims of prostitution, while typically protecting the pimps and johns. What we need are better laws that treat those who use, rape, batter, and kill prostituted women and youth as sexual predators. We also need direct services for prostituted women and youth. Prostituted women and youth know that men like Spitzer are not an anomaly. Wealthy, powerful men use and sell prostituted women and youth in this country all the time. He just happened to get caught.

Christine Stark, Co-editor of Not For Sale: Feminists Resisting Prostitution and Pornography



From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
jester
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11798

posted 17 March 2008 11:47 AM      Profile for jester        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
How dare the sex workers actually speak up for themselves, particularly when they disagree with those who disingenuously claim to be helping them.

Hmmm...disingenuous huh?

Is claiming that sex trade workers should be considered victims disingenuous or are claims of support for the sex industry by self-interested profiteers who may be predators of vulnerable individuals or victims of manipulation themselves disingenuous?

This is not an issue of free-willed choice to peddle sex rather than getting a day job, it is an issue of providing that choice to marginalised individuals who are coerced into no choice by manipulation or poverty.


From: Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged
martin dufresne
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 11463

posted 17 March 2008 07:15 PM      Profile for martin dufresne   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What Is So Wrong with an Emperor Paying for Sex? - Commentary by Ann Woolner
quote:
March 14 (Bloomberg.com) -- However riveting the reading, turn away for a moment from those pages in the FBI affidavit concerning ``Client 9'' and ``Kristen.''

Flip over to Page 15, where the man accused of running the Emperors Club VIP talks with two employees about a difficult prostitute in Los Angeles.

She had missed an appointment the night before and left a ``crazy'' text message, says Rachelle Lewis, an alleged booker for the club.

The three wonder aloud whether she is using drugs.

``A lot of these girls deteriorate to this point,'' remarked Lewis.

Now, why would these girls deteriorate? We are not talking about streetwalkers trolling dark corners for $20 encounters.

The women of the Emperors Club surely knew what they were doing and were happy to rake in big bucks to spend time with wealthy, powerful men. Even a governor! Of New York, no less.

Like the women the so-called D.C. Madam claimed to send out to clients looking for sexual fantasy, they are classy, independent women, not victims of brutalizing pimps who drug them, rape and beat them, indeed, who own them.

Surely the glamorous women the Emperors Club sent to the best hotels in New York, Paris, London and wherever their fat-wallet clientele travels, are nothing like those destitute girls from starving, distant villages sold by their families or lured by promises of a better life in America only to find themselves sex slaves.

So, what's with the deterioration?

If any form of prostitution is victimless, surely it would be the sort that authorities say operated out of the Emperors Club VIP.

If that libertarian streak in you screams out that the government shouldn't be policing this perfectly harmless, very intimate, inevitable and ancient activity, I understand. (...)


[ 17 March 2008: Message edited by: martin dufresne ]


From: "Words Matter" (Mackinnon) | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Solvent Magazine
recent-rabble-rouser
Babbler # 15065

posted 20 March 2008 10:18 PM      Profile for Solvent Magazine   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
legalize prostitution so that the next heroic individual that needs to get a little luvin' that he can't get any other way, doesn't lose his job over it.

in case no one has mentioned it yet on this thread (i didn't read the whole thing) ... look into what seymour hersh has to say about this. apparently spitzer was about to slam bush and cheney really really hard in a piece to the washington post. he would have nailed 'em bad had this thing not broken the day before the post was going to run the piece.


From: North Bay, Ontario | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 21 March 2008 03:59 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure I buy this, but...

U.S. Defends Tough Tactics With Spitzer

quote:
The scale and intensity of the investigation of Mr. Spitzer, then the governor of New York, seemed on its face to be a departure for the Justice Department, which aggressively investigates allegations of wrongdoing by public officials, but almost never investigates people who pay prostitutes for sex.

A review of recent federal cases shows that federal prosecutors go sparingly after owners and operators of prostitution enterprises, and usually only when millions of dollars are involved or there are aggravating circumstances, like human trafficking or child exploitation.

Government lawyers and investigators defend the expenditure of resources on Mr. Spitzer in the Emperor’s Club V.I.P. case as justifiable and necessary since it involved the possibility of criminal wrongdoing by New York’s highest elected official, who had been the state’s top prosecutor.

Bradley D. Simon, a veteran Justice Department trial lawyer who was federal prosecutor in Brooklyn throughout the 1990s, said that although it was rare for the department to use so many resources on the workings of a prostitution ring, the involvement of such a high-level politician must change the equation.

“If they’ve got some evidence of a high-ranking public official involved in violations of federal criminal code, it may not be unreasonable for them to pursue it,” he said. Still, he said, “I don’t think prostitution has been a high priority at the Justice Department.”


Some defense.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Doug
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 44

posted 27 March 2008 05:41 AM      Profile for Doug   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Now Eliot Spitzer's been connected to a second prostitution ring. So much for customer loyalty.

"There he hoes again!"

[ 27 March 2008: Message edited by: Doug ]


From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
remind
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 6289

posted 27 March 2008 05:52 AM      Profile for remind     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
TAT
From: "watching the tide roll away" | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 March 2008 06:07 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
God, what a rag that is, huh? "Busty bottle blonde."

BTW, Doug, as someone who's been babbling longer than I have, you should probably know how to use the URL feature by now so that it doesn't cause sidescroll. Could you fix your URL please?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 March 2008 06:34 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think the REAL issue here is captured nicely by this article.

quote:
The information Stone provided was very detailed - right down to the calf-length black socks Spitzer allegedly wore while bedding his paid paramours.

Calf-length black socks!? He wore them during sex!?

I'm sorry, but that's just wrong.


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 27 March 2008 06:41 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Michelle:
God, what a rag that is, huh? "Busty bottle blonde."


Yeah, but are they real or fake?


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
josh
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 2938

posted 27 March 2008 06:45 AM      Profile for josh     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:

Four months before a hooker scandal brought down Eliot Spitzer, controversial Republican operative Roger Stone tipped the FBI to the governor's penchant for prostitutes.

The information Stone provided was very detailed - right down to the calf-length black socks Spitzer allegedly wore while bedding his paid paramours


Stone is one of the biggest sleazes in the political world. Not surprised he was involved, particuarly given the feud Stone had with Spitzer's father.

quote:

This is a message for Bernard Spitzer. You will be subpoenaed to testify in front of the Senate committee on investigation on your shady campaign loans. You will be compelled by the Senate sergeant at arms, if you resist, you will be arrested and brought to Albany - and there's not a goddamn thing your phony, psycho piece of s--- son can do about it. Bernie, your phony loans are about to catch up with you. You will be forced to tell the truth. The fact that your son is a pathological liar will be known to all.


http://gothamist.com/2007/08/22/crazy_phone_cal.php


From: the twilight zone between the U.S. and Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Michelle
Moderator
Babbler # 560

posted 27 March 2008 06:47 AM      Profile for Michelle   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
No kidding. Strange that they saw fit to tell us whether the hair colour was fake, but not the breasts. Because that's very important! Almost as important as the calf-length black socks.

What do you think of the calf-length black socks, josh?


From: I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fidel
rabble-rouser
Babbler # 5594

posted 27 March 2008 07:04 AM      Profile for Fidel     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
All Liberal Democrats and lefties alike are sex maniacs. Everyone knows that. Their immoral purpose is to spread demon seed throughout the world. bwahahaha
From: Viva La Revolución | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are Pacific Time  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | rabble.ca | Policy Statement

Copyright 2001-2008 rabble.ca